You are on page 1of 8

RSC Advances

Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.

View Article Online


PAPER View Journal | View Issue

Microbial resistant nanocurcumin-gelatin-cellulose


fibers for advanced medical applications
Cite this: RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494
Gownolla Malegowd Raghavendra,a Tippabattini Jayaramudu,a
Kokkarachedu Varaprasad,*b Singanamala Rameshc and Konduru Mohana Rajua

Curcumin, a greatly potent, non-toxic and naturally existing bioactive material in turmeric is widely
employed to develop biomedical functional materials due to its environmental friendly nature. In general,
curcumin functional materials were prepared by administrating non-aqueous solvents as a dissolving
medium for curcumin. These non-aqueous solvents cause adverse effects for the environment and
humans. However, if the curcumin functional materials are developed based on aqueous solution then
the adverse effects can be eliminated. In view of this, for the first time aqueous based nanocurcumin
(nanoparticles of curcumin) impregnated gelatin cellulose fibers (NCGCFs) were developed by a green
process. The required nanocurcumin was prepared by ultrasonication process. Transmission electron
microscopy showed the sizes of nanocurcumin exist in the range 2 to 15 nm. Nuclear magnetic
resonance spectra showed no structural modification of nanocurcumin to that of curcumin. The
developed fibres were characterized by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron
microscopy, thermal analysis and swelling studies. Cumulative releasing studies showed slow and
sustained releasing patterns for NCGCFs. A comparative antimicrobial study was performed for
Received 6th November 2013
Accepted 25th November 2013
nanocurcumin impregnated gelatin cellulose fibres (NCGCFs) and curcumin impregnated gelatin
cellulose fibres (CGCFs) against E. coli and S. aureus. The results indicated the superior performance of
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra46429f
NCGCFs over CGCFs. Hence, NCGCFs prepared completely from naturally available materials can be
www.rsc.org/advances considered as a novel kind of functional materials for wound dressing and antimicrobial applications.

systems as solvents for curcumin.8–10 However, these


1. Introduction approaches cause some undesirable effects for the human and
In the case of bulk loss of tissue or nonhealing wounds such as the environment.11–14 Owing to this researchers explored newer
burns, trauma, diabetic, decubitus and venousstasis ulcers, a approaches which involve: the use of adjuvant like piperine that
proper wound dressing is needed to cover the wound area, interferes with glucuronidation; the use of liposomal curcumin;
protect the damaged tissue and if possible to activate the cell the use of curcumin phospholipid complex; the use of struc-
proliferation and stimulate the healing process.1 For this tural analogues of curcumin.15–17 But these methods seem to be
purpose, a natural, non-toxic and biocompatible material is expensive or complicated or to have a low performance.18 In that
highly preferable based on environmental reasons. aspect, recently Bhawana et al. prepared nanocurcumin (nano-
Curcumin, a natural hydrophobic polyphenolic compound particles of curcumin),19 which showed improved aqueous
derived from the rhizome of the herb curcuma longa, possesses solubility, thereby it can be used directly instead of curcumin.
a wide range of biological activity including wound healing, In this investigation, to enhance the curcumin applicability in
anti-bacterial, anti-oxidant, anti-inammatory and anti-cancer biomedical sciences, nanocurcumin was synthesized and used
properties.2–5 Though curcumin possess signicant biomedical along with suitable natural polymers, gelatin and cellulose.
properties, it is poorly soluble in aqueous solvents.6,7 This limits Gelatin, a water soluble protein derived from unwired
its clinical application. Of late, many researchers administrated helices of natural collagen, is widely used in biomedical appli-
non-aqueous solvents or combination of organic and aqueous cations,20–23 particularly in designing wound dressing mate-
rials,24 haemostatic agents,25 tissue engineering scaffolds and
a
drug delivery matrices.26 In addition, it is pro-angiogenic,27 non-
Synthetic Polymer Laboratory, Department of Polymer Science & Technology, Sri
Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapuramu-515003, India
immunogenic,28 biocompatible, biodegradable29 and exhibits
b
Departamento de Ingenierı́a de Materiales–DIMAT, Facultad de Ingenierı́a low inammatory cell response without side effects in the host
Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile. E-mail: varmaindian@gmail.com; tissue.30 Further, gelatin absorbs excess wound exudates
kvaraprasad@udec.cl because of its excellent ability to absorb water more than 5–
c
Phytomedicine Laboratory, Department of Botany, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, 10 times as weight as itself.31
Anantapuramu-515003, India

