You are on page 1of 3

Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Primary Dental Care

Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Growing Problem?


Farhad B Naini and Daljit S Gill

Key Words Body Dysmorphic Disorder, Psychology, Cosmetic Dentistry, Facial Aesthetics © Primary Dental Care 2008;15(2):62-64

Body dysmorphic dsorder (BDD) is characterised by a preoc- undertake dental aesthetic and reconstructive procedures, in
cupation with an imagined defect in one’s appearance or, in the case addition to the use of facial aesthetic procedures, it is paramount
of a minor physical anomaly, the individual’s concern is markedly for all dental clinicians to have an understanding of this condition.
excessive, causing significant distress in their life. One of the most BDD patients often request multiple aesthetic procedures, but
common areas of preoccupation is the dentofacial region, with up to remain unsatisfied with their treatment results. It is imperative for
20% of patients diagnosed with BDD expressing specific concern the dental clinician to diagnose this condition prior to instigating
regarding their dental appearance. With the increased ability to clinical treatment, and to make an appropriate referral.

Body dysmorphic dsorder (BDD) BODY DYSMORPHIC


is a disorder of body image that
DISORDER
remains challenging to diagnose. It
is not possible surgically to ‘cure’ The Italian professor of psychiatry
patients with this condition, which Enrico Morselli (Figure 1) described
requires referral to a clinical psy- a condition termed ‘Dysmorpho-
chologist or psychiatrist, ideally phobia’ in 1891. The condition has
through their general medical prac- been redefined as two separate enti-
titioner. The prevalence of BDD in ties: delusional and non-delusional
the population is estimated to be variants. It is only relatively recently
approximately 1%.1 However, data that the non-delusional variant
on the prevalence of BDD in the was classified as body dysmorphic
UK community are generally lack- disorder (BDD) in the Diagnostic
ing. In one study, 86% of a sample and Statistical Manual of Mental
of patients diagnosed with BDD Disorders.3
specified their dentofacial appear- BDD is characterised by a pre-
ance as the cause of their concern.2 occupation with an insignificant or
In another study, approximately non-existent appearance defect that
Figure 1 The Italian professor of psychiatry Enrico Morselli (1852-1929)
20% of a sample of 500 patients coined the diagnostic category of ‘dysmorphophobia’ in 1891, although
causes significant distress to patients
diagnosed with BDD expressed he made reference to an earlier paper from 1886 in which he began to and interferes with their social life.
discuss the concept.The term was introduced into English with the
specific concern regarding their The most common preoccupations
publication of Eugenio Tanzi’s textbook in 1910.
dental appearance.1 Therefore, den- involve the skin, nose, eyes and eye-
tists, orthodontists and facial aesthetic journals. However, commencing treat- lids, lips, mouth, jaws and chin. However,
surgeons must be aware of the condition. ment on such patients risks not only any part of the body may be involved and
This is particularly important for dental potential medicolegal problems for the the preoccupation may involve several
clinicians, as the condition tends to clinician, but also antagonism and even body parts simultaneously.4 The criteria
receive little exposure within dental violence. required to make a diagnosis of BDD

FB Naini MSc, BDS, FDS, FDSOrth, MOrth. Consultant Orthodontist, St George’s Hospital and Medical School, London, UK.
DS Gill MSc, BSc, BDS, FDS, FDSOrth, MOrth. Consultant Orthodontist/Honorary Senior Lecturer, Eastman Dental Hospital, London, UK.

