Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/269057216
CITATIONS READS
0 808
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
The Project of the Association of Mechanical Engineering and Metalworking Industry in Latvia and BA School of Business and Finance View project
BA School of Business and Finance Research Project Grant Program “Application of Modern Teaching Methods in Business Studies in Higher Education” View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Inese Mavlutova on 12 May 2016.
University of Latvia,
3
Abstract. The authors examined conceptual basics of the company's financial strategy, studied its devel-
opment possibilities under inconsistent economic conditions, and developed methodological ground of
organizing and enacting restructuring by using of a particular example. The actual restructuring target
gains an additional effect (effect of synergy). The company's market value indicator concept can be used
as the best quantitative indicator to evaluate the effect of synergy. The goal of research is to justify the at-
tractiveness of business restructuring used to increase a company's market value and develop restructuring
program. Upon examination of the implementation of a financial strategy mechanism in companies expe-
riencing financial difficulties, the evaluating mechanism of the company restructuring effect was found
to have been improved from the aspect of a company‘s financial performance and indicators of market
value.
101
I. Mavlutova, A. Sarnovics, G. Olevsky
conditions to make management decisions about technical insolvency and concluding with bank-
future activities of the company formed during the ruptcy.
early eighties of the 20th century. Enactment of During the stage of owner's crisis financial
strategically significant decisions is at first related performance of the company worsens, which ini-
to attracting monetary resources, respectively, to tially does not influence the payments to creditors.
the quality of business financial management. The criterion chosen is the limitation of interests
The main component of financial manage- of the owner, respectively, the real loss of owners
ment on the other hand is financial strategy, which investing. Theoretical ground of offered criterion
includes the establishment of a sustainable system and numeral measurement is completely possible,
of financial activity's targets and indicators, as despite of apparent abstractness. For owners the
well as the determination of priority tasks for a company is an object of investing financial re-
present perspective. In general financial strategy is sources, allowing increasing the value of the re-
defined as business policy in the matter of main sources invested. In order to compare the effec-
directions of financial development (Porter 1998; tiveness of investments, alternative investments
Prahalad, Krishnan 2008; Wahl, Prause 2013). As- with the same risk level can be used as the ground.
pects of financial strategy are described in publica- Therefore, to determine the direct loss to owners,
tions of Van Horne, Vachowicz (2005), Brigham present market value and present initial investment
et al. (2008), Brigham, Ehrhardt (2010). After per- value of the equity capital should be compared,
forming an analysis of scientific publications the considering that they will be used as alternative
authors concluded that the content of financial investments with the same risk level.
strategy may be displayed as provided in Figure 1: Thereby the following inequality can be used
as the criterion of the first stage which is the own-
er's crisis:
TV pk + D
〈1 (1)
T V pam
where: TVpk – company's market value; D – own-
er’s dividends; TVpam – present initial investment
value of the equity capital with the possible alter-
native use of the resources invested with the same
risk and liquidity level.
102
BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING AS A TOOL OF FINANCIAL STRATEGY OF A COMPANY
financial sources and financial flow is irrational in integrated financial strategy's definition is the most
these companies. appropriate, as well as choosing the type of restruc-
Considering the company as a complicated turing by evaluating its results and effectiveness.
system, dependent on external and internal factors,
a company's restructuring is defined as changing Restructuring motives
the structure or the business units. Analysing the
impact of both external and internal factors, re- Decreasing the Increasing the Motives leaving
structuring includes improvement of the compa- outflow of inflow of re- out the move-
ment of re-
resources sources
ny's management systems, financial, economic and sources
strategic activities, marketing systems, personnel
management, quality management and innovation Effect of
production
Increasing
solvency
Difference
between
management. Low efficiency of the company's scale market and
economic activity after the recession can be con- Cheapest Diversification
book value
riers and existence of competitors desiring for ad- Fig. 2. Structure of main restructuring motives
(source: compiled by authors)
dition of the company (Mitchell et al. 2012). Tak-
ing strategic and tactical targets into account, the
The authors have concluded that an important
majority of motives for restructuring a company
part of a company's restructuring concept is the
can be classified in following groups as provided
classification of the types, because restructuring
in Figure 2.