3494 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online

Paper RSC Advances

In our recent study, natural polymer with silver nano- 2.3. Preparation of nanocurcumin-gelatin cellulose bres
particles impregnated cellulose bres has conrmed signi- (NCGCFs) and curcumin-gelatin cellulose bres (CGCFs)
cant antibacterial properties.32 In surgical zone, cellulose
Finely aqueous dispersed nanocurcumin of various concentra-
bres gained medically more importance as designing
tions in water (10 mg per 5 mL, 15 mg per 5 mL and 20 mg per
Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.

material for scaffolds. Cellulose bre contains cellulose, a


5 mL) were prepared by sonicating the respective solutions for
homopolymer of b-D-glucopyranose units linked together by
15 min. To each of the solutions, 50 mL (1% w/v) gelatin solu-
(1 / 4)-glycosideic bonds.33 Cellulose bres as a scaffold
tion was added. The contents were stirred over orbital shaking
supports injured limb or wound, absorbs blood and secre- incubator at 250 rpm with an ambient temperature of 27  C for
tions exudates and provide pain relief. It serves as the 4 h, followed by 15 min sonication to obtain homogeneous
protective dressing for wound, thereby preventing wound
nanocurcumin gelatin solutions. For the obtained homoge-
contamination from outside environment. Hence, developing
neous solutions, 500 mg of pre-weighed and washed cellulose
antimicrobial property for cellulose bres is an advantageous
bres were immersed, stirred for 4 h at 250 rpm at an ambient
step in improving medical standards in the area of surgical
temperature and sonicated for 15 min to acquire nanocurcumin
zone.
impregnated gelatin cellulose bres (NCGCFs). Finally, various
In view of above, a signicant attempt was made to develop
formulations of NCGCFs (NCGCF-10, NCGCF-15 and NCGCF-
nanocurcumin-gelatin cellulose bres (NCGCFs) for advanced 20) were taken out, air dried and kept in dessicator for further
antimicrobial applications by utilizing completely natural characterizations.
materials. A comparative antimicrobial study was performed for
Analogous to NCGCFs, similar formulations of curcumin
NCGCFs and curcumin impregnated gelatin cellulose bres
impregnated gelatin cellulose bres, CGCFs (CGCF-10, CGCF-15
(CGCFs). The results indicated the superior performance of
and CGCF-20) were prepared directly by taking various
NCGCFs over CGCFs. So far, no work was reported on the
concentrations of curcumin solution (DCM as solvent) instead
nanocurcumin impregnated cellulose bres. For the rst time
aqueous nanocurcumin dispersion. The synthesis routes for
nanocurcumin impregnated gelatin cellulose bers (NCGCFs)
NCGCFs and CGCFs were shown in Scheme 1.
were developed by eco-friendly green process. The improved
therapeutic potentialities of nanocurcumin bres, obtained by
following environmental friendly approach is a promising tool 2.4. Characterizations
to curb micro-organisms and will open a new era in modern bio- The morphology of obtained nanocurcumin was observed with
medical applications. transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1200EX, JEOL, Tokyo,
Japan), performed by placing a drop of the aqueous nano-
curcumin dispersion (10 mL; 2 mg mL1) on the 3 mm copper
2. Experimental Procedures grid and allowed it to dry at ambient temperature. 1H NMR
2.1. Materials spectra was obtained in CDCl3 using Bruker DRX 300 MHz NMR
spectrophotometer. Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy
Curcumin (assay of 98%) supplied by Sigma Aldrich (Bengaluru,
(FTIR) was conducted to investigate the possible chemical
India). Cotton cellulose bres (1 mm thickness) were purchased
interactions among cellulose bres, gelatin and nanocurcumin
from SIMCO thread mills (Salem, Chennai, India). Gelatin (GT;
by using a Perkin Elmer (Model Impact 410, Wisconsin, MI,
product no. 54045) was obtained from S.D. Fine Chemicals
USA) spectrophotometer over the scanning range 500–4000
(India). Dichloromethane (DCM) purchased from Merck speci-
cm1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to
alities Pvt. Ltd (Mumbai, India). All the chemicals used in this
observe the surface morphology (JEOL JEM 7500F, Tokyo,
work are of analytical grade. Double distilled water was used
Japan) of the developed bres at an accelerating voltage 3 kV. All
thorough out the experiments.
samples were gold coated previous to examination with a led
SEM. The thermal analysis was conducted on SDT Q 600
thermal analyzer (T. A. Instruments-water LLC, Newcastle, DE,
2.2. Synthesis of curcumin nanoparticles (nanocurcumin)
USA), at a heating rate of 20  C min1 with 100 mL min1
Curcumin nanoparticles were prepared by ultrasonication nitrogen gas ow rate. Curcumin/nanocurcumin releasing
technique. In a typical synthesis, 1 mL of curcumin solution patterns of the bres were monitored by using UV-Vis spectro-
(0.5 w/v%) prepared from dichloromethane (DCM) was sprayed photometer (Elico-SL 164, Hyderabad, India).
dropwise into 50 mL boiling water at a ow rate of 0.2 mL min1
under ultrasonic conditions, with an ultrasonic power of 100 W
and a frequency of 30 kHz, similar to the method adopted by 2.5. Cumulative releasing studies
Bhawana et al.19 Aer 15 min sonication, the contents were Recent studies have indicated that it is important to know the
stirred at 200–800 rpm at ambient temperature for about 20 min antibacterial activity over a period of time. To provide efficient
till all the dichloromethane was evaporated and a clear orange- antibacterial activity over a period of time a stable and pro-
colored solution was remained. The solution was ultra- longed release of curcumin/nanocurcumin is necessary. In
centrifuged for 20 minutes at 12 000 rpm and freeze-dried to order to study the release of curcumin/nanocurcumin from the
obtain curcumin nanoparticles (nanocurcumin) and utilized for developed bres, known weights of bres were placed in a
further studies. measured volume (5 mL) of 7.4 pH buffer at 37  C and the

