DUBRAVKA UJES. AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA* ‘The ancient city of Rhizon was located on the easter coast of the Adriatic in Montenegro at the far end of the northernmost inlet of the modern Golf of Kotor, which the Venetians called the “Boeche di Cattaro” and the ancient Romans called the “Sinus Rhizonicus”. Its dark and turbulent ‘waters gave ancient mariners the impression it was a wide river. On the shore, the lower town was enclosed by large city walls datable to the late 3* or the 4" century B.C., and on top of the nearby hill called Gradina there is @ fortress whose walls are datable to the late 4" or the 3" century B.C? (fig. 1). During the Hellenistic period, specifically during the wars conducted by the Romans against the Illyrians and the kingdom of Macedonia, Rhizon appears as a city of considerable importance. Potybius (2. 11, 16) states that in 229 B.,, after the Romans had defeated Teuta, the ‘widow of the Illyrian king Agron, she took refuge in Rhizon, which he describes as a small but strongly fortified city. Moreover, Livy (45. 26, 2) records that in 167 B.C. a Roman garrison com- manded by C. Licinius was introduced into Rhizon, and a little later (45. 26, 13) he also mentions the Rhizonitae in the same region as the ‘Agravonitae and the Olciniatae, in connection with the Roman partition of the Ilyrian territory into three parts in 167 B.C. ‘THE ISSUES OP THE MINT OF RUIZON ‘The mint of Rhizon issued the following coinages: = autonomous coinages of the town, in bronze (fig. 2and3), = the royal coinage of King Ballios, in silver and bronze (fg. 4), - and, most probably, the coinage called “Coinage from the Rhizonian Gulf, in silver and, perhaps, bronze, which has been considered as the coinage of a symmachy of towns which included Rhizon (fig. 5). * I wish to express my thanks to the organiser for the financial support which helped my participation at the Colloque. I also wish to express my gratefulness to John. . Morgan Ill for his kind help in all phases of my work ‘on this study. See also acknowledgments. * For the geographical position of the town and gulf see Pseudo-Seylax, Periplous 24-25, Strabo, Geographia 7. 5, 3 and 7, Apollonius, Argonauica’4. 516, Pliny, Historia Naturalis 3.144, Stephanus Byzantius, Ethnica sv. Pifov and also s.v. Bovd6n, Claudius Ptolemaeus, Geographia 2. 16 (17), 5 and 2. 16 (17), 12, Tabula Peutingeriana 7.1, Anonymus Ravennas, "Cosmo graphia 4, 16 (and pethaps also 5. 14), Constantinus Porphyrogenitus, De thematibus 2.9 and De administrando imperio 34. For general background, information on Rhizon, see OBERIUMMER E. 1914, p. 937-939, ALFOLDY G. 1968, p. 1214-1217 and CABANES P. 2001, p. 1023-1024. For Rhizon as a regional center on the crossroad of the sea and land routes, see UIES D. 1999, p. 212-213, * The walls were discussed by GaRASANIN M. 1966, p. 27-36. However, the dates cited above result from my ‘own unpublished research. Fig. 1: plan of Risan withthe sites Carine and Gradina. ‘The chronology of these coinages is still not determined with precision, primarily because the historical contexts of their issuance remain poorly known. There is no mention of King Ballaios in any extant ancient literary source, while Rhizon is ly mentioned by only two extant ancient istorians, Polybius and Livy, in the passages cited above. Several features of these coinages, such as the characteristics of their style, elements of ins- * Prax K. 1940, p.27-535. The mint of the “Pragung aus ‘dem Sinus Rhizonicus” cannot be localized, although all the finds of known provenience came from Risan. Only ‘ca 34 specimens are known; see UsES D. 1993, 22. The ‘obverses of this coinage bear a Macedonian shield ; for the type of the shield, its chronology and “political propaganda” of the shield pattern see Liamt K. 1998, p-43-44 and p. 149-151DuBRAVKA Uses cription and iconography - especially the presence of the title facviais on the coinage of Ballaios, and the presence of @ Macedonian shield on the “Coinage from the Rhizonian Gulf” - and their ‘metrology, point to the 3" and 2™ centuries B.C. as the general chronological framework for the activity of the Rhizonian mint and for the successive issuance of the coinages of different issuing authorities there. ‘The following analysis of the autonomous coinages of Rhizon is based on the information available from more than 100 specimens of both types, most of which are Kept in the Central Archaeological Collection of Montenegro in Podgorica, a smaller number in the National ‘Museum in Belgrade and the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, and one specimen in the Archacological ‘Museum in Split’. All these coins were discovered in Risan, as stray site-finds at Carine, the modern name of the site of the lower town of ancient Rhizon, except for a specimen of unknown pro- venance, in the Museum in Split. Until now, no hoard containing the autonomous coins of Rhizon has been found. Four published group-finds ‘composed of Ballaios’, autonomous, and other coins are, in fact, cumulative site-finds from the coastal fields of Carine’. In contrast, the ex- “1 wish to express my gratefulness to Mr. M. Pravilovs, curator in charge of the Coin Collection of the Central Archaeological Collection in Podgorica, for kindly allowing me to publish the coins from this collection. The coins in the National Museum in Belgrade have been published in UIES D. 1993, p. 534 Tako wish o express my thanks to Dr. H. Kim, Keeper of the Greek Coin Collection of the Ashmolean Museum, for kindly allowing me to examine the ‘unpublished eons from the collection of Si A.J. Evans and those already published by Gontnt G. 1991, p. 25- 530, and to use them in my study. MAROViC 1 1988, p 96-97, pl. 22/lab, published the coin in the “Archaeological Museum in Split. The specimen no. 4 of Evans’ "Coins of a successor of Ballaos” in the ‘Archaeological Museum in Zagreb was “probably from Risano”, but I could not trace it, Other museums in Sebia and Montenegro do not possess any specimens of these coinage, See the Catalogue fr further details. 5 For the circumstances of the discoveries of three group finds in the National Museum in Belgrade containing cis of Ballaios, the autonomous coinage of Rhizon, and coins issued by other authorities, see UES D. 1993, . 6 and eadem 200, p. 341, note I. Sarfice stray finds tof coins, especially those of Balaos, are so frequent in Carin that already A.J. EVANS 1880; p. 291-292, stated that in less than an hour of walking he collected sever ‘The lots assembled that way might give the impression that they belonged to hoard, although they usually also cavations in Carine have furnished only Ballaios* coins, but not a single specimen of the autonomous coinage’. Thus, the numerous surface site-finds which have been recorded over an extended span of time constitute a substantial body of valuable evidence whose significance approaches that of the finds of coins in excavations. ‘There are two’ main types of the autonomous coins of Rhizon, both of which are small in size and have the inscription PIZONITAN om the reverse. ‘The first type : Obverse : beardiess male head facing to the right. Reverse : Artemis advancing to the left and holding vertically a torch in her right hand. The inscription is separated in two parallel lines running downward on both sides of the figure of Artemis, contain coins of other issuing authorities, such as the autonomous coins of Rhizon, but even more frequently Late Roman bronze coin, as isthe ease with the group finds in the National Museum in Belgrade, Hence these should be considered as cumulative site finds, In all probability the 4" group containing both Ballaios’ and autonomous coins, acquired in Risan by . M. F. May in late 1920s, mentioned in CH 1, p28, n° 88 and published by GoRIN! G. 1991, p. 25-30, had been assembled inthe same way. The eoins in Podgorica had ‘been acquired in several Tots of stray surface finds together with Ballas’ and various Roman bronze is. ® The excavations ofan urben habitation context with a surface area of ea. 130 m? yielded 135 bronze coins of Ballaios - see Uses D., KOVAGEVIC V. 1992, p. 9-24, and especially Us’ D. 1994, p. 139-145. The cireumstances of discovery indicate that the houses were destroyed; the finds of imported South talian pottery of secure chronology, especially that of Goathia production, are datable to the late 4 and 3° century BC for more details ofthe potery see Uxes D. 1994, 142-143 and eadem 1999, p. 204 ‘Note thatthe unique specimen of the type: male head to the right on the obverse, and PI~ ZO in a wreath on the reverse, published by EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 292, pl. 1309, isnot discussed here. ST auhere to the reading PIZONITAN, as read by [EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 292, and Iter accepted by other scholars. However, there is stil no specimen on which the entre inscription can be clearly read, especially not the syllable NI. Evans’ readings PIONITAN (with question mark) and PIEANOTAN (with uncertainty) wore probably due tothe poor stale of preservation of the coins in his possession ; see EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 292 and 295. For, PIZO- is clearly read on more than 10, wile PIEO- or PIEA- not on any of the specimens ‘hich I could examine,AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA Fig. 2: the post-Ballaios type of the autonomous coinage of Rhizon in Illyria, Plaster casts. For the details and location ofeach coin see the Catalogue.ail DuBRravka Uses 4B 512 Fig. 3: the Apollo-Artemis type ofthe autonomous coinage of Rhizon in Myris153 AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA a Fig. 3 (cont): the Apollo-Artemis type ofthe autonomous coinage of Rhizon in Illyria Plaster casts. For the details and location of each coin see the Catalogue. Fig. 4: a silver coin of King Ballaios Fig. 5: a silver specimen of the “Coinage from BMC Thessaly-Aetolia, pl 14/13. the Rhizonian Gulf”. Plaster cast Published by D. Usrs 1993, pl. 3/30. 