Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lela T. Whitener
Dec. 8, 2020
Running head: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, A New Opportunity
2
Abstract
This paper is on DACA: a program that gives young people who were born in another country
but identify as Americans a way to gain legal residency. This program also aids in boosting the
country's economy while avoiding the unnecessary removal of the recipients. Immigration is a
major factor in the media today causing many to have differing opinions on what to do with
those who have been residing in the country and those trying to enter the country. Along with
The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program didn’t exist until June 2012 under
the president at the time Barack Obama. First I am going to explain DACA and how it benefits
its recipients. Following I will speak on any controversy that is connected to the program
recently. Last I will analyze how prevalent the program has been in the media and how it pertains
DACA stands for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, in which the Obama
Congress affirmatively rejected such a program in the normal legislative process on multiple
occasions (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, n.d.). This came to be after the Secretary of
Homeland Security Janet Napolitano issued on June 15, 2012, a memorandum entitled
“Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion concerning Individuals Who Came to the United States as
Children,” (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, n.d.). Those who were approved under the
act were known as “Dreamers”: was coined in 2001 to describe young immigrants who would
benefit from the passage of the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM)
Act, a bill offering a pathway to citizenship for young undocumented immigrants who were
brought to this country as young children by their parents. Today, “Dreamers” is used more
broadly to describe all young immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as kids and identify as
Americans in every sense of the word, but do not have legal status.
Since DACA was created as an immigration law the main purpose is to give people who
arrived in the U.S. as children and whose immigration status has remained illegal some kind of
safety net from deportation. To be eligible for the program, anyone under the age of 31 that
Running head: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, A New Opportunity
4
arrived in the United States illegally while under the age of 16, must be physically present while
applying, and entered illegally before 2007 or entered illegally, and their visa has expired, is in
high school, or has graduated with a diploma or GED. Applicants are eligible for employment
authorization. The law provides that after the immigrant obtains DACA status, they are not
actively illegal, yet the immigrant also does not have legal status. It does not directly provide a
path to permanent citizenship (Sember, 2020). Research from Crouse (2018) showed that DACA
beneficiaries come from different regions and countries around the world. In the U.S., the top
five countries of origin for beneficiaries are Mexico (79.4%), El Salvador (3.7%), Guatemala
(2.6%), Honduras (2.3 %), and Peru (1.1%). In Michigan, the top country of origin for
DACA-eligible immigrants is Mexico.5 The majority (53%) of DACA beneficiaries across the
country are women, and two-thirds of them are 25 years of age or younger. These stats show how
much of an impact this program has had not only in America but for the nations of those who
were accepted.
Once a recipient's time expires or is about to expire if they want to continue in the
program they must renew their status. The DACA expiration date is on the I-797, Notice of
Action form that an applicant received when their DACA was approved. A tip for those applying
for a renewal is that they should submit their DACA renewal request no later than 120 days (4
months) before their expiration date. The USCIS is sometimes very slow when it comes to
granting DACA renewals. If you submit your request after the 120-day window, you could be at
risk of losing your job and other protections (United We Dream, 2020). DACA has given more
than 800,000 young people access to basic freedoms, including work permits, driver’s licenses,
affordable higher education, and, in certain states, professional licenses. A national study from
2017 revealed that 91% of DACA respondents are currently employed. Their average hourly
Running head: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, A New Opportunity
5
wage is $17.46 an hour, up from $10.29 before receiving DACA. Forty-five percent of
respondents are currently in school and among those currently in school, 72% are pursuing a
bachelor’s degree or higher. Nearly 80% of respondents said they obtained driver's licenses,
which is also a public safety improvement for all people (What is DACA and Who are Dreamers,
n.d.). In correlation with the rise of employment rates, a 2016 study of DACA beneficiaries
found that DACA increased the likelihood of participants’ employment through expanded labor
force participation, while also decreasing the rate of unemployment for individuals (Crouse,
2018). In research from Haurwitz (2017) about 800,000 undocumented immigrants have
benefited from DACA, including 234,000 in Texas, second only to California's 425,000. Since its
inception, DACA has proven to be an effective strategy for boosting beneficiaries’ wages,
employment opportunities, and education. While there are several shortcomings to this policy,
DACA was a good first step in addressing our outdated immigration system (Crouse, 2018).