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 | 3495
View Article Online

RSC Advances Paper


Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.

Scheme 1 Schematically illustrating the synthesis routes for NCGCFs and CGCFs.

released amount of curcumin was determined at different time factor has stimulated to develop microbial resistant nano-
intervals by recording the absorbance of release medium by curcumin impregnated gelatin cellulose bers (NCGCFs) for
UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The absorption of the solutions of wound dressing scaffolds. Further, employing curcumin as
curcumin was measured at lmax 491.2 nm.2 nanoparticles (nanocurcumin) has exhibited pronounced
activity than administering directly as curcumin.19 The method
2.6. Swelling properties adopted to develop NCGCFs was a green process, feasible at
ambient conditions without the aid of any external chemical
The swelling ratio or swelling capacity (Sg/g) of all the bres
agent. The process of preparing antimicrobial bres (NCGCFs)
developed was determined by swelling them in phosphate
was systematically illustrated in Scheme 1: Step 1: preparation
buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 for 24 h at 37  C using eqn (1):
of nanocurcumin by a physical ultrasonication process. Step 2:
preparation of aqueous nanocurcumin dispersion. Step 3:
Swelling ratio (Sg/g) ¼ [Ws  Wd]/Wd (1)
fabrication of antimicrobial NCGCFs from cellulose bres.
where, Ws and Wd denote the weight of the swollen cellulose To compare the enhanced results of NCGCFs, curcumin
bre at equilibrium and the weight of the dry cellulose bre, impregnated gelatin cellulose bres (CGCFs) were also prepared
respectively. The data provided is an average value of 3 indi- by taking curcumin solution (DCM as solvent). The synthesis
vidual sample readings. route for CGCFs was shown in Scheme 1. The key role of gelatin
is to stabilize the nanocurcumin with cellulose bres and also to
release the nanocurcumin in sustained manner for longer
2.7. Antimicrobial activity
duration. Gelatin was particularly chosen due to its wide
The antimicrobial activity of developed bres was tested against applications in biomedical eld, particularly in designing
Staphylococcus aureus (G+) MTCC-7443 and Escherichia coli (G ) wound dressings materials. It also exhibits low inammatory
MTCC-1668, obtained from the Institute of Microbial Tech- cell response without side effects in the host tissue.30
nology, Chandigarh, India. The required nutrient agar medium Examination of nanocurcumin by TEM (Fig. 1A(a–c)) showed
was prepared by mixing peptone (5.0 g), beef extract (3.0 g), the nanoparticles were spherical in shape and exists in the size
sodium chloride (5.0 g) and agar (15.0 g) in 1000 mL of distilled range of 2 to 15 nm. The quite interesting aspect of nano-
water and the pH was adjusted to 7.0.34,35 The agar medium was curcumin was, though it was physically compacted to nano-
sterilized in a conical ask at a pressure of 6.8 kg (15 lbs) for dimension, it was structurally not altered and showed NMR
30 min and transferred into sterilized petri dishes in a laminar spectrum similar to that of the pure curcumin (Fig. 1B). In 1H
air ow chamber (Microlt Laminar Flow Ultra Clean Air Unit, NMR spectra (Fig. 1B), the peaks at d 3.951 and 5.802 ppm
Mumbai, India) for solidication. Aer solidication, 50 mL showed the presence of intact methoxy groups and the methine
(108 CFU mL1) of microbial culture was uniformly spread out. proton in enolic form. The peaks in the range of d 6.841–7.138
Over the petri dishes, bres (NCGCFs/CGCFs) each of 5 mm ppm showed the presence of aromatic protons.19 Two doublets
length were distributed and incubated for 24 h at 37  C to were assigned for olenic protons at d 6.504 and 7.618 ppm
obtain inhibition zones. Finally, the formed inhibition zones respectively and were coinciding with those many of previously
were measured and photographed. reported literatures. Over all, NMR spectra suggested the
chemical integrity of nanocurcumin was identical to that of
3. Results and discussions curcumin. Structure of curcumin and the 1H NMR spectra of
nanocurcumin were presented in Fig. 1B.
Ordinary wound dressings allow microorganisms to exhibit To understand the morphology of the bres, SEM exami-
undesirable effects on wounds. This is one of the main factors nation was carried out for NCGCF, CGCF, gelatin-cellulose bre
for disease transmission and subsequent tissue damage.36 This and pure cellulose bre. SEM image of NCGCF (Fig. 2A) clearly

