Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Causes and Effects of 1999 Military Coup - IR..Anees
Causes and Effects of 1999 Military Coup - IR..Anees
Content:
Theories of military intervention
Causes of military coup
Musharraf regime
Impact of 1999 coup
Introduction:
There are many causes behind the marsh law in under developed
countries .political instability is one of the important factor of all the
military marsh laws. All the political leaders have been involved in the
activities of corruption throughout their regime. So military dictators
always accused the political and civil leadership for the causes of
military marsh laws. Musharraf also blamed Mian Muhammad nawaz
shareef that he showed him the path towards the president house.
Military is also the well-organized institution in the under developed
countries. All the civil institutions have always been deteriorated in the
developing countries. This is also the biggest reason of all the military
coups. Causes of military coups have been discussed in this research
assignment. The effects of Musharraf regime have also been discussed
in this assignment. Object of making the Pakistan was to establish a
free and dominated state but these military dictators pushed the
Pakistan into darkness. So nation was drifted into dictatorship due to
both of these politicians and military generals. But politicians blamed
army and army blamed politicians. Debate is endless. After making of
Pakistan, Pakistan has sent most of its time under military coup.
Pakistan has born four marsh laws. Democracy spread disappointment
and military dictators took advantage of it. They established
accountability in country to please the common citizens. But they did
not indulge in any long term planning or policy making. On 12 October
1999 Musharraf removed nawaz government and imposed marsh law
in the state.so the causes ad effects of his coup have been discussed
widely in this assignment.
Historical Background:
On the issue of military coup in Pakistan there is a lot of literature
present which is written by Pakistani scholars as well as foreign
scholars.
Rizvi, A H(2000),”The Military and politics in Pakistan 1947-
19997”,Lhore Sang-e-Meel press. He has explained the military
institution . he has described the causes of military intervention in the
politics of Pakistan. He is not biased at all. He has described both
negative and positive effects of both civil and military regimes honestly.
He deals with the first three military coups in this book.
Jan , A U (2006),” The Musharraf factors.Lahore.Jamhoori publishers”.
He is the critic of Musharraf regime. He has said that Musharraf regime
had many bad effects on politics of Pakistan. He started war on
terrorism. Kashmiris were disappointed by the military regime of
Musharraf. Musharraf regime also caused many causalities in FATA.
There is also a book on the military coup of general pervaiz Musharraf
of Sharukh Rafi Khan “Pakistan Under Musharraf”.in this book he has
widely explained the causes of Musharraf intervention in Nawaz
government. He has also described the Musharraf regime and
consequences of his regime.
Ayesha siddiqa’s book, “Pakistan Military Economy”.in this book she
has analyzed the military economy and policies of military government
to boost up the economy of Pakistan. State has specially described
economic policies of Musharraf during his era.
Journal of Kukreja A V,(1995)” Military intervention in politics:
contrasting cases of Pakistan and India”. Edition ; political system in
Pakistan vol. 7 new Delhi : deep and deep publishers.
Talbot (1999), Pakistan a modern history”. In this book the writer has
given brief history of the Pakistan. He has written all the political history
of Pakistan. He has also described the military regimes in Pakistan.
State of Problem(SOP)
The basic purpose of research is to describe the causes of military
intervention in the politics of Pakistan and to elaborate the Musharraf
regime after 1999 coup and effects of his regime.
THEORIES OF MILITARY INTERVENTION:
Military intervention is a common phenomenon in under developed
countries. It has many causes and effects in these countries. Huntington
and Janowitz are considered the founder of these theories. Many other
scholars have also there theories about military intervention in third
world countries.
Janowitz theory:
“Janowitz believe that there should be good civil military relations in a
state. Civil military relationship is the most important part of his theory.
According to him there should be balance within the relation of civil
and military. Neither politicians should interfere in military affairs nor
military should interfere in civil relations.in this way both of these
institutions can be run side by side.” (Dike, 2003)
Political instability:
Leadership crisis was one of the main reason of all coups. Quaid e
Azam died after one year of making of Pakistan .then Liaqat Ali khan
tried but he failed to set the problems on right path and he also died in
1951. After these two leaders Pakistan did not get any sincere
leadership. The first constitution was made in 1956 which was ended in
1958 and first marsh law on Pakistan was imposed in 1958.
