Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BS Iso TR 09122-6-1994 (1998)
BS Iso TR 09122-6-1994 (1998)
9122-6:1994
Implementation of
ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
Contents
Page
Committees responsible Inside front cover
National foreword ii
Foreword ii
1 Scope 1
2 Background 1
3 Position of the regulator 3
4 Steps to be considered 3
5 Toxic products and mechanisms of toxicity in fires 4
6 Methods of toxic hazard assessment 5
7 Recommended hazard assessment procedure 6
Annex A (informative) Bibliography 8
© BSI 10-1998 i
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
National foreword
Summary of pages
This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover, pages i and ii,
the ISO TR title page, page ii, pages 1 to 8 and a back cover.
This standard has been updated (see copyright date) and may have had
amendments incorporated. This will be indicated in the amendment table on
the inside front cover.
ii © BSI 10-1998
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide
federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of
preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical
committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee.
International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with
ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical
standardization.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards, but
in exceptional circumstances a technical committee may propose the publication of
a Technical Report of one of the following types:
— type 1, when the required support cannot be obtained for the publication of
an International Standard, despite repeated efforts;
— type 2, when the subject is still under technical development or where for any
other reason there is the future but not immediate possibility of an agreement
on an International Standard;
— type 3, when a technical committee has collected data of a different kind from
that which is normally published as an International Standard (“state of the
art”, for example).
Technical Reports of types 1 and 2 are subject to review within three years of
publication, to decide whether they can be transformed into International
Standards. Technical Reports of type 3 do not necessarily have to be reviewed until
the data they provide are considered to be no longer valid or useful.
ISO/TR 9122-6, which is a Technical Report of type 2, was prepared by Technical
Committee ISO/TC 92, Fire tests on building materials, components and
structures, Subcommittee SC 3, Toxic hazards in fire.
This document is being issued in the type 2 Technical Report series of publications
(according to subclause G.4.2.2 of part 1 of the ISO/IEC Directives) as a
“prospective standard for provisional application” in the field of toxicity testing of
fire effluents because there is an urgent need for guidance on how standards in this
field should be used to meet an identified need.
This document is not to be regarded as an “International Standard”. It is proposed
for provisional application so that information and experience of its use in practice
may be gathered. Comments on the content of this document should be sent to the
ISO Central Secretariat.
A review of this type 2 Technical Report will be carried out not later than two years
after its publication with the options of: extension for another two years;
conversion into an International Standard; or withdrawal.
ISO/TR 9122 consists of the following parts, under the general title Toxicity testing
of fire effluents:
— Part 1: General;
— Part 2: Guidelines for biological assays to determine the acute inhalation
toxicity of fire effluents (basic principles, criteria and methodology);
— Part 3: Methods for the analysis of gases and vapours in fire effluents;
— Part 4: The fire model (furnaces and combustion apparatus used in
small-scale testing);
— Part 5: Prediction of toxic effects of fire effluents;
— Part 6: Guidance for regulators and specifiers on the assessment of toxic
hazards in fires in buildings and transport.
Annex A of this part of ISO/TR 9122 is for information only.
ii
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
© BSI 10-1998 1
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
e) the tests do not normally allow the testing of 2.3 Integrated assessment methods
materials in their end-use configuration, i.e. as These methods require a detailed analysis of given
composites or in conjunction with other scenarios. The stages of hazard development need to
materials; be determined, enabling a series of logical steps to
f) the tests are not capable of addressing the be identified and used as a basis for a hazard
environmental aspects of fires which may assessment of particular scenarios. Within these
influence escape and therefore the overall steps there are still areas for which it is possible to
hazard, i.e. building design and fire protection give only general advice, and where assumptions
measures; have to be made. Ongoing and future research is
g) the use of data from animals (mostly rodents) aimed at improving capabilities in these areas.
can be regarded as representing effects on The magnitude of the toxic, or more completely the
humans only to the extent that the rat is life threat, hazard depends upon the complex
correlated with humans as a biological system. interaction of many parameters, starting with an
Failure to allow for differences between species ignition source and ending with possible toxic or
may introduce errors with respect to important other hazards affecting potential victims present in
aspects of fire atmosphere toxicity in human the system. When a system is designed, it is
subjects. necessary to consider the effects of all these
2.2 Importance of fire growth characteristics component parameters in assessing the overall life
in toxic hazard assessment threat hazard.
