Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rebecca Koval
COR115C
3 December 2010
the many challenges to official Church teachings that began in the late 1960’s with the
advent of the second wave of feminism (Ruther, p. 81), the Church has remained
grounded in its practice of only ordaining men to the ministerial priesthood. After
inquiring into this controversial issue by looking for answers in the New Testament
Scriptures, the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith legitimately concluded
in the 1976 declaration Inter Insigniores (or "Declaration on the Admission of Women to
the Ministerial Priesthood"), that the priesthood is not a role Christ intended for women.
According to this official document, the Church aspires to maintain its “fidelity” (sec. 4,
par. 6) to Christ in all its activity; therefore, this strict adherence to the Church’s
“constant tradition” (sec. 1) is most certainly not without reason. If the Church is to
remain loyal to the wishes of its founder and consequently to God, the ordination of
In 1994, Pope John Paul II stated in his apostolic letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, (or
“Reserving Priestly Ordination to Men Alone”) that the Church, “has no authority
whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be held by
all the Church’s faithful” (sec. 4, par. 2). However, despite this clear and definitive
message, there currently exists a growing worldwide movement for women’s ordination,
Womenpriests (2010) claims to have ordained over 100 women in their own ceremonies,
often with the help of established priests and bishops who are sympathetic to their
mission such as Fr. Roy Bourgeois, who was excommunicated when he refused to repent
for participating in some of these ordinations (National Catholic Register, 2008). The
Women's Ordination Conference (2010) advocates for reform through grassroots efforts
as well as offering support to women who feel the need to answer “their call” to the
priesthood. Though these organizations have crafted many arguments in order to justify
their actions, the Church has remained steadfast in its position, even going so far as to
add the ordination of women to its list of grave crimes in 2010 (Normae de gravioribus
delictis, art.5). Needless to say, Vatican officials and local archbishops alike have been
warning laity to disregard these feminist organizations and their “ordinations” of “women
1993 interview that the Church must remain obedient to its tradition; therefore, there is
no way a woman’s ordination can be considered valid, even after it has been performed
(pp. 70-71). Though feminist theologians such as Marian Ronann and Rosemary Radford
Ruther make the argument that Catholic tradition regarding this teaching is rooted in a
ample evidence to support the opposite; that the Church in fact, holds women in high
esteem (Mulieris Dignitatem, sec. 10 & 11) and that valid theological reasons exist for
sec. 6).
This study will examine the Church’s theology with regards to women’s
Women's Ordination 3
ordination by looking at three official documents issued by the Vatican: the 1976
declaration Inter Insigniores, as well as two encyclicals written by Pope John Paul II,
Mulieris Dignitatem (or "On the Dignity and Vocation of Women") (1988) and Ordinatio
Sacerdotalis (1994). This study will examine three general topics that typically arise
when the issue of women's ordination is examined: apostolic succession, the metaphor of
the bride/bridegroom, and last but not least, the role of the priest during Mass. Scholarly
Apostolic Succession
At the last supper, Jesus sat with his apostles and acting as priest performed the
first Eucharistic celebration where he "ritually offered himself as victim" (Egan, p. 20).
"...Jesus took the bread, said the blessing, broke it, and giving it to his disciples
said, 'Take and eat; this is my body.' Then he took the cup, gave thanks, and gave
it to them saying, 'Drink from it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant,
which will be shed on behalf of many for the forgiveness of sins" (Mt 22:26-28).
This final and somber meal was meant to symbolize Christ's impending sacrifice.