leads to crucial changes in the company's organi-
A summary of the motives of restructuring
zational, asset and capital structure. There are sev-
brings forth a conclusion that managers and own-
eral approaches of restructure enactment. The au-
ers traditionally enact two targets: an increase of
thors prefer the following types of restructuring:
company's competitiveness and a further increase
mergers of companies, acquisitions of companies,
of the company's value. Depending on the targets
forming strategic alliances, restructuring of prop-
and the company's strategy one of the types of re-
erty, activities to eliminate financial difficulties.
structuring is chosen – operative or strategic.
All types of restructuring are related to a compa-
International practice nowadays and skills of
ny's financial strategy (Gaughan 2007).
restructure enactment in Latvia testifies that re-
Regardless of how formal the motives of a
structuring is one of the most complicated tasks of
company's restructuring are, its real objective is to
management. Restructuring does not lead to simul-
gain additional effect (effect of synergy) (Tomperi
taneous changes in resource and capital structure
2006).
or in the economic activity in general. Restructur-
During examination of several Latvian and
ing process can be enacted only when the targets
foreign expert conclusions the authors have con-
have been made clear, the concept of restructuring
cluded that during the process of restructuring the
is justified and all the stages and methods have
most appropriate concept for examining whether a
been comprehended.
company’s financial strategy is implemented is the
It is clear that the restructuring targets are set
evaluation of a company's market value with the
by the strategy, while financial resources provide
income concept which includes two techniques:
the ground of enacting it and defines the effect of
capitalization of income and discounting the future
enactment (Weston et al. 2012). This means that in
cash flow (Fernandez 2007; Damodaran 2009).
order to justify the targets of restructuring the use of
103
I. Mavlutova, A. Sarnovics, G. Olevsky
104
BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING AS A TOOL OF FINANCIAL STRATEGY OF A COMPANY
105
I. Mavlutova, A. Sarnovics, G. Olevsky
trade space is increasing while the total number of complishing the tasks the sub-targets are achieved,
shops is decreasing in 2012 (The main macroeco- and consequently the main target – increasing the
nomic indicators 2013). company's value – is gained. The solvable tasks of
Analysis of the closest competitors’ effec- LLC RVP are the “leafs” of the “tree”.
tiveness indicates that since the gross income mar- Misleading and groundless future cash flow
gin of the LLC RVP is average or even a little may lead to wrong investment decisions, but the
higher than average, the profitability falls far be- potential increase of cash flow is the main manner
hind from sales process. However the owner's in- of attracting new investors to the company.
vestment profitability (equity profitability) is the Financial forecasts for LLC RVP are drawn
lowest. Owners of the LLC RVP have managed up for five year long time period – from 2013 to
their business by using the conservative method 2017. The ground for the chosen time period is the
(high equity and low liabilities). The profit has not expected changes in company's activity during the
been paid out in a form of dividends since 2005. next five years. After that date a steady develop-
As one of the most critical restructuring stag- ment of the company is expected.
es the forecasting of future activity may be consid- It is planned to maintain the gross profit mar-
ered. Based on how qualitative and objective the gin constant in a five year perspective (22%),
future forecasts are formed, the decision will be which is close to the actual data – in 2012 the
made about the company's restructuring program. company has performed with a gross profitability
During the research the authors have conclud- of 22%. The most significant changes are planned
ed that it is necessary to study, classify and bear in in the cost structure. It concerns such expenditure
mind the main risk factors when analysing the ac- items as selling and management costs.
tivity of the LLC RVP. Key macroeconomic risks During analysis of the expected free cash
are related to the changing level of consumer fi- flow of LLC RVP the authors have concluded that
nancial prosperity. However the specific risks and starting with 2013 the cash flow will improve rap-
their impact on LLC RVP are similar to other Lat- idly. It is improved by results of operational activi-
vian retail businesses. Risks related to the internal ties (EBIT growth) and suppliers’ deferred pay-
environment of LLC RVP are considered the main ments, because there is no need for additional
risks of a company's economic activity. funds to finance working capital.