3496 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online

Paper RSC Advances


Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.

Fig. 1 (A) TEM images of nanocurcumin (a–c) and (B) 1H NMR spectra of nanocurcumin in CDCl3 and structure of curcumin.

depicts the uniform distribution of curcumin nanoparticles FTIR spectroscopy is an important tool that indicates the
over gelatin bound cellulose bre which were highly stabilized combined interaction of nanocurcumin, gelatin and pure
by hydrophilic groups of gelatin. In case of CGCFs (Fig. 2B), cellulose bre in NCGCFs bres. The spectra of pure cellulose
irregular distribution of bulky curcumin with less stabilized by bre, nanocurcumin, gelatin and NCGCF were shown in Fig. 2B.
hydrophilic groups of gelatin could be seen. Fig. 2E represents For pure cellulose bre, characteristic peaks at around 3364
SEM image of pure cellulose bre. The SEM image of gelatin- cm1, 2924 cm1 and at around 1311 cm1 corresponding to
cellulose bre (Fig. 2D) were prepared from 1% gelatin solution –OH stretching frequency, >CH2 stretching vibration and C–H
that was used in the synthesis of NCGCFs/CGCFs showed a bending mode respectively; characteristic bands at 1150 and
smooth surface without any particle distribution. This indi- 1015 cm1 are assigned to the C–O–C from the glucosidic units
cates that the distributed particles in case of NCGCFs and or from b-(1 / 4)-glucosidic bonds.37,38 For nanocurcumin, the
CGCFs are only due to nanocurcumin/curcumin respectively. bands observed at 3346 cm1, 1591 cm1, 1508 cm1, 1263
Also it could be clearly seen from Fig. 2A and B that due to size cm1, and 1142 cm1 are respectively attributed to the phenolic
factor, curcumin in its nano form exists more in number O–H stretching, stretching vibrations of the benzene ring, C]C
and more in quantity over NCGCFs than in bulk form over vibrations, aromatic C–O stretching and C–O–C stretching
CGCFs. Further, the presence of nanocurcumin/curcumin over modes.39 Gelatin showed characteristic peaks at 3284 cm1 due
gelatin bound cellulose bres was technically conrmed to N–H stretching, at 1634 cm1 due to C]O stretching (amide
through its bonding interactions by using FTIR spectral data I), at 1540 cm1 due to N–H bending (amide II) and at
and thermal data. 1236 cm1 due to C–N (amide III).40,41 The spectra of NCGCFs

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 | 3497
View Article Online

RSC Advances Paper


Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.

