Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles 11/6/2020 4:35 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk, By A.

Malfavon, Deputy Clerk

1 SAMUEL D. INGHAM III

State Bar #66279
2 444 South Flower Street
Suite 4260
3 Los Angeles, California 90071-2966

4 Telephone: (310) 556-9751

Fax: (310) 556-1311
5 E-mail: sam@inghamlaw.com

6 Court-Appointed Counsel For

BRITNEY JEAN SPEARS, Conservatee
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

10

11 In the Matter of the No. BP 108 870

Conservatorship of the Person
12 and Estate of CONSERVATEE'S OBJECTIONS TO:

13 TWELFTH ACCOUNT CURRENT;

REPORT OF CONSERVATOR OF
14 THE ESTATE; PETITION FOR ITS
SETTLEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL
15 BRITNEY JEAN SPEARS, THEREOF

16 Assigned To:
Judge BRENDA J. PENNY
17 Department: 4
Hearing Date: 11110120
18 Time: 1:30 p.m.
Calendar#: 5001
19 Conservatee.

20

21 Conservatee, BRITNEY JEAN SPEARS ("BRITNEY" or

22 "Obj ector" 1 ) , hereby objects to the "TWELFTH ACCOUNT CURRENT;

23 REPORT OF CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE; PETITION FOR ITS SETTLEMENT

24 AND FOR APPROVAL THEREOF" filed by JAMES P. SPEARS ("JAMES") ( "the

25 Accounting") on the following grounds.

26 Ill
27
1
28 For convenience, this pleading will refer to members of the
SPEARS family by their first names. No disrespect is intended.

1
111323 v2 OBJECTIONS TO 12 ACCOUNT CURRENT
 1. FIRST ISSUE: PAYMENT OF EXCESSIVE FEES TO TRI STAR

2 a. Facts

3 TRI STAR SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT GROUP became

4 BRITNEY's business manager more than ten years ago. In that role,

5 its compensation was calculated as a percentage of BRITNEY's gross

6 entertainment related income. This arrangement generated millions

7 of dollars in commissions for TRI STAR over the years that BRITNEY

8 toured and performed actively. But all that changed when she

9 announced an "indefinite work hiatus" in January 2019.

10 On November 12, 2019, LOU TAYLOR, CEO of TRI

11 STAR emailed JAMES as follows 2 :

12 Jamie -

13 We just ran time and billing for Britney and all of the
entities. We have a (400k) loss on time and billing this
14 year - we have been paid &179k.

15 I want to stay at 5 percent commission but set a floor of

$500k a year.
16
Meaning we would not get paid less than the $500k this
17 year & 2020 so we would get a retainer payment each month
and each quarter settle it up against the commission.
18 Unlike the other professionals management and legal we
are still having to do work even though Bis not includ-
19 ing the court accounting.

20 Then next year we will look at time and billing again.

21 Is this approved?

22 A month later, on December 20, 2019 at 10:50

23 a.m. ROBIN GREENHILL of TRI STAR sent JAMES a spreadsheet entitled

24 "Tri Star YTD Commissions" which compared the actual commissions

25 received by TRI STAR during 2019 to the $500,000.00 "minimum fee

26
27 2
See email chain ending July 21, 2020 from JAMES' attorney to
28 Objector's attorney attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by
this reference.

2
111323 v2 OBJECTIONS TO 12 ACCOUNT CURRENT
 amount for services rendered" and concluded that the "amount owed"

