Professional Documents
Culture Documents
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. to whom it may concern, this is to clear up any misconception surrounding outstanding debt to Toronto-Dominion Bank Inc.
my ex rel:RYAN SANDER, Ryan Sander, ryan sander. my appellation is Oryah Taj El. all debt discharge in full with this bills of exchange, according to the law.
2. Supreme Court Case Study: “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105 . “A writing is ‘void ab initio’ in the case of
fraud in the inception, and it need not be formally rescinded as a prerequisite to right of avoidance”.
3. Supreme Court Case Study: "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as
inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 p. 442
4. Supreme Court Case Study: "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no 'rule making' or legislation which would abrogate them." ." MIRANDA v.
ARIZONA , 384 U.S. 436 (1966) 491; 86 S. Ct. 1603
5. Convention Providing a Uniform Law For Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes
6. 73d CONGRESS. SESS. I. CHS. 48, 49. JUNE 5, 6, 1933. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That
(a) every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an
amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation
hereafter incurred. Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provision is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon
payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. Any such provision contained in any law authorizing obligations
to be issued by or under authority of the United States, is hereby repealed, but the repeal of any such provision shall not invalidate any other provision or authority contained in such law.
7. Title 8, 22 & 28 USC December 26th, 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 (Convention Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replace STATUTES with
international Law, placing all states under international Law.
Bill of Credit; A bill of credit is some sort of paper medium by which value is exchanged between the government and individuals. Money is a bill of credit, but a bill of credit need not be
money. An interest-bearing certificate that was issued by Missouri, and usable in the payment of taxes, was thus ruled to be an unconstitutional bill of credit.
9. All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the
Confederation. This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the
United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several
states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
The Constitution for the United States Article VI
10. note: Supreme Court Case Study: the Credit River decision (MN) in 1968 found that federal reserve notes were not lawful tender for the payment of debts the
affidavit above by Oryah Taj El specifies gold and silver as the form of money acceptable to moors no lawful tender was offered for the interest held by Oryah Taj
El. in the Credit River case. it clearly stated that federal reserve notes were not lawful money …"Federal reserve notes are legal tender in absence of objection
thereto." 1925, MacLeod vs Hoover… “. . . checks, drafts, money orders, and bank notes are not lawful money of the United States ...” State v. Neilon, 73 Pac 324,
43 Ore 168. the corporate entities were prevented and precluded from violating the law established. the court in the case (Neilon) also prevented the form of
“payment” .
12. and 18 U.S. Code § 242.Deprivation of rights under color of law
13. Supreme Court Case Study: “Once Challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist.
tuck v Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751.211, P2d 389.
”S
amount of obligation: one thousand eight hundred ninety five dollars and eighty two cent.
[moorish national dollarium]
16. EFFECTIVE DATE: Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, §819, formerly §818, as added by Pub. L. 95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 883, §818; renumbered §819, Pub. L. 109–351, title VIII, §801(a)(1),
Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 2004, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter] takes effect upon the expiration of six months after the date of its enactment [Sept. 20, 1977], but section 809
[section 1692g of this title] shall apply only with respect to debts for which the initial attempt to collect occurs after such effective date."
17. SHORT TITLE: This subchapter known as the "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act", see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title.
18. §1692c. Communication in connection with debt collection(b) Communication with third parties
Except as provided in section 1692b of this title, without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector, or the express permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, or
as reasonably necessary to effectuate a postjudgment judicial remedy, a debt collector may not communicate, in connection with the collection of any debt, with any person other than the
consumer, his attorney, a consumer reporting agency if otherwise permitted by law, the creditor, the attorney of the creditor, or the attorney of the debt collector.
If such notice from the consumer is made by mail, notification shall be complete upon
19. §1692d. Harassment or abuse
A debt collector may not engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, oppress, or abuse any person in connection with the collection of a debt. Without limiting the
general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:
(1) The use or threat of use of violence or other criminal means to harm the physical person, reputation, or property of any person.
(2) The use of obscene or profane language or language the natural consequence of which is to abuse the hearer or reader.
(3) The publication of a list of consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts, except to a consumer reporting agency or to persons meeting the requirements of section 1681a(f) or
1681b(3) 1 of this title.
(4) The advertisement for sale of any debt to coerce payment of the debt.
(5) Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.
(6) Except as provided in section 1692b of this title, the placement of telephone calls without meaningful disclosure of the caller's identity.
(Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, §806, as added Pub. L. 95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 877.)
20. §1692e. False or misleading representations
A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing,
the following conduct is a violation of this section:
(1) The false representation or implication that the debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, or affiliated with the United States or any State, including the use of any badge, uniform, or facsimile
thereof.
(2) The false representation of—
(A) the character, amount, or legal status of any debt; or
(B) any services rendered or compensation which may be lawfully received by any debt collector for the collection of a debt.§1692k. Civil liability
(a) Amount of damages
Except as otherwise provided by this section, any debt collector who fails to comply with any provision of this subchapter with respect to any person is liable to such person in an amount equal
to the sum of—
(1) any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of such failure;
(d) Jurisdiction
An action to enforce any liability created by this subchapter may be brought in any appropriate United States district court without regard to the amount in controversy, or in any other court of
competent jurisdiction, within one year from the date on which the violation occurs.