EVIL AND DIVERSITY IN ORIGEN'S DE PRINCIPUS 1. Introduction: The Original Fall asthe Cause of Diversity Sn uniue doce of th cri all du the negegnt (Ota) of a ral creatures However, what te implication ofthe following passage? Viz. Mar eslodh and Weataesn of thing wouble o preserve the good, coupled With ‘arogard and neglet of beter things, begun te process of withaval from te ood, Now to with (rom He good nobing sae that Yo be immersed in vl? Org explains ws alos ‘Sh dpe wakes Ad 0 cch min. opin the Sl mn nee {ele rors in pron ls ves ro mab) fore eri ere sect he diva ma hat hens Cri vets hey mast esogysed fave poe fem he ass Wehave cabot) he mah ees wad which was Fu nd ene In this quotation, Origen careful, but retvely, assumes tha the orginal fairl beng, ness of thei melegenti, might be te case a versity in tuts rte ai ya raat enn ee Sng aceta te ilepes pe cock soe SEB a nee en ee Sot eee Sale bn ir bp doce Ws Sah Serie Red ects Agee rete SERS eaaa ca hry ar ss press cho i ee np oO o af the Undening of igen’ Dive ofthe Ova al nT Met Gani Roo (The Met aire eat ati nl anc ‘Stet emesis ei “ams gee La nan rn er spigot mt Th, 9.640: po ew gum dtr ‘Sobran pre cee ts eget eae cet lnee enn ean Smee eee40 wren this world. Ashe expounds the reinship of the nelegenta of each ational ‘eat in hit pre-erstenoe to that of vanly und the divers, be msi, ina purely existential ere, th very of abl ngs Wah hat nthe Word ‘Thseore, i Is possible that Origen thinks tee i ceva covrespondence ‘een her movements nd the diversity this world whi sn ince ei ‘Sine ie aboltly ler fr hin ha the pinay sae of hs word, which (Godad create. was Blesed wit nity a harmon. he mon case of his var ‘ean vers word mst fe soup on the prof eset, who had ey ‘nth bese sate ince Oxge engl lost hat ster Was a Gono case ‘which coud gives to tis varity and diversity, be stesses in Or Fo Pri pes that ‘owe gunz bee, aed be sun what ter ems cn we ine © ‘Suis an cdots Grr grrr mote ge popu) fos ‘tho ly on that iil wet al hea whch hey wee ft {hay cad" tngs eed wl ney te st of fotos sd thon ed sou he de tion and ner af lsu, xchaned tee use goto tek xn ma is Wich ay gy “Ths Origen ete the question a to «whether twas th varying alls oft Jecualbengs whic provoked Gt form a world of sich vaya diversity As ican be sa ht the very divers in the pristine sate was supposed tobe unde divine providence, Orgs thinks tit ster mere etons whic pve re tote divers in this worl wherein divine rovdenceaange all eater ‘eld in postions coespoding othe Yatton ir movements a the hed purpose oftheir minds es i oi BEE oT ad Wk. Se Pak (10.222 come sini notes aca i it ie ‘ipsa roth ma ue ‘Speco cae Ce ee ner i me ems ‘Scart ei ote er sco a os SRC Ts die cmp en ‘Sim i fan om se echelon sw TPE 10 ln ei lin pat dt a 3. Fri pf 1 hry tw arti te eras et ‘namo ie pa pas anon ean pai ds 1, Pree Will and Diversity ‘ne basis of or discussion onthe meaning of serene» in Origen’ On ‘Fit Principles, here he we the watt stave nots, which Hse ate of tional restr, namely aby change in existence and mobility ‘til we ean arent it the ee four being te, He explain tat fi "arlety of atangemens has ben sued by God a result of previous causes ‘sng om ie wil". There, or ee wi whch Was hough fa tense ‘ei shuld now Be cinsired in ems oth cone of nelgetia (Ea) 1s the case of verity inthis wal ‘Origen never aint te cane of ei 9 cmtngeney, an even howgh some “ahve sapped that