Fig. 2 SEM images of (A) NCGCFs fibre, (B) CGCFs fibre, (D) gelatin-cellulose fibre, (E) pure cellulose fibre, and (C) FTIR spectra of pure cellulose
fibre, nanocurcumin, gelatin and NCGCFs fibre.

comprise a composite of the cellulose bre, nanocurcumin and occurs at around 398.48  C. The thermal decomposition residue
gelatin, displaying all the characteristic bands of cellulose bre, of NCGCFs at 600  C was 25.04%, an intermediate value of the
nanocurcumin and gelatin. This clearly indicates their bonding remaining thermal residues (cellulose bre (15.45%), gelatin
interaction. (23.97%) and nanocurcumin (28.94%)). The intermediate value
Thermal property of bres is a valuable piece of evidence that indicates that all the components in NCGCF were well bound to
provides the information on physical characteristics and the give a normalized result. Based on the thermal data, it was
components present in the bres as well. The primary ther- evident that in NCGCFs all the components were well bind as a
mogram of the bres was shown in Fig. 3A. The results indi- composite to exhibit good thermal stability.
cated that, in all the samples, an initial weight loss at a
temperature below 100  C was observed due to the loss of
moisture present on the surface. The initial degradation of 3.1. Cumulative releasing studies
NCGCFs occurs at around 290.67  C, higher than all of its The cumulative releasing studies (Fig. 3B) demonstrated that
individual components and the nal degradation temperature the rate of curcumin/nanocurcumin release is different for

Fig. 3 (A) TGA curves of pure cellulose fibre, gelatin, nanocurcumin and NCGCFs fibre, (B) % cumulative releasing studies of CGCF-20 and
NCGCF-20.

3498 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online

Paper RSC Advances

NCGCFs and CGCFs. In comparison with both the bres with increase in concentration. Further, for the same concen-
(NCGCFs and CGCFs), CGCFs release curcumin at a faster rate tration, the swelling ratio values of NCGCFs (Fig. 4B) are higher
than NCGCFs. CGCFs released all the amount of curcumin that than CGCFs (Fig. 4A). This was due to ‘size factor’ and
present in it at about 16 h where as NCGCFs showed at about ‘aqueous–nanocurcumin interaction’. Due to size factor, for the
Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.

60 h. The observed slow and sustained release of nanocurcumin same quantity of material, stoichiometrically nanocurcumin
from NCGCFs was due to more stabilization of nanocurcumin exists more in number than bulk curcumin, thereby stoichio-
by the hydrophilic groups of gelatin, owing to its size factor. The metrically more number of voids will exist to retain more
prolonged release of nanocurcumin from NCGCFs suggests the number of water molecules in case of NCGCFs. Apart from this,
usefulness of the product towards wound care applications for a size factor allows smaller nanocurcumin to distribute more
longer duration. uniformly with well dened voids over NCGCFs, whereas, these
well dened voids were absent in case of CGCFs. Owing to these
3.2. Swelling ratio reasons, comparatively large amount of water molecules will be
retained and accumulated in the more and well dened voids of
Swelling ratio plays a signicant role in biomedical applica-
NCGCFs than lesser irregular voids of CGCFs, resulting higher
tions, particularly in antibacterial applications. In the present
swelling for NCGCFs. The other factor that contributes for
investigation, the swelling ratios of bres were measured at an
higher swelling of NCGCFs is ‘aqueous–nanocurcumin inter-
ambient temperature by using a gravimetric method.35 Initially
action’. Compared to bulk curcumin, nanocurcumin possesses
known weight of dried bres was immersed in 50 mL phosphate
higher aqueous interaction which also enhances the swelling of
buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 for 24 h at 37  C. The bres were
NCGCFs.19 Hence, it was concluded that when all the relative
then removed and their surfaces were blotted with lter paper
components in NCGCFs and CGCFs were being equal, the
and weighed. The swelling patterns of the bres (NCGCFs/
enhanced swelling ratio of NCGCFs was due to ‘size factor’ and
CGCFs) were illustrated in Fig. 4.
‘aqueous–nanocurcumin interaction’. Overall, swelling data
It was noticed primarily that the swelling ratios of the
signicantly conrms that the developed bres were good
developed bres (NCGCFs/CGCFs) were higher than that of pure
absorbents for blood and secretions exudates, which is very
cellulose bre. The signicant result was due to the hydrophilic
essential for wound dressing applications.
nature of gelatin that bound to the developed bres of NCGCFs/
CGCFs, which could able to absorb water more than 5–10 times
as weight as itself.31 Secondly, from Fig. 4A and B, it was clear 3.3. Antimicrobial activity
that the swelling ratio of the bres (both NCGCFs and CGCFs) The main objective of this study is to develop aqueous based
increases with increase in concentration of curcumin/nano- environmental friendly microbial resistant bres by effective
curcumin. It was predicted that the existed voids between the utilization of curcumin. Keeping this in view, novel nano-
particles (curcumin/nanocurcumin) act as both facilitating and curcumin bres were developed as effective antimicrobial
trapping network for incoming water molecules to interact agents against E. coli and S. aureus. Fig. 5 illustrates the anti-
further with gelatin and to accumulate over the bre. The microbial efficiency of the developed bres (NCGCFs/CGCFs).
phenomenon can be comparable with various hydrophilic The inhibition zones exhibited by all the bres (NCGCFs/
hydrogel systems.24 The proportionately increase in number of CGCFs) were found to be in the range 2.5–6 mm. According to
voids with increase in concentration of curcumin/nano- the Standard Antibacterial test “SNV 195920-1992”, specimens
curcumin provides scope for much more water molecules to showing more than 1 mm microbial zone inhibition can be
retain in the voids and accumulate over the bre, resulting considered as good antibacterial agents.42 Hence, the bres
increased swelling ratio values for both NCGCFs and CGCFs developed were considered as good antibacterial agents,