2 was $308,974.51. Less than two hours later, JAMES replied "ap-

3 proved" to Ms. GREENHILL. TRI STAR received that amount from

4 BRITNEY on December 21, 1019 the very next day.

5 Knowing nothing about this new fee arrangement,

6 two days later counsel for BRITNEY began requesting information

7 from JAMES' counsel regarding the fees paid to TRI STAR and others

8 whose compensation is based on a percentage 3 • The $500,000.00

9 minimum fee was disclosed to counsel for BRITNEY in January 2020

10 but it took counsel for JAMES nearly seven months from that first

11 request to forward the email chain discussed above. She represented

12 that "the agreement [with TRI STAR] was recently modified pursuant

13 to the correspondence below". However, counsel also admitted that

14 she doesn't have "access" to a copy of the written contract with

15 TRI STAR, and in fact asked BRITNEY's counsel for a copy.

16

17 b. Objections

18 The foregoing facts reveal that during the

19 account period JAMES agreed on BRITNEY's behalf:

20 ( 1) to change TRI STAR's long standing

21 compensation arrangement from a percentage to a flat minimum fee of

22 $500,000.00 based on "time and billing"; and

23 (2) to grant TRI STAR at the very end of the

24 year a retroactive raise of more than $300,000.00 for its services

25 during 2019, representing a 260 % increase from the amount it wou l d

26 otherwise have been entitled to receive for t he year.

27
3
28 Email from SAMUEL D. INGHAM III dated December 23, 2019
attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated by t his reference.

3
111323 v2 OBJECTIONS TO 12 ACCOUNT CURRENT
 1 These radical new arrangements were made b y

2 JAMES without any apparent legal obligation to do so. There is no

3 indication that he questioned the propriety of TRI STAR's huge fee

4 increase, attempted to negotiate a more favorable deal, or even

5 requested supporting detail for the "time and billing." Moreover,

6 the new fee arrangements were not disclosed to the Court other than

7 by a single line entry in the redacted portion of the Accounting.

8 Objector believes that the retroactive fees

9 paid to TRI STAR in the amount of $308,974.51 are excessive and

10 should be disallowed in the ir entirety as a credit on the Account-

11 ing.

12

13 2. SECOND ISSUE: PAYMENT OF LOU TAYLOR' S PERSONAL

14 LEGAL FEES

15 a. Facts

16 During the account period, BRITNEY paid SIDLEY

17 AUSTIN LLP ("S I DLEY") in excess of $350,000.00 in attorneys' fees

18 and costs. All of these fees and costs are identified on The

19 Accounting as "Lutfi v. Spears". In fact, SIDLEY did represent

20 BRITNEY in connection with two litigated matters against OSAMA

21 "Sam" LUTFI in 2019 4 •

22 SIDLEY also represented LOU TAYLOR, CEO of TRI

23 STAR, personally during 2019. A copy of a "cease and desist le t ter"

24 dated June 3, 2019 sent by SIDLEY on Ms. TAYLOR's behalf is

25 attached as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by this reference. SIDLEY

26 billed the cost of this letter to BRITNEY on its statement dated

27
4
28 SPEARS v. LUTFI, LASC #19 STRO 03041 and a confidential JAMS
proceeding.

4
ll 1323 v2 OBJECTIONS TO 12 ACCOUNT CURRENT
 August 9, 2019 referenced to "Sam Lutfi v. Andrew Wallet, as Co-

2 Conservator". The fee was paid by one of BRITNEY's entities during

3 the account period. SIDLEY's direct representation of Ms. TAYLOR

4 personally was not disclosed to counsel for Objector.

6 b. Objections

7 In the absence of a contractual obligation to

8 do so, voluntary payment of Ms. TAYLOR's legal expenses in all

9 likelihood would represent an impermissible gift of the conserva-

10 tee's funds to Ms. TAYLOR. Having the same law firm r epresent both

11 BRITNEY and Ms. TAYLOR also presents serious conflict of interest

12 issues which were not disclosed to BRITNEY's counsel.

13 During the account period, BRITNEY paid

14 hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees to SIDLEY and othe r

15 law firms. Given the gravi t y of the financial and ethical issues

16 involved, Objector believes that all charges for attorneys' fees

17 during the account period (other than those of FREEMAN, FREEMAN &

18 SMILEY and counsel for Objector) should be audited by someone other

19 than JAMES, his attorneys, accountants, or other agents to

20 determine the appropriateness thereof in order to evaluate a

21 possible objection to these items by BRITNEY.