DACA came to be under Obama’s administration during his presidency, but fear and
uncertainty began to rise about the continuation of DACA when the succeeding president was
announced. Throughout his campaign, Trump promised to undo most of the Obama-era laws
passed. In keeping his promise the Trump administration in September 2017 moved to terminate
DACA (What Is DACA and Who Are the Dreamers? 2020). Even though this program proved to
be beneficial to the economy, immigration was still a topic that the nation has been split on for
quite some time. On the day after the Administration announced its intention to end the Deferred
Action for Childhood Arrivals experts throughout San Diego were already voicing their
discontent and concern with the thousands of jobs that would be lost in San Diego as a result, as
well as the financial instability it would cause for hundreds of San Diego businesses (Zavala,
2017).
Running head: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, A New Opportunity
6
The timing of Trump's decision was no coincidence: Texas Attorney General Ken
Paxton, along with Republican officials in nine other states, had threatened to sue the
administration if the program, commonly known as DACA, wasn't rescinded by Tuesday. "I
applaud President Trump for phasing out DACA," Paxton said. "As the Texas-led coalition
explained in our June letter, the Obama-era program went far beyond the executive branch's
legitimate authority (Haurwitz, 2017)." On the other hand, some of the national higher education
leaders reacted differently. Mary Sue Coleman, president of the Association of American
Universities and a former president of the University of Michigan, said she was "appalled by this
administration's disregard for the lives of thousands of young people brought to the United States
as children. American in every way except birthright, they are upstanding individuals who
contribute to their communities and our nation (Haurwitz, 2017)." Shortly after the DACA
program’s fifth anniversary on Sept. 5, 2017, the U.S. Attorney General announced that the
Justice Department would end the program over a six-month phasing out period. As of that date,
United States Immigration and Citizenship Services (USCIS) stopped accepting new DACA
applications. Nearly 700,000 beneficiaries across the country will be affected by the termination
The Trump administration had many backing it on its decision to rescind DACA but, with
a 5-4 ruling on June 18, 2020, the Supreme Court blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to
end DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). The ruling maintains the program and
allows DACA recipients to renew membership, which offers them work authorization and
temporary protection from deportation. The ruling leaves open the possibility that the
Administration could still end DACA in the future if they give a proper justification (What Is
Running head: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, A New Opportunity
7
DACA and Who Are the Dreamers? 2020). Despite the Supreme Court decision to reinstate the
DACA program, the Trump administration released a memo on July 28, 2020, that shortens the
The media has constantly been covering the status of whether or not DACA would
remain available. Major outlets like CNN, Fox News, NBC, and many other news stations
covered the constant change and updates on DACA. Social media has also been an outlet that has
informed people about what is happening with the DACA program. For example, during Trump's
presidency, he has consistently used Twitter as a source to tell the people how he feels or his
opinion. After his attempt to get rid of DACA was shut down he took to social media and
tweeted “We will be submitting enhanced papers shortly to properly fulfill the Supreme Court’s
ruling & request of yesterday,” Mr. Trump wrote (Shear & Cochrane, 2020). Since DACA has
made headlines there has been false information spread just like there is with the overall topic of
immigration. Rumors and biases from news stations have their impact on viewers.
In conclusion, DACA (Deferred Action for childhood arrivals) has many studies proving
it benefits the nation's economy. Through jobs and education, the program has allowed those
from around the world, and here in America that wasn’t before. Since DACA is in direct
correlation to immigration its status became prevalent in the media. Immigration not only affects
those dealing with deportation or those trying to find a better life but it also impacts those who
References
Crouse, V. (2018, September 10). The benefits of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). (2019, September 23). Department of
Haurwitz, R. (2017, September 7). College leaders urge quick action to fix DACA McRaven,
college leaders urge fix for DACA: McRaven: ’I and the UT System believe in our DACA
students. Proquest.
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1935942241/E99F5AEB2BAA401EPQ/3?accountid
=12711
Shear, M. D., & Cochrane, E. (2020, June 19). Trump Says Administration Will Try Again to End
Sember, B. (2020, November 24). Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA): Application
Process. Legalzoom.Com.
https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/deferred-action-for-childhood-arrivals-daca-applicati
on-process
What is DACA and Who Are the Dreamers? (2020, June). Anti-Defamation League.
https://www.adl.org/education/resources/tools-and-strategies/table-talk/what-is-daca-and-
who-are-the-dreamers
Zavala, M. (2017, September 15). DACA Decisions Could Affect the Economy. Proquest.
Running head: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, A New Opportunity
9
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2160693675/FAB56D6867204379PQ/15?accountid=
12711