Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.
Curcumin, a greatly potent, non-toxic and naturally existing bioactive material in turmeric is widely
employed to develop biomedical functional materials due to its environmental friendly nature. In general,
curcumin functional materials were prepared by administrating non-aqueous solvents as a dissolving
medium for curcumin. These non-aqueous solvents cause adverse effects for the environment and
humans. However, if the curcumin functional materials are developed based on aqueous solution then
the adverse effects can be eliminated. In view of this, for the first time aqueous based nanocurcumin
(nanoparticles of curcumin) impregnated gelatin cellulose fibers (NCGCFs) were developed by a green
process. The required nanocurcumin was prepared by ultrasonication process. Transmission electron
microscopy showed the sizes of nanocurcumin exist in the range 2 to 15 nm. Nuclear magnetic
resonance spectra showed no structural modification of nanocurcumin to that of curcumin. The
developed fibres were characterized by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron
microscopy, thermal analysis and swelling studies. Cumulative releasing studies showed slow and
sustained releasing patterns for NCGCFs. A comparative antimicrobial study was performed for
Received 6th November 2013
Accepted 25th November 2013
nanocurcumin impregnated gelatin cellulose fibres (NCGCFs) and curcumin impregnated gelatin
cellulose fibres (CGCFs) against E. coli and S. aureus. The results indicated the superior performance of
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra46429f
NCGCFs over CGCFs. Hence, NCGCFs prepared completely from naturally available materials can be
www.rsc.org/advances considered as a novel kind of functional materials for wound dressing and antimicrobial applications.
3494 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
In our recent study, natural polymer with silver nano- 2.3. Preparation of nanocurcumin-gelatin cellulose bres
particles impregnated cellulose bres has conrmed signi- (NCGCFs) and curcumin-gelatin cellulose bres (CGCFs)
cant antibacterial properties.32 In surgical zone, cellulose
Finely aqueous dispersed nanocurcumin of various concentra-
bres gained medically more importance as designing
tions in water (10 mg per 5 mL, 15 mg per 5 mL and 20 mg per
Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 | 3495
View Article Online
Scheme 1 Schematically illustrating the synthesis routes for NCGCFs and CGCFs.
released amount of curcumin was determined at different time factor has stimulated to develop microbial resistant nano-
intervals by recording the absorbance of release medium by curcumin impregnated gelatin cellulose bers (NCGCFs) for
UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The absorption of the solutions of wound dressing scaffolds. Further, employing curcumin as
curcumin was measured at lmax 491.2 nm.2 nanoparticles (nanocurcumin) has exhibited pronounced
activity than administering directly as curcumin.19 The method
2.6. Swelling properties adopted to develop NCGCFs was a green process, feasible at
ambient conditions without the aid of any external chemical
The swelling ratio or swelling capacity (Sg/g) of all the bres
agent. The process of preparing antimicrobial bres (NCGCFs)
developed was determined by swelling them in phosphate
was systematically illustrated in Scheme 1: Step 1: preparation
buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 for 24 h at 37 C using eqn (1):
of nanocurcumin by a physical ultrasonication process. Step 2:
preparation of aqueous nanocurcumin dispersion. Step 3:
Swelling ratio (Sg/g) ¼ [Ws Wd]/Wd (1)
fabrication of antimicrobial NCGCFs from cellulose bres.