6/1 :the obverse of a bronze coin 6/2 :the obverse of a bronze coin 6/3 : the obverses of two"autonomous” of Apollonia, 3".2" c, B.C. of Oricus, "2" c. B.C. bronze coins of Pela, ca. 188/7-168 B.C. Cabinet des Médsilles F.G. 68. Cabinet des Médalles F.G. 279, SeuDanov N. 2003 n° 150-151 Fig. 6: coins with analogous representations of Apollo's head on their obverse.DUBRAVKA UsES 7/1. Mamertines 7/2, Magnetes Cabinet des Médailles F.G. 836 ROGERS 1952, fig. 325 Cabinet des Médailles F.G. 194 716, Megara BMC43, pl. 21/14 715, Diodotus [or I BMC Bactria-India 7, pl. 9 7/4, Lysimacheia BMC Thrace 23 7/7 and 7/8. The League of the Acarnanians BMC Thessaly-Actolia 13-14, pl. 27/4-27/5, 713, Anticyra Fig. 7: coins with a comparable representation of Artemis on thei reverse starting on the right behind her (PIZO-) and con- tinuing in front of her on the left (-NITAN). ‘The second type Obverse : head of Apollo to the right Reverse : Artemis advancing to the right and holding horizontally a torch in both hands. The inscription starts on the left going from the bottom upwards behind the figure of Artemis (PIZO-) and continues on the right in front of her going again from the bottom upwards (-NITAN). Sir Arthur J. Evans first discovered the Rhizonian autonomous coinage in the 1870°s, but actually identified only the first type on the basis of just one well-preserved specimen (variant I, n® 1, fig. 2/1)". Another specimen, attributed by Evans to a successor of Ballaios, also belongs to the same type, but its poor state of preservation impeded its attribution to this type and a correct reading of its inscription (variant I, n° 4, fig. 2/4)", Evans discovered several specimens of the second type, too, but none with a well-preserved inscription. The features of the head on the obverse ° EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 292, “Autonomous coins” no. 2, pl. 13/10, a drawing. A photograph of this coin was published by RENDIC-MIOCEVIC D. 1976, Fig, 3, and also GORINIG. 1991, p. 28-29, fig. a. This coin was also ‘mentioned in HEAD B. V. 1911, p. 316 and BRUNSwiD J. 1898, p.75, " EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 294, “C Ballacos” n° 1, pl. 14/11AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA reminded him of the “helmeted head of Libertas or Pallas on consular denarii", and hence he identified ‘them as the “coins of ‘successor of Ballaios showing Roman influence™"'. In 1930°s, J. M. F. May identified this type of Rhizonian autonomous coinage, but his work long remained unpublished in a manuscript until in 1991 it was at last posthumously published by G. Gorin’. The head on the obverse was described as a “female head ‘wreathed r. (Persephone?)”. Several well-preserved specimens in the National Museum in Belgrade enabled further clarification of the characteristics of this type". My close examination of practically all. the specimens preserved in the museum collections has enabled me to draw more precise conclusions concerning the iconography, ins- criptions, varieties, and technical characteristics of the coins of both types, and especially of the second type" ‘The wear resulting from circulation is more obvious on the coins of the former type, but in general itis not considerable. The coins suffered more from corrosion, intensified by the action of the salty soil at Carine on the bronze alloy of low quality. The alloy of the former type is inferior, and the specimens which underwent removal of their patina display a rather dark color of bronze. The alloy of the latter type is of a slightly lighter shade and comparatively better, but still of poor quality. The flans of the former type are mostly thin, sometimes of quadrangular shape, The flans of the latter type are more regularly round, but are often carelessly struck, which renders the relief shallow and the figures not centered. At the edge there often appear fissures, which probably indicate an insufficient temperature of the flan at the moment of minting, ‘THE FIRST, OR POST-BALLAIOS TYPE, ‘The first type clearly imitates the iconography of king Ballaios’ coins of the EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 294, “Coins of a successor of Ballaeos” n° 2-3 (perhaps algo 4), pl. 14/12-13 (15), p. 299, ® Gon G. 1991, p. 25-26, 28, dating this type to ca. 170-168 B.C. without discussion. For J. M. F. May's contribution to the study of the Rhizonian mint see VisoNA P. 2000, p. 60-62. © Uses D, 1993, p. 19-20, 28, 31-32; 15 specimens. "Thad occasion to see at least about a hundred more coins of both types, all of them collected as stray surface finds in Carine, in the private possession of several inhabitants of Risan, but I was only once allowed to make several photos and plaster casts. Rhizonian type, i. the type with the royal ttle and the figure of Artemis running to the left (fig. 2)" The arrangement and flow of the inscription, although different and shorter, also corresponds to that on Ballaios’ coins. The differences are the following: considerably lower weight, ranging from ca. 1,90 down to 0,50 gr, smaller size, poorer quality of bronze and very poor schematized style, similar, but inferior even to the most “stylized”, or “barbatized” specimens of the coins of Ballaios. Moreover, the figure of Artemis became simplified in that her short chiton lost drapery and almost disappeared, as did the two lances in the goddess’ left hand, which both probably happened as a combined result of the decline of style and the reduction of weight and size of the flans. Hence, it is likely that this type of autonomous coinage was issued after the royal coinage of Ballaios. This conclusion is corroborated by the above-mentioned complete absence of these coins in the excavated context of a destroyed settlement which yielded ‘numerous bronze coins issued by Ballaios. ‘There are two variants of this type : 1. The variant of a larger weight, with a flat relief and “linear”-stylized features of the head. 2. The variant of a lesser weight and sometimes a very small flan, and of a different, very plain style, but with @ higher relief, However there are also specimens of “intermediary” characteristics, so that these variations do not indicate the existence of two different denominations within this type. ‘The reduction of weight and the alteration of style are rather due to a decline of the quality of issues of the mint, i. to a general decline of the internal conditions and, probably, a changed status of the town after Ballaios’ reign. ‘The type and style of the male head on the obverse is $0 close to the royal portrait that it seems quite likely that the latter was maintained together with the unchanged iconography of the reverse of the royal coinage. It follows that after "* CAVEDONI C. 1842, p. 128 fist diferentated these two types, and EVANS A. J 1880, p, 296-297 labelled them the “Pharian’ and “Rhizonian” according to the ancient names of the places of their most frequent occurrence, The ‘Pharian’ type has no royal tte and the figue of Artemis is stationary, with the goddess standing slightly tured tothe left and holding vertically a torch. Nosilver coins of ‘Pharian’ type are known. For a detailed analysis of these two types SHE U1ES D. 1993, 29-10 M See the above note 6 155DUBRAVKA Uses, the end of Ballaios’ reign, Rhizon continued to issue coinage, although in a relatively impo- verished situation. This continuation of issuing ‘manifestly occurred in changed political conditions that sanctioned an autonomous coinage, which however remained in line with the previous authority ‘The small number of preserved specimens of this autonomous type — only four ascertained by a legible inscription, with about a dozen more which can convincingly be assigned to this type - indicate there was a small volume of the overall mint output over a short time, which is a further sign of a severe decline of the town and its mint after Ballaios’ reign. The inclusion of about 30 more specimens in a Very poor state of preservation (listed in the Appendix to the Catalogue) only corroborates this impression. It was possible t0 identify two specimens of this autonomous coinage struck by the same obverse dies (variant I, n? 1 and 2). For all the above reasons, this type may be entitled the Post-Ballaios type of the autonomous coinage of Rhizon. Hence the determination of its chronology directly depends upon the chronology of the royal coinage of king Ballsios. Yet the period as well as the general circumstances of his rule still remain uncertain, The characteristics of Ballaios’ coinage and the extant historical records of affairs in Ilyria in the 3" and 2 centuries B.C. have prompted two proposals 1.A. J. Evans dated this type of the auto- nomous coinage of Rhizon before the coinage of king Ballaios, which he dated from after ca. 167 B.C. to before ca. 135 B.C.” This chronology was discussed by J. BrunSmid and subsequently was widely accepted, 2.J. M. F, May, followed by G. Gorini, dated this type ca. 175-170 B.C., placing it at the same time or shortly after Ballaios’ coinage, which Gorini dated from ca. 195 to ca. 175 B.C. 1 am mentioning these proposals only briefly, and leaving for later study a detailed analysis of the coinage of Ballaios, who was a prominent ruler in the island of Pharos and the king, obviously of the Illyrians, in