eveything nis world i governed eer by chance vee ets or by aff ocean hat hing i within the power of owls, clearly believer tht everything which exists or happens sn this world is ttanged bythe providence of Gods In ther mors in epad to he woke of God's providence, Origen ives in is conta ve te whee word. We sould ts py ateton wo the ita be ever tbe he cause of the vere in This wort thar of oa ature, since atonal eetues ar fee nature and he ‘erty of their overeat nde sil the very essence of er common ‘Whtis more ipsa, Origen never assigns cause to diferent reas, ashe repeat efits the Marines nl Grows in On Fre Principe, the Crestor fleets, the at and pood Cod of the Law and ope ne and the tamer’, Nor doer be ace the cause of the vers thi wold to God, the only Creator Mins, ecase or him, «Ged tbe Cea ofthe nies i both pd and jo nd rmiptents and wen "in he Benning He crested wa ‘wise octet tht anal eis, He lal no othr essen fer reais em cee Himself, tht i, Hi goodness, and hereto, s He, Himself in whom was ‘ser variation nor change nr lck of power, was he cs fall hat was tobe (Geld, He rene sl Wi creatires equ snd aks, for spl eso a hae ‘was ln Hin no cause which could give ise to varie and diversity» 10. Wheto g's tng fe nO rt rie oe ny apes aid ig Be Pa Th Sa of Coa ks TH 5.59 20628): epee her rat eet eo i EAH Si: an et at ce oo Tape wn arty el ar poi 1a". 22 293; 20205 sg 252329, 1S Pn 53.8602) Ee garcia meng ao somite ny ds kn i to a fas ‘oc 3631 386 Roum ea mnt omen de rere mer sem gin rg brs nf oaon rea Consequey, he causes of the varity an dive this wo eds oar fre wl ot ot tore precisely in our very extn, cet by God, 0 His ‘ge nd sit, ra by ate oo cangs nee ad mi in wil, ‘Why, howeves, ise wil sid by Origen to be nt onl the case a ev ta also ta of ivesity? I resonable to suppose tht he reenies tho acta Feat of evil to be his vty diversi. Aa we have sous in Or spec ves tin ofthe tom neler Ota, we rea the ery ate frond ee tures our obit of wl aso on feo Therefore we mnt acknoes thatthe esence of ternal restr eedom shouldbe he moby, which, ‘witout dvb inlaes te fundamental possibilty of wig ev Indo in his ‘esl this very possiblity Tariunly ago with stance, even gating ot ot ‘onl tin, ‘rite tho aes the following guest: ow conse wt th reservation of win sol et, Fr fen soht be Sn wth at wh fey a who the Wd of Gs dain ‘espe nd cpa nd onscreen ‘ho the te om who the word ny os wh re ern oe ar {iy tom he hsing of hopin hy ae at dsp te wond who Soslexad: who fey ef hon Gl eves poise cans or at ‘ms a satis smn hi ied on se aon hen ah a ‘ered by aur sve am wha cr rn a cua ae igs ap fw eve wna se os nt se men toe [in wl ead God arta al hse ngs hs oom this we can clearly understand Origen’ tue intention, where he recog as th the realty of vi which appears as versity ats wea, sac ase ‘ut menace det the exteme icompchensiity ofits eases, which deprives Uso our tlie a God, te good a just Creator, wh te mos fender ‘upper of oar existence. Origen els that weal are oo Weak to srvive such scr tres? and evealy confess that heats one acaons te {sown to God alone and lose his capita prayer “aa rant 3 i 15 Gu en ra ‘sn ais ct ‘Sime nat mero io ao pon ene cam ‘ei: a a tw fra (gotten exon ta tn ope oe Seton ne pena ee gah a ‘eta ce gi eet pt Shee et 2 8 2; 2629, apes it sig a ch a ne ‘mca snipe i x pasa tata cn a aac" ae aL oT cms PCA 3 I. ‘The Reason for Diversity Nevers n this dverse word, we