where, Ws and Wd denote the weight of the swollen cellulose To compare the enhanced results of NCGCFs, curcumin
bre at equilibrium and the weight of the dry cellulose bre, impregnated gelatin cellulose bres (CGCFs) were also prepared
respectively. The data provided is an average value of 3 indi- by taking curcumin solution (DCM as solvent). The synthesis
vidual sample readings. route for CGCFs was shown in Scheme 1. The key role of gelatin
is to stabilize the nanocurcumin with cellulose bres and also to
release the nanocurcumin in sustained manner for longer
2.7. Antimicrobial activity
duration. Gelatin was particularly chosen due to its wide
The antimicrobial activity of developed bres was tested against applications in biomedical eld, particularly in designing
Staphylococcus aureus (G+) MTCC-7443 and Escherichia coli (G ) wound dressings materials. It also exhibits low inammatory
MTCC-1668, obtained from the Institute of Microbial Tech- cell response without side effects in the host tissue.30
nology, Chandigarh, India. The required nutrient agar medium Examination of nanocurcumin by TEM (Fig. 1A(a–c)) showed
was prepared by mixing peptone (5.0 g), beef extract (3.0 g), the nanoparticles were spherical in shape and exists in the size
sodium chloride (5.0 g) and agar (15.0 g) in 1000 mL of distilled range of 2 to 15 nm. The quite interesting aspect of nano-
water and the pH was adjusted to 7.0.34,35 The agar medium was curcumin was, though it was physically compacted to nano-
sterilized in a conical ask at a pressure of 6.8 kg (15 lbs) for dimension, it was structurally not altered and showed NMR
30 min and transferred into sterilized petri dishes in a laminar spectrum similar to that of the pure curcumin (Fig. 1B). In 1H
air ow chamber (Microlt Laminar Flow Ultra Clean Air Unit, NMR spectra (Fig. 1B), the peaks at d 3.951 and 5.802 ppm
Mumbai, India) for solidication. Aer solidication, 50 mL showed the presence of intact methoxy groups and the methine
(108 CFU mL1) of microbial culture was uniformly spread out. proton in enolic form. The peaks in the range of d 6.841–7.138
Over the petri dishes, bres (NCGCFs/CGCFs) each of 5 mm ppm showed the presence of aromatic protons.19 Two doublets
length were distributed and incubated for 24 h at 37 C to were assigned for olenic protons at d 6.504 and 7.618 ppm
obtain inhibition zones. Finally, the formed inhibition zones respectively and were coinciding with those many of previously
were measured and photographed. reported literatures. Over all, NMR spectra suggested the
chemical integrity of nanocurcumin was identical to that of
3. Results and discussions curcumin. Structure of curcumin and the 1H NMR spectra of
nanocurcumin were presented in Fig. 1B.
Ordinary wound dressings allow microorganisms to exhibit To understand the morphology of the bres, SEM exami-
undesirable effects on wounds. This is one of the main factors nation was carried out for NCGCF, CGCF, gelatin-cellulose bre
for disease transmission and subsequent tissue damage.36 This and pure cellulose bre. SEM image of NCGCF (Fig. 2A) clearly
3496 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
Fig. 1 (A) TEM images of nanocurcumin (a–c) and (B) 1H NMR spectra of nanocurcumin in CDCl3 and structure of curcumin.
depicts the uniform distribution of curcumin nanoparticles FTIR spectroscopy is an important tool that indicates the
over gelatin bound cellulose bre which were highly stabilized combined interaction of nanocurcumin, gelatin and pure
by hydrophilic groups of gelatin. In case of CGCFs (Fig. 2B), cellulose bre in NCGCFs bres. The spectra of pure cellulose
irregular distribution of bulky curcumin with less stabilized by bre, nanocurcumin, gelatin and NCGCF were shown in Fig. 2B.
hydrophilic groups of gelatin could be seen. Fig. 2E represents For pure cellulose bre, characteristic peaks at around 3364
SEM image of pure cellulose bre. The SEM image of gelatin- cm1, 2924 cm1 and at around 1311 cm1 corresponding to
cellulose bre (Fig. 2D) were prepared from 1% gelatin solution –OH stretching frequency, >CH2 stretching vibration and C–H
that was used in the synthesis of NCGCFs/CGCFs showed a bending mode respectively; characteristic bands at 1150 and
smooth surface without any particle distribution. This indi- 1015 cm1 are assigned to the C–O–C from the glucosidic units
cates that the distributed particles in case of NCGCFs and or from b-(1 / 4)-glucosidic bonds.37,38 For nanocurcumin, the
CGCFs are only due to nanocurcumin/curcumin respectively. bands observed at 3346 cm1, 1591 cm1, 1508 cm1, 1263
Also it could be clearly seen from Fig. 2A and B that due to size cm1, and 1142 cm1 are respectively attributed to the phenolic
factor, curcumin in its nano form exists more in number O–H stretching, stretching vibrations of the benzene ring, C]C
and more in quantity over NCGCFs than in bulk form over vibrations, aromatic C–O stretching and C–O–C stretching
CGCFs. Further, the presence of nanocurcumin/curcumin over modes.39 Gelatin showed characteristic peaks at 3284 cm1 due
gelatin bound cellulose bres was technically conrmed to N–H stretching, at 1634 cm1 due to C]O stretching (amide
through its bonding interactions by using FTIR spectral data I), at 1540 cm1 due to N–H bending (amide II) and at
and thermal data. 1236 cm1 due to C–N (amide III).40,41 The spectra of NCGCFs
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 | 3497
View Article Online
Fig. 2 SEM images of (A) NCGCFs fibre, (B) CGCFs fibre, (D) gelatin-cellulose fibre, (E) pure cellulose fibre, and (C) FTIR spectra of pure cellulose
fibre, nanocurcumin, gelatin and NCGCFs fibre.
