Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Competency:
- Evaluate the benefits and risks of using GMOs (S11/12LT-IIej-19)
- Time Allotment: 2 days
Specific Objectives:
After going through the learning activity sheets, you are expected to:
1. cite the benefits and risks of using GMOs;
2. explain the impacts of using GMOs in the Philippine industry; and
3. express opinions and/or stand on the use of GMOs.
Key Concepts
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are organisms whose genes are being altered
through genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is a biotechnological technique used by
scientists to directly modify and manipulate an organism‟s genome. The picture below
summarizes the process on how GMOs were made (Powell, 2015).
Insert
Source: https://i1.wp.com/sitn.hms.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Untitled2.png?w=900
3. Reduction of the need for pesticides and insecticides to those GMOs containing
genes that could fight against pests and
insects.
4. Agricultural animals can increase their yields
and decrease vulnerability to diseases when
genetically modified. For example, cattle have
been enhanced to increase resistance to mad cow
disease, and salmon have been genetically
modified to grow bigger and mature faster (see
Figure 1).
6. Genetically modified food can contain higher amounts of vitamins and minerals.
For instance, rice can be genetically modified to contain more Vitamin A to reduce
the number of people going blind. Figure 2 shows how the golden rice is
genetically engineered to contain vitamin A.
In fact, Philippines get the go signal from the regulators in the use of golden rice
technology to solve the increasing number of children who gets killed and/or blind
worldwide based on the report of the World Health Organization (WHO) due to vitamin A
deficiency. This is after the Philippine-based International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)
who developed the crop announced that Golden Rice is safe as the conventional rice and
it was supported by the Philippine Department of Agriculture Bureau of Plant Industry
(Baragona, 2019).
Source: http://www.isaaa.org/kc/inforesources/biotechcrops/image1.jpg
In fact, in recent study, Casper (2020) suggests that there is a direct correlation
between the increase of number of children with autism to the consumption of
glyphosate on corn & soy as shown in Figure 4.
As of today, many available genetically modified products are already available in the
market. The pictures below show few of them. Non-BT eggplant vs. BT eggplant
Source: https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2020/10/05/without-gm-insect-resistant-bt-eggplant-
filipino-farmers-face-51-73-crop-losses-almost-daily-pesticide-spraying/
Source: https://im-media.voltron.voanews.com/Drupal/01live-166/styles/892x501/s3/2019-12/rice.jpg?itok=OAq-ZmcK
One example of public debate over the use of a genetically modified plant involves the
case of Bt corn. Bt corn expresses a protein from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis. Prior
to construction of the recombinant corn, the protein had long been known to be toxic to a
number of pestiferous insects, including the monarch caterpillar, and it had been
successfully used as an environmentally friendly insecticide for several years. The benefit of
the expression of this protein by corn plants is a reduction in the amount of insecticide that
farmers must apply to their crops. Unfortunately, seeds containing genes for recombinant
proteins can cause unintentional spread of recombinant genes or exposure of non-target
organisms to new toxic compounds in the environment.
The now-famous Bt corn controversy started with a laboratory study by Losey et al.
(1999) in which the mortality of monarch larvae was reportedly higher when fed with
milkweed (their natural food supply) covered in pollen from transgenic corn than when fed
milkweed covered with pollen from regular corn. The report by Losey et al. was followed by
another publication (Jesse & Obrycki, 2000) suggesting that natural levels of Bt corn pollen
in the field were harmful to monarchs.
Debate ensued when scientists from other laboratories disputed the study, citing the
extremely high concentration of pollen used in the laboratory study as unrealistic, and
concluding that migratory patterns of monarchs do not place them in the vicinity of corn
during the time it sheds pollen. For the next two years, six teams of researchers from
government, academia, and industry investigated the issue and concluded that the risk of Bt
corn to monarchs was "very low" (Sears et al., 2001), providing the basis for the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency to approve Bt corn for an additional seven years.
Guide Questions:
Q1. What are the benefits and risks of using GMOs specifically the BT corn as mentioned
in the selection?
Q2. Knowing the benefits and risks of the use of BT corn in the selection, what do you
think are the impacts of this GMO in the Philippine industry?
Q3. If you were a farmer, would you choose to plant BT corn in your farmland after
knowing the benefits and possible threats of the GMO to biodiversity? Why or Why not?
Source: https://sbt.blob.core.windows.net/storyboards/rebeccawilson21/e-tech-gmo.png
Guide Questions:
Q1. What is your stand about the use of GMOs in the Philippine agriculture?
Q2. Aside from the organisms mentioned in the comics strip, can you identify GMO
product in your locality? Give at least two of them and compare it to the organic crops
produced by some farmers in your barangay.
Reflection:
Mang Jose is a farmer from Agusan del Sur. He is undecided on what variety of rice he
will plant on the next planting season. He is torn between the native rice and the Golden rice
(GMO). Can you help Mang Jose in choosing between the two varieties by writing a letter
(maximum of 100 words) or making a flyer informing him about the advantages and
disadvantages of each variety on human? Note: (emphasize in your letter or flyer the health
benefits and risks of each variety on human)
Rubrics:
GM Food Newsletter (Issue No. 26) December 2017 Published by the Centre for Food
Safety. Accessed November 4, 2020
https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/programme/programme_gmf/images/GM_Food_Ne
wsletter26_1e.jpg
Prakash, Dhan, Sonika Verma, Ranjana Bhatia, and Bhupindera N. Tiwary. "Risks and
precautions of genetically modified organisms." ISRN Ecology 2011 (2011).