Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STATE
VS
IN THE MATTER OF
STATE
VS
(Mention the name of the applicant)
FIR Number: (Mention the FIR number)
Under Section: (Mention the sections under which the FIR has been filed)
Police Station: (Mention the name of the Police Station)
1. That the present FIR has been registered on false and bogus facts. The facts stated
in the FIR are fabricated, concocted and without any basis.
2. That the police has falsely implicated the applicant in the present case, the applicant
is a respectable citizen of the society and is not involved any criminal case.
3. That the facts stated in the complainant against the applicant are civil disputes and
does not constitute any criminal offence at all.
4. That the applicant is not required in any kind of investigation nor any kind of custodial
interrogation is required.
5. That the applicant is having very good antecedents, he belongs to good family and
there is no criminal case pending against them.
6. That the applicant is a permanent resident and there are no chances of his
absconding from the course of justice.
7. That the applicant undertakes to present himself before the police/court as and when
directed.
8. That the applicant undertakes that he will not, directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
9. That the applicant further undertakes not to tamper with the evidence or the
witnesses in any manner.
10. That the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
11. That the applicant is ready and willing to accept any other conditions as may be
imposed by the Court or the police in connection with the case.
PRAYER
It is therefore prayed that the court may direct the release the applicant on bail in the
event of his arrest by the police.
Any other order which the court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances
of the case may be also passed in favor of the applicant.
APPLICANT
THROUGH
COUNSEL
The applicant is also required to swear an affidavit in support of the anticipatory bail
application.
Power of Attorney in favour of the council is required to be executed and attached along
with the anticipatory bail application.
Copy of the FIR with its true translation if it is in vernacular is required to be filed along
with the Anticipatory Bail Application Format India.
Copies of all the relevant documents are required to be attached alongwith the
Anticipatory Bail Application Format India.
Certified copies of the orders passed by the Sessions Court rejecting the anticipatory
bail application is to be filed along with the anticipatory bail application.
SUGGESTED FORMAT OF THE ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION TO BE FILED
BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IN THE EVENT OF THE APPLICATION FOR
ANTICIPATORY BAIL BEING DISMISSED BY THE SESSIONS COURT.
IN THE MATTER OF
STATE
VS
(Mention the name of the accused)
Under Section: (Mention the sections under which the FIR has been filed)
2. That the police has falsely implicated the applicant in the present case, the applicant
is a respectable citizen of the society and is not involved any criminal case.
3. That the facts stated in the complainant against the applicant are civil disputes and
does not constitute any criminal offence at all.
4. That the applicant is not required in any kind of investigation nor any kind of custodial
interrogation is required.
5. That the applicant is having very good antecedents, he belongs to good family and
there is no criminal case pending against them.
6. That the applicant is a permanent resident and there are no chances of his
absconding from the course of justice.
7. That the applicant undertakes to present himself before the police/court as and when
directed.
8. That the applicant undertakes that he will not, directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
9. That the applicant further undertakes not to tamper with the evidence or the
witnesses in any manner.
10. That the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
11. That the applicant is ready and willing to accept any other conditions as may be
imposed by the Court or the police in connection with the case.
12. That the Court below has failed to consider all the facts and circumstances of the
case
and has wrongly dismissed the anticipatory bail application.
PRAYER
It is therefore prayed that the court may direct the release the applicant on bail in the
event of his arrest by the police.
Any other order which the court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances
of the case may be also passed in favor of the applicant.
APPLICANT
THROUGH
COUNSEL
Anticipatory Bail application
ATTENTION:
For online services on Anticipatory Bail Application, send us the copy of FIR on
mail. We have in house experts for all online legal services on criminal matters.
The provisions of bail under the Indian laws are contained in Section 437, 438 and 439
of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Anticipatory bail application can be filed under
Section 438 of CrPC seeking the release of the applicant in the event of his arrest.
Anticipatory Bail Application can be filed before the Court of Session, High Court but not
before the court below the court of the session or before the court of Magistrate. The
provisions of Section 438 of the CrPC are as under:
438. Direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest:
When any person has reason to believe that he may be arrested on an accusation of
having committed a non- bailable offence, he may apply to the High Court or the Court
of Session for a direction under this section; and that Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that
in the event of such arrest, he shall be released on bail.
When the High Court or the Court of Session makes a direction under sub- section (1),
it may include such conditions in such directions in the light of the facts of the particular
case, as it may think fit, including:
a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police
officer as and when required;
a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat
or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him
from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
The condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of
the Court;
such other condition as may be imposed under sub- section (3) of section 437, as if the
bail were granted under that section.
If such person is thereafter arrested without warrant by an officer in charge of a police
station on such accusation, and is prepared either at the time of arrest or at any time
while in the custody of such officer to give bail, be shall be released on bail; and if a
Magistrate taking cognizance of such offence decides that a warrant should issue in the
first instance against that person, he shall issue a bailable warrant in conformity with the
direction of the Court under sub- section (1).