Rhizon, mighty enough in front of the overpowering Romans to issue his silver coinage of a Macedonian royal 2 BVANS A. J. 1880, p. 292, 295, 300-301 ™ BRUNSMID J. 1898, p. 76-77, with comments on the previous proposals for dating the reign of Ballo. " GoRIN! G. 1991, p. 28 ; see also VISONA P. 2000, p. ‘62, See GORINI G. 1984, p. 49 for his dating of Ballaios’ coinage ca, 195-175 BC type, besides an enormous output of bronze coinage which spread in many ports along both the east and west coasts of the Adriatic and Ionian ‘Seas. Hence, I may suggest that Ballaios’ coinage might more plausibly be dated not in the 2 century, but rather within the period of the greatest strength of the Illyrians, when they were able to mount the long-distance maritime raiding expe- ditions which provoked their first con-frontations with the Romans around 230 B.C. Hence I prefer to date Ballaios” coinage some time in the second half of the 3" century B.C., followed soon after its cessation by the autonomous coinage of the Post- Ballaios type. ‘THE SECOND, OR THE “APOLLO/ARTEMIS” TYPE A selection of the best-preserved coins of the other type of the autonomous coinage is presented in fig. 3. Their weight most frequently ranges from 1,80 downward to 1,40 grams. Only a few coins weigh less than 1 gram, or more than 2 grams, except for a single specimen of over 4,7 grams, which however shares the same obverse die with two specimens of which weigh slightly more than just I gram. Stil, the slight differences of weight among the largest portion of the preserved specimens are probably a sign of the existence of cone unit only, with no fraction- or multiple-coins. From around 40 sufficiently _ well-preserved specimens, I could identify 8 obverse-dies, and almost twice as much reverse dies. The dies are most probably more numerous, but the state of preservation and the offentered and shallow relief of the coins impede a more thorough die- analysis. These same imperfections hinder the examination of the details of the types and the inscription, The circulation restricted to its minting town, the small number of coin dies and preserved specimens, and the modest quality of their alloy, flan-making, die-engraving and striking, strongly suggest that the issuing of the coins of this type lasted for a very short period, probably not more than a decade. In an attempt to determine the chronology of this period, in the following paragraphs I shall consider: = The iconography ofthis type, aiming in particular to detect the occurrence of analogous repre- sentations on the issues of definite chronology. = Its regional “numismatic environment”, i.e. the coinages of the Illyrian tribes and king Genthius, 0 that its characteristics may be distinguished from theirs.AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA ~ Information from the historical sources, in an attempt to trace the indications for discerning the historical context in which this coinage was issued. Despite the small size of the coins, on several well-preserved specimens it is evident that the head is wreathed with laurel leaves. These, and the coiffure, with the hair rolled behind and a couple of curls hanging downward, are characteristic of Apollo. It is also strongly reminiscent of Artemis’ hairstyle, but she usually wears a diadem, which does not occur on any specimen, Moreover, a quiver and bow on the shoulder, which would clearly indicate Artemis, are never present. Hence this divinity should be identified as Apollo™ Several close analogies in representations of Apollo’s head on the bronze coins of the neighbouring regions provide support for this identification, These coins share the same types: the head of Apollo Agyieus on the obverse, and his obelisk on the reverse’, and were issued, first of all, al by Apollon ig. 6/1), and also Oricus (ig. Olympe* and Ambracia™. These issues have ‘usualy been dated between ca, 229 and 168 B.C, except for that of Ambracia, which is usually dated ca. 238-168 B.C. (je. to the period of the Epirote Republic). A recent reanalysis of these and other bronze issues of Apollonia datable to the 3° and 2" centuries B.C. demonstrated that they lasted even longer, probably until the reform of Apoltonia’s bronze coinage datable ca. 120 B.C. ® [first proposed ths identification in Uses D. 1993, p 20. 2" For the iconography of Apollo Agyieus, diffused in Ilyria and Epirus, see Di Fir BALESTRAZ21E. 1984, Bp 323-332, 0° 279-283. BMC Thessaly ~ Actolia 49-53, pl.129; Apollonia continued to issue this type with a different weight standard until the 1" century B.C. See ibid 60-61, L122, and also 75-76, pl. 13/1. SNG Cop. Thessaly = Ilyricum 401, and also 403-406 (later issues, already 1" century B.C). © BMC Thessaly - Actolia 1-3, pl. 31/13, which is more clearly visible in SEAR D. R. 1978, 1909 ; SNG Cop. ‘Thessaly - Ilyricum 525; CEKA H. 1972, p. 143-144 (oot illustrated); PAUSE-DREYER U,, CEKA N. 1988, p. 87. Oricus was traditionally considered as an Eubocan foundation on the borders of Epirus and lyri > For very rare small bronzes of Olympe in Tlyria see CEKA H. 1972, p. 147 (not illusrated), and PAUSE- DREYER U., CEKAN, 1988, . 87-88, n° 144b, ® BMC Thessaly - Actolia 10, pl32/3, SNG Cop. ‘Thessaly - Ilyricum 24 2" See the detailed discussion by PICARD O., GIONGECAS S. 1996, throughout and especially p. 192-195, on the Yet defining the exact chronology of the issues of either Apollonia or these other towns remains quite difficult in the total absence of any relevant literary ‘or epigraphic information. The “autonomous” bronze issues of Amphipolis, Pella, Thessalonike and of “the Macedonians”, datable to 188/7-168 B.C,, i to the last decade of the reign of Philip V and to the reign of Perseus, also exhibit similar features of the head of Apollo, and a certain similarity of style (fig. 63)”. ‘Analogies for the figure of Artemis may be found on the reverses of several issues in bronze”, ‘The double yéAxo1 of the Mamertines display a similar figure of Artemis running to the right holding a horizontal torch in both hands, with a hhound at her feet. This issue has been dated close to the end of the 3" century B.C.” (fig. 7/1). A very similar figure of Artemis with a torch appears on the bronze coins of the Magnetes in Thessaly, struck in Demetrias and usually dated to the period between 196 B.C. (when the proconsul 7. Quinetius Flamininus proclaimed the freedom of the Greck cities)” and 146 B.C. (when Thessaly and Phocis were incorporated into the Roman province of Macedonia)". There are two related types of this issue, one with the head of Artemis metrology, style, and occurrence of these coins in hoards ® GarBLeR H. 1906, p. 42-43, n° 97-105, pl. 1/20-21; ‘TouRATSOGLOU Y. 1987, p. 74-78, pl. 7/7 and 10/L1- R For the representations of Artemis with torches on the coins, see KAnIL L, 1984, p, 656-657, but this list isnot exhaustive. See UES D. 1993, p. 20-21, forthe coins with the closest analogies, mostly mentioned her, 10. The figure of Artemis with either one or two torehes but in long chiton isnot discussed here. ® SansTROM M, 1940, p. 126, Series XVI, Group A, 1° 365-370, period IV dated to ca, 20-200 B.C. Earlier, Gaprict M. 1985? (1927), p. 151, n° 57-58, pl. 44/365- 310, dated it after 216 B., ic. tothe beginning of the Roman period. See also HEAD B. V. 1911, p. 156, dated to after ca, 210 B.C, SNG Cop. Sicily 466, and TTAGLAMONTE G, 1994, p. 254, serie XVI, n° B 63, ‘The obverse represents the head of Heracles wearing a lion's skin *Polybius 18. 44, 2 and 46, 5, see GARDNER P. Introduction to BMC Thessaly-Aetoia, pxxxi-xxxi > Hea B. V. 1911, p. 300, RoGERS E, 1932, p. 106- 107, n® 324 (with the head of Artemis on the obverse) and 325 (with the head of Apollo, but different from the head on the Rhizonian coins), fig. 163-164, SNG Cop. Thessaly ~ Mlyricum 163. G. GORI 1984, p. 48, indicated this type as an analogy for the representation of Artemis onthe coins of Balai.18 DUBRAVKA Uses and the other with the head of Apollo on the obverse (fig. 72), Bronze coins of Anticyra in Phocis display a figure of Artemis advancing to the right holding a torch in her left hand and a bow in her right hand, with a hound at her feet. This type is thought to be fn autonomous issue of the 2" century B.C. or later (fig. 7/3)". Bronze coins of Lysimacheia in the Thracian Chersonesus, with Artemis standing to the right and holding a long torch provide an approximate analogy (fig. 7/4). The issuing of this type is commonly dated within the period from the foundation of this city ca. 309 B.C. to its destruction ca. 200 B.C.". A similar figure of Artemis appears as one of the mint marks on the 3 century B.C. issues of the Seleucid kings in Lysimacheia, but very rare tetradrachmas of Antiochus IIT struck between 196 and 190 B.C. bear a symbol which has been interpreted as ‘Artemis holding a sceptre or thyrsus rather than a torch’ Bronze coins of Diodotus I or II of Bactria (a, 256-239 B.C. and later) display a very similar figure of Artemis holding a long torch advancing to the right, with a hound at her feet (fig. 7/5)". Diodotus Iwas a Seleucid satrap who revolted from Antiochus II to become the first independent king in that region. Numismatic evidence indicates that there were two successive rulers with this same name, and it is not possible determine which © Heap B. V. 1911, p. 339, IMHOOF-BLUMER F, GARONER P. 1964, 124-125, pLY/XVIL, LAcROKX L” 1949, p. 309-310. The coin type probably represents the statue recorded by Pausanias 10. 