Primary Dental Care • April 2008


62
FB Naini and DS Gill

have been listed (American Psychiatric DIAGNOSIS IN THE


Association).3 They are that: Patient interview/consultation:
• Excessive concerns regarding a DENTAL SURGERY
1. There is a preoccupation with an
minor or imperceptible appearance
imagined or minimal defect in appear- defect The diagnosis of BDD is vital for clini-
ance. If the defect is minimal, the cians involved in any form of dentofacial
• Over-specific concerns, often with
individual’s concern is excessive. the patient bringing diagrams and appearance-altering treatment, such as
2. The preoccupation causes substantial pictures to demonstrate how they orthodontics, orthognathic surgery or
emotional distress and impaired social should be treated aesthetic dentistry. Timely diagnosis
and occupational functioning. • Vague description of concerns will enable appropriate referral to mental
(as opposed to over-specific)
3. The preoccupation is not caused by healthcare professionals, either via the
• Patient admits to chronic mirror-
other mental disorders. checking behaviour general medical practitioner or possibly
Although the perceived physical anom- • Dissatisfaction with previous through a specialist hospital unit, such as
aly may concern any part of the body, clinician(s)/clinical treatment an orthodontic, maxillofacial or cranio-
the face is commonly involved. Patients • ‘Doctor-shopping’, particularly if facial unit with direct access to a clinical
may have specific or vague concerns. previous clinicians have refused to psychologist or liaison psychiatrist. This
Their preoccupation with a particular undertake treatment will ultimately avoid much stress for
feature may remain unchanged, or their • Illogical desires, such as that a the patient and the clinician, and help
clinical procedure will change their
complaints may shift from one body life, job prospects or personal to avoid possible future medicolegal
part to another over time. Although relationships problems.
patients’ insight into the severity of their • Unrealistic expectations of clinical Diagnosis is essentially based on the
concer ns is var iable, they are often treatment result patient interview, past medical history
deeply convinced of the severity of their Past medical history:
and observation of recognised patterns of
defect. It is not possible for clinicians behaviour (Figure 2). There is no single
• Previous history of psychiatric treat-
simply to talk patients out of their ment, particularly for depression question that will disclose a diagnosis of
concern. • Anxiety disorders, particularly BDD. Patients will initially be asked an
BDD usually commences in adoles- obsessive-compulsive disorder open question regarding the reason for
cence, with a gradual onset.5 However, (OCD) and social phobia (avoiding their consultation and their concerns.
social situations, even being
sudden onset may also occur, particu- housebound) Patients with BDD are likely to have
larly following major life events, such excessive concerns about a minor or
• History of substance abuse
as the ter mination of a relationship imperceptible defect in their appearance.
• History of eating disorders
or leaving home.6 Mild symptoms in Patients may be over-specific about a
adolescence may subside over time, but Social and family history: perceived appearance flaw, but may also
moderate to severe symptoms tend to • Unemployed sometimes be rather vague in their
follow a more chronic path. There is • Unmarried/divorced and/or living description of a defect. In addition, a his-
alone
frequent comorbidity in patients with tory of ‘doctor shopping’, dissatisfaction
BDD, particularly with depression, • Family support: does the patient with previous clinicians and treatment,
have a poor relationship with their
social phobia, substance abuse, obsessive family? and unusually demanding behaviour are
compulsive disorder (OCD), and eating ‘red flag’ signs. It is possible that patients
Recognised patterns of
disorders.7 The general dental practi- may hide any previous psychiatric history
behaviour:
tioner is likely to be the first clinician to from clinicians for fear that it will pre-
• Unusually demanding or suspicious
observe the characteristic dental erosive behaviour vent them from receiving treatment.
pattern due to vomiting in patients with • Frequent cancellation and rebooking Another factor is that patients may well
eating disorders. of appointments blame their ‘defect’ for lack of success in
The nature of BDD is such that it • Camouflaging behaviour, such as life, work or personal relationships. Such
very much takes hold of the patient’s covering the mouth with a hand patients are likely to have unrealistic
or scarf
life. Significant social problems, includ- expectations that treatment will solve all
ing social isolation and work-related Figure 2 Indications and ‘giveaway’ signs of body their problems.
problems (due to avoidance of social dysmorphic disorder. It is important to ask patients how
interaction), result from a conviction that much time they spend thinking about
those around them consistently notice have been given, with an equal sex inci- their defect, and how long they spend
their ‘defect’. Up to 50% of BDD patients dence.9 However, the prevalence among looking in a mirror per day. Engaging in
admit to suicidal ideation.8 patients seeking facial aesthetic treatment any such compulsive appearance-related
There are few data on the prevalence may well be higher.10 People with BDD behaviour for more than one hour per
of BDD. Figures from 0.7% to over 5% are often single or separated. day is a cause for concern.2 Patients may

Primary Dental Care • April 2008


63
Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Growing Problem?