Anticipatory bail and regular bail are two different legal prepositions. The landmark
judgment on the distinction is the famous case of Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of
Punjab, the relevant observations made by the Supreme Court of India are as under:
“The distinction between an ordinary order of bail and an order of anticipatory bail is that
whereas the former is granted after arrest and therefore means release from the
custody of the police, the latter is granted in anticipation of arrest and is therefore
effective at the very moment of arrest. Police custody is an inevitable concomitant of
arrest for non-bailable offences. An order of anticipatory bail constitutes, so to say, an
insurance against police custody following upon arrest for offence or offences in respect
of which the order is issued. In other words, unlike a post-arrest order of bail, it is a
pre-arrest legal process which directs that if the person in whose favor it is issued is
thereafter arrested on the accusation in respect of which the direction is issued,
he shall be released on bail.”
It is not necessary that an FIR is registered before the filing of the Anticipatory Bail
Application, the apprehension of arrest or detention can be a ground of anticipatory bail
application. The court can consider and pass orders in this regard. An anticipatory bail
application can be filed and anticipatory bail granted even after the FIR is registered but
the applicant has not been arrested. The provisions of Section 438 cannot be invoked
after the arrest of the accused. After arrest, the accused has to seek the remedy under
Section 437 or Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
INTERIM BAIL
An interim bail order can be passed under Section 438 of the Code without notice to the
Public Prosecutor under very urgent circumstances. The notice should be issued to the
Public Prosecutor or to the Government advocate simultaneously. In such event the
question of bail should be re-examined in the light of respective contentions of the
parties.
The ad-interim order too must conform to the requirements of the Section and suitable
conditions can be imposed on the applicant even at that stage. The provisions of
Section 437 and 438 are different and distinct as the court of Magistrate exercises its
powers under Section 437 at the first instance.
It has been held in several cases that if the anticipatory bail application is made to the
High Court or the Court of Session, it must apply its own mind to the question and
decide whether a case has been made out for granting such relief. While considering
the anticipatory bail application, the court of the session or High Court cannot leave the
question for the decision of the Magistrate concerned under Section 437 of the Code.
Such a course will defeat the very object of Section 438. In a way, Anticipatory bail
application is on a better legal footing as compared to the bail application under Section
437 of CrPC.
The Supreme Court has defined the anticipatory bail application and the import of the
same under Indian laws. Supreme Court has explained that Anticipatory bail is the
temporary release of the accused from the custody of police either with or without
surety. The words anticipatory bail has not been defined in the CrPC. The expression
“anticipatory bail” is a misnomer and the order of anticipatory bail becomes operative
after the arrest of the accused. The anticipatory bail under crpc provides that a person
who has a reasonable belief that he may get arrested for a non-bailable offense then he
may apply to sessions court or the high court to get a direction for grant of anticipatory
bail under section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure.
The court while considering the Anticipatory Bail Application may consider the following
factors –
Nature and gravity of accusation,
The antecedents of the applicant including the fact as to whether he has previously
undergone imprisonment on conviction by a Court in respect of any cognizable offence,
The possibility of the applicant to flee from justice, and
Where the accusation has been made with the object of injuring or humiliating the
applicant by having him so arrested.
After considering all these aspects and the facts of the case, the court may either reject
the application forthwith or issue an interim order for the grant of anticipatory bail.
If the sessions court or the high court does not pass any interim order under Section
438 of CrPC on the anticipatory bail application or does not grant the anticipatory bail
then the police officer has the authority to arrest such person without a warrant on the
basis of the accusation apprehended in such application.
Post amendments of 2005 in the criminal laws, it is mandatory to hear Public Prosecutor
in the case of Anticipatory Bail. If the sessions court rejects the anticipatory bail
application, then the application for anticipatory bail can be filed in High Court.
While considering the anticipatory bail application, the court can put certain conditions
and restrictions while granting anticipatory bail. These conditions and restrictions are as
follows:
i) The applicant of the Anticipatory bail application shall join the investigation and attend
the investigation proceedings as and when directed by the investigating agency, the
police or the court.
ii) Applicant of the anticipatory bail application shall not tamper with the evidence in any
manner.
iii) Applicant would not intimidate the witnesses of the case.
iv) The applicant of the anticipatory bail shall not run away from the jurisdiction of the
court or leave the country. In such circumstances, the court may impose the condition of
depositing the passport of the accused person.
Anticipatory bail application can be filed when the FIR has been registered. If a notice of
arrest has been issued by the Investigation Officer of the case, then the Anticipatory
Bail Application may be filed before the court of Sessions.
If no FIR registered, still Anticipatory Bail Application can be filed and the court after
seeking the version of police and Public Prosecutor may pass appropriate orders even
granting anticipatory bail to the applicant or the accused persons or even the suspected
persons. Such bail can be on several conditions to be imposed by the court of Sessions
or the High Court.
CANCELLATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL:
Section 439(2)of CrPC deals with cancellation of anticipatory bail. Though there is a
specific provision in the code of criminal procedure but under law the court which has
the power to grant the anticipatory is also empowered to cancel bail or recall the order
related to bail upon appropriate consideration of facts. Anticipatory bail should not be
abused in any manner as it is a special privilege given to a person who is under
reasonable apprehension of his arrest. The power to cancel the regular or anticipatory
bail can be invoked only when the court is satisfied that the ends of justice will be
defeated unless the accused is committed to custody.