It is now recognised that data from small-scale The toxic hazard in any fire becomes predictable if
toxicity tests are useful in toxic hazard assessments two sets of information are known:
in conjunction with other input data on fire growth a) the time/concentration profiles of the
characteristics. The most important variable in the important toxic products in the fire;
development of toxic hazard in fires is the rate of fire b) the time/concentration/toxicity relationships of
growth and the rate of evolution of the common fire these products in humans.
gases. The point in any fire when a victim becomes The first set of data may be obtained from
incapacitated or dies therefore depends strongly mathematical modelling of fire growth using
upon the growth curve of the fire and the points in
small-scale test results as input data, or from
time where an incapacitating or lethal dose of
large-scale fire test results. The second set of data is
products has been inhaled.
derived from toxicity studies of combustion products
This is not to say that toxicity is no longer a and individual fire gases in animals and humans.
problem, since it is the toxic effects that ultimately This approach is the basis of toxic hazard
cause incapacitation or death in the majority of assessment methods being developed in
fires, and it is therefore important to know what will ISO/TC 92/SC3, and in BSI Publication DD180[5], in
cause toxic effects in order to predict the potential
the National Institute for Standards and
hazard in any particular fire. Also, toxicity data for
Technology Hazard 1.1 models[6] and in the Fire
individual materials can be used to screen for rare
Research Station “ASKFRS” model[7].
products of unusually high toxic potency, and to
improve the accuracy of fire performance There are many ways in which the development of
predictions based upon hazard assessments. It life threat hazard may be controlled. Historically,
follows that an individual material can be assessed the main approach to fire control has been to control
in terms of its contribution to toxic hazard only as the ignition and flame spread properties of
part of a system rather than in isolation. Its materials and other factors relating to the
suitability will depend on its contribution to the structural design of buildings and transport
overall ignition and growth characteristics of fires systems. The implementation of these measures has
as well as the toxic potency of its products. This has resulted in some control of the development of life
led to the development of models which combine threat hazard.
several aspects of life threat for the overall
assessment of hazard and a code of practice
approach rather than the use of simple pass/fail
criteria.
2 © BSI 10-1998
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
© BSI 10-1998 3
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
4.2.2 Determination of the toxic potency of the 5.1 Effects of narcotic gases
products Narcotic gases affect the brain and circulatory
The next item of information required is the toxic system, causing confusion followed by loss of
potency of the products, i.e. the exposure dose consciousness and death depending upon the
needed to cause toxic effects. This is discussed in exposure dose inhaled. The only narcotic gases
this subclause, and more detailed guidance is given found to be important in fires are CO, HCN, CO2
in ISO/TR 9122-5[8]. and low oxygen. The effects of these gases on
In practice, the exposure dose in a particular humans and the ways in which they interact are
scenario will depend upon a number of factors such reasonably well known. Also it has been found that
as: incapacitation becomes significant at a well defined
endpoint, when a victim passes from a near normal
a) fire growth and yield of toxic products;
to an unconscious state following a brief period of
b) size of fire compartment and ventilation; confusion[9]. It is therefore possible to develop
c) routes of spread of toxic products, distribution, effective mathematical models based upon data
dilution and loss of products prior to inhalation; obtained from humans and other primates[9], to
d) building or compartment features e.g. fire predict when a victim will become incapacitated in a
alarms, active fire suppression systems, smoke fire due to the effects of narcotic gases, if the
control systems; concentration/time curves for these gases in a fire
are known. Details of such models are given in
e) nature of passive fire protection, i.e. fire ISO/TR 9122-5[8].
resistance rating of vertical and horizontal fire
separations and burning characteristics of 5.2 Effects of irritants
surfaces; Irritant fire products have two principal effects:
f) position of occupants relative to the fire and a) they cause immediate painful sensory
means of escape; stimulation of the eyes, nose, throat and lungs;
g) exposure time and time required for escape. b) they cause lung inflammation and oedema
4.2.3 Calculation of toxic hazard which may lead to death due to impairment of
respiration, usually a few hours after exposure.