Fig. 4 Swelling behavior of (A) cellulose fibre and various formulations of CGCFs (CGCF-10, CGCF-15 and CGCF-20) and (B) cellulose fibre and
various formulations of NCGCFs (NCGCF-10, NCGCF-15 and NCGCF-20).

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 | 3499
View Article Online

RSC Advances Paper

exhibited enhanced antimicrobial efficiency seems to be


appropriate.
It was reported that antimicrobial action of phenolic
compounds was related to the inactivation of cellular enzymes,
Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.

which depended on the rate of penetration of the substance into


the cell or caused by membrane permeability changes.43 Higher
surface area of curcumin nanonanoparticles provides compar-
atively more interaction surface for nanocurcumin to interact
with bacteria and smaller size of it facilitates to penetrate more
effectively inside the cell wall, causing bacterial death. In over
all, the mechanism of antibacterial activity was believed to be
anchoring of nanocurcumin to the cell wall of the bacterial cell,
Fig. 5 Antibacterial activity against (A) E. coli and (B) S. aureus breaking it, and then penetrating inside the cell. The penetrated
exhibited by (o) pure cellulose fibre, (a) CGCF-10, (b) CGCF-20, (c)
nanocurcumin disrupt the cell organelles and kill the cell
NCGCF-10 and (d) NCGCF-20.
through lysis.19 The antibacterial activity was more pronounced
against S. aureus (G+) than E. coli (G) due to which inhibition
effective in killing the bacteria. From Fig. 5, it was noticed that zones were formed higher for S. aureus (G+) than E. coli (G)
NCGCFs, developed based on aqueous solution showed better (Fig. 5). This variation in antibacterial activity is due to the
inhibition zones than CGCFs, developed based on non-aqueous difference in their cell membrane constituents and structure.19
solvent (DCM). This clearly indicates the superior performance It is known that S. aureus (G+) contain an outer peptidoglycan
of nanocurcumin impregnated gelatin cellulose bres layer, while E. coli (G) contain an outer phospholipidic
(NCGCFs). The superior performance was due to presence of membrane, both of which undergo different types of interaction
quantitatively and stoichiometrically more nanocurcumin when encountered by curcumin.19
molecules over NCGCFs than CGCFs that involved in bacterial
devastation process. Due to increase in quantity and nano- 4. Conclusion
curcumin number, more number of curcumin nanoparticles
will be released from NCGCFs and act on relatively more From the present investigation, aqueous based nanocurcumin
number of bacterial colonies and destroy, resulting higher impregnated gelatin cellulose bers (NCGCFs) were developed
bacterial inhibition zone for NCGCFs than CGCFs. Also, as the as effective antimicrobial agents. The process adopted was a
antibacterial activity was performed over a period of 24 h, the green process and the materials employed were of natural
amount of curcumin that act against the bacteria is the amount origin. The developed NCGCFs showed more pronounced
of curcumin that released from bres at 24 h. The amount of antibacterial activity than CGCFs. Hence, NCGCFs have great