However, this act also laid the foundation for the creation of the Church that would
continue after Christ's death (Egan, p. 20). In choosing the Twelve to be present at the
first ritual of the Eucharistic meal, Christ was conferring his own priesthood onto his
apostles, so that they, in turn, might carry on his legacy and purpose (Inter Insigniores,
art. 4, par. 5). Clearly, Jesus wanted his faithful to continue to celebrate this sacrifice after
he was gone; for as he was breaking bread he gave the Twelve specific instructions to
intentions of Christ at the last supper, practices "apostolic succession", meaning that in
line that stems directly back to the first ordained priests: the Apostles (Egan, p. 20). For
the Twelve:
In other words, the Church believes that since Jesus chose only men to serve as his
intimate associates and future priests, ordination must always remain reserved for men
It seems unlikely that Jesus called only men to be apart of the Twelve arbitrarily,
since his "...attitude towards women was quite different from that of his milieu, and he
deliberately and courageously broke with it" (Inter Insigniores, art. 2, par. 1). Examples
abound throughout the Gospels of Jesus defying traditional patriarchal Jewish culture: for
punishment for adultery in his day was death by stoning (Jn 8:1-11). Yet another example
of this is in when Jesus is resting near a well, waiting for his apostles, when a Samaritan
woman walks by to fetch water. Jesus asks the woman to give him a drink to which she
replies, "How can you, a Jew, ask me, a Samaritan woman, for a drink?" for at the time
Samaritan women were regarded by Jews as being ritually impure. However, Jesus didn't
care, for he replied "If you knew the gift of God and who is saying to you, 'Give me a
drink,' you would have asked him and he would have given you living water". When
Women's Ordination 5
Jesus' apostles found him speaking with this woman, they are shocked as it was against
Much controversy exists over Jesus' choice of having only male apostles; for it is
unclear as to what extent Jesus was influenced by social constraints. Fr. Richard
Viladesau makes the argument that it is impossible to know to what extent Jesus was
influenced by "societally conditioned attitudes regarding women" (p. 8) and that it would
be foolish to simply assume that he was always able to transcend his humanity. There is
ample evidence throughout the Gospels that Jesus paid no heed to the laws and "position
of men" (Mt 22:16) in both his thoughts and actions; therefore, it seems odd that he
would then exclude women from being apart of the Twelve simply due to the cultural
norms of his day (Inter Insigniores, art. 2, par. 4). When taking all of this into
consideration, it appears as though his choice was most likely an intentional one
In his 1988 encyclical Mulieris Dignitatem, Pope John Paul II references Paul’s
Letter to the Ephesians in which the saint explains the dedication that Christ has to the
Church he established: “Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the Church and gave
himself up for her…”(Eph 5:25-32). Throughout the tradition of the Catholic Church, this
metaphor of Christ the bridegroom who ministers to the bride Church has been constantly
used, not only as an image to meditate upon, but as a way of making understandable the
mysterious and “unfathomable” union between Christ and the congregation that he
The Covenant made between God and humans first took the "form of nuptial
mystery" in the Old Testament where the land of Israel is seen as God's "ardently loved
spouse" where his "Chosen People" reside (Inter Insigniores, sec. 5, par. 5). The prophet
Hosea likens the land of Israel to a "harlot wife" who is betrothed to God; however,
instead of letting her go, God chooses to chastise the faithless spouse so as to show her
"...I shall hedge in her way with thorns and erect a wall against her, so that
she cannot find her paths. If she runs after her lovers, she shall not overtake
them; if she looks for them she shall not find them" (Hos 2:8-9).
Once Israel comes to understand that her behavior towards her husband was thankless
"...I will allure her; I will lead her into the desert and speak to her heart...I will
espouse you to me forever: I will espouse you in right and justice, in love and
mercy; I will espouse you in fidelity, and you shall know the Lord" (Hos 2:16,
2:21-22).
This metaphor is also expounded upon further in the Bible, especially in the Song of
Songs, where the love that exists between God and his people is described through a
This "spousal love" (Mulieris Dignitatem, art. 25, par. 1) extends to Christ's
relationship with the Church as well, for Christ died so that the people of God could one
day experience eternal life; indeed, he is "the Bridegroom who has given himself" (par.
3). For Christ's "death will gather together again the scattered children of God; from his
pierced side will be born the Church, as Eve was born from Adam's side" (Inter
Insigniores, art. 5, par. 5). This connection between Christ and his Church is meant to
mirror and indeed is “rooted in the biblical reality of human beings as male and female”
according to Pope John Paul (Mulieris Dignitatem, sec. 23, par. 2). In other words,
Women's Ordination 7
Christ, who was male, loves and is eternally unified with his Church. As a response to
Christ's love, the members of the Church gather in celebration to form the Body of Christ,
in so doing taking on a receptive, feminine attitude and role with regards to Jesus (Butler,
p. 511), who is and forever will be the "Lord of the Church" (Viladesau, p. 15).
One could very well argue that a metaphor such as this need not be carried over
into the practices and daily life of the modern Church. For according to Fr. Richard
aspects of that relationship while losing others" (p. 15-16). However, "this mystery is a
profound one" (Butler, p. 510), and is deeply imbedded in Catholic tradition, so much so,
The metaphor of the bride and bridegroom is important not only to the
relationship between Christ and his Church, but also to the relationship between men and
women within the Church and what role each gender is able to play. According to Pope
John Paul, masculinity and femininity are "eternal" truths that are "immutably fixed in
human experience" (Mulieris Dignitatem, art. 2, par. 2), for "sexual difference is willed
by God" (Butler, p. 503). These differences between the sexes are complimentary, and
highlight the "fundamental equality" (art. 10, par. 1) that exists between men and women.