pris in searching or its case thro varius phenomena for wba proceeds from ease mu necessary have 4 eginangs and sive separ teaches uso accept al things Which happen to's a on by God, bean we know hat ting fappeneithoat Hime Tisqute lear om these sens Hat, hough Origen was dterned opus: {he ramon o ings ratonaly, be wat never asap sana, sce oe hi, the work of esarhing» is ¢ natural Tooging, paced in us by Go ashe elas a the followin ‘en me wt sil sda the nd Das wo dcover wht Kn | SSSA show nd win tr Michel {hiner whch we piv o hve tn ae by Gr We Dts hi loging of Tove uly tes tyne ery Go; andthe tray Sen 1p sl ws a ur ly Hate ses onda i, Sou tad ee iis orl sepia igo hnow Gath loam he as ‘Threore, a5 Origen exphins, hon we wero earth wes animals o tes snd we perceived the dlfeencessmong thm ads the very great ve) ‘Soong men. However, when we stub hg we did at understand the es Sens for ten: bat dis alone was suggested ous y the very versity of What we Sa that we soul earch oat and enue for wat reaton al thee wee eres ‘vere and aranged in sich variety" In shor, whe we lead ou ves a is rc cl ri aera ct, ne We mt bower ek tt {chin mm smo eget Fs ris gh Na ‘Sian asp oto cy ly. Ne yer na ‘roan a sat ee dr yer sf ple a ge RiLMe sete an wa Wg seo [Bini 1 6 389) pps rs is ma uct nai miata de pr, mad st "Arm, ers et Cn ite we led ih sae «i'n si tg ty an Cai sn Sry pe Pe Sten Spr he mena race ie Pee Ong Comment os Cop ib 88cm 9.9 Sts tip 18610 Ese on ga ob oe frst mss ner ie 1g prt a to pron a pa lat ad ‘ite ona cart ma apn prec engrne oen e ‘etn i rs ar mec ee Bd i a 0 rs, a ave ras sean on tii as es ‘em ria pre ew eo Se at ae ae Speman496 Peay odd, we perceive great divest init; ye at the same tine, however, Beng in the midst of te very diver, the teat of el which i the trestening ‘ower to deprive ut of our belt in God, we we eocouaged to euch ot at Inquire for th reson of his versity and vase inthis word, Le, th easing of Scenes Tiss our condition, we, who lve ia such a world, though we ae thought 0 he raponble foi divert dnote eran the eso foe hich we placed ther, well a ove rating in te romeo or tation Ben ‘AT reasons wil be ally clcdated”. Whatmore dfca, wens pest a ‘or seach eiving in 2 good and just God, wh has promised us or slaton Sn who presides oer ll ts wood ever ceasing To workin it Because of och {vine providence, we take for granted Ua his reat vary ab divest of things canbe derstood to he mos righteous and eqiable™, Who on enh could folerte such diel search? We are existences who, even in tis weld, neglet”t sewch or God and ae ap separate frm Hi. Though ou i sea search ais word might ead sto sped to Hin athe set cow, i PO Se fru to neglst to do so even thee, onl 9 descend again. If we fllow te Sea of animigration tough efferent mors, how ean we pos teas ‘enna fe Wen hagh wn tnt yee ‘of sc iiss, Can we do nothing bt resign ourselves to uiy wea fl lowing Oisn's doce whic inst on defending Go's pes a juice? 