Once the exposure dose and toxic potency have been
determined, it is possible to calculate the time when Irritant effects during a fire lie on a continuum from
potential victims will have received an mild eye irritation to severe eye and respiratory
incapacitating or lethal exposure to toxic products tract pain, and ultimately death during or after
in the fire. This can then be compared to the time exposure. All fire atmospheres are irritant and
required for escape. Where an assessment of full life contain many irritating chemical species. Some
threat hazard is being performed, the effects of heat twenty of so have been identified in combustion
exposure and visual obscuration by smoke must also product atmospheres, and there is evidence that
be considered. other, unknown, irritant species are also present[9].
For these reasons the irritancy of combustion
5 Toxic products and mechanisms of product atmospheres cannot, as yet, be predicted
toxicity in fires fully from even a comprehensive chemical analysis,
and the only way to estimate irritancy is by animal
Combustion products cause incapacitation and exposure. Two test parameters can be used in
death in fires by two main mechanisms — narcosis rodent tests; sensory irritancy can be estimated by
and irritancy. measuring the RD50 (the concentration causing
a 50 % decrease in breathing rate in mice) and lung
irritation by measuring the LC50 in terms of the
concentration causing postexposure deaths due to
lung damage. However, care must be taken in using
rodent data to predict effects in humans[9].
4 © BSI 10-1998
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
5.3 Variations in yields of narcotic and irritant The advantages of the first approach are that it can
products under different fire conditions be based upon small-scale test data alone, and that
The yields of different narcotic and irritant products when animal exposures are used it is possible to
from even an individual material in a fire can vary detect any unusual toxic effects which cannot be
greatly depending upon the thermal decomposition predicted from a solely chemical analysis of
conditions under which it is decomposed. It is combustion products. The reliance on animal
therefore very important in any small-scale test exposure data can be considered a disadvantage of
using chemical analysis of combustion products, or the first approach in some countries. However, with
using direct animal toxicity measurement, that the the advancing knowledge in this field, the need for
decomposition conditions are similar to those of the animal experimentation is decreasing, so that in
fire being modelled. It is also important to many cases a toxic potency estimation can be based
understand that no small-scale test can model the upon analytical data from small-scale experiments.
changing conditions of growth and development The advantage of the second approach is that the
occurring in large-scale fires. concentration/time curves for the toxic fire products
are measured directly, and data based upon the
5.4 Effects of visual obscuration by smoke and
exposure to heat effects of exposure of humans can be used to
calculate time to incapacitation or death.
In addition to the effects of narcotic and irritant
In practice, for a full analysis of any given scenario,
products, consideration also needs to be given to the
it is preferable to use data from both of these
effects of visual obscuration by smoke, which
approaches in making a hazard assessment, but the
reduces escape efficiency or renders a victim
methods used will depend upon the data available
unwilling to enter a smoke-filled escape route, and
and the type of hazard assessment required.
of heat which initially hinders or prevents escape
due to skin pain and burns or hyperthermia, and The aim of both types of methods is to calculate the
can cause death either during or after exposure. fractional effective dose (FED) of toxic products
presented to potential victims during the fire. This
6 Methods of toxic hazard assessment is achieved by calculating the exposure dose
received each minute during the fire and expressing
There are essentially two types of method which can it as a fraction of the dose required to cause
be used for assessing toxic fire hazard: incapacitation or death. These FEDs are then
a) from a battery of small-scale tests on summed until a time is reached when the fraction
individual materials or composite samples, the reaches unity, and incapacitation or death is
results of which are used as inputs to predicted to occur. Details of the procedures used to
mathematical fire models, or from simple calculate FEDs are presented in ISO/TR 9122-5[8].
large-scale tests where only mass loss or heat Applications of the these methods in toxic hazard
release rates are measured. The essential assessments are described in the following
components are subclauses.
