ECC 510 Fall 2020

Peer Evaluation of Research Presentation

Checklist
Peer Evaluation: Peer evaluation is an important part of academic research. For this assignment, you will
provide a peer evaluation for three of your classmates’ presentations. Use this checklist to guide your thoughts as
you watch the presentations. Please ask at least one question after the presentation. After the presentation, write
a summary paragraph to provide your peer with an evaluation about their research presentation. Consider your
notes on the peer evaluation checklist, the response to your question, and your overall reaction to the presentation.
Email your paragraph to your peer and cc your instructor on the last day of your classes for this course. Your
review should highlight areas of strength in the presentation, as well as areas for growth or consideration.

 Title Slide: Included title (title indicated what the research is about), name, class, instructor, and
date.

 Introduction: Presenter provided an overview of the proposed study in terms of context (e.g., in
what setting, time of year, etc).

 Problem Statement: Presenter identified the problem being investigated in the study. Presenter
may consider: the stakeholders, indicators that the problem exists, or possible sources of the
problem.

 Literature Review: Presenter explained relevant literature read for this assignment in a manner
that is easily understood and in a scholarly manner.

 Identified Gaps in Research: Presenter identified gaps in research and related to their research
interests.

 Implications to Researcher’s Research Interests: How could this study be implemented?

 Conclusion: Presenter concluded presentation in a succinct, relevant manner.

Overall Presentation:
 Completeness (Included all of the above information?)
 Organization (Easy to understand what this study would be about?)
 Engagement and clarity (Engagement of the audience? Did visuals/data enhance the presentation?)
 Time limits (Was it between 10 - 15 minutes?)

Presenter’s Name: Chelsea Niederlag Peer Evaluator Name: O’Nesseia Edmondson

Peer Evaluator Comments: Chelsea, I thoroughly enjoyed your presentation on Creating Trauma Informed
Leaders in Schools. It is obvious that you have such a deep passion for kids who have been in this kind of
situation and your knowledge of what is needed to see them through is already evident. I am excited to learn more
and to better understand how I can better serve trauma kids in my classroom or as a leader. All the best, I can’t
wait to read your study!