37, 1, a work of Praxteles or his sons for a sanctuary in Anticyra. The ‘obverse represents the head of Poseidon. Coins of this are extremely rare. ® BMC Thrace 2-3 (not illustrated; assigned to the age of Lysimachus), visible in Ska D. R. 1978, 1620. In ‘SNG Cop. Thrace Il, 903-904, this type is dated to the period from the foundation of the town by Lysimachus £2, 309 BC. to is destruction by the Thracians ca. 200. ‘The obverse represents the head of Heracles wearing & lion's skin Le RIDER G. 1988, passim and especially 204 concerning Antiochus Ml. See also Newett E. T. 1941, p. 357. From 196 B.C. Antiochus Ill was restoring Lysimachia so that it might be a residence of his elder son Seleucus (Polybius 18.51, 7-8) SMorKHoM 0. 1991, 'p. 120-121, fig, 382, MUTCHINER M. 1975, p. 44, types 82 and 83 (dichalkon and lepton), BMC Bactra-india 7, pl.1/9, more clearly Visible in SEAR D, R. 1979, "7804. ‘The obverse represents the head of Zeus. of them was responsible for these issues with Artemis In general, the representation of Artemis in a short chiton, advancing or running with either one Cr two torches corresponds to the iconography of Artemis Soteira, who ensured the overnight victory of the Megarians over the Persian army in 479 B.C. by guiding them with her torches, ie. as Phosphoros™. This type of Artemis is represented ‘on the bronze issues of Megara datable after 146 B.C. (fig, 7/6)”. It slightly differs in that Artemis is represented as running and holding a short vertical torch in each hand. ‘Analogies in the silver coins are limited to the issues of the Acamanian League datable to the short period of the expedition of Antiochus IL the Great to Greece in the late winter of 192/191 B.C. and the early spring of 191 B.C., when he reached Acarnania™®. A unique specimen displays a similar coiffure and overall style of the obverse and a very close analogy for the representation on the reverse of Artemis holding horizontally a long torch in both her hands (fig. 7/7)”.The figure of Artemis is %Pausanias 1.40, 2-3, implies that Strongylion's Artemis Soteira was represented as Phosphoros, i bearing torches BMC 43, pl21/14, with the head of Eucledes on the obverse ; see also IMiOoF-BLUMER F., GARDNER P. 1964, p. 4, pl. Ail, NG Cop. Attica ~ Aegina 485 and 493, and LACROX L. 1949, p. 294, pl. 26/4. This coin {ype appeared in the Imperial period, too, BMC 47, 12202. The copy of this statue of Artemis from the nearby Pagac, recorded by Pausenias 1. 44, 4, is represented only on the issues ftom the Roman imperial period, soe INHOOF-BLUMER F., GARDNER P. 1964, p. 859, pl. A/LIl, SNG Cop. Altica - Aegina 496 and 498, LAcROWX L, 1949, p. 294, pl. 26/56. The figures of “Artemis with either one of two torches, ina short or long chiton and with various dtals,or Diana Lucifera, appear on the reverses of imperial issues of more than ten mints in the provinces of the Balkans and Asia Minor; see KAI L. 1984, p, 656-657 (this list isnot complete), The presence of Antiochus II in Acamana in erly spring of 191 B.C. is recorded by Livy 36.11, 910 12, 1, and Appian Syriaca, 3, 16. For his expedition to ‘Acamania see GRAINGER J.D. 2002, p. 230-237, and also OseRHUMMER E. 1887, p. 178-180, Oost S. I 1954, p. 58-65, Dany O. 1999, p. 189-200. *GaDNeR P. 1878, p. 101-102, pl. 5/13, first recognized the historical setting and hence the precise chronology of the issuance of this coin, See also Inaoor-BLUMER F. 1878, p.31, 1° 36, BMC Thessaly - Actolia 14, pl. 27/5 and p. lili of the Introduction, [BARELON E. 1890, p. luxxin® 5 and p. xxiv, HEAD B. V. 1911, Dany 0. 1999, p. 337, type VIIl, GRAINGER J. 1D, 2002, .234, note 22AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA surrounded by an oak-wreath with acoms, and an anchor, the dynastic emblem of the Seleucids, is placed in front of her. However, the specific circumstances of issuing remain obscure, such as, jn which city and by which issuing authority it was struck, since the Acamanians’ support for Antiochus was only partial: Leucas, which is normally considered as the federal capital and the ‘main mint of the Acamanian League at that timo, together with Thyrcheum, another mint of the League, remained loyal to the Romans." In addition, this coin differs significantly from the usual silver issues of the Acarnanian League by its unique iconography — the standard type of the silver coins of this League displaying the beardless head of Achelous on the obverse and the figure of Apollo Actius on the reverse — and also by its unusual weight and coarse style.” However, this coin is related to a small group with practically identical figure of Artemis, but much lighter, of a ‘much finer style, with a torch as a symbol in the field, and with the head of Achelous on the obverse; this group is also datable to 192 B.C.(fig. 718)". * Appian Syriaca, 9,56, forthe tradition regarding the reasons for which the anchor became the emblem of Seleucus I Justin 15 4, 34, forthe story of Seleueus I's conception by Apollo, who in a dream supposedly presented Seleucus’ mother Laodice with a ring engraved with an anchor, which later appeared as a mark on his descendants’ thighs. Clement of Alexandria, Paedagogus 3.11, $9, 2, for the anchor asa spmbol ofthe Seleucis. 36.11-12 records that only Medeon and some other towns of Acamania submited to Antiochus, while ‘Thyrreum and Leucas remained loyal to the Romans. Appian Syriaca, 3, 16 records that Antiochus besieged ats songholds in Acani. whieh tater indiates that some of the Acamanians resisted campaign, See Wnor# W. 1892p. 10, 0st SI 1954, P. 61-62, DANY O. 199, p. 193-194, and GRAINGER. 1D. 2002, p. 230-257. For Leueas as mint see IMHOOF- ‘BLUMER. 1878, p, 13 and Davy 0.1999, p. 287, ® For the types of the Acamanian League in general, see the fundamental work by Ioni0or-BLUMER F. 1878, 1346, and the enhanced catalogue by Davy 0, 1999, ‘Numismatische Appendix’ in p. 311-339. Regarding the weight ofthis coin (7,35 g), see IMsoOF-BLUMER F. 1878, p. 31, note 28a (a/sater of basically Att silver standard), and Dany ©. 1999, p. 303 and 307 (a lighter % stater of Coreyrean standard). * Iutioor BLUMER F. 1878, p, 30, n° 32, pl. 14/6, BUC Thessaly ~ Aetolia, 13, pl.27/4, DANY 0. 1999, p. 336, type Vit, 1-4. Only four specimens are recorded. This type had been indicated as an analogy for the representation of Artemis on the coins of Ballsios by RENDIC-MiOcEVIE D. 1976, p. 39, and GoRINt G. 1984, ‘The distinctive iconography of an important silver coinage firmly based in this historical context might be regarded as good support for ecalihing ho chonalogy of « Socne Hae wie Similar iconography of a smaller town in neighboring region". Yet, the preserved specimens . 48, More generally, this type belongs to the group B of the Acarnanian ‘silver coins in the standard classification by IMNOOF-BLUMER F. 1878, p. 29-32, types n° 31-36. See also DANY 0, 1999, p. 300-306, and 336-338 types VIL-XI, HEAD B. V. 1911, p. 333 and SCHWABACHER W. 1953, p. 221-223. All the types of ‘group are known either as a unique coin or in a few specimens only, and none so far was discovered in a coin hoard. Their weight ranges from almost 6,5 to less ‘than 3g. This group displays a variety of reverse types, ‘one of them being a unique specimen with the standing figure of Apollo Citharoedus and an elephant, another Seleucid symbol, on the obverse, thus linking the whole ‘group even more firmly to Antiochus’ expedition. For this coin see the above-mentioned literature, especially ‘Waomit W. 1892, p 9-11, For the dating ofthe issues of ‘the whole group, including both types with Artemis, cither to the period of preparations or during the campaign, see SCHWABACHER W. 1953, p.222, Oost S. I, 1954, p. 62, DANY O. 1999, p. 304 and GRAINGER J 1D. 2002, p. 234, note 2. ““GaRDNER P. 1878, p. 90-102 supposed that Antiochus’s expedition in Greece had its wider fumismatic aspect in that some other coinages displaying a mixture of local and Seleucid elements of iconography were issued by allied cities and states to promote his exploits; this supposition was accepted by BABELON B. 1890, p. loxxichoxxiv. Such coinages supposedly included the tetradrachmas of the League of the Actolians, who asked Antiochus for military help and organized the first stages of his expedition : the tetradrachmas of Chaleis, in which he established his headquarters ; the didrachmas of Carystus in Euboea, ‘and the bronze coins of Hephaestia in Lemnos and of ‘Amynander, the king of the Athamanes, who welcomed the arrival of Antiochus and/or had high expectations forthe results of his expedition. For references to these coinages see BMC Central Greece 85, pl. 21/1 for CChaleis, and 18, pl. 19/2, for Carystus ; BMC Thessaly — ‘Aetolia 9-11, pl. 30/6, for the Aetolian issues, and also ‘BMC Seleucid Kings of Syria, p. xxvi and 29, n° 1-4, pl 28/2-4, forthe coinages of Carystus and of the Aetolian League with the portrait of Antiochus III ; BMC ‘Thessaly — Actolia 1-4, p.18/5, for Amynander ; BMC Thrace 6, for Hephaestia. However, in his thorough study of the Euboean coinage Picard rejected this supposition regarding the tetradrachmas of Chaleis, because he convincingly demonstrated that the beginning of this issue could not have been earlier than the 180's or 170's B.C.; see PICARD O, 1979, p. 91 and 284 (3). The other issues mentioned above certainly reed more critical restudy.DUBRAVKA UlES of the Acamanian issues with Artemis are so ‘unusual and rare that the question naturally arises if they could have been influential enough to be ‘copied by the mint of Rhizon. The characteristics ‘of the group to which the types with Artemis belong, especially the reduced weight and discontinuity of the choice of coin types, rather imply a reduced overall output, especially of the type with an anchor. Moreover, it seems likely that they were completely demonetarized immediately after the