In order to determine the most profitable capi-
Table 1. Restructuring tasks of the company LLC RVP
tal structure – to find the minimal weighted aver-
(source: compiled by authors) age cost of capital (WACC) which provides the
Mar- Establishing product portfolio largest income, prices of the company's borrowed
ketin Product advertising and equity capital were calculated with different
g Sales promotion funding models or structures.
Increasing sales
106
BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING AS A TOOL OF FINANCIAL STRATEGY OF A COMPANY
tors of restructuring process discovered in the re- company's market value indicator concept could
search. be used. In order to evaluate the company
objectively it is necessary to use at least two
Table 2. WACC calculation matrix (by CAPM method)
concepts. For more active companies the income
for LLC RVP (source: compiled by authors) capitalization and discounting the future cash flow
Pro- Pro- Borrowed Equity WAC methods could be the most appropriate.
por- portion capital price C% When determining the company's market
tion of of eq- price after (by value in order to define the minimal profitability
bor- uity, % taxes(by CAPM or the equity price demanded by the owners, it is
rowed allocated mod- recommended to use the CAPM model. The use of
capit. synthetic el)% CAPM in countries without a highly developed
% rating stock market, including Latvia, is performed by
method) % using the stock index of the geographically and
0 100 6.46 14.16 14.16 economically closest countries or regions, or the
10 90 6.46 14.85 14.01 systematic risk coefficient of the industry (beta
20 80 6.89 15.71 13.95 coefficient).
30 70 7.10 16.82 13.90 The great amount of unsuccessful restructuring
40 60 7.27 18.30 13.89 cases does not decrease the amount of performed
restructuring projects because of their potential ad-
50 50 8.54 20.37 14.46
vantages when compared to the traditional methods
60 40 8.93 23.48 14.75 of business strategy implementation. Therefore the
70 30 9.65 28.65 15.35 causative factors of failures should be identified
80 20 10.63 39.01 16.30 during the restructuring and the risks of restructur-
90 10 10.63 70.06 16.57 ing enactment have to be evaluated.
5. Conclusions References
Based on analysis of restructuring in the process of Brigham, E.; Gapenski, L. 2008. Intermediate Financial
company’s financial strategy implementation the Management 4th edition. The Dryden Press. 1024
authors have concluded the following: p.
Restructuring is a process aimed at the maxi- Brigham, E.; Ehrhardt, M. 2010. Financial Manage-
mization of a company's market value by imple- ment Theory and Practice. Cengage Learning.
1184 p.
menting activities aimed at improving the compa-
CFA Institute. 2008. Financial Statement Analysis.
ny's activity. During the process of enacting a CFA® Program Curriculum Volume 3. ASV:
successful financial strategy the following targets Pearson Custom Publishing.
are gained: Crum, R. L.; Goldberg, I. 1998. Restructuring and
− increase of company's equity value as an Managing the Enterprise in Transition. The inter-
obligatory condition to increase the national Bank for Reconstruction and Develop-
competitiveness; ment. Washington: The World Bank, USA.
− company's financial position is improving http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-3658-4
due to strengthening of its solvency, Damodaran, A. 2012. Investment Valuation: Tools and
liquidity, financial stability and profita- Techniques for Determining the Value of any As-
set, University Edition, 3rd edition New Jersey:
bility; John Wiley & Sons. 992 p.
− attraction of long-term investments in Damodaran, A. 2009. Finding the Right Financing Mix:
form of direct investments or long-term The Capital Structure Decision. New York: Stern
debt commitment is accomplished. School of Business.