comprise a composite of the cellulose bre, nanocurcumin and occurs at around 398.48 C. The thermal decomposition residue
gelatin, displaying all the characteristic bands of cellulose bre, of NCGCFs at 600 C was 25.04%, an intermediate value of the
nanocurcumin and gelatin. This clearly indicates their bonding remaining thermal residues (cellulose bre (15.45%), gelatin
interaction. (23.97%) and nanocurcumin (28.94%)). The intermediate value
Thermal property of bres is a valuable piece of evidence that indicates that all the components in NCGCF were well bound to
provides the information on physical characteristics and the give a normalized result. Based on the thermal data, it was
components present in the bres as well. The primary ther- evident that in NCGCFs all the components were well bind as a
mogram of the bres was shown in Fig. 3A. The results indi- composite to exhibit good thermal stability.
cated that, in all the samples, an initial weight loss at a
temperature below 100 C was observed due to the loss of
moisture present on the surface. The initial degradation of 3.1. Cumulative releasing studies
NCGCFs occurs at around 290.67 C, higher than all of its The cumulative releasing studies (Fig. 3B) demonstrated that
individual components and the nal degradation temperature the rate of curcumin/nanocurcumin release is different for
Fig. 3 (A) TGA curves of pure cellulose fibre, gelatin, nanocurcumin and NCGCFs fibre, (B) % cumulative releasing studies of CGCF-20 and
NCGCF-20.
3498 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
NCGCFs and CGCFs. In comparison with both the bres with increase in concentration. Further, for the same concen-
(NCGCFs and CGCFs), CGCFs release curcumin at a faster rate tration, the swelling ratio values of NCGCFs (Fig. 4B) are higher
than NCGCFs. CGCFs released all the amount of curcumin that than CGCFs (Fig. 4A). This was due to ‘size factor’ and
present in it at about 16 h where as NCGCFs showed at about ‘aqueous–nanocurcumin interaction’. Due to size factor, for the
Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.
60 h. The observed slow and sustained release of nanocurcumin same quantity of material, stoichiometrically nanocurcumin
from NCGCFs was due to more stabilization of nanocurcumin exists more in number than bulk curcumin, thereby stoichio-
by the hydrophilic groups of gelatin, owing to its size factor. The metrically more number of voids will exist to retain more
prolonged release of nanocurcumin from NCGCFs suggests the number of water molecules in case of NCGCFs. Apart from this,
usefulness of the product towards wound care applications for a size factor allows smaller nanocurcumin to distribute more
longer duration. uniformly with well dened voids over NCGCFs, whereas, these
well dened voids were absent in case of CGCFs. Owing to these
3.2. Swelling ratio reasons, comparatively large amount of water molecules will be
retained and accumulated in the more and well dened voids of
Swelling ratio plays a signicant role in biomedical applica-
NCGCFs than lesser irregular voids of CGCFs, resulting higher
tions, particularly in antibacterial applications. In the present
swelling for NCGCFs. The other factor that contributes for
investigation, the swelling ratios of bres were measured at an
higher swelling of NCGCFs is ‘aqueous–nanocurcumin inter-
ambient temperature by using a gravimetric method.35 Initially
action’. Compared to bulk curcumin, nanocurcumin possesses
known weight of dried bres was immersed in 50 mL phosphate
higher aqueous interaction which also enhances the swelling of
buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 for 24 h at 37 C. The bres were
NCGCFs.19 Hence, it was concluded that when all the relative
then removed and their surfaces were blotted with lter paper
components in NCGCFs and CGCFs were being equal, the
and weighed. The swelling patterns of the bres (NCGCFs/
enhanced swelling ratio of NCGCFs was due to ‘size factor’ and
CGCFs) were illustrated in Fig. 4.