1. Jesus Christ and Diversity in the Word From this aural follows the queston conceming Orion's unsung of Sess Cis inti context Despite al the arguments sais his Christology from {he point of development ofthe doctrine of the Ty, our research epg Cheay of neegenti, offers ey fs understanding “cording 0 Org all sous, which ave ela ths wo, wuld be weakened by poingtrogh ll ort of fsttions a ational restr in anamigtion ‘ag tora woeie! ely than tree fal at Howe he pis ou the ole Ct plajed, a Talis tate ttt ten tag Eo ee nt aa eae {0c sor pct ot is en af iain hg wee ot ales loos me Sesiog Finca anion cata SSSR rman Smee fr. so men ome er 495 he ony begat Sino ah, wh whe Wo ad Wind ft Fate. en iistnct site Father nt pry which He a ee he wet ws ob 7, 5 conte Hee nd ft the foo care cme she Sven ‘a Gt 2,1 andro th hn Osteo ean ma tier wa an {Sub exe toupee rien guting fo The Ltr the Hebrew, expe that However, 20 nce ie comoumthn ft agn, le (Chit) Bas been mated to put ty in by the saris of Hinge (eD 9,261. that Chit became 8s ‘ic, once ad forall nd hat, the consummation of the apes, He wil Be man feted tod wo in Tn the course of ou dicusins, it is important to ote Orgen's understanding of Chi’ ate, which he exis as follows: "cami be due ht he ate of Hiri) soa wa he se hat fl ‘ou oerwne col ube cae el wee nt lone However, nee Til tocinss pdr ei wit mei each soul Wc ‘go hs Sef ve ihe ing change) aed Itcprty in monde wa he ony of veh eal eng at by ‘tres fpr may of etion md on nade war of ve, SPSS AE cage ares as nce aos nt eet pd ‘on bell a by tenures ong use chaned inate “Thre we ya hat Ci overall nglegete by His love of Gal's sightcosoes, as Origen dese bel: nti mano, te, ht Chri] a which ie ic oon in he fe, was {cere plod inthe wr for ever the wie fo evra God Goa all Iara feting and hgh sl htt cet be ele cans ot scab sc by being cnc Kl came to poses: enchant ‘oop is ty wih word of Cos [Now we re ey to give ateston to Origen’ reference wove in choosing gonlunl sid ty nee nse iethe Some afte ale cy 28, Pin 6 gp. 2061227219. 277.7: Une emi fis dg eve ap ys eet soap ae re “ee mt a et on fas een. 3 207.10 egy iy aw do ng tf to oy ‘srt mate ligt faci ami pe athe an, quae Cis i cei EE pepe Sais aca sa canes or aa Seco au ht abcde un ab et oa, on ret oe “7G Prop 1417-2 Ho re mod et a a, use, gon Jer ie senpr erin sr pia sr port tom eh gn sv id ‘itp doo cue canenr ow mnie i on a oe tine der gue pe296 oxen, “Tae ty pte So of Gd, here, og wham al ig vi aii ‘le were mes (Co 0) mcg sling se bth deal ngs 1 ver nae madris 20) Forse Heth nse mage he “Tie Gs (Ct 19) He ted al toa cee winner {ppc n ims nc nytt each tne dope of partpton {ese ofthe ly fe wl et sel rest had keh hol of aa ‘etl asd weer ov, at ou of wh Jer al No man eine Sout 0 clinging Wo God oh ening ete a eer fae ‘ann cpr sind go oe wi ab word of no Hs pt and spend, nas mie ih Hin ta pect See on pi, Jute sponte promis ohm whore ayn mn es at =e wo Spee We L's ane spits (Core 17 ‘As wosee fom this quoion, or re wl atscinod wi our parption in Cvs, which leads us o poner ove the laoahip between out neslegentia ‘re il pi fve The eson why Gee fe x esa of Hi ove Towa be icant be sled wie oor Trlr, the at tht Go He, coniseily and throughly, loves us os His creatures, ‘As Chis olny chose to love rghcousoes, tingng Wo it nchangeably and iseparaly in accordance wih he ime f Hie lave, tha iy wling)y ‘hey God though His lve, we are enourge to obey God, allowing Cvs, through love twat Him, tis only Bepten So, the Logo, eras so wi ‘om, ad nt by Tec ad neces” Since or subecton wand aden 9 Crs mean no less dan good acts which eas he salvaon abd restoration of ‘he enti ereton, we J notre ie or neloenti, bt alld to bosome partake f the dine nature trough iting Cis he comes a it tani ple as Ep a oe ‘eG ta ipa na ‘tee np area ‘Sri a Sen mf mon es ee Ser tee a ep ne a ne le fat ‘com eeprom on tae pe at "x" Cerin rig ating oe ate Sn roti, P. Wee, he ‘sn of oar it ri ese 4. Prin 8,7 2781829, {EE Paci fp 34088510 pe ein orci mn ‘cae ee eta it at ae ‘Sm ue ab gn popes maa eae oa onoars AD or of aurtranion though diferent words, According o Origen, sine Jess Chet |sGod's Lagos and Wisdom, in which in tbe blessed stat of or cen, we ve ‘condly participated to iiss follow Jens Chet eves the meaning ‘oy man ings sana reste ‘Whe Origen describes Jens iva the Son of Go the ig of God the ate ase quoting «For she (he Wisdom of Gd) sth ghee ee alli nd an unspoded mare ofthe working af God and an mp of Hie go ‘es (ir 7,26) he knows suite well iv extemely dif Tor ov, serving of being crested othe image of God ad ale De) i this wold, forthe case of whas diversity we ae respensibl inoue. Ong, However ‘over fai o peach caret ha we shoul believe i search fan pace the Good News of Crit, who wae incamaod in such a word forthe ceaseless ‘wok of G's ove, fri te res of ou eplegentie ad the wort fa {Hoodoo ive Chee fe tour wo snc He overcame Hit nelgeni, ae strugaing wih ie though His lve of Gs. We cn therefore conctude rom what hs en tte vet he problems of his vaed an diverse wr, Including ev det the neglegenti of rational restr, ot only lead tt elie the fealiy of evil at io encore 6 ‘penonal level als ines tat vate word basset to with "sence, Therefore, wea given macy opprtnitis of ealiring ow individual ‘esp in th word which mean ot we az alowed ove worth fin {see othe age of Cod, ining the eof fsa Ct Who Wonk a TS ‘diverse work, beleving flyin God's ove 'V. Conclusion: rom the Inglry Into Evi fo the Refletion on Sin Soar, we ave otined Origen’ theory on fe wll an ave gven crf con sideration to the ober of ev ia On Fir Prins. Hower, a bis ee Uheologi system which comprchends both holon, from the creation 1 he this wlth een ite cial he. Nir xed 8 mia loge! eoneuens, held those whom, im rete ef he ‘uogition ofthe fie apts he acted. Tottori we kon supe Teo at is thoy, seems tha his systen, iss fl of inconsistencies, ty hing of whether oro be as solved th poem of ei a er spore peta enpree ieee ‘ana nt a espa er ens nen et econ Soe pear a Sn regen mtn mr EERE ior cement feet eee ae ae ee eee aren aes aN5 nove “Through research on his we ofthe tem neplegent, twas found que often ‘tat he andrstinde the aol creatures are on the bre of screeds, tnd rsngnizes both date iference and sian bswen he Creator nd Hs crear, ad prune the ean out es exsence a beng c= ‘aot the inage end sind of God Tn adton 1 his we discovered though the concept of nelegentia that Ot ‘on regards the came of ell ar that of vey in thr weeds ane to make tr unerstand tha oor very ts extenceclesrycomrespond tot Ufortnasy, In such ord which the reality of our evi along we ae encouraged Safch fr the reasons for such divers, we cannot hep ut being completly powerless due fo ur own ful Through Chis however, who overcame Ti ‘erent by His tove we are down te way follow te One wh ith kage (fGen goodness ‘We are srl oblige oacept or neleentia, which doesnot lead us to God toca ou laity to changes lon ceatres having vets movements. ‘nthe other hand, we, who are ceed scoring othe image of God, ate never ‘eprived ofthe powsr of fee wil nthe expect Origen ily believes {Go's love as we ae apo forget His race i we ea inthe less state Le, {Eine av san sgh se essen gene et ok ‘ring sar of our lonsip with God he Creat. Therefore is very poi ‘wo reals