In order to eliminate the insolvency, the Dockery, E.; Herbert, W. E. 2000. Corporate govern-
financial position of the company has to be ance and enterprise restructuring in transition
evaluated in a short time, and in case of an economies: evidence from privatized Polish com-
unstable situation a financial strategy has to be panies, Journal of Managerial Finance 26(9): 80–
enacted to recover the company. One of the key 92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074350010766891
elements of financial strategy is company's Fernandez, P. 2007. Company valuation methods. The
most common errors in valuations. Social Science
restructuring. Research Network 31. [online] [accessed 14 Octo-
The actual restructuring target is the gain of ber 2013] Available from Internet:
an additional effect (effect of synergy). As the best http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id
quantitative indicator to evaluate the effect the =27497
107
I. Mavlutova, A. Sarnovics, G. Olevsky
Gaughan, I. 2007. Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Porter, M. E. 1998. Competitive Strategy: Techniques
Restructurings 4rth edition, John Wiley & Sons for Analysing Industries and Competitors, New
Inc. 648 p. York, USA: The Free Press. 397 p.
Gilson, S.; Altman , E. 2010. Creating Value Through Prahalad, C.; Krishnan, M. 2008. The New Age of Inno-
Corporate Restructuring: Case Studies in Bank- vation: Driving Co-Created Value through Global
ruptcies, Buyouts, and Breakups, 2nd edition. John Network, McGraw-Hill. 304 p.
Wiley & Sons Inc. 848 p. Sharpe, W. 2008. Capital Asset Pricing Model. Nether-
Glen, A. 2008. Corporate Financial Management, 4th land: Value Based Management, [online] [accessed
edition, Harlow: Financial times, Prentice Hall. 16 October 2013] Available from Internet:
996 p. http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_c
Hitchner, J. 2003. Financial Valuation: Applications apm.html
and Models. New Jersey: John Willey & Sons. Tomperi, I. 2006. M&A Case: Theory of Investments.
1402 p. Vaasa: University of Vaasa.
Howson, P. 2003. Due Diligence: The Critical Stage in Van Horne, J.; Vachowicz, J. 2005. Fundamentals of
Mergers and Acquisitions. Gower Publishing Ltd. Financial Management .12th edition, Prentice Hall
286 p. Inc. 760 p.
Malhotra, B.; Sarma, V. 2013. An exploratory study on Vance, D. 2010. Corporate Restructuring: From Cause
successful management of international mergers Analysis to Execution. Berlin, Heidelberg :
and acquisitions in IT industry, Indian Streams Re- Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
search Journal 4(1): 1–17. The main macroeconomic indicators. Latvian Republic
Mavļutova, I. 2011. Business Restructuring and Com- Ministry of Finance home page [online] [accessed
pany’s Market Value: Scenarios for company’s de- 12 November 2013] Available from Internet:
velopment, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publish- http://www.fm.gov.lv/?lat/makroekonomika
ing. Wahl, M.; Prause, G. 2013. Toward understanding
Miller, L. 2011. Mergers and Acquisitions: A Step by resources, competencies, and capabilities: business
Step Legal and Practical Guide. New Jersey: John model generation approach, Entrepreneurship and
Wiley&Sons, 352 p. Sustainability Issues 1(2): 67–80.
Mitchell, M.; Mirvis, M. H.; Philip, H. 2012. Applying http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2013.1.2(1)
OD to Make Mergers and Acquisitions Work, OD Weston, J.; Jawien, F.; Piotr S.; Levitas, E. 2012. Re-
Practicioner Journal, 5–12. structuring and its implications for business eco-
Mitchell, M.; Marks, L. 2011. Consulting in mergers nomics, Journal of Business Economics 1(33): 5–
and acquisitions: Interventions spawned by recent 12.
trends, Journal of Organizational Change Man-
agement 10(3): 267–279.
McTaggart, J.; Kontes, P.; Mankins, M. 1994. The Val-
ue Imperative: Managing for Superior Sharehold-
er Returns. New York, USA: The Free Press.
367 p.
108