failure of Antiochus” expe Hence these Acamanian coins could hardly have had any significant influence on the mint of Rhizon, although they are apparently so. similar. ‘The alliance of the Acamanians with the IIlyrians in 229 B.C. during the reign of queen Teuta seems to have been only short-lived and with no stable basis". In the almost forty years between this alliance and the expedition of Antiochus Il to ‘Acamnania, the situation on the eastern shores of the Adriatic and lonian Seas changed substantially, 0 that it would be implausible to suppose any ‘connection between these two regions of so great consequence that would result in the direct imitation of a coin type. On the whole, the chronologies of the coinages with the comparable reverse types indicate the second half of the 3" and the frst half of the 2" century B.C. as a broad period in which the figure of Artemis with a torch frequently occurs. This iconographic analogy suggests that ‘the Rhizonian coinage with this type may well belong to this same period. On the whole, the numismatic and historical evidence pose no obstacle to this suggestion. An evaluation of the place of this Rhizonian coinage within its regional numismatic environment, i.e. among the other coinages which were struck in the Illyrian regions during this period, may help to define a more narrow time span to which it probably belongs. © see Polybius 2.6, 9-10 on the beginning of this alliance in 230 B.C. In the spring of 229 B.C. the fleet of the Illyrians and Acamanians defeated the fleet ofthe ‘Achaeans and Aefolians atthe island of Paxos south of Coreyra, Polybius 2.10,1-6. There is no further mention ‘of combined actions of the Tilyrians and Acarnanians afer the treaty imposed on the Illyrians by the Romans in 228 B.C. Among the forces of Antigonus Doson at ‘tho battle of Sellasia in 222 B.C. Polybius (2. 65, 4, 2. 66, 5 and 10, 67, 1 and 7, and 68, 9) mentioned the Acarnanians, ‘and also his Ilyrian allies under the ‘command of Demetrius of Pharus, but nothing indicates, that there was then an alliance between the Illyrians and the Acamanians, The chronologies of issuing of the post- Ballios coinage and also of its predecessor, the coinage of king Ballaios in Rhizon, are certainly comprised within the same time span, The presence of Artemis on these almost certainly earlier coinages made the reappearance of a slightly modified representation of the goddess easy, even supposing a short interval of inactivity of the mint after the cessation of issuing of the Post-Ballaios type. Moreover, the figure of Artemis with a torch is specific for the coinages of Ballaios and the autonomous coinages of the Rhizonian mint, and does not appear on any other coinage in the Illyrian regions, either of the indigenous Illyrian tribes or of the Greek along the eastern Adriatic coast. Besides its specific iconography, other characteristics of the Rhizonian coinage with Apollo and Artemis, such as its weight and its overall appearance, differ considerably from the characteristics of the coinages of the Illyrian issuing, authorities: the towns of Scodra"” and Lissus", the tribes of the Labeates”” and the “ The metrology of the Illyrian coinages still needs to be studied and the weight slandards of the bronze issues remain uncertain. For the purpose of this study it suffices to emphasize thatthe average weights ofall the types of these coinages are considerably greater than the average weight of the Rhizonian type with Apollo and Artemis. Compare, for instance, the weights of the issues of Scodra, Lissus and Genthius as indicated in the ¢atalogue to ISLAMI S. 1966, p, 240-252. *” Scodra in the region of the Labeates is indicated as the Illyrian capital by Livy 45.262, and by Florus, Epltomae 1. 29,3. Livy 44.31,2-3, records that Scodra was the center of resistance to the Romans ~ Genthius ‘organized it as the main fortress for his whole kingdom because it was the strongest town of the Labeates, and difficult to approach, “itis unclear whether Lissus was a profoundly Hellenized Mlyrian town or a foundation of the elder ionysios of Syracuse, as is stated by Diodorus 15.13, 4-5 ; for a discussion of various views of Diodorus* statement see MAY J. M. F. 1946, p. 48 (4). However, LLissus is commonly reckoned as an Illyrian issuing authority because its coinage doubtlessly belongs tothe period of reign of Genthius, who placed his headquarters. in Lissus and probably made it his residence and a temporary capital, because it was by far the strongest defensible position in the core region of his kingdom, as is stated by Livy, 44,30,6-8. See also Polybius 28.8, 4-5 and Livy 43. 20, 2-4, who indicate that king Genthius was in Lissus in 169 B.C. * For the Labeates and ther territory see Livy 43. 31,2, 44.31,10 and 32,3, and especially 43.19,3, where it is indicated that Genthius was reigning in the land of the Labeates. See above for Scodra as their town,AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA Daorsi®, and king Genthius"'. All the issues of these authorities are in only bronze, with just a few preserved specimens and, with only one exception, had a restricted area of circulation. ‘The basis for establishing the chronology of the issues of these authorities is provided by the coinage of king Genthius, with the symbol of a Macedonian shield on the obverse and his name and royal ttle on the reverse”. The appearance of an unmistakably Macedonian symbol manifestly reveals the political influence under which this coinage was initiated and also determines its chronology: during Genthius’ alliance with Perseus and not later than 168 B.C. Within this same chronological framework should be dated also the issues of Scodra and Lissus bearing the types with the Macedonian shield, which, according to May, seem to have been issued either at the same time or slightly earlier than the royal issues. King Genthius also issued a type with purely Ilyrian symbols: the head of the Illyrian divinity Rhedon, ie. a beardless male head wearing a causia, facing to the right on the obverse, and on the reverse a galley, pethaps a lembus, a light lyrian vessel. This ® For the Daorsi see Polybius 32. 9,2, Livy 45.26,14, Appian Ilprica 2, and Strabo 7.55. They inhabited the hinterland of central Dalmatia and were subject to Genthius. 5 For the literary sources conceming Genthius, see [STAMELINF. 1910, p. 1198-1201 5 The sequence of varius types of coins issued by king Genthius inthe mints of Seodra and Lissus was established by MAY J, M. F. 1946, p. 49-50, 52-54. An earlier proposal by EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 269-286 related the issues with the shield to the period of its domination by the Macedonians following the capture of Lissus by Philip V in 213 B.C. This proposal was accepted by BRUNSMID J. 1898, p. 70 and 74, but May convincingly disproved it A study by IsLAvt I. 1966, p. 225.253 added new material to the discussion, but the chronology he proposed for the related issues of Scodra, Lissus and Genthius (p. 232-233) is not plausible, in that he dated the issues of the towns bearing. the Macedonian. shield not only during the period of alliance of Genthius with Perseus, but also much earlier, as well as after 168 B.C. CEKA H. 1972, p. 154 expressed a similar opinion to Islam's. See also a detailed study ofthe types with the Macedonian by LIAM K. 1998, p. 146-148, generally agreeing with ‘May's conclusions about the chronology. The coinages of the llyrian issuing authorities sil need more critical studying and a reassessment ofthe chronology of some spesile types, For the identification of the head on the obverse as that of the male divinity Rhedon, which better suits its appearing on the coinages of the towns and tribes, and type has been dated to the period preceding the alliance with Perseus", during which Genthius officially although not very resolutely adhered the pro-Roman policy developed by his father Pleuratus®. This is the only Illyrian issue that circulated beyond its area of issuing, and it reached the northern regions of Genthius’ kingdom, as is attested by specimens discovered as far away as central Dalmatia. The same type was issued by Lissus, and is considered as synchronous with the related type of Genthius". It was also issued by the tribe of the Labeates", probably in their capital Scodra, and by the Daorsi in central Dalmatia (Fig. 8/1 and 8/2)". Very probably all these issues should also be dated to Genthius’ reign. not asthe portrait of Genthius, see CEKA H, 1976, p. 29- 34. For the chronology see MAY J. M. F. 1946, p. 53. The type was fist published by EVANS A. J. 1880, p.271, n° 4, pl. 13/6. BRUNSmuD J. 1898, p. 71, n° 3-5. See also Ceka H. 1972, p. 153-154, and RENDIC-MIOCEVKC D. 1969, p. 1-7 * around 189 B.C, Pleuratus was considered the most powerful among the Illyrian rulers, which he became with the help of the Romans, see Polybius 21.11,8 and 21.21.34. 5 Sec for instance MAROVIE I. 1976, p. 223, n° 1, which ‘was discovered near Split. 57 The issue of Lissus should be dated at the same time as the corresponding issue of Genthius, see May J. M. 1946, p. 53-54. See also BRUNSMID J. 1898, p. 74, 3-4, 'SNG Cop. Thessaly ~ Ilyricum 524, ISLAM S. 1966, p. 235-236 and 245, and JUBANIB, 1972, p. 70-73. 