After this constitution was also made in 1962. After this a charismatic
politician came into power. He gave the Pakistan its third constitution.
He made the 1973 constitution for the Pakistan. Then general Zia ul
Haq enforced marsh law in country in 1977 and he became the
president of Pakistan in 1978. He wanted to enforce Islam in Pakistan.
Zia regime was appreciated by the religious parties.
“Zia became the most powerful president of Pakistan bur he died in the
plane clash in 1988.people of Pakistan saw the most corrupted
government from 1988 to 1999. These were the governments of Mian
Muhammad nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto. People became
disappointed due to the corruption of these two political parties and
then Musharraf enforce marsh law in 1999. East Pakistan and West
Pakistan was geographically separated from one another .it also made
the great cause of political instability which led to the military coup.”
(Dawn, October 24,1999)
Economic crisis:
Pakistan military has also great number of resources in the country
which are the main reason of military power in Pakistan. Economic
crisis of Pakistan is well known. Government spends only 3% of its
revenue on health and education. Pakistan has never stood on its foot
in the field of economy. Neither the civil nor military governments pay
attention to the worse economic condition of Pakistan.
“Pakistan economy through the 1990s suffered from the handful of
important buckles that should have restored many years before. First,
the tax base remained meager, consisting of approximately half of the
million people out of population of 140million”. (ishtaiq, 2008)
International Factor:
After Second World War, two super powers emerged on the map of the
world .these powers were USSR and United States of America
(USA).most of the world divided into bipolar bands. There was
communist system in RUSSIA while there was capitalist system in
America. United States of America invited India to join there
anticommunist group but India rejected there invitation and they
decided to become neutral in the whole scenario but Pakistan accepted
the invitation of America and it joined there group.
“Pakistan joined the organizations of SEATO and CENTO. Pakistan and
severe threat from India for its survival, that is why Pakistan preferred
to join America for its survival. On the other hand Pakistan did not get
enough resources from India after portion to run the country. Sob
Pakistan was also dependent upon the aid of America for its economy.
America also supported military regime in Pakistan because it was in
her favor when Russia entered in Afghanistan.”( Kukreja,1995)
“ America supplied weapons to the freedom fighters of the Afghanistan
through Pakistan. Zia ul Haq helped America as much as possible. Then
after the 9/11 America attacked Afghanistan then they supported
Musharraf regime and I return the got military air bases in Pakistan.in
such way, the support of America did not allow democracy to prosper
and flourish in Pakistan.” (Rizvi, 1997)
Corruption:
Corruption has always been the biggest problem of Pakistan. Neither
civilian nor military government took solid steps to root out corruption
from Pakistan. This was the biggest reason that used to tell by the
marsh law administrators after imposing the military coup in the
country. Every time after the military coup, army blamed the civil
government for the destruction of Pakistan through the corruption.
“The selected civilian leader did not set any democratic standard.
During 1988-99 democratic transition remained highly tenuous and
incomplete. Benazir Bhutto assumed power as the youngest prime
minister in Pakistan history. But it is almost impossible to measure the
weight of expectations.as much as mounting charges of corruption,
incompetence explains the palpable growth of disillusionment. The
limited achievements of her 1988-90 government compounded
allegations concerning her alleged authoritarian wadero mentality and
activities of her increasingly controversial spouse,Mr.Percent Asif ali
zardari”. (Talbot, 1999.p 293)
Corruption is the main cause of the grievance of the people of Pakistan.
Pakistan could not make progress since its making due to the
corruption.
“Corruption diverts resources from the poor to the rich and increase
cost of running business, distort public expenditure and deters foreign
investor. Also corruption has become government toppling issue in
many countries. In Pakistan four governments were dismissed during
(1990-99) on the charge of corruption.” (Nation, September12, 1999)
The citizens of Pakistan elected Mian Muhammad nawaz shareef with
the hope that he would eradicate corruption from the Pakistan but
everything was in the vein.
“When Nawaz Sharif was dismissed and Benazir elected for second time
in 1993.her government was again dismissed in 1996 on the charge of
corruption and once again nawaz Sharif formed government. During his
second term, the condition of the country could not change. Foreign
and internal debt kept on rising.” (Rizvi, 1997)
“Pakistan politicians never got the confidence of the foreign investors.