This equality stems precisely from men and women's complimentary natures as both
genders possess qualities that the other lacks; for example, women are able to fulfill the
function of motherhood, a role that men will never be able to understand or experience
Women's Ordination 8
Likewise, the priesthood is an office that only men can legitimately fulfill. At
Mass, when the Eucharistic celebration that is performed, the priest acts "in persona
Christi", meaning that throughout this ritual he wears the mask of Christ, thus
symbolizing and enacting Christ's image "...by whose power he pronounces the words of
consecration" (Butler, p. 501). Scholar and theologian Sarah Butler argues that the priest
In other words, the Church does not exclude women from the priesthood based on the
idea that they are inferior to men; rather it simply does not make sense for a woman to
However, not all Catholics necessarily trust that the Church's teaching of
complementarity ensures that women will be treated with the same amount of dignity and
feminist theologian Rosemary Radford Ruther, believe that requiring separate but equal
gender roles within the Church is simply a cover-up for excluding women from higher
level decision-making roles within the hierarchy (Ruther, p. 79-80). Ruther questions
whether or not the Church's stance is just by asking, "If Jesus made social justice central
to his definition of good news, can we do less" (p. 62)? She argues that at this point in
history both men and women should be "recognized as images of God and representatives
of Christ...we must bring women's gifts of ministry into the church for the first time" (p.
7). However, what Ruther fails to realize is that even though women possess many gifts,
Women's Ordination 9
God owes no grace to anyone and that the pursuit of priestly ordination is not anyone's
Despite the fact that many women may feel "called" to enter the priesthood, the
"Such an attraction, however noble and understandable, still does not suffice for a
genuine vocation. In fact, a vocation cannot be reduced to a mere personal
attraction, which can remain purely subjective". (Inter Insigniores, sec. 6)
Indeed, the Congregation states that, “…the priestly office cannot become the goal of
social advancement, no merely human progress of society…can itself give access to it: it
is of another order” (sec. 5). In other words, even though there is a certain amount of
authority and responsibility connected with the priesthood, it is a holy and sacred office;
politician or civil servant. In its fight to remain authentic to its tradition in the twenty-first
century, the Church must continue on its chosen path. The priesthood is not and never
will be open to the same kind of equal gender representation that has come to be more
It seems very unlikely the Catholic Church will ever accept women as priests. As
ordination ceremony taking place in his region, "...to attempt an ordination in this way is
to step outside the Church" (National Catholic Register). Indeed, it seems that no matter
how hard self-proclaimed "womenpriests" try to gain recognition, they will most
certainly never succeed in getting it from the Catholic Church- in fact, according to new
Women's Ordination 10
to be seen whether these women will break off from the Roman Catholic Church and
form their own denomination once they eventually realize that their hope for recognition
When the Church goes against popular opinion regarding women's expanding
roles, it does so not out of a desire to oppress women, but out of "fidelity" (Inter
Insigniores, art. 4, par. 6) to Christ. The Church will continue to refuse to adapt to
changing "civilizations and times" if these adaptations mean that it must "abolish...the
sacramental reference to constitutive events of Christianity and Christ himself" (par. 5),
"...beneath all changes there are many realities which do not change and which
have their ultimate foundation in Christ, who is the same yesterday and
today...and forever" (Mulieris Dignitatem, art. 28, par. 1)
The Church's stance in no way implies that women are incapable of becoming
priests due to any defect in their character; it simply holds the belief that it has "no
since the Church has concluded that there exists no substantial evidence in the Gospels
that Jesus intended women to become priests. However, there does exist, as this study
briefly examined, convincing evidence that ordaining women would run contrary to the
intentions of Christ and the foundations of the Church he established. Therefore, although
many progressive Catholics (and feminists) may disagree with the Church's teachings on
women's ordination, there is currently no sign that it will ever fail to "...remain faithful to
the type of ordained ministry willed by the Lord Jesus Christ..." (Inter Insigniores, art. 1,
Women's Ordination 11
par. 1).
References
Apsotolic Letter Mulieris Dignnitatem. August 15, 1988. Retreived on October 21, 2010
Women's Ordination 12
from http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_
Jp-ii_apl_15081988_mulieris-dignitatem_en.html
Apostolic Letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis. May 24, 1994. Retrieved on October 21, 2010
from http://www.vatican.va.holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_
jp-ii_apl_22051994_ordinatio-sacerdotalis_en.html
Butler, S. (1992). The priest as sacrament of Christ the bridegroom. Worship, 66(6), 498-
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (1976, October 15). Declaration inter
cdfinsicd.htm
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. (2010, May 21). Normae de gravioribus
_norme_en.html
Egan, R. (1994). Why Women Cannot Be Priests. The Homiletic and Pastroral Review,
(94). 14-23.
Gossmann, E. (1998). Women's Ordination and the Vatican. Feminist Theology: The
Journal of the Britain & Ireland School of Feminist Theology, (18), 67. 67-86.
http://www.romancatholicwomenpriests.org
Women's Ordination 13
Rosemary, R.R. (2008). Catholic Does Not Equal the Vatican. New York, NY: The New
Press.
http://www.womensordination.org/content/view/10/41/
Women's ordination won't be valid, bishop says. (2005). National Catholic Register.
81(25).
Women's Ordination 14