1) the toxic potency data for the materials 6.1 Toxic hazard assessment based on mass
(lethal mass loss exposure dose) obtained from loss exposure dose toxicity data
small-scale combustion toxicity tests using
6.1.1 Simple assessment using a single mass
animal exposures (or increasingly from
loss exposure dose toxic potency figure for all
calculation methods using chemical analytical
materials
data from small-scale toxicity tests),
2) the mass loss/concentration curve for the The simplest form of toxic hazard assessment could
be based upon mass loss concentration data for the
fire, obtained from a combination of
fire and an average value for the toxic potency of
small-scale tests and mathematical fire
combustion products from materials considered to
models, or from simple large-scale tests;
be of “normal” toxicity. In practice, this would
b) from large-scale fire tests which include include nearly all common materials. Examples of
measurements by chemical analysis of the such methods are presented in British Standard
concentration/time profiles of the major toxic fire Institution (BSI) Publication DD180[5], and in
gases and smoke particulates. These are National Institute for Standards and Technology
combined with existing knowledge of the toxicity (NIST) Publication 827[10]. In BSI DD180, a value
of these gases and particulates derived originally of 500 g·m–3·min is suggested for lethality
from human and animal exposures. and 200 g·m–3·min for incapacitation. The NIST
publication takes a similar approach and suggests a
value of 900 g·m–3·min for lethality
and 300 g·m–3·min for incapacitation.
© BSI 10-1998 5
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
6.1.2 Toxic hazard assessment based upon 6.2 Toxic hazard assessment based mainly on
mass loss exposure dose toxicity data allowing chemical analytical data on the
for differences in toxic potency between concentration/time profiles of toxic products
different materials and different fire types measured in large scale fire tests, and existing
In practice, there are differences between the toxic knowledge of the toxic effects in humans and
potencies of the combustion products from different animals
materials, and for individual materials the toxic As with 6.1.2 b) 1), this type assessment is based
potencies vary with the decomposition conditions in upon the concept that only a few major products are
different types of fires. It is also necessary to make important in causing toxic effects in fires. Time to
provision for materials of “unusual toxic potency” incapacitation or death by narcosis can be well
for which the toxic potency is greater than that of predicted from existing data without the need for
most materials. For this more sophisticated form of further animal exposures, although prediction of
assessment potency factors can be used to allow for irritant effects is somewhat less precise. This
deviations in toxic potency from the general potency method enables the best possible assessment of the
figure. Depending upon the type of hazard likely effects in humans, and it does not require
assessment being performed, the potency factors animal tests to be performed (although the
could be obtained in a number of ways: assessment is improved by the input of some
a) from a toxic potency database for materials of empirical small-scale toxic potency data for the
different general types in different types of fire; materials involved in the fire). The method requires
a basic set of data to be measured in large scale fire
b) from toxic potency data obtained from specific
tests, or calculated from engineering data, including
small-scale combustion toxicity tests performed
the time/concentration profiles of the CO, CO2,
on the materials under investigation. The toxic
HCN, O2, acid gases (e.g. HCl, NOx), total
potency data could be derived from
hydrocarbons or organic irritants (e.g. acrolein),
1) chemical analysis of the combustion total particulate matter and smoke optical density.
products and calculation of the likely toxic
Details of all the methods described in clause 6 are
potency, on the basis that only a few major
presented in ISO/TR 9122-5[8].
toxic products are important in causing toxic
effects,
7 Recommended hazard assessment
2) a combination of 1) with limited animal procedure
exposures to determine the approximate lethal
exposure dose, to allow for possible effects The recommended procedure for conducting toxic
additional to those of the few major toxic hazard assessments is as follows.
products. 7.1 Identify the fire scenario of concern, and the type
These data on the mass loss exposure doses required of fire (smouldering, growing/pre-flashover, fully
to cause incapacitation or death can then be used as developed) together with its characteristics.
input data to the hazard assessment model. 7.2 Small-scale toxic potency tests could be
performed on the materials to be assessed (using
chemical analysis with or without animal
exposures) under relevant thermal decomposition
conditions at this point or later in the analysis.
6 © BSI 10-1998
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
© BSI 10-1998 7
BS ISO/TR 9122-6:1994
Annex A (informative)
Bibliography
[1] ISO/TR 9122-1:1989, Toxicity testing of fire effluents — Part 1: General.
[2] New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code, Article 15, Part 1120, Combustion Toxicity
Testing and Regulations for Implementing Building Materials and Finishes; Fire Gas Toxicity Data File.