Corruption went on spreading unabated. Public representatives were
being criticized for looting national exchequer for the personal gains at
the cost of the common man. The fate of the people in power did
change, but not that of ordinary citizens.” (Dawn, October 24,1999)
Nawaz-Musharraf Row
“The realities of the October 12, 1999 are the realities of Pakistan
history. They said incident had started from the retreat of Pakistani
forces engaged in was against India over Tiger Hills in the Kergol
Section”
Prime Minister Mian Nawaz Sharif “after Washington Acord held at 4 th
July 1999 decided the Pakistan’s Army will quit the hills. Army and
particularly chief of Army Staff General Pervaiz Musharraf was not
prepared to retreat but this was his duty to obey the order”. (Dawn.
October 17, 1999)
Therefor Nawaz Sharif took the major decision of removing the Army
Chief General Pervaiz Musharraf from his post.
“A period of tension between Nawaz Sharif and General Pervaiz
Musharraf started. Both of them were ready to dismiss each other.
They did not like each other at all. The growing tension between them
got spur when corps commander Quetta, General Tariq Pervaiz met
with the Prime Minister General Pervaiz Musharraf termed this meeting
against the rules and regulations of the Army and sacked him as the
Chief”. (New Week, October 25, 1999)
“The termination of General Tariq Pervaiz made Prime Minister more
careful throughout his career as Prime Minister, he was unable to get
along with his Army chiefs starting with Aslam Beg, Then Asif Nawaz
and then Wahid Kakar who sent him home in 1993.”
“Returning he had to content with Jehangir Karamat who told the
country what was wrong in it and its leaders. For that he was caked.
Nawaz Sharif like Zulfiqar Ali went down the line and choose the third
in seniority, a man he look to be weak as he had no political base as
usual a bad judge of character. Nawaz Sharif had blundered General
Pervaiz Musharraf is a soldier’s soldier storing of mind.”
“Within a year the situation arose in which it was a case of Nawaz Sharif
getting side of Musharraf as Army Chief until fall 2001. But then last
week Nawaz Sharif in explicable moved against Musharraf.
“Nawaz Sharif had lost his confidence in the Army Chief and vice versa.
The Prime Minister wanted such a person near to him who gave him
safety. General Zia-u-din was most near to him so he selected him for
the post COAS and sacked General Pervaiz Musharraf.””
“Keeping in view circumstances General Musharraf dismissed the
Nawaz Sharif government on October 12, 1999 became the chief
Executive of Pakistan.”
Referendum 2002
“In 2002 president General Pervaiz Musharraf announced that
referendum would be held to restore democracy in the real sense. He
said that “I have no wish to remain on the chair of president but I want
to restore democracy in Pakistan so this compelled me to take part in
politics.”
“For this purpose referendum is the cry off the day. Chief Election
Commissioners, Chief Justice Irshad Hassan Khan were given the task to
fix date for referendum. The Chief Election Commissioner fixed 30 th
April, 2002 for referendum.”
“On April 14,2002 a meeting was held under the Chief Election
Commissioner to discuss the issue related to referendum, CEC provided
all the requirements, Ballot papers were issued all over the country.”
“President General Pervaiz Musharraf visited to every corner of the
country to take the people in confidence. He was assured that we were
working according to our own agenda and we want to introduce new
reforms”. (The Daily Nation, April 15, 2002)
References:
Rizvi , A.H , (2000).The Military and Politics in Pakistan 1947-
1997/Lahore: Sange-E-Meel publications.
Jan A.U, (2006) , The Musharraf factors. Lahore; Jamhuri Publishers.
Kukreja V,(1995) “ Military interference in politics: Contrasting cases of
Pakistan and India”. Edition; Political system in Pakistan vol 7. New
Delhi: Deep and deep publishers.
Talbot(1999). “Pakistan a modern history “ /Lahore :Vanguard Book Pvt
Ltd.
The Daily Dawn, May 20,1997
The Daily Dawn ,October 18,1999
The Daily Dawn ,October 19,1999
The Daily Dawn ,October 24,1999
The Nation ,October 25,1999.