curcumin release (%) can be calculated from the % cumulative potential for their utilization in wound/burn dressings as well
release curves (Fig. 3B). It was clearly evident from Fig. 3B that as in the fabrication of antibacterial nishings and textiles.
by the time 24 h, CGCFs releases all its impregnated curcumin,
where as NCGCFs releases only 80.24% of curcumin. This Acknowledgements
indicates that though the antibacterial activity of CGCFs was
due to 100% release of curcumin, the concerned inhibition The author (IF 110192) wish to acknowledge the Department of
zones exhibited by CGCFs were less than the inhibition zones Science & Technology (DST, INIDA) and Ministry of Science &
exhibited by NCGCFs where the curcumin release was only Technology for providing nancial assistance through Innova-
80.24%. This indicates the higher efficiency of the NCGCFs tion In Science Pursuit for Inspired Research (INSPIRE) pro-
bres than CGCFs. Further, to conrm the higher efficiency of gramme. The authors (KVP) thank the Fondecyt Proyecto no.:
NCGCFs than CGCFs in curbing the bacteria, antibacterial test 3130748 Chile (South America).
was performed for the similar concentrations of homogeneous
curcumin and nanocurcumin gelatin solutions, which were References
used during synthesis of NCGCFs and CGCFs. The test was
carried out by maintaining the conditions similar to the 1 K. Ulubayram, A. Nur Cakar, P. Korkusuz, C. Ertan and
conditions that were maintained for antibacterial test for N. Hasirci, Biomaterials, 2001, 22, 1345–1356.
bres. The results undoubtedly reached the predicted expec- 2 K. Varaprasad, K. Vimala, S. Ravindra, N. N. Reddy,
tations and showed higher inhibition zones for nanocurcumin G. V. S. Reddy and K. M. Raju, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med.,
gelatin solutions than curcumin gelatin solutions, suggesting 2011, 22, 1863–1872.
the higher efficiency of nanocurcumin and thereby nano- 3 J. H. Naama, A. A. Al-Temimi and A. A. H. Al-Amiery, Afr. J.
curcumin impregnated NCGCFs. With these results, it was Pure Appl. Chem., 2010, 4, 68–73.
concluded that the higher inhibition zones exhibited by 4 G. P. Nagaraju, S. Aliya, S. F. Zafar, R. Basha, R. Diaz and
NCGCFs were not duly as a result of quantitative and stoi- B. F. El-Rayes, Integr. Biol., 2012, 4, 996–1007.
chiometric parameters but impact of nanocurcumin was also 5 G. Guo, S. Z. Fu, L. X. Zhou, H. Liang, M. Fan, F. Luo,
played. Based on above experimental ndings, NCGCFs Z. Y. Qian and Y. Q. Wei, Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 3825–3832.

3500 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
View Article Online

Paper RSC Advances

6 K. Varaprasad, Y. M. Mohan, K. Vimala and K. M. Raju, 25 N. N. Reddy, K. Varaprasad, S. Ravindra, G. V. S. Reddy,


J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2011, 121, 784–796. K. M. S. Reddy, K. M. M. Reddy and K. M. Raju, Colloids
7 S. Mangalathillam, N. S. Rejinold, A. Nair, Surf., A, 2011, 385, 20–27.
V. K. Lakshmanan, S. V. Nair and R. Jayakumar, Nanoscale, 26 N. Adhirajan, N. Shanmugasundaram, S. Shanmuganathan
Published on 25 November 2013. Downloaded by Missouri University of Science and Technology on 22/08/2014 13:05:41.