22

23 3. THIRD ISSUE: PAYMENT OF ACCOUNTING FEES TO TRI STAR

24 a. Facts

25 As discussed above, TRI STAR received compensa-

26 tion for its services as a percentage of BRITNEY's entertainment

27 related income until the very end of 2019. However, the Accounting

28 also reveals an additional payment of $80,000.00 to TRI STAR dated

5
111323 v2 OBJECTIONS TO 12 ACCOUNT CURRENT
1 before the alleged modification of TRI STAR's agreement under the

2 category "Professional Fees - Accounting".

4 b. Objection

5 In the absence of a contractual obligation to

6 pay TRI STAR separately for "accounting services", this payment is

7 excessive. Further supporting information is needed from JAMES in

8 order to evaluate a possible objection to this item by BRITNEY.

10 4. FOURTH ISSUE: PAYMENT OF RENT BY JAMES

11 a. Facts

12 The Accounting alleges as follows:

13 During the period covered by the Account, Bridgemore

Timber, LLC, one of the entities owned by the Conserva-
14 tee, received rent from Spears Management, LLC, an entity
owned by Mr. Spears, as reflected on Schedule F-3. The
15 receipts represent rent paid by Spears Management, LLC
for storage space. This tran sact ion was authorized by Mr.
16 Wallet, the former Co-Conservator of the Estate 5 •

17

18 In fact, there is no entry in the Accounting at all for income paid

19 by SPEARS MANAGEMENT, LLC, to BRIDGEMORE TIMBER, LLC.

20
21 b. Objection

22 If JAMES or SPEARS MANAGEMENT, LLC are

23 utilizing storage space belonging to BRITNEY as alleged in the

24 Accounting, rent should be paid as alleged in the Accounting.

25 Further supporting information is needed from JAMES in order to

26 evaluate a possible object i on to this item by BRITNEY.

27
28 5
Page 5, lines 12-16 (unredacted and redacted versions)

6
111323 v2 OBJECTIONS TO 12 ACCOUNT CURRENT
 1 5. FIFTH ISSUE: "INVESTMENT VALUATION DIFFERENCES"

2 a. Facts

3 The Accounting includes a credit for $77,725.26

4 labeled "Investment Valuation Differences" 6 • In response to a

5 calendar note by the Probate Attorney questioning this credit,

6 JAMES filed a response offering this explanation:

7 This is an itemized credit that is reported each year on

the Accounting and is an investment valuation d i fference
8 This takes into account the timing difference between the
value of investments on the statement date and the final
9 settlement date for sales/purchases that occur near the
end of the Accounting reporting period. It is a normal
10 function of investments to have these timing differences,
and due to the high value of Conservatee's investments
11 and portfolio, the combined effect is more significant
than it would be for a portfolio of a lesser value 7 •
12

13 b. Objection

14 CEB, Fiduciary Accounting Handbook (2020)

15 states "personal representatives, conservators and guardians must

16 report their gains on sales and must calculate the amount of the

17 gain. Prob C §1016(a) (5). The Probate Code says nothing more than

18 this, but because it requires the account to balance ( Prob C

19 §1061(c)), when one considers the rules for reporting receipts and

20 disbursements, the formula for calculating gain emerges. That

21 formula could be stated:

22 Gross Sales Price - Carry Value= Gain on Sale 8

23 Under this formula, it is unclear why the Accounting would make

24 reference to the "value of investments on the statement date" at

25
6
Schedule D at page 098. Counsel for JAMES has agreed that
26 the amount should not be redacted.
27 7
"FIRST SUPPLEMENT" page 4,lines 5 through 10.
28 8
§7.5 at pages 231 and 232 (emphasis added)

7
111323 v2 OBJECTIONS TO 12 ACCOUNT CURRENT
 1 all. Counsel for Objector has requested a further explanation from

2 counsel for JAMES 9 but no response has been forthcoming. Further

3 supporting information is needed from JAMES in order to evaluate a

4 possible objection to this item by BRITNEY.