tat Origen ses fe will as ot being used 54 pasive meas only © ‘Scribe the cause of eit God, bts aseied to be a postive infvnce on ‘te for to tke ood hoof the danger of ety complacency Hence, we ca su tha in Origen's dot, whe we bevitably fal due our fault of neglegentia neglecting part in Go's action towards this word, ‘wee slays in Heuvel salvation. Tht we shal be saved in the en ther do 10 rata tein nor am easy complceny, bt eaters tough ou nega, sce We never deptved of Gal's rae tha we become aware that He, Eins, rs endowed ws, ou ceation with tis nelegenia as the ‘Raton foro seareh forthe meaning of our vere, Le he psstlity His woteasng work upon ws. Answering © hypatetal opponent who might ‘hag tat nels termined ve may wel py th it fo a ing’ ued natu, for ad, thre would te no way wo sale Is ova nel fee, Therefore itis by no means passive sneessry cil, et lone a defect {national retires, bal shows pte sgnieanc by leg see up The meaning of screednsry as ore underanding of bing crete nesoding tothe imge of Goa ‘Gos lays working upon His creates without seglcting» them, ahough we canoe But be subject wo having he posi of being sneeta> and fal case we ae merely crestres, who are cossitnly made fo be existe, ‘sey aking ourselves he meaning of our etetedoess 1 he image of God 45.1. rn 3,3 IR: pei ilo ries ats «eit mt eee a a acres aN pn om PE 499 Hence we com in conte wth G's lave a hrf a ven the oppor of epentng of ou ogc Him. Thus, we we able five aga worthy of ba ‘Sete tothe mae of Gog, at we sere forthe messing faves inhi werd '5°God asus fo do, and igen Kesp on woking fo ou fellow eee 0 Sxswerfo Him, kaowing that we shall never wbderstand all te reasons for IS ‘very plang evisu ou final saan "When Orpen ert the wha ef nih or rin hy Gt, he ‘means to adonsh rata! ceutwes ste Tor negeting thei vn iid ‘read the reo Ged or these reat, wh ak th proper anderson ‘of tir nelegenia, full 0 ao soch fundamental uestone forthe elder Standing 16 who they ae, wha hey nek, apd whom they shoud ask fe wha they lek ‘Viewed inthis ight, the meaning of the word's diversi well xpressd by ‘Origen en he sae at ‘heh conto he eaten, bt at fo ect nes dln pe {hoof mvc s pepe by th Co fr ex one wha ng se y God ‘mind or onl pi ha polenta, ato wi ie ‘meri, and as rede hamster Tovble or halo (Sod. We must so 9, wer, thts es who ae of ihr ete rained mailer th ret {pst tee tow tem rt yes ey eee my become seine colurc fthe re, acing the Ape sh ‘rnd car atm joo vane, wing tyre fm ‘wo mba im tope ere Origen pins oat tht ational crete wh mist Cris the oie inlly falling deo ter areca cases, ty ar edowed With th espn stiles inthis woes that this very Avert i hs wold which has “aussi ures, mens tat ove lead aceped the espns of Pesfoming ou ty in ths wel rom he very bepianing of or exitence. Tae to Ga’ creation: Hence «pe realization| The problem of elo the divest fn this world now comple ws, who have been pursing the eae of el at ‘object or have refused to ace case deve fo oa ee wi, 0 be akare somata nn i ee phenome eee ene Sanit ome acta nena whecendoecpe ioe gemmeermee foes shee enti ee act amee team aee ee acmeneatanae mecmeerees cet 12's rts oranda sn soma eg cn pa eee ieanameereeeea500 sumova of cu own sin, tht shat we, ourselves, are the agent fe. The word in ‘phic oe ei the aly working place ‘we cn fl in is versity, he evi cerespandig fo or ov Sand ‘hon tke oar own espns or iproving them “Te ages