Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. A quotient topological space is Hausdorff if and only if any two distinct equivalence
classes are contained in two disjoint open saturated sets.
Proof. (1) The first separation axiom is equivalent to the statement that every singleton
{[x]} in X/R is closed.
The latter is equivalent to the fact that the inverse image of {[x]}, which is [x] seen
as a subset of X , is closed.
© ª
Examples 2. 1. Let S = n1 ; n ∈ N . Consider the partition of R composed of S
and all the singletons {x} with x ∈ R \ S , and the corresponding equivalence
relation R.
The quotient space X/R does not satisfy the first separation axiom.
{(0, y), (1, 1 − y)} with y ∈ [0, 1], {(x, y)} with x ∈ (0, 1) .
For ε > 0 and δ > 0 small enough, the open saturated sets
are disjoint.
Similar arguments work for any two distinct equivalent classes in X/℘.
2. If the graph of R is closed and for every U open in X , p(U ) is open then X/R
is Hausdorff.
∆ = {(v, v) ∈ X × X ; v ∈ X}
{((0, x), (1, 1 − x)) ; x ∈ [0, 1]} and {((1, x), (0, 1 − x)) ; x ∈ [0, 1]} .
But it is not true that for every U open in X , p(U ) is open in X/℘ (equivalently,
−1
p (p(U )) is open in X ).
The set p−1 (p(U )) is not open, because it does not contain an open ball centred in
(1, 1/2).
2
Examples 5. R/Z is Hausdorff.
Indeed, the graph of the equivalence relation is the union of parallel lines
[
{(x, y) ; y = x + n} ,
n∈Z
and it is closed.
S
For any open set in U , p−1 (p(U )) = n∈Z (n + U ) which is open as union of open
sets. It follows that p(U ) is open in R/Z.
Proposition 3, (2), implies that R/Z is Hausdorff.
A similar argument shows that Rn /Zn is Hausdorff.
³ ´
0 0
Proof. Let T̃ be a topology on X/R such that p : X → X/R , T̃ is continuous.
Then for every U ∈ T̃ 0 , p−1 (U ) is in T .
It follows that U ∈ T̃ . We have thus proved that T̃ 0 ⊆ T̃ .