6 WHEREFORE, on the basis of the foregoing objections,

7 BRITNEY requests that this Court make an order as follows:

8 1. On the First Issue, disallowing the credit in the
9 amount of $308,974.51 for fees paid to TRI STAR;

10 2. On the Second Issue, directing that all charges for

11 attorneys' fees during the account period (other than those of

12 FREEMAN, FREEMAN & SMILEY and counsel for Objector) be audited by

13 someone other than JAMES, his attorneys, accountants, or other

14 agents to determine the appropriateness thereof in order to

15 evaluate a possible objection to these items by BRITNEY;

16 3. On the Third, Fourth and Fifth Issues, directing JAMES

17 to provide further supporting information in order to evaluate a

18 possible objection to this item by BRITNEY; and

19 4. Granting such further relief as the Court may deem

20 proper.

21 Dated: November 6, 2020

22

23

24 urt-App For
BRITNEY JEAN SPE
25 Conservatee
26

27
9
28 See email dated October 27, 2020 attached as Exhibit "D" and
incorporated by this reference

8
111323 v2 OBJECTIONS TO 12 ACCOUNT CURRENT
 1 VERIFICATION

3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA

4 COUNTY OF VENTURA

5
6 I have read the foregoing CONSERVATEE'S OBJECTIONS TO:

7 TWELFTH ACCOUNT CURRENT; REPORT OF CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE;

8 PETITION FOR ITS SETTLEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL THEREOF and know its

9 contents. The matters stated in the foregoing document are true of

10 my own knowledge, except as t o those matters which are stated on

11 information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to

12 be true.

13 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the

14 State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that

15 this declaration is executed this -.?- day of Nov ember, 2020 at

16 Ojai, California.

17

18

19

20
21

22

23

24

25

26
27

28

9
111323 v2 OBJECTIONS TO 12 ACCOUNT CURRENT
EXHIBIT A
Samuel Ingham

From: Jeryll S. Cohen on behalf of Jeryll S. Cohen

Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 11:49 AM
To: 'Samuel Ingham'
Cc: Gerald ine A. Wyle
Subject: Tri Star Engagement Agreement
Attachments: Tri Star YTD Commissions.pdf

Amicusld: 223242
AmicusStatus: Saved
AmicusFileName: Spears Conservatorship
AmicusFilelds: 122
AmicusDealtWith: Yes

Sam,
I am responding to your request for a copy of the Conservators' agreement w ith Tri-Star. I apologize for not getting thi s
to you soo ner. The Tri-Star engagement letter was originally entered by Andrew and Jamie as Co-Conservators . We do
not have access at this time to the early conservatorship files, which were not saved electronically. I believe that the
original contract with Tri Star was part of the first tour agreement - you probably have a copy of it in your files. If you
do, please forward it to us. In the meantime, we will have someone at our office, which is partially open now, look
thro ugh our arch ive files, provid ed that Garcetti does not re instate the stay at home orders .

In any event, the agreement was recently modified pursuant to the correspondence below.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Best,
Jerylll

Jeryll S. Cohen Attorney At Law

FREEMAN SMILEY

Tel:
~-his er:-:aH ar:ri an') fiiss ~r2nsrrdte(· \Mifr; it ,?.r-.~.: tt,-.:;,
f;'CJffi d!s 1~\o:'.::-1L?. u:ider !.L0 2a,:,r-; .';y-::)ie;·1t

From: Jamie Spears

Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 1:10 P
To: Robin Greenhill
Subject: Re : Retainer against commission Tri Star

Approved

Sent from my iPhone

1
On Dec 20, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Robin Greenhill wrote:

Here is the calculation based on the below.