5 junant B. 1972, p. 69-75 fist published this coinage dating it to 168-167 B.C, See also RENDIC-Miocevic D. 1973, p. 9-24. See below for more plausible chronology. BRUNSMID J. 1898, p. 7475, n® 1-2, BASLER D. 1971, p. 333-336, MARIC Z. 1976, p. 253-260, Marovié I. 1976, p. 229-231. The issue by the Daorsi is of a lightly different style, but all the details of its sonography are the same and there is no substantial difference in their weight. © All the authors cited inthe previous fotnote dated this issue after 168 B.C. However, see MAY J. M. F. 1946, 1p 54 (35), who is right in considering it improbable that the types nearly identical to those of Genthius could be used after his downfall, Hence both the tribal issues should be dated to the same period as the related issue of Genthius. The grounds for the earlier chronology ‘were sought in Livy’s record (45.26, 13-15) of Anicius” decree given in Scodra in 168 B.C. which indicates that, the Daorsi were favored with inmunitas by the Romans because having joined their side before the final defeat ‘of Genthius. In light of this information, their coinage ‘was understood as commemorating their liberation from Genthius? rule and dated after 168 B.C. The reason for which the Labeates would have been granted the coinage of the same type thus remains uncertain, 161DUBRAVKA UJES Fig. 8/1: a bonze coin ofthe Daorsi Published by Manié Z. 1976, p. 256. Fig, 82: a bronze coin of the Labeates. Reproduced from RENDIC MIOCEVIC D. 1973, p.24. None of the above-mentioned Ilyrian issues, hhas any similarity to the issues of Rhizon Altogether there are no numismatic grounds for correlating the Rhizonian type featuring Apollo and Artemis with the Illyrian issues datable to the reign of Genthius. Rhizon does not seem to have had a place in Genthius’ minting poticy. Even if it ‘were supposed that an independent coinage might have been present in the northem part of his realm, the Rhizonian coinage is so dissimilar that it could be better explained as belonging to a different epoch, There arises the question if the Rhizonitae could have been allowed to mint coinage by the Romans, or if they could have independently started their own coinage after 168 B.C. The thorough plundering which followed the conquest of Illyria by the Romans makes it rather difficult to posit any minting by an Illyrian issuing authority after 168 B.C."". The presence in 167 BC. of a because they were not mentioned as a favored tribe, in contrast with the Rhizonitae, who were indicated’ as liberos and immunes, so a Rhizonian coinage of this ‘ype should rather have been expected, but none such has been discovered so far. This whole interpretation should better be abandoned. © Livy 45. 43, 5 records that in the tiumph of L. Anicius Gallus for his victory over Genthius and the Iilyrians were carried 27 pounds of gold and 19 of silver, 13.000 denarii and 120.000 specimens of the “lllyrian silver"; Livy however judged it as a much lesser one than the contemporary triumph over Perseus and Macedonia, It remains unresolved which coins were Roman garrison in Rhizon (Livy 45. 26, 2) does not suggest that the conditions were then favorable for issuing an autonomous coinage. These remarks in fact apply to the question of the chronology of all the other coinages produced in Rhizon. Without direct information from the extant literary sources but with the evidence provided by the coins themselves, it seems more plausible to date the autonomous Rhizonian type with Apollo and Artemis before 168 B.C., and perhaps even before the reign of Genthius. This period coincides with the reign of Pleuratus, Genthius’ father. The historical sources indicate he pursued a pro-Roman policy, which seems to have brought a calmer period of restoring the forces for the Illyrians" ‘Thus the very end of the 3” and the first two or three decades of the 2” century B.C. appear as the probable period for the issuing of the second autontomous coinage of Rhizon. For this period, as well as in_ general, there is practically “no information from the literary sources regarding the relations of the coastal towns, such as Rhizon, with the regional power, or with the Illyrian kingdom. Almost nothing applicable to Rhizon can be inferred from Polybius’ (5.4,3-4) mention of “nohsdsvacrat” who vexed King Scerdilaidas. ‘The archaeological evidence sheds some more light on the contexts of the Rhizonitan coinages, including the second autonomous type. Although not yet sufficiently excavated, the site of the ancient town of Rhizon has yielded important finds, which indicate that Rhizon had been a port of trade on the intersection of sea- and land routes, through which various commodities and goods were distributed further inland®. The fragments of distinct imported types of pottery are especially ‘meant asthe “Illyrian silver" It seems that Livy 44.27, 8-12 implies that in 168 B.C. in Pella Perseus allowed the minting of 300 talents of silver for Genthius. No extant specimen can be related to this information, but CRAWFORD M. 1985, 221 suggested that these coins ‘might be Livy's “Iliyrian silver” "See the above footnote $5. Polybius 18, 47, 12 records thatthe Romans reassigned to Pleuratus Lychnis ‘and Parthus, which had previously been occupied by Philip V. For the finds of pottery see Uses D. 1999, passim. The finds of pottery of South Italian origin include the types datable from the late 4® to the 2™ centuries B.C., such as late red-figure pottery perhaps of Apulian production, late Gnathia pottery, the pottery with late Gnathia elements, and Canosa pottery. Some of the high-quality pottery might well come from Dyrrhachium and Apollonia, but the lack of a comprehensive work on these centers of production prevents a more precise atribution,AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA indicative of contacts withthe neighboring regions. Such pottery of ascertained chronology mostly came from’ Southern Italy, implying that the contacts with the opposite side of the Adriatic Sea were frequent. Finds of coins from Southern Italy also occured among the stray site finds: a quadrans of Petelia in Bruttium and a diobol of Heraclea in Lucania’, Conversely, the bronze coins of Ballaios of the Rhizonitan type have been discovered on many sites in Italy, leaving no doubt that the exchange of coinage was reciprocal”. Hence it seems that the Rhizonitans were in active contact with the westem Adriatic coast in the period close to the issuance of the autonomous coinages, presumably for trade and, possibly, in connection with the reeruitment of mercenaries. ‘The movement of people across the Adriatic Sea, which caused the movement of coinage and pottery, became more intensive from the First Iilyrian war onward®, In this light, the above- mentioned close resemblance of the Rhizonitan autonomous coinage with the coinage of the Mamertines gains importance : it seems to add to the likelihood of dating the Rhizonitan autonomous coinage around the late 3° and early 2* centuries BC. ‘The autonomous coinages of Rhizon thus appear more understandable in their historical context, and their issuing seems datable as follows: = The Post-Ballaios type was issued in continuity after the issuing of Ballaios in Rhizon, near the end of the 3° century B.C, = The Apollo/Artemis type is datable to the period between the last decade of the 3" and the second or atthe latest the third decade of the 2™ century B.C. © Ums D, 1993, Heraclea: Group find I, no. 54, BMC Italy 42, ca, 380-281 B.C., but the coin is perforated and hence it was in a prolonged, though non-monetary use which could explain its combination with later coins in the same site-context ; Petelia : group find II, n° 35, BMC Waly 1, 216-89 B.C. There are aso finds of coins of Dyrrhachium, group find I: drachma, n° 55, BMC Corinth 27-31, ca. 250-229 B.C., and bronze coins n° 56-58, BMC Thessaly - Aetolia 138-169 (type), ca. 229- 100 B.C. group find Il: bronze coins, n° 32-34, same type as the previous. For the circumstances of discovery of the group finds, see the above footnote 6. ‘ For the finds ofthe coins of king Ballaios in Italy, see VISONA P. 1985, p. 117-121 and GoRINIG. 1989, p.30- 31 * See CRAWFORD M. 1978, p. 1-11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 wish to express my thanks to the following colleagues for their kind help : = Dr. Andrew Meadows, the Keeper of Greek Coin Collection of the British Museum, for providing the seannings for the illustratons 4 and 7/4-8. = Dr. Dominique Gerin, Cabinet des Médailles, alee Gn emt groan. tar Bowing Oe seannings for the illustrations 6/1-2 and 7/1-3, = Mr. Nikola Seldaroy for providing the scannings of {0 coins from his collection, here 6/3 a and b, = Dr. Henry Kim, the Keeper of Greek Coin Collection of the Ashmolean Museum, for providing the scannings, for the coin 8/1 in the illustration 2, CATALOGUE ‘This catalogue includes all the specimens of both types of the Rhizonian autonomous coinage which were available for the study. 1, The first, or post-Ballaios type Variant 1 slightly larger flan, linear schematization of the style, and the inscription clearly present on the first, four specimens, 1. 1,86 g, 12,10 mm, 9. Ashmolean Museum. EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 292 (giving 1,200 g as weight), group ‘autonomous coins of Rhizon n® 2, pl. 13/10, For more literature see footnote 10 inthe text. 2.1,89 g, 11,70 mm, 9. Archaeological Museum in Split. MAROVIC I 1988, p.96, pl. 2/1a-b. ‘This and the previous specimen n° 1 share the same obverse dies and moreover are very close to the obverse of n® 3. 3..0,80 g, 11,75 mm, 4. Very thin flan, Podgorica. Only AN: can be discerned, 4.1.50 g, /, /. Present location unknown. EVANS A. J 1880, p. 294, group IV: coins ofa successor of Ballaeus 1, pigs. = The indicated weight was given by Evans. However, see n® 1 above for the difference between his and Gorini’s measuring. Hence this might be the specimen withthe greatest preserved weight so far recorded. = The part of the inscription on the lef, in front of the figure of Artemis, should be read NIT[AN]. Evans proposed MY(A/N?), in which N close to was ead as M, Tas ¥ and Aas A or N. This would be the only specimen of this type with the syllable NI legible. 