You are on page 1of 1

South African Airways vs CIR (GR number 180356, February 16, 2010)

Facts: Petitioner have no license to do business in the Philippines, sells passage documents for
off-line flights through Aerotel Limited, general sales agent in the Philippines. Petitioner filed for
claim of refund erroneously paid tax on Gross Philippine Billing for the year 2010. The CTA
denied the petition and reasoned that petitioner is a resident foreign corporation engaged in
trade or business in the Philippines and therefore is not liable to pay tax on GPB but cannot
allow refund because the petitioner is liable for the 32% income tax from its sales of passage
documents.
Issue: whether or not the CTA erred in its decision.
Held: Yes. Since it does not maintain flights to and from the Philippines, it is not taxable.
Petitioner, being an international carrier with no flights originating from the Philippines, does not
fall under the exception. Petitions falls under the general rule. The petitioner’s tax refund claim
assumed that the tax return it filed were correct because petitioner is liable under section 28 (a)
(1). Taxes can be offset if intimately related, unless exempted assumed within the purview or
general rule, liabilities and tax credit must first be determined before offset can take place.

SMI-ED Philippines vs CIR (GR number 175410, November 12, 2014)


Facts: SMI-ED Philippines constructed buildings and purchased machineries and equipments
after its registration; however, it failed to commence operations. Later on, its machineries and
equipments were sold and SMI-ED was dissolved. In its quarterly income tax return for the year
2000, it subjected the entire gross sales of its properties to 5% final tax on PEZA registered
corporations and paid taxes amounting to 44 million pesos. SMI-ED filed an administrative case
of refund.
Issue: whether or not SMI-ED can claim for refund.
Held: Yes. The amount of capital gains tax for the sold land and/or building of petitioner and the
amount of corporate income tax for the sale of petitioner’s machineries and equipments should
be deducted from the total final tax paid.

You might also like