Robin Greenhill

From: Lou Taylor

To: Jamie Spears

Cc: Robin Greenhill
Subject: Re: Retainer against commission Tri Star

Yes I know Robin and I were supposed to go through it with you - know it's bad timing. We just want to
create a floor since we can't afford to lose 400k. We are looking to true up 2019

Meaning the floor is we won't make less than the 500k a year and if commission is at least that we will
true it up.

Coram Dea,
Lou Taylor

On Nov 12, 2019, at 6:42 PM, Jamie Spears wrote:

Sorry my head trying to get all this going on straight will get back to you

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 12, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Lou Taylor

wrote:

Jamie -

We just ran time and billing for Britney and all of the entities. We have
a (400k) loss on time and billing this year - we have been paid &179k.

I want to stay at 5 percent commission but set a floor of $500k a year.

Meaning we would not get paid less than the $500k this year & 2020 so
we would get a retainer payment each month and each quarter settle it
up against the commission. Unlike the other professionals management
and legal we are still having to do work even though Bis not including
the court accounting.

Then next year we will look at time and billing again.

2
 Is this approved?

Coram Dea,
Lou Taylor

Confidential and Privileged: This message contains information

which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are addressee
(or authorized to receive for addressee), you may not use, copy or
disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in this
message. If you have received this m e ~ d v i s e
the sender by reply e-mail or reply t o - - - - and
delete the message.

Transfer of Funds: It is the policy of Tri Star Sports & Entertainment

Group, Inc. that wire instructions and/or directions to transfer
funds are always to be in a password-protected attachment where
the password is provided by a separate means of communication
such as phone or text. Please be advised that funds should not be
transferred or processed based on written instructions received in a
non-secure manner.

IRS Circular 230: Under requirements imposed by the IRS Circular

230, we inform you that, if any advice concerning one or more U.S.
federal tax issues is contained in this communication (including any
attachments), such advice was not intended or written to be used,
and cannot be used by you or any other taxpayer for the purpose of
(1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue code or (2)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.

LOS ANGELES
9255 Sunset Blvd.
PEOPLE • THE RIGHT
2nd Floor
W. Hollywood, CA 90069

instagram/twitter: @tristarteam

<Tri Star YTD Commissions.pdf>

3
EXHIBIT B
EXHIBITB
Samuel Ingham

From: Samuel Ingham

Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 12:59 PM
To: 'Geraldine A. Wyle'; Jeryll S. Cohen (Jeryll.Cohen@ffslaw.com)
Subject: Budget

Amicusld: 216396
AmicusStatus: Saved
AmicusFileName: Spears Conservatorship
AmicusFilelds: 122
AmicusDealtWith: Yes

Good morning, Geri & Jeryll -

Hope you are both enjoying the holiday seas on .

I'm writing to foll ow up o n ou r previ ous discussions of the 2020 budget.

My client wants to star t planning her tr ave l for early next yea r and we
need to know what funds will be available.

It would also be very helpful if you could provide a list of all

individuals and firms currently being paid by the conservatorship and i ts
entities as percentages. Ideally this would include the name, percentage,
fee basis and contra ct expiration date.

Finally, I'm wondering if you have been able to check in t o alternatives

for the production team on the next record album.

Thanks and best regards,

8a1.rx1
Law Offices of Samuel D. Ingham III
444 South Flower Street
Suite 4260
Los Angeles, California 90071-2966

Telephone (310) 556-9751

Fax (310) 556-1311
Cell (310) 713-8542

1
EXHIBIT C
 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 WEST FIFTH STREET

SIDLEY LOS ANGELES, CA 90013

+1 213 8966000
+1 213 896 6600 FAX

GH IRSCHFELD@SIDLEY.COM
AMERICA • ASIA PACIFIC • EUROPE +1 213 896 6033

June 3, 2019

Via Email and FedEx

Bryan Scott Kuchar

3397 Peachtree Comers Cir Apt. F
Peachtree Comers, GA 30092
brvanku charra,vahoo.com

Re: Cease and Desist to Mr. Kuchar re: /?!iTJ:l11F1,·w.loi!intm1o r. com

Dear Mr. Kuchar:

This Firm represents Lou Taylor, President of Tri Star Sports and Entertainment Group
Los Angeles ("Ms. Taylor"). This letter demands that you immediately and permanently take
down the website located at the URL hl.\p:/h:i.n,ys.7., ·_jotrn.1tavL.:ir.c(nn (the "Website"), and
relinquish all rights in and to that URL to Ms. Taylor.

Your operation of the Website is highly defamatory, disparaging, harassing, libelous, and
makes false claims regarding Ms. Taylor, and illegally misappropriates her name and likeness
without her consent. Your conduct has caused, and is continuing to cause, irreparable injury to
Ms. Taylor, her family, and her clients, in addition to substantial money damages.

Title 15, section 8131 of the United States Code makes it unlawful to register a domain
name that consists of, or is similar to, the name of another living person without their consent.
You are in blatant violation of that statute and should Ms. Taylor be forced to take action to
enforce her rights under that statute, she will be entitled to recover her attorneys' fees and costs
from you, in addition to any damages or equitable relief. Additionally, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) (the
Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, or the ACPA), protects against the registration,
use or trafficking in, or uses any domain name with a bad faith intent to profit from a trademark
( or service mark) that is protected under federal law. This includes public figures such as Ms.
Taylor.

Ms. Taylor therefore demands that you immediately take down the Website and refrain
from any further defamatory, disparaging, or harassing activity toward Mrs. Taylor. In addition,
you must transfer domain ownership to Ms. Taylor. Finally, Ms. Taylor demands that you
refrain from registering any future domains that could mislead a reader into thinking the domain
is affiliated with or run by, or with the consent of, Ms. Taylor, or otherwise misuses her name or
likeness.

Sidley Austin (CA} LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership doing business as Sidley Austin LLP and practicing in affiliation with other Sidley Austin partnerships.
SIDLEY
Bryan Scott Kuchar
June 3, 2019
Page2

Absent your written acknowledgment of this letter (by signing as indicated below) and
your unequivocal agreement to agree to the specific demands contained herein by no later than
5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time on Tuesday, June 4, 2019, we will immediately pursue all
available legal and equitable remedies.

Please take notice that litigation is imminent and that you therefore have a duty to
preserve, and not to delete, discard or otherwise destroy the originals and all copies of documents
relating to the subjects set forth in this letter, including without limitation all documents relating
in any way to Ms. Taylor. This letter is not intended to be a complete recitation of each of your
actionable violations, or a complete recitation of Ms. Taylor's rights and remedies, all of which
are expressly reserved.

Sincerely,

~-~Gerry B. Hirschfeld

GBH:at

244082936v I
EXHIBIT D
EXHIBITD
 ,,, sam@inghamlaw.com
RE: C/O Spears, LASC Case No. BP108870
Oct 27, 2020 at 10:59:36 AM
Geraldine A. Wyle David C.
Nelson Esq. rpearson@loeb.com
'"' ___ Jeryll S. Cohen
Than ks , Geri. Could you send me the deta iled ca l c ulati on f or the 2019
"investment valuation differences" ?

Also just a remi nder a bout the pending "meet and con f er " on the mot i on to sea l .