also use camouflaging techniques, such should stress the fact that they are acting CONCLUSION
as covering their mouth with their hand in the best interests of the patient. After
or a scarf. Frequent cancellation and obtaining the patient’s consent, referral With the increased ability to undertake
rebooking of appointments and a sus- to the general medical practitioner is dental aesthetic and reconstructive pro-
picious attitude should also alert the advisable, and it will be his or her deci- cedures, in addition to the use of facial
clinician. sion as to whether or not subsequent aesthetic procedures such as Botox ®
referral to a clinical psychologist or (injections containing Clostridium botu-
TO TREAT OR NOT TO psychiatrist is required. linum type A neurotoxin complex) and
dermal fillers, it is paramount for general
TREAT dental practitioners to have an under-
MANAGEMENT
BDD is a psychiatric disorder; therefore, standing of BDD.
any form of clinical treatment is likely to People diagnosed with BDD should be Clinical intervention, without the
leave the patient unhappy, often more so treated by a clinical psychologist or psy- support of a clinical psychologist or psy-
than before treatment was instigated. chiatrist with experience in managing chiatrist, will often exacerbate a patient’s
Patients often find fault in the treatment the disorder. Having confirmed the diag- symptoms and lead to greater problems.
result, and may find new ‘defects’. There nosis, treatment may be undertaken by The challenge for dental clinicians is
are situations in which treatment may be psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy or a therefore to diagnose the condition prior
provided when a minor defect actually combination of the two. to instigating clinical treatment.
exists, but this must be undertaken Cognitive-behavioural therapy in par-
jointly with the support of a clinical ticular has been shown to be effective in REFERENCES
psychologist or psychiatrist. Therefore, the management of BDD. Two methods 1. Phillips KA. The Broken Mirror: Understanding and Treating
Body Dysmorphic Disorder. New York: Oxford University
the overall recommendation is not to of cognitive-behavioural therapy spec- Press; 2005:56.
undertake clinical treatment of patients ifically have demonstrated beneficial 2. Veale D, Boocock A, Gournay K, Dryden W, Shah F,
with BDD.11 results: Willson R, et al. Body dysmorphic disorder. A survey of
fifty cases. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;169:196-201.
1. Exposure therapy: This deals with the
3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical
INFORMING THE PATIENT patient’s ability to ‘expose the defect’ Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA;
in a social setting. 1994.

Patients should be informed that clinical 2. Response prevention: Techniques to 4. Phillips KA. Body dysmorphic disorder: the distress of
imagined ugliness. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:1138-49.
treatment by the dental clinician would prevent the patient from using estab-
5. Castle DJ, Morkell D. Imagined ugliness: a symptom which
not be beneficial for them in the long lished behaviour patter ns, such as can become a disorder. Med J Aust. 2000;173:205-7.
term. mirror-checking and camouflaging 6. Phillips KA, Mernard W, Fay C, Weisberg R. Demographic
characteristics, phenomenology, comorbidity, and family
It is important to inform patients behaviour.12 history in 200 individuals with body dysmorphic disorder.
without offending them. It is also vital Pharmacotherapy may also be effective in Psychosomatics. 2005;46:317-25.

for clinicians not to allow patients to talk the management of BDD. Selective sero- 7. Neziroglu F, Yaryura-Tobias JA. A review of cognitive
behavioral and pharmacological treatment of body dys-
them into providing treatment. Patients tonin reuptake inhibitors are currently the morphic disorder. Behav Modif. 1997;21:324-40.
should be informed in a polite and first-line medication, helping to reduce 8. Veale D. Advances in cognitive behavioural understanding
straightforward manner, and clinicians obsessive-compulsive behaviour.13 of body dysmorphic disorder. Body Image. 2004;1:113-25.
9. Otto MW, Wilhelm S, Cohen LS, Harlow BL. Prevalence
of body dysmorphic disorder in a community sample of
women. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:2061-3.
CPD now available via FGDP(UK) aesthetic modules 10. Ishigooka J, Iwao M, Suzuki M, Fukuyama Y, Murasaki M,
Miura S. Demographic features of patients seeking cos-
metic surgery. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998;52:283-7.
The FGDP(UK) Advanced Certificate in Aesthetic Dentistry is being launched this April under
11. Phillips KA, Pagano ME, Menard W, Fay C, Stout RL.
the direction of Professor Mike Mulcahy and Linda Greenwall, and is available to dentists who hold a
Predictors of remission from body dysmorphic disorder: a
masters-level postgraduate qualification in a relevant discipline.The following optional modules of the prospective study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005;193:564-7.
course will also be individually available to all registered GDPs, who will be able to collect
12. Veale D, Gournay K, Dr yden W, Boocock A, Shah F,
12 hours of verifiable CPD as well as improving their skills in aesthetic dentistry. Willson R, et al. Body dysmorphic disorder: a cognitive
behavioural model and pilot randomised controlled trial.
24 - 25 October 2008 Porcelain veneers Behav Res Ther. 1996;34:717-29.
14 -15 November 2008 Facial aesthetics 13. Phillips KA, Dwight MM, McElroy SL. Efficacy and safety of
30 - 31 January 2009 Posterior aesthetic restorations fluvoxamine in body dysmorphic disorder. J Clin Psychiatry.
24 - 25 April 2009 Soft tissue management in the aesthetic zone 1998;59:165-71.
13 -14 February 2009 Crown and bridge aesthetics
15 -16 May 2009 Complete dental aesthetics Correspondence: FB Naini,
Department of Orthodontics,
If you are interested in taking up the course or the optional modules, please contact St George’s Hospital and Medical School,
Amy Green on 020 7869 6774 or at agreen@rcseng.ac.uk. London SW17 0QT.
E-mail: Farhad.Naini@yahoo.co.uk

Primary Dental Care • April 2008


64

You might also like