‘aqueous–nanocurcumin interaction’. Overall, swelling data
It was noticed primarily that the swelling ratios of the
signicantly conrms that the developed bres were good
developed bres (NCGCFs/CGCFs) were higher than that of pure
absorbents for blood and secretions exudates, which is very
cellulose bre. The signicant result was due to the hydrophilic
essential for wound dressing applications.
nature of gelatin that bound to the developed bres of NCGCFs/
CGCFs, which could able to absorb water more than 5–10 times
as weight as itself.31 Secondly, from Fig. 4A and B, it was clear 3.3. Antimicrobial activity
that the swelling ratio of the bres (both NCGCFs and CGCFs) The main objective of this study is to develop aqueous based
increases with increase in concentration of curcumin/nano- environmental friendly microbial resistant bres by effective
curcumin. It was predicted that the existed voids between the utilization of curcumin. Keeping this in view, novel nano-
particles (curcumin/nanocurcumin) act as both facilitating and curcumin bres were developed as effective antimicrobial
trapping network for incoming water molecules to interact agents against E. coli and S. aureus. Fig. 5 illustrates the anti-
further with gelatin and to accumulate over the bre. The microbial efficiency of the developed bres (NCGCFs/CGCFs).
phenomenon can be comparable with various hydrophilic The inhibition zones exhibited by all the bres (NCGCFs/
hydrogel systems.24 The proportionately increase in number of CGCFs) were found to be in the range 2.5–6 mm. According to
voids with increase in concentration of curcumin/nano- the Standard Antibacterial test “SNV 195920-1992”, specimens
curcumin provides scope for much more water molecules to showing more than 1 mm microbial zone inhibition can be
retain in the voids and accumulate over the bre, resulting considered as good antibacterial agents.42 Hence, the bres
increased swelling ratio values for both NCGCFs and CGCFs developed were considered as good antibacterial agents,
Fig. 4 Swelling behavior of (A) cellulose fibre and various formulations of CGCFs (CGCF-10, CGCF-15 and CGCF-20) and (B) cellulose fibre and
various formulations of NCGCFs (NCGCF-10, NCGCF-15 and NCGCF-20).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 | 3499
View Article Online
3500 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online
2012, 4, 239–250. and M. Babu, Eur. J. pharm. Sci., 2009, 36, 235–245.
8 A. Barik, B. Mishra, L. Shen, H. Mohan, R. M. Kadam, 27 L. Dreesmann, M. Ahlers and B. Schlosshauer, Biomaterials,
S. Dutta, H. Y. Zhang and K. I. Priyadarsini, Free Radical 2007, 28, 5536–5543.
Biol. Med., 2005, 39, 811–822. 28 L. Xiaohua, A. S. Laura, H. Jiang and X. M. Peter,
9 K. Vimala, Y. M. Mohan, K. Varaprasad, N. N. Reddy, Biomaterials, 2009, 30, 2252–2258.
S. Ravindra, N. S. Naidu and K. M. Raju, J. Biomater. 29 D. Peter, R. Unger, V. V. Sandra, C. Veerle, J. S. J. Patric,
Nanobiotechnol., 2011, 2, 55–64. S. Etienne, et al., Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8, 338–344.