Bes t regards,

Stun
Law Offices of Samuel D. Ingham III

Telephone (310) 556-9751

Fax (310)556-1311

From: Geraldine A. Wyle <Gen~)djoe.Wvle@Jts:aw.corr>

Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 7:48 PM
To: David C. Nelson Esq. ( ::neison@loeb.QQLD.) <~lson@loeb.com> ; 'roearson@loeb.com' <rpearson@loeb.com>
Cc: Samuel D. Ingham Ill (;am@inghamlaw.com) <~arn@inghamlaw.com>; Jeryll S. Cohen
<c&rY.11, Cobel.l@ff slaw.com.>
Subject: FW: C/O Spears, LASC Case No_ BP108870

Counsel,
Please see below and the attached.
Geri
Geraldine A . Wyle Attorney At Law
FREEMAN l"f'JES: iVJ hN SMILEY

Tel: 310.255.6133 Fax: 310.255.6233

,:>:1;W:::; fron! y ..1:n- c .: ~iput,:-r sy-;t~ 1 n~. ·:·cu :) 1:::ukl •::he::!: (i~is t·t·n:Ji\ c1n·:l ~;!·:y ,·:~t!aci-in~-.)nts fct :::~ 2 ;·J:·r·~•t'-'.l(, r"i c! (·c:,;;:ur_,::t· '-.::, 1;~;~:1L EiF,ai; :.r :-~~a;;-::r;:1:~.5;,:;.n
·.::2nno~ b-s ~Ji.ici:'.:u1t~~0 d t0 be sa··:ur-, :.i:· (~~-;-;:;r-h::~:.:a . F~·eem;:1n. :=re cm:::n ,s~;S;m;!i::y. t ;_F '.:~cc0pt~; :-;,:, frai::-(:1y k:- ~:;~y d;ir:i:.:~fiS (:&~:~e c~ !);{ 2 11~; -·- -·~::

From: Clare Goldwasser

Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 7:39 PM
To: 'fillJ.9bBJil.:,'<llingharniaw.com'; jaurig;n!l~ Q:.lli;).gQJ .com; ,JQ.ruif£.i20h'1rno111gruil.!fil\!&Pm.; gjQ!les@jQnesswan§Ql}_.f',.Qfil; yaslIB._@_gj,)J.J..:.:_
,2-_w.cQll; Jsgrant @iacourt.or;
Cc: Geraldine A. Wyle; Jeryll S. Cohen ; Rebekah E. Swan ; Thu N. Pham ; Bea C. Estrada
Subject: C/O Spears, LASC Case No. BP108870

Dear Counsel,

You are being served with the following. The [Redacted] First Supplement was e-filed this afternoon, and the
[Under Seal] First Supplement will be delivered to Department 4 tomorrow.
 [Under Seal] First Supplement To Twelfth Account Current; Report Of James P. Spears, Conservator
Of The Estate ; Petition For Its Settlement And For Approval Thereof (attached) .
[Redacted] First Supplement To Twelfth Account Current; Report Of James P. Spears, Conservator Of
The Estate; Petition For Its Settlement And For Approval Thereof (attached).

Thank you.

Clare Goldwasser Paralegal

1888 Century Park East Suite 1500 Los Angeles CA 90067

Tel: 310.255.6159 Fax: 310.255.6259

T/-;is s:;1a;! acd ;:~~;y f:!t,.s. tn.in.s:-;-0 Pti::·d ~,:lti·; :t ;.:::n:::, tiif: prope-11)1 of :=:-:ce;:-:an, Fr:&emi:1;-;. /!, 3P-!FHy. :.LP ar.d l':0l'if:iitis ir,tc,rrr.c1Uon t:-int !s co:1f::!s,1E3J 2nd!ur r)·G'.t~d.2cl f,orn d:s1:icsu1c·
un-::k::f thi:::. ,;:,~:c:TtPy--r:!i,~n~ :)i·iv:ie91;:~. ,:,.:'.int dc:i•.:~r.ss pr~'11:e~Je. ~/1,:; .,~tt,:r:-h:y V;i·:,r;z prctluc.l (i•".;\;t ,~ ,_. _- ,_tf!,_, ~q..o;'.,.1.:.,;~- L._,., _!~ is. 1, .10i1dr< .:, . .,: ..) ,; -fnt \he US(-=! ~1r :i1~~: jr:<::"iv:d:.:.;;:il or ::,q~iN ~,,