Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chubb Case Solution
Chubb Case Solution
Operating liabilities
Unpaid claims and loss expenses 22,623 22,293
Unearned premiums 6,599 6,546
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 2,090 2,385
Total operating liabilities (B) 31,312 31,224
Financial Liabilities
Securities lending payable 1,247 2,620
Long-term debt 3,460 2,466
Total Financial Operating Liabilities (E) 4,707 5,086
Investment operations:
Before-tax revenues:
Taxable Investment income 1,506 1,580 1,408
Other revenues 49 220 115
Realized investment gains 374 245 384
Investment expenses (35) (34) (29)
Investment Income before tax 1,894 2,011 1,878
Tax (35%) (663) (704) (657)
Investment Income after tax 1,231 1,307 1,221
Tax-exempted investment income 232
Change in unrealized appreciation of investments, net of tax 134 81 (313)
Net investment income after tax 1,597 1,388 908
A: Insurance companies have Fixed income portfolios- a part of which they hold till maturity. Hence these
investments are recorded at book value. Any investments that are not to be held till maturity would be marked to
market. These unrealised gains/losses would be a part of investment income in the reformulated income statement.
B: Insurance companies may have negative NOA from their underwriting operations. This is because the premiums
they receive are more or less fixed cash inflows and the cash outflow from claims is spread over a longer time
period. This this mismatch can be exploited by investing the premium amount( which would reduce cash) and
generating returns from it. However, the recorded liabilities arising from the business would be larger hence NOA
would be negative.
C: Investment gains/losses tend to be notional. Also, many insurers have negative earnings from their underwriting
operations which are offset by unrealised investment gains. Therefore, keeping these income streams separate for
the purpose of analysis in important
D: It is desirable to have income from an insurer to be reported on a comprehensive basis as insurers may overstate
their income by booking profits which they haven’t realised yet on their profitable investments to inflate their
investment incomes and hence the overall profit
E: Value of investments= 41,768 – 1,247 = 40,521, as most investments are marked to market
F: Some key ratios for Chubb Corporation:
(US$mn, Dec YE) 2007
Underwriting margin (pre tax) 15.2%
Investment income margin (pre tax) 15.9%
Comprehensive RoAE (%) 21.4%
Claims ratio (%) 52.7%
Expense ratio (%) 32.1%
Combined ratio (%) 84.8%
OLLEV 162.6%
Chubb Corporation is profitable at the underwriting level which showing strong fundamentals and lesser risk of
change in investment income due to market movements. It has a combined ratio below 100%. Comprehensive RoAE
of 21.4% is also pretty solid for an insurance firm.
The OLLEV of 162.6% may look like a cause for concern but it may stem from the negative NOA and the typical cash
cycle for insurer. Hence it must be examined with respect to the OLLEV for a typical P&C insurer in USA like Allstate.