5. 1,12 g, 11 mm, 10. Ashmolean Museum, ftom J. M. F. May's collection. Published by Goris! G. 1991, p. 21, n® 29 (not illustrated) as a “barbarous imitation” of BBallaios’ coins of the Rhizonian type, with a remark “unclassifiable” 168DuBRAVKA Uses 6.0,930 g, 11,30 mm, 6(2). Podgorica, Varian 11: very small flan, the ead sometimes seems to be to the left (such as n° 7, 11 and 12), differently schematized style, inscription discemible on one specimen only. The sequence of these coins is arranged according to their weight. 7. 1,64 g, 10,30 mm, / (the obverse is not well preserved). Belgrade, IGBC (Inventory of Greek Bronze Coins) n° 194, Uses D, 1993, p. 21, group find I, n° 50. 8.1,43 g, 11,80 mm, 12. Only -Z0- can be discerned. Belgrade, IGBC n° 189. Unis D. 1993, p. 21 and 28, group find I, n° 48. 9.1,12 g, 10,90 mm, S. Belgrade, IGBC n° 191. USES D. 1995, p. 21, group find I,n® 47 10, 1,00 g, 9,65 mm, (the obverse is not well preserved). Belgrade, [GBC n° 193. UsES D. 1993, p. 21, group find I, n° 49. 11. 0,935 g, 10.30 mm, / (the obverse is not well preserved). Podgorica 120,88 g, 10,65 mm, 11. Belgrade, GBC n° 192. Uses. 1D. 1993, p. 21, group find 1, n* 48, 13. 0,875 g, 10.25 mm, 7. Three dots(?) in front of the head, Podgorica, 14, 0,825 g, 10,15 mm, / (the reverse is not centered). Podgorica, 15, 0,69 g, 9,90 mm, 11, Belgrade, IGBC n? 190. Uses D. 1993, 21 and 28, group find I, n° 46. 16. 0,595 g, 8,00 mm, / (the obverse is not well preserved), Podgorica. 2. The second, or ApollolArtemis type: ‘The specimens are grouped according to their obverse dies. Reverse dies may differ. If not otherwi stated, the specimens are from the collection in Podgorica Group 1 1.3,625 g, 14,75 mm, 6 2.2,110 g, 12,25 mm, 6. 3. 2/0008, 11,65 mm, 4. 1,960 g, 12,90 mm, 6. 5.1,645 g, 11,60.mm, 6 6.1585 g, 13,45 mm, 6. 7.1,480 g, 12,50 mm, 6. 8.1,250 g, 11,20mm, 3. Belgrade, [GBC n° 226. Uses, . 1993, group find Il, n°25. 9. 1,220 g, 15,00 mm, 9. 10. 1,170g, 11,55 mm, 3 11, 0,84 g, 11,90 mm, 4. Belgrade, IGBC n° 227. Uses . 1993, group find Il, n° 26. Group 2 1. 1,720 g, 11,90 mm, 9 2.1.16 g, 12,10 mm, 1. Belgrade, IGBC n° 182. Uses D. 1993, group find I, n° 38. 43. 1,00 g. Diameter and the position ofthe dies remain ‘unknown, EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 294, group IV: coins of ‘a successor of Ballaeus n” 2, pl.14/12. 4, 1,00 g, 12,00 mm, 9, Belgrade, GBC n° 183. Uses D. 1993, group find I, n° 39. 5.0.98 g, 11,60 mm, 9. Belgrade, IGBC n° 245. Uses D. 1993, group find Hl, n° 11 6.0942 g, 11 mm, 2. Ashmolean Museum, from J. M. E, May collection, Gorin G. 1991, 50. 70,940 g, 11 mm, 6. Ashmolean’ Museum, from J. M. F. May collection. GoriNi G. 1991, 51. 8, 0,892 g, 11 mm, 2. Ashmolean Museum, from J. M. F. May collection. GoRiNt G. 1991, 52. 9.0855 g, 12,55 mm, 9. 10. 0,85 g, 11,90 mm, 9. Belgrade, IGBC n? 184. Uses. , 1993, group find I, n° 40, 11. 0,63 g, 10,85 mm, 7. Belgrade, IGBC n? 185. Uses . 1993, group find I, n° 41. Group 3 1. 1,685 g, 12,45 mm, 12. 2. 1,672 g, 13 mm, 12. Ashmolean Museum, from J. M. F. May collection. GORING, 1991, 45. 3.1,630 g, 150mm, / 41,620 8, 14,00 mi, 3. 5. 1,50 g, Details remain unknown. EVANS A. J. 1880, .294, group IV : coins ofa successor of Ballacus n° 3, pula 6. 1,479 g, 13 mm, 3. Ashmolean Museum, from J. M. F, May collection, GoRiNt G. 1991, 47. 7.1280 g, 12.25 mm, 3. 8, 1,020 g, 11,60mm, 9 Group 4 1. 3,054 g, 13 mm, 7. Ashmolean Museum, from J. M. F, May collection. GORiNt G. 1991, 43, 2 2,10 g, 11,10 mm, 3. Ashmolean Museum, discovered by A. J, Evans in Risan and donated in 1934, 3.1,630 g, 13,45 mm, 9 4, 1,511 g, 13 mm, 2. Ashmolean Museum, from J. M. F. May collection, GORINI G. 1991, 46, 5. 1,058 g, 11 mm, J. Ashmolean Museum, from J. M. F. May collection. GoRINIG. 1991, 49. Group 5 1.2475 g, 14,90 mm, 4 2.2.29 g, 13,30 mm, 12. Belgrade, IGBC n° 181. Uses D. 1993, group find I, n° 37. 3 1,705 g, 13 mm, 10. Ashmolean Museum, from J. M. F, May collection. Gorint G, 1991, 44, 4,1,705 g, 14,50 mm, 3.AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA Group 6 1.4,72Sg, 17,20 mm, 11 2.1315 g, 16,45 mm, / 3. 1,270 g, 10,50 mm, 3. Group 7 1, 200 g, 11,20 mm, 12. Belgrade, IGBC n° 186, Uses D. 1993, group find I, n° 42, 2. 0,75 g, 9,20 mm, 9. Belgrade, /GBC n° 246. Uses D. 1993, group find Il, n° 12. 3.0,825 g, 9,85 mm, /. 8 Two specimens with specific die-combinations, not related tothe groups 1. 1,86 g, 10,10 mm, 9. Ashmolean Museum, discovered by A. J. Evans in Risan and donated in 1934, Gown G. 1991, b. ‘This is the only specimen that displays the second part of the inscription -ITAN to the right, in front of the figure of Artemis. Its relief is the best preserved of all, yet the flan was considerably smaller than the surface of the dies, so that the types are not completely visible. 2. 1,075 g, 11,45 mm, / (obverse obliterated). 9. Unclasifiable specimens, because worn, corroded or partially obliterated 1.2,150g, 13,10 mm, / 2. 1,79 g, 11,10 mm, 9. Belgrade, GBC n° 187. UsES D. 1993, group find I, n° 43. 3. 1,435 g, 12,65 mm, / 4.1287 g, Il mm, pierced, in poor condition. Ashmolean’ Museum, ftom J. M. F, May collection Gorin G, 1991, 48. 5. 1,00 g, 12,00 mm, 1. Belgrade, GBC n° 188. Uzes D. 1993, group find I, n° 44 6. 0,90 g, 12,80 mm, 7, Belgrade, GBC n° 228. Uses D. 1993, group find I, n°27. 7.0,16 g, 10,70 mm, 9, Belgrade, IGBC n° 230. Uses D. 1993, group find TI, n° 29, 8.0.72 g, 12,00 mm, 4, Belgrade, JGBC n° 229. Uses D. 1993, group find II, n° 28. 9, Weight, diameter and the position of the dies remain ‘unknown. EVANS A. J, 1880, 294, group IV: coins of a successor of Ballaeus n° 4, pl.14/15, reported as being. kept in the Archaeological Museum in Zagreb. APPENDICES 10 THE CATALOGUE 1. List ofthe illegible specimens There are 35 obliterated specimens in Podgorica. ‘They are not worn, but either corrosion or excessively abrasive removing of their patina damaged thet shallow relief. Most of them probably belong to the variant I of the Post-Ballaios type, because of their small size and weight. However, some larger specimens might also belong tothe other autonomous type. Their attribution is unclear, but all these coins most probably belong 0 either one or another autonomous type, and for this reason they ar listed here cumulatively. 11,975 g; 10,35 mm, 2.1785 g; 11,45 mm, 3. 1,780 g; 10,40 mm, 4.1,720 g; 11,75 mm, 5. 1685 g; 11/25 mm. 6, 1,600 g; 12,00 mm, 7.1570 g; 12.90 min, 8. 1,540 g; 13,55 mm, 9, 1455 g; 10,80 mm, 10, 1,425 g; 11,50 mm. 11, 1420 g; 14,00 mm. 12, 1385 g; 12,40 mm. 13. 1,210 g; 12,30 mm. 14, 1,180 g: 10,50 mm, 15.1170 g; 11,50 mm. 16. 1,170 g; 10:30 mm. 17. 1080 g; 10,50 mm. 18. 1060 g; 10:15 mm. 19. 1,040 g; 09,85 mm. 20, 0,930 g; 10,70. mm. 21, 0,910 g: 10,40 mm, 22, 0,870 g; 08,65 mm, 23, 0,825 8; 11,85 mm. 24, 0,820 g; 10,40. mm, 25, 0,790 g; 13,60 mm. 26, 0,765 g; 10,90 mm. 270,750 g; 10,35 mm, 28. 0,735 g; 9,75 mm. 29, 0,725 g; 10,60 mm. 30. 0,680 g; 11,85 mm, 31, 0,640 g; 8,20 mm, 32, 0,620 g:9.70 mm. 33, 0,620 g; 9,65 mm. 34,0,575 g: 11,25 mm. 35. 0,480 g; 10,40 mm. 2. Total number of specimens available for the study 107 specimens. 1. Post-Ballaios type: 16 specimens - Podgorica 6, Belgrade 6, Ashmolean 2, Split 1, and one known only from the publication by EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 294, pl. 14/11 2, Apollo-Artemis type: 56 - Podgorica 26, Belgrade 15, ‘Ashmolean 12, and 3 known from the publication by EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 294, pl 14/12, 13 and 15. 3. legible - obliterated: 35 specimens, all in Podgorica 3. The coins in the museum collections : 103 specimens, 1. Ashmolean 14: 2 Post-Ballaios type (further referred to as PB) and 12 Apollo-Artemis (A/A) type. Publication: 1 by EVANS A. J. 1880, p. 292, pl. 13/10 (1 PB, here n® WI), 12 by GORINI G. 1991 (IL AVA and 1 PB), and 1 published here for the first time (A/A, 4/2). Regarding 12 specimens published by G. Gorini 1991, p.28166 DUBRAVKA Uses, a 10 A/A come from sged hoard from J. M. F. May's collection, previously unpublished, but studied by May in 1930s, Here 2/6-8, 3/2 and 6, Wl, 4-5, 5/3, 8/1 and 94), b/ 1 of AJA type, indicated as “b* because believed to have been published by Evans A. J. 1880, but it is not any of the spocimens published there. Here 8 c/ 1 of PB type, published accidentally as n° 29 of “barbarous imitations” of Ballaios* coins of *A* (i Rhizonian) type. Here US. 2. Belgrade 21: 6 PB and 15 AJA. Put 1998. 