2012, 4, 239–250. and M. Babu, Eur. J. pharm. Sci., 2009, 36, 235–245.
8 A. Barik, B. Mishra, L. Shen, H. Mohan, R. M. Kadam, 27 L. Dreesmann, M. Ahlers and B. Schlosshauer, Biomaterials,
S. Dutta, H. Y. Zhang and K. I. Priyadarsini, Free Radical 2007, 28, 5536–5543.
Biol. Med., 2005, 39, 811–822. 28 L. Xiaohua, A. S. Laura, H. Jiang and X. M. Peter,
9 K. Vimala, Y. M. Mohan, K. Varaprasad, N. N. Reddy, Biomaterials, 2009, 30, 2252–2258.
S. Ravindra, N. S. Naidu and K. M. Raju, J. Biomater. 29 D. Peter, R. Unger, V. V. Sandra, C. Veerle, J. S. J. Patric,
Nanobiotechnol., 2011, 2, 55–64. S. Etienne, et al., Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8, 338–344.
10 X. Z. Zhao, T. Jiang, L. Wang, H. Yang, S. Zhang and P. Zhou, 30 E. Rodolfo, G. Sazo, K. Maenaka, W. Gu, P. M. Wood and
J. Mol. Struct., 2010, 984, 316–325. M. B. Bunge, Biomaterials, 2012, 33, 8529–8539.
11 A. Hardjasa, M. Ling, K. Ma and H. Yu, J. Exp. Microbiol. 31 T. Wang, X. K. Zhu, X. T. Xue and D. Y. Wu, Carbohydr.
Immunol., 2010, 14, 161–164. Polym., 2012, 88, 75–83.
12 J. Mráz and H. Nohová, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 32 G. M. Raghavendra, T. Jayaramudu, K. Varaprasad,
1992, 64, 79–83. R. Sadiku, S. S. Ray and K. M. Raju, Carbohydr. Polym.,
13 A. Gescher, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 1993, 6, 245–251. 2013, 93, 553–560.
14 R. W. Lane, B. L. Riddle and J. F. Borzelleca, Toxicol. Appl. 33 D. J. Gardner, G. S. Oporto, R. Mills, M. A. Said and A. Samir,
Pharmacol., 1982, 63, 409–421. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 2008, 22, 545–567.
15 L. Li, F. S. Braiteh and R. Kurzrock, Cancer, 2005, 104, 1322– 34 T. Jayaramudu, G. M. Raghavendra, K. Varaprasad,
1331. R. Sadiku, K. Ramam and K. M. Raju, Carbohydr. Polym.,
16 K. Maiti, K. Mukherjee, A. Gantait, B. P. Saha and 2013, 92, 2193–2200.
P. K. Mukherjee, Int. J. Pharm., 2007, 330, 155–163. 35 T. Jayaramudu, G. M. Raghavendra, K. Varaprasad, R. Sadiku
17 P. Anand, A. B. Kunnumakkara, R. A. Newman and and K. M. Raju, Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, 95, 188–194.
B. B. Aggarwal, Mol. Pharmaceutics, 2007, 4, 807–818. 36 P. G. Bowler, B. I. Duerden and D. G. Armstrong, Clin.
18 N. Luo, K. Varaprasad, K. S. Reddy, A. V. Rajulu and J. Zhang, Microbiol. Rev., 2001, 14, 244–269.
RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 8483–8488. 37 D. M. Suet, G. C. Chitanu and V. I. Pop, React. Funct. Polym.,
19 Bhawana, R. K. Basniwal, H. S. Buttar, V. K. Jain and N. Jain, 2006, 66, 1240–1249.
J. Agric. Food Chem., 2011, 59, 2056–2061. 38 S. M. Li, N. Jia, J. F. Zhu, M. G. Ma, F. Xu, B. Wang and
20 T. A. Holland, Y. Tabata and A. G. Mikos, J. Controlled R. C. Sun, Carbohydr. Polym., 2011, 83, 422–429.
Release, 2003, 91, 299–313. 39 X. Z. Sun, G. R. Williams, X. X. Hou and L. M. Zhu,
21 M. Ozaki and Y. Tabata, J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed., 2005, 16, Carbohydr. Polym., 2013, 94, 147–153.
549–561. 40 B. Lei, K. H. Shin, D. Y. Noh, I. H. Jo, Y. H. Koh, W. Y. Choi
22 Y. Tabata and Y. Ikada, Biomaterials, 1999, 20, 2169– and H. E. Kim, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 14133–14140.
2175. 41 N. Ninan, Y. Grohens, A. Elain, N. Kalarikkal and S. Thomas,
23 M. Yamamoto, Y. Ikada and Y. Tabata, J. Biomater. Sci., Eur. Polym. J., 2013, 49, 2433–2445.
Polym. Ed., 2001, 12, 77–88. 42 M. Pollini, M. Russo, A. Licciulli, A. Sannino and
24 P. R. Reddy, K. Varaprasad, R. Sadiku, K. Ramam, A. Maffezzoli, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 2009, 20, 2361–2366.
G. V. S. Reddy, K. M. Raju and N. S. Reddy, J. Inorg. 43 S. Moreno, T. Scheyer, S. S. Romano and A. A. Vojnov, Free
Organomet. Polym. Mater., 2013, 23, 1054–1060. Radical Res., 2006, 40, 223–231.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 3494–3501 | 3501

You might also like