who sade to ecgaze hs oa s,s God bt abot secmdet and ably immanent in heats of Ct. Fr, cording Origen, “ings wee moe sce “in hs wal th Chef the ory begining of cao, «Ct pated ivi ll atonal ettes ‘nasser a parpson in Hist in sucha way tat exch otsnd Spr of Ppt ropardonae othe ving aecog wih Which he al clang 0 Ha, tl he end or consummation, whe sthe goodness of God tra Cit wil Fes hiv ene creation to one en re is ences being copeed nd = Se nour encour with God hugh Ch tei, urn sw dat the probe of ei by pesoiying in the mane of hedicy. We, then coe $e more lly that God ie sour ln, ls deseo wash aay the fur soul, wiih hey have tought on theaslves Hough vate is nd ‘himeso", He, Mims very age! nvaved in evi inthis wo for us "ach ol eet, who was raed to pss oe Wi, was aso ea fo ‘ofthis diverse wor, by means ofthe preceding fall eto hs wn neglegentia ‘Secle cton = dre a sih rt vo S ath eben, Seo TD. «Wi Kaen die eee eee ane et thare iat aed a ar acraece BERR tea emeranmtenise ieee tema earn ntecene Rea eae ere are reel trea eee ease! ereeenrpace ene aces cehereeerrneaae ca eerie Seopa orem ate ania ethrresarmt winapi tno creat hae Datos incl hc at oe SRR Ty RN le weeny ince mite cer ew pg itarase herrea napees tage ~Bbdsaavemmirerem meets seats aL Nps moma bene so ‘Tere, we, who ae inguling lato the problem of ev, have ame to realize that we ae sich an agent, which makes it posite for us to rove ha the cause ‘ofthe diverse word ineldig vi which we formally reparded 3 bj es inour very reedom, eseaal fot ow existence, ah 0 coats hat he pc ‘Tre beau or ys and follow or Savor fear mn fe wl 2 fee responsible agents, teiving in divine roidene. In ths wa, we ae ‘Blowe to mae Ch, techyowerrming sna eh il vere tetten god and ev ith groans pal etre rnin ie a ing ‘ented tothe ge of God ae encouraged to tun towards God, “Thro if sch pont inthe aoa pis of be Whole eeaton cane shared with ou ova stele wath si ore a this vere ord wil tbe in 0 ‘ee reent the factions in the trnston fhrgh ferent words, However, ‘hele of esha inti endarceof he Ceator which ech of shi lea rected, according to the mesure four pty rips our place o eon ‘or cnon in whit o be oro ofl some dy nhs works Tit way fe lead us forbear te caus fei tou on in, ince thi sed 09 faith in Go's re providence which reigns over evn His own consideration 8 ‘ry spent Fo, mech faith, we my ele fn Ga lve, complished “The conlsion of ou Igy sas follows the poem of ell in On Pi Princpes tars out be oo inherent existence 25 aol ceatures it feed, whic is eset to out being xed tothe image of CG. Origen’ specific Usage ofthe osm neslegent opens up 4 ne ig lato our undestading of ‘eretocs, which cfs the elevnceherween the Creator and is crests, {tals showing usta the fies of erentes emerges a potent or evi ‘Origen recognizing the reat fei the diversi this wet, hk tht we ‘me endowed wit nvdual and vere respoasbiies in thls Wedd, sac We, barseles ar the eau of his diversity. This reaionship between this diverse ‘todd an our sin larly eases our responsiblity in his wor withot oa rowing each cal eorespondence. Though ths sk Seons Ike meaningless ipvays worting upon his world thrugh Chr Tertre enighened by Co's alter with apa clin hs diese wa we canoes deeper dane ‘Son of evil involed in ous 412.6 Miroku, Fujisawa Michiko Kevan Kanagawa Prtetre state lapse EDO > orton fie eis sa ee mt ie et rt rei pdr cand en pr pat as en ot rs ‘Soman engl nc mun pe