3. Split: 1 PB, Published by MAROVIC I. 1988, p. 96, pl 2a/lab, 4. Podgorica 67 specimens: 6 PB, 26 A/A, 35 illegible Al published here for the frst time. sd by WES D. 4. Additional note ‘The specimen published by Evans A. J. 1880, p. 294, group IV : coins of a successor of Ballaeus, n° 5, 1.14/14, isa coin of Ballaios, forthe following reasons! its weight (given as 2,60 g, ie. might be slightly larger) and size are comparatively larger, and my close ‘examination of the coin and its plaster cast revealed that Artemis is not slowly advancing but dynamically running and also carrying spears in her left hand, which corresponds to the ‘Rhizonian’ type of Ballas’ coins. BIBLIOGRAPHY ALPOLDY G, 1968 = ALFOLDY G,, 5. "PiGjv. RE Suppl 11, Stutgart 1968, col, 1214-1217, BABFLON E, 1890 : BABELON E., Catalogue des ‘monnaies greeques de la Bibliotheque Nationale. Les rois de Syrie, d'Armenie et de Comagine, Pati, 1890. [BASLER D. 1971 : BASLER D., Novdié plemena Daorsa’ (MUnze des Stammes Daorsoi), Glasnik Zemaliskog ‘muzeja (Wissenschafliche Mitteilungen des Landes- ‘muscums) 26, Sargjevo 1971, p. 333-336. BRUNSwID J. 1898 : BRUNSMID J., Die Inschrifien und Minzen der griechische Stddie‘Dalmatiens, ‘Abhandlungen des Archacologisch-Epigraphisches ‘Seminares der Universitat Wien, Heft 13, Wien 1898, ‘CaBANES P. 2001 : CABANES P., sv. Risintum (Rhizon), Der Newe Pauly 10, Stuttgart, 2001, col. 1023-1024 ‘CavpONt C. 1842 : CAVEDONI C. {a comment without title after the article by Nisiteo P., *Medaglie del re Ballaeus’, p. 122-128 in the same volume], nnali dell ‘Istituto di Corrispondenca Archeologica 14, Roma 1842, p. 128. CEKA H. 1972: CEKA H., Questions de mumismatique illrienne, Tiana, 1972 CEKA H. 1976 : CEKA HL, Le buste du roi Genthios ou bien une figure de mythologie illyrienne? in Kovanje 1 Kovnice anickog i srednjevekovnog novea (Frappes et ateliers monétaires dans Vantiguité et moyen age, [Belgrade 1976, p. 29-34. CHIL: Coin Hoards I, London, 1975. CRAWFORD M. 1978 : CRAWFORD M,, Trade and movement of coinage across the Adriatic in the Hellenistic period, in Scripta Nummaria Romana, Essays presented to H. Sutherland, London, 1978, p. I= I DANY O. 1999 : Dany O., Akarnanien im Hellenismus, Geschichte und Volkerrecht in Nordvwestgriechenland, ‘Manchen, 1999, Di FILIPPO BALESTRAZZ E. 1984 : Di FILIPPO Batestrazzt B., sv. Apolfo Agyiews, LIMC Il, Zarich, 1984, p. 327-232. EVANS A. J. 1880. EVANS A. J, On some recent discoveries of Illyrian coins,” The Numismatic Chronicle* 20, London 1880, p. 269-302, GaBRICI M, 1985? : GABRICI M., La monetazione del bronzo nella Sicilia antica, Bologna 1985 (reprint of Palermo 1927). GABBLER H. 1906, 1935 : GaEBLER HL, Die antiken Minzen von Makedonia und Paionia, Antiken Munzen ‘Nordgriechenlands, vol. II, Berlin 1906-1935, GanaSan M. 1966: Gaasanins Starnar 17, Belgrade, 1966, p.27-36 GGanbyen P. 1878 + GARDNER P., Macedonian and Greek coins of the Seleucida, ” The Numismatic Chronicle 18, 1878, p. 9002 Gorist G. 1984 : Grint G., Re Ballaios: una proposta eronologica, in Il erinale dell'Europa, l'area illirico- danubiana net suo! rapporti con It mondo classico, Roma 1984, p. 43-49. GoRINI 1989 : GoRIM G., Una moneta di Ballaios da San Domino, Isole Tremiti, Rivista Italiana di Numismatica 91, Milano, 1989, p.27-32. Gorn 1991 ; Gorn G,, The Ballaeus hoard from Rizan in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, Sefeizer -Manzblatter 162 (Jg. 41), Basel, 1991, p. 25-30. GRAINGER J, D. 2002: GRAINGER J.D, The Roman War of Antiochos the Great, Leiden-Boston, 2002. HEADB. V. 1911 : HEADB. V., Historia Nummorum, A Manual of Greek Numismatics, New and Enlarged edition, assisted by G. F. Hill, G. Macdonald and W. Wroth, Oxford, 1911, reprint ‘Sanford J. Durst, New York, 1983. Innt0Or-BLuMER F. 1878 : IMHOOF-BLUMER F., Die ‘Manzen Akamaniens, Numismatische Zeitschrift 10, 1878, p. 1-180. IMHOOF-BLUMER F., GARDNER P. 1964? : IMHOOF- BLUMER F., GARDNER P., Ancient Coins Illustrating Lost Masterpieces of Greek Art. A Numismatic Com- ‘mentary on Pausanias, New enlarged edition with 1 Moenia Aeacia.AUTONOMOUS COINAGE OF RHIZON IN ILLYRIA introduction, commentary and notes by Oikonomides A. 'N., Chicago, 1964"; 1* edition: London 1885. ISLAM S, 1972 : ISLAMI S,, ‘Le monnayage de Seodra, Lissos et Gentios, Miia 2, Tirana 1972, . 379-408. JUBANI B. 1972 : JUBANI B., Monnaies illyriennes a Fethnikon de AABIATAN découvertes & Kukés, Sta Albanica9, 1, Tirana, 1972, p. 69-75. Kani L. 1984 : KAHIL L,, sx, Artemis, Zarich, 1984, p. 618-723. LACROIX L. 1949 : LACROKX L., Les reproductions de Staines sur les monnaies grecques, La statuaire rchaique et classique, Litge 1949. Le RIDER G 1988 : Le RIDER G,, L'atelier séleucide de Lysimachie, — Quaderni Ticinesi ~ Numismatica e Antichita Classiche 17, Lugano, 1988, p. 195-207. LIAMPL K. 1998 : LiAMPI K., Der makedonische Schild, ‘Athens ~ Bonn 1998 Manié Z, 1976 : MARIC Z., Dva nova primjerka aorsijskog novea sa Gradine Osanigi kod Stoca (2 neue daorsische Minzen von der Gradina Osani¢i bei Stolac), Godiinjak Centra za balkanoloska ispitivanja nnual of the Centre for Balkan Studies) 11, Sarajevo 1976, p. 253-260 Manovié 1. 1976 : MaRovié L, Iz Numizmatitke birke Atheoloskog muzeja u Splitu (Quelques pitces de monnaie de la Collection numismatique du Musée archéologique de Split), Godiénjak Centra za balka- ‘nolaika ispitivanja (Annual of the Centre for Balkan ‘Studies) 11, Sarajevo, 1976, p. 221-244, Manovi¢ 1, 1988 : MaRoveéI., Novae ilirskog dinasta Baleja (BAAAAIOS) u Arheoloskom muzeju u Splitu (The coinage of Ballaios (BAAAAIOZ) in the Archaeological Museum in Split), Vjesnik za arheologiju i historiu dalmatinsku (Bulletin. dar- ‘chéologie et d'histoire dalmates) 81 Split, 1988, p. 81- 145, May J. M, F, 1946 : May J. M. F., Macedonia and Mlyria (217-167 BC), The Journal of Roman Studies 36, 1946, p. 48-56 MITCHINER M. 1975 : MITCHINER M., Indo Greek and Indo-Schythian Coinage, vol. I: The Early Indo-Greeks ‘and Their Antecedents, London 1975, MoRkHOLM O. 1991 : Merkholm O,, Early Hellenistic Coinage from the Accession of Alexander the Great to the Peace of Apamea (336-186 B.C), ed. P. Grierson, U. Westermark, Cambridge 1991. NEWELL E, T. 1941 : NEWELL B, T., The Coinage ofthe Western Seleueld Minis, from Seleueus I to Antiochus IIT, New York 1941. ‘OBERHUMMER E. 1887 : OBERHUMMER E., Akarnanien, Ambrakia, Amphilochien, Leukas im Altertum, ‘Mainchen, 1887, LIMC I, COBERKUMMER B. 1914 > OBERHUMMER E,, sv. Pig’, RE VAL, Stuttgart 1914, col. 937-939. Ost S. 1, 1954 : OOST 8, L, Roman Policy in Epirus ‘and Acarnania in the Age of the Roman Conquest of Greece, Amold Foundation Studies IV New Series, Dallas 1954, PAUSE-DREYER U., CEKA N. 1988 : PAUSE-DREYER U,, CeKAN., Manzprigung in lyrien, in Albanien, ‘Schatce aus dem Land der Skipetaren, Mainz. 1988, p. 85.90, Picard ©. 1979 : PWARD 0. Chalcis et la cconfédération eubéenne, étude de numismatique et d'histoire (IV"F" sidcle, Bibliotheque des Ecoles fran- saises d’Athénes et de Rome, fascicule 234 Athénes- Paris 1979, PICARD 0,, GIONGECAS S. 1996 : PICARD 0., GIONGECAT'S,, Remarques sur la politique monétaire Apollonia au 3° et au 2 s, av. J-C, livia 1-2, Tirana 1995 [1996], p. 187-198. INK K. 1940 : PINK K., Lokale Prigungen aus dem Sinus Rhizonicus, Serta Hoffilleriana, _Vjesnik Hrvashog. drheoloshog Drutwa (Courier ofthe Croatian Archaeological Society) 18-20, Zagreb, 1937- 1940 (1940), . 527-535 Rinnié-Miotend’ D. 1969 : Rewic-Mutevié D., Neki problemi tipologije i kronologije novea ilirskog Aral. Cena (Quelgues questions de a typologie et chronologie des monnaies du roi illyrien Genthius) ‘Munizmariske jet! 16 27), Zagreb 1969, p. 1-7 Rennié-Mioteié D, 1973 : RenDieMioevie D, Uz ralaz. doskora aepozmatog lbeatos novea. Pilog zonologitlirskog plemenskog novea (A propos de trouvalle: de monnaie indie. des Labeates. Contri- bouion la chrnologie du monnayage tale. des Illyriens), Numizmaticke vijesti 20 (31), Zagreb 1973, p. 9.24 Revoé-Mioteué D, 1976 : Rewié-moteué Latelir mondtaire de Rhizon et ses énissions, ia Kovanje | lovnice anithog 1 srednjevelomnog novca rapper et atliers monciires dans Vania et ‘moyen ag), Belgrade 1976, p. 35-46 ROGERS E, 1932 : ROGERS E, The Copper Coinage of Thessaly, London 1932 SCHWABACHER W. 1953 : SCHWAHACHER W., Some unknown federal coins of the Acarnanians, in MYLONAS G. E. and RAYMOND D. (eds), Studies Presented to David Moore Robinson on His Seventieth Birthday Ml, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri 1953, p. 219.223, SEAR D. R. 1978, 1979 : SEAR D. R,, Greek Coins and ‘Their Values, -, London 1978-1979. SARSTROM M. 1940 : SARSIROM M., 4 Study in the Coinage of the Mamertines, Lund 1940, 1st168 DUBRAVKA UsES SeDaRov N. 2003 : SELDAROV N., The Seldarov Collection , Slopje, National Bank of the Republic of ‘Macedonia, STANELINF. 1910: STAHELIN,, sv. Genthios, RE 13, Stuttgart 1910, col, 1198-1201, ‘TAGLIAMONTE G. 1994 : TAGLIAMONTE G., I figli di Marie, mobilid, mercenari e mercenariato italic! in ‘Magna Grecia e Sicilia, Roma 1994. ‘ToURATSOGLOU Y. 1987 ; ToURATSOGLOU Y.,Mace- ddonia, in A.M. BURNETT, M. H. CRAWFORD (eds), The Coinage in the Roman World in the Late Republic, Proceedings of @ Colloquium, London 1985, BAR Int Ser. 323, 1987, p. 53-67. Uns D. 1993 : Uses D., Le monete del Re Ballaios & della zecca Rizonia al Museo Nazionale di Belgrado (Novae kralja Balajosa i risanske kovnice iz Narodnog, ‘muzeja u Beogradu), Numizmaticar 16, Belgrade 1993, p. 534, UsS D. 1994 : Uns D, Nuovi ritrovamenti ‘numismatict di Risan, Bocche di Cattaro, Montenegro, Jugoslavia, Actes du 11 Congres International de Numismatique (Bruxelles 8-13 septembre 1991), vol. 1, Bruxelles 1994, p. 139-145. ‘Uses D. 1999 : Uses D., ‘Rhizon (Montenegrin coast), a trading and staple town on the crossroads of Mediter- ranean. and inland Balkan routes - Late Classical and Hellenistic pottery evidence, Quaderni Ticines! — Numismatica e Antichta Classiche 28, Lugano 1999, p. 203-220, Uses D. 2001 : Uses D., Greek hoards from the Western Balkans, The Numismatic Chronicle’ 1, London, 2001, p. 341-347, Uses D., Kovacevié V, 1992 : Uses D., Kovacevie V,, Coins of “King” Ballaios found in Risen, excavations 1988 (Novac “Kralja” Balajosa sa iskopavanja u Risnu 1988), Munzmatigar 15, Belgrade 1992, p.9-24, VisoNA P. 1985 : VISONA P. Coins of Ballas found in Htaly, Vjesmik za arheologiju 1 histori dalmatinsku (Bulletin d'archéologie et d histoire dalmates) 78, Split 1985, p. 117-122. VISoNA P. 2000 : ViSONA P, J. M. F. May's contribution to the study of Greek-llyrian coinage, Proceedings of the 2™ International Numismatic Congress in Croatia (Opatija, October 1998), Opatiia 2000, p. 60-63. ‘Waottt W. 1892 : WRoTH W., Greek coins acquired by the British Museum in i891, The Numismatic Chronicle 12, London 1892, p. 121