10 X. Z. Zhao, T. Jiang, L. Wang, H. Yang, S. Zhang and P. Zhou, 30 E. Rodolfo, G. Sazo, K. Maenaka, W. Gu, P. M. Wood and
J. Mol. Struct., 2010, 984, 316–325. M. B. Bunge, Biomaterials, 2012, 33, 8529–8539.
11 A. Hardjasa, M. Ling, K. Ma and H. Yu, J. Exp. Microbiol. 31 T. Wang, X. K. Zhu, X. T. Xue and D. Y. Wu, Carbohydr.
Immunol., 2010, 14, 161–164. Polym., 2012, 88, 75–83.
12 J. Mráz and H. Nohová, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 32 G. M. Raghavendra, T. Jayaramudu, K. Varaprasad,
1992, 64, 79–83. R. Sadiku, S. S. Ray and K. M. Raju, Carbohydr. Polym.,
13 A. Gescher, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 1993, 6, 245–251. 2013, 93, 553–560.
14 R. W. Lane, B. L. Riddle and J. F. Borzelleca, Toxicol. Appl. 33 D. J. Gardner, G. S. Oporto, R. Mills, M. A. Said and A. Samir,
Pharmacol., 1982, 63, 409–421. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 2008, 22, 545–567.
15 L. Li, F. S. Braiteh and R. Kurzrock, Cancer, 2005, 104, 1322– 34 T. Jayaramudu, G. M. Raghavendra, K. Varaprasad,
1331. R. Sadiku, K. Ramam and K. M. Raju, Carbohydr. Polym.,
16 K. Maiti, K. Mukherjee, A. Gantait, B. P. Saha and 2013, 92, 2193–2200.
P. K. Mukherjee, Int. J. Pharm., 2007, 330, 155–163. 35 T. Jayaramudu, G. M. Raghavendra, K. Varaprasad, R. Sadiku
17 P. Anand, A. B. Kunnumakkara, R. A. Newman and and K. M. Raju, Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, 95, 188–194.
B. B. Aggarwal, Mol. Pharmaceutics, 2007, 4, 807–818. 36 P. G. Bowler, B. I. Duerden and D. G. Armstrong, Clin.
18 N. Luo, K. Varaprasad, K. S. Reddy, A. V. Rajulu and J. Zhang, Microbiol. Rev., 2001, 14, 244–269.
RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 8483–8488. 37 D. M. Suet, G. C. Chitanu and V. I. Pop, React. Funct. Polym.,
19 Bhawana, R. K. Basniwal, H. S. Buttar, V. K. Jain and N. Jain, 2006, 66, 1240–1249.
J. Agric. Food Chem., 2011, 59, 2056–2061. 38 S. M. Li, N. Jia, J. F. Zhu, M. G. Ma, F. Xu, B. Wang and
20 T. A. Holland, Y. Tabata and A. G. Mikos, J. Controlled R. C. Sun, Carbohydr. Polym., 2011, 83, 422–429.
Release, 2003, 91, 299–313. 39 X. Z. Sun, G. R. Williams, X. X. Hou and L. M. Zhu,
21 M. Ozaki and Y. Tabata, J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed., 2005, 16, Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, 94, 147–153.
549–561. 40 B. Lei, K. H. Shin, D. Y. Noh, I. H. Jo, Y. H. Koh, W. Y. Choi
22 Y. Tabata and Y. Ikada, Biomaterials, 1999, 20, 2169– and H. E. Kim, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 14133–14140.
2175. 41 N. Ninan, Y. Grohens, A. Elain, N. Kalarikkal and S. Thomas,
23 M. Yamamoto, Y. Ikada and Y. Tabata, J. Biomater. Sci., Eur. Polym. J., 2013, 49, 2433–2445.
Polym. Ed., 2001, 12, 77–88. 42 M. Pollini, M. Russo, A. Licciulli, A. Sannino and
24 P. R. Reddy, K. Varaprasad, R. Sadiku, K. Ramam, A. Maffezzoli, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 2009, 20, 2361–2366.
G. V. S. Reddy, K. M. Raju and N. S. Reddy, J. Inorg. 43 S. Moreno, T. Scheyer, S. S. Romano and A. A. Vojnov, Free
Organomet. Polym. Mater., 2013, 23, 1054–1060. Radical Res., 2006, 40, 223–231.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 | 3501