Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Facts
Judgement
Significance
See also
Court Court of Appeal of
England and Wales
Judgement
The Court of Appeal ordered that the claimant was entitled to specific performance. Lord Herschell argued: "Where the
circumstances are such that it must have been within the contemplation of the parties that, according to ordinary usage of
mankind, the post might be used as a means of communicating the acceptance of an offer, the acceptance is complete as soon as
it is posted."
Significance
The case is based on a line of decision starting with Adams v Lindsell (1818), according to which the acceptance was valid at the
time of posting. The importance of this decision's ratio is that a postal acceptance will only be valid at the time of posting if it is
reasonable for the offeror to expect an acceptance by post. The fact that both parties were living in different towns justifies the
inference that both parties had contemplated that a letter sent by post was a mode by which acceptance might be communicated
(per Kay L.J. at page 36)
See also
Offer and acceptance
Mailbox rule
Adams v. Lindsell
Dunlop v. Higgins
Household Fire Insurance Co v. Grant
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of
Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.