Though the power conferred under Section 438 of the Code can be described as an
extraordinary in character, but this does not justify the conclusion that the power must
be exercised in exceptional cases only because it is of an extraordinary character.
Nonetheless, the discretion under the Section has to be exercised with due care and
circumspection depending on circumstances.
Before power under sub-section (1) of Section 438 of the Code is exercised, the Court
must be satisfied that the applicant invoking the provision has reason to believe that he
is likely to be arrested for a non-bailable offence and that belief must be founded on
reasonable grounds. Mere “fear” is not belief, for which reason, it is not enough for the
applicant to show that he has some sort of vague apprehension that some one is going
to make an accusation against him, in pursuance of which he may be arrested. The
grounds on which the belief of the applicant is based that he may be arrested for a non-
bailable offence, must be capable of being examined by the Court objectively. Specific
events and facts must be disclosed by the applicant in order to enable the Court to
judge of the reasonableness of his belief, the existence of which is the sine qua non of
the exercise of power conferred by the Section.
The grounds which can be taken in Anticipatory Bail Application besides the merits of
the FIR can be other grounds which may mainly contain the following:
• Arrest being for ulterior motives such as humiliation and unjustified harassment.
• Irreparable injury to reputation & liberty.
• Otherwise a fit case for bail before arrest.
• Physically surrender before the court.
• Motivation of police on police on political consideration.
No blanket order of bail should be passed and the Court which grants anticipatory bail
must take care to specify the offence or the offences in respect of which alone the order
will be effective. While granting relief under Section 438(1) of the Code, appropriate
conditions can be imposed under Section 438(2) so as to ensure an uninterrupted
investigation. One such condition can even be that in the event of the police making out
a case of a likely discovery under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, the person released
on bail shall be liable to be taken in police custody for facilitating the recovery.
Otherwise, such an order can become a charter of lawlessness and a weapon to stifle
prompt investigation into offences which could not possibly be predicated when the
order was passed.
Though it is not necessary that the operation of an order passed under Section 438(1)
of the Code be limited in point of time but the Court may, if there are reasons for doing
so, limit the operation of the order to a short period until after the filing of FIR in respect
of the matter covered by the order. The applicant may, in such cases, be directed to
obtain an order of bail under Section 437 or 439 of the Code within a reasonable short
period after the filing of the FIR. The court in its wisdom can also impose other
conditions and eventualities in the interest of justice.
While considering all these aspects, we may sum up that society has a vital stake in
both of the interests, namely, personal liberty of an individual and the investigational
power of the police. The Court is to strike a balance between the two while deciding
anticipatory bail application under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Anticipatory bail filed by the Applicant / accused and I am filing the present
affidavit in reply for the purpose of opposing the said applications and also for
the purpose of narrating few necessary facts, which are suppressed and/or
falsely narrated by the Applicant in his Application.
This Draft was actually filed in the Court which is shown in the title clause and same is
authored by Mr. Shreekant V. Gavand, Advocate High Court. This draft is uploaded only
for the information of Students in Oriental College of Law, Navi Mumbai. The
Management or the Law College authorities owes no responsibility whatsoever in
respect of averments made therein. For the purpose of maintaining privacy the names
of the parties / village / police station have been changed.
2) I say that the true facts of the present case are as under:
a) b) c) ..............................
3) I say that in the circumstances I have lodged FIR against the accused. I say
that the averments made in the FIR are true and correct and same may be treated as
part and parcel of the present affidavit.
4) Add - Grounds Justifying how the offence falls within the four corners of the sections
5) I say that accused has committed offence punishable u/s. 999 of IPC and other
sections as stated in FIR and relief of pre-arrest bail cannot be granted to the accused.
6) I say that there is prima facie case against the accused and as such benefit of
pre-arrest bail cannot be given to the accused and therefore in the facts and
circumstances of the case the applications for anticipatory bail filed by the
Accused may kindly be rejected.
AND FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS AND JUSTICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL
AS IN DUTYBOUND EVER PRAY.
DATED: / / 20 Respondent
Advocate for the Applicant
VERIFICATION
I Shri.------, Age -----years, the Applicant above named, residing at village -----Dist.
Thane do hereby state on solemn affirmation that what is stated in the above
paragraphs is true & correct to the best of my knowledge & information, which I believe
to be true.
Date: / / 20
Respondent I know the deponent.
Advocate for Applicant
Format of Application for surrender of the accused
of Application for surrender of the accused
IN THE COURT OF _______, SESSIONS JUDGE, ____
In the matter of :
____ Versus ______
FIR No. ______
U/S : ____ IPC
P.S. ____ District ____
Next Date of Hearing – ____
IN THE MATTER OF
STATE
VS
(Mention the name of the accused)
FIR Number: (Mention the FIR number)
Under Section: (Mention the sections under which the FIR has been filed)
Police Station: (Mention the name of the Police Station)