This actively demonstrates the reading effects reduced of younger sibling teacher
experience, the math effects of younger sibling teacher experience, heterogeneity
in sibling effects by economic disadvantage and the heterogeneity by sibling gender match. The summary of sibling effects associated with a 0.011-0.012 SD improvement in child’s reading tests. Most of older sibling’s assignment to an experienced teacher is beneficial while in younger sibling’s assignment to an experienced teacher does not have a effect on a child’s reading or math achivement. There are pattern of results in line with discussion of theoretical mechanisms and consistent with past studies which also find evidence. For example, years of schooling, high school graduation, school subject choice, etc. In sibling effects and potential mechanisms, this means that the role model effects and pattern of results suggests are important. The particular reason for the circumstance is that its not clear why it would be present from older to younger siblings and not vice versa. Past literature finds that school inputs are more effective. In heterogeneity by economic disadvantage, it analyzes effects separately by the status of economic disadvantage which means a measure of free or reduced price lunch eligibility. In disadvantaged households, past studies have found larger sibling effects. For the exact purpose of Heterogeneity by sibling gender match is that sibling effects can be stronger for same gender siblings and it analyzes effects for same-gender siblings and different-gender siblings. Same gender siblings interact more frequently. To sum up everything that has been stated so far, roughly 30% of the own teacher experience effect on reading test score, the weaker evidence that older sibling math teacher experience increases child math score, while the younger sibling teacher experience is not significantly related to readingnor math achivement so the pattern results suggests that direct sibling effects play a more important role than indirect parental effects. There are highlights how family characteristics interact with school inputs to create learning and to access school-based inputs, such as experienced teachers that has a significant benefits for students and their younger siblings. And it can reinforce inequality due to differential access to high quality schools and due to these spillovers, that the education may be larger than previously estimated and for children from disadvantaged families can play important role in closing socioeconomic gaps in achivement.