New York State, Department of State, Office of Fire Prevention and Control, Albany, NY 12231
(December 16, 1986).
[3] Naval Engineering Standard Test 713, Determination of the Toxicity Index of the Products of
Combustion from Small Specimens of Materials. UK Ministry of Defence, Ship Department Section
D191 (1981).
[4] French decree (arrêté) of 4 November 1975, amended 1 December 1976, governing the use of synthetic
materials containing nitrogen and chlorine.
[5] British Standards Draft for Development DD180. Guide for the Assessment of Toxic Hazards in Fire in
Buildings and Transport. British Standards Institution, 1989.
[6] PEACOCK, R.D. et al., Technical Reference Guide for the Hazard I Fire Hazard Assessment Method,
Version 1.1., NIST Handbook 146, Volume II, US Government Printing Office, 1991.
[7] CHITTY, R. and COX, G., ASKFRS — A Fire Engineering Calculator. Building Research Establishment,
Fire Research Station, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire WD6 2B1, UK Ref. AP46.
[8] ISO/TR 9122-5:1993, Toxicity testing of fire effluents — Part 5: Prediction of the toxic effects of fire
effluents.
[9] PURSER, D.A., Toxicity Assessment of Combustion Products. In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection
Engineering, C.L. Beyler Ed. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA. (1988), Part 1, pp. 200-245.
[10] BABRAUSKAS, V. et al., Toxic Potency Measurement for Fire Hazard Analysis. NIST Special
Publication 827. US Government Printing Office, 1991.
8 © BSI 10-1998
blank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSI Ð British Standards Institution
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BSI is the independent national body responsible for preparing British Standards. It
|
| presents the UK view on standards in Europe and at the international level. It is
| incorporated by Royal Charter.
|
|
| Revisions
|
|
| British Standards are updated by amendment or revision. Users of British Standards
|
| should make sure that they possess the latest amendments or editions.
|
|
| It is the constant aim of BSI to improve the quality of our products and services. We
|
| would be grateful if anyone finding an inaccuracy or ambiguity while using this
| British Standard would inform the Secretary of the technical committee responsible,
|
| the identity of which can be found on the inside front cover. Tel: 020 8996 9000.
|
| Fax: 020 8996 7400.
|
|
| BSI offers members an individual updating service called PLUS which ensures that
|
| subscribers automatically receive the latest editions of standards.
|
|
| Buying standards
|
| Orders for all BSI, international and foreign standards publications should be
|
| addressed to Customer Services. Tel: 020 8996 9001. Fax: 020 8996 7001.
|
|
| In response to orders for international standards, it is BSI policy to supply the BSI
|
| implementation of those that have been published as British Standards, unless
|
| otherwise requested.
|
|
| Information on standards
|
| BSI provides a wide range of information on national, European and international
|
| standards through its Library and its Technical Help to Exporters Service. Various
|
| BSI electronic information services are also available which give details on all its
|
| products and services. Contact the Information Centre. Tel: 020 8996 7111.
|
| Fax: 020 8996 7048.
|
|
| Subscribing members of BSI are kept up to date with standards developments and
| receive substantial discounts on the purchase price of standards. For details of
|
| these and other benefits contact Membership Administration. Tel: 020 8996 7002.
|
| Fax: 020 8996 7001.
|
|
| Copyright
|
|
| Copyright subsists in all BSI publications. BSI also holds the copyright, in the UK, of
|
| the publications of the international standardization bodies. Except as permitted
| under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 no extract may be reproduced,
|
| stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means ± electronic,
|
| photocopying, recording or otherwise ± without prior written permission from BSI.
|
|
| This does not preclude the free use, in the course of implementing the standard, of
|
| necessary details such as symbols, and size, type or grade designations. If these
|
| details are to be used for any other purpose than implementation then the prior
| written permission of BSI must be obtained.
|
|
| If permission is granted, the terms may include royalty payments or a licensing
|
| agreement. Details and advice can be obtained from the Copyright Manager.
|
| Tel: 020 8996 7070.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSI |
|
389 Chiswick High Road |
|
London |
|
W4 4AL |
|
|
|
|
|
|