Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................2
Free college is useless..................................................................................................................................3
High-cost country for educating..................................................................................................................3
Free colleges are FREE?...............................................................................................................................4
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................5
Reference....................................................................................................................................................6
Introduction
Free education means that the government must pay for the tuition cost while students
pay for the other expenses such as room and board. There are 17 million students in
undergraduate programs in the United States. As the 2020 presidential election heats up, many
candidates are bringing free college in the show the national spotlight. At least 38 States have an
existing or proposed variation of free college programs. Some people argue that tuition-free
college will help decrease crippling student debt. If tuition is free, students will take on
significantly fewer students loan. Every year, tuition at American colleges and universities goes up,
but virtually no one seems to know why. In fact, the average cost of higher education in the United
States increases at twice the rate of inflation, and by going up 8 percent each year, the cost of tuition
However, tuition-free college is not a free college, and the student will stay have a large
debt. Tuition is only one expense college student has to pay and accounts for about 40% of the
total average college cost. On the other hand, the taxpayer would spend billion to subsidize
tuition, while other costs remain high. People argue that it would be unfair because college
students would be giving a degree to increase their lifetime earnings on taxpayers' backs. Lastly,
even if taxpayers covered college tuition, college costs remain high for several reasons, including
fancy dorms, amenities like lazy rivers and climbing walls: student services access healthcare,
athletics and increase and administrative personnel. The tuition-free college will decrease
We can argue about whether some of the benefits of college spillover to non-students,
what economists call "positive externalities,” might justify some public subsidy of higher
education. However, what is non-disputable is that a considerable part of the benefit of going to
college goes to the student. In large portion- and indeed, I would suggest that most college
students come from families with above-average incomes. Text pairs do not finance their fellow
citizens' financial investment, so why should they pay for their human capital investment? Even
if the qualifications are free and not the living expenses, a person may still claim a slew of
benefits and receive no incentive to ever get a job because he or she remains in the education
system for years and years. (Gritz, 2010) We provide an incentive for people to exploit their
potential, their talents, for gain. They had skin in the game, and, for the most part, throughout
most of history, they financed it on their own. I think to call it racist or classist, whatever that is,
to have to talk about skin in the game is somewhat dis-ingenious. I do not think it is fair to say
that all of the gains that low-income people attain do not come from going to college, nor do I
think we have. What about costs we associated with 40% of students who enter college not
graduating in 6 years, who go to a four-year college? What about those costs? If we lower the
price of going to college, we encourage more and more people who have been marginal
academically. If all education is free, then less thought is required, and students may waste years
of their life studying for qualifications that they do not need or even want. (Kamenetz, 2016)
magnitude, but they are not substantial. The real issue is it cost 25 to 30 thousand dollars to
educate college students in the United States, on average; in most of Europe and elsewhere
globally, it is ten or fifteen thousand, much less. We are a high-cost country for educating.
Intercollegiate athletics are part of it. The correlation between spending on college and reputation
is positive. That is, the more we spend, the better our reputation. Furthermore, many schools are
going for reputation, rightly or wrongly. Peoples are different. For some people, college is an
experience. Other students do not make it through college at all, and for whom? College today,
significantly if they borrow money to finance this less successful experience, is sometimes
misery. It is a risky investment. That is not to say we should not have college, nor does it say we
should publicly support the college. Nevertheless, it says we need to take this into account. If
colleges and Universities were being fully funded by tax dollars, they would encourage students
to join with a whole host of silly and frivolous programs because the quality of education would
Free college is one way to combat student debt. When lawmakers say free college, but
they usually mean it is tuition-free. Other costs like living in a dorm for paying rent, paying for
the meal are not included. States like California, Oregon and Tennessee all offer some version of
free college. In 2017, San Francisco became the first city to offer all of its resident's free tuition
tuition program. Now the college asks the city to cover the cost like hiring more professors and
providing student services (Mojadad, 2020). There is also the argument that offering free tuition
to everyone quote be a waste of money since not everyone wants to get a college degree. There is
research showing that graduating rates fall the fewer students pay. 47% of community college
enrollees’ drop out of school, and their number might increase if it becomes free for everyone
(Hess, 2021). So free tuition might raise the already high drop-out rates, others argue that if the
free student's point is to help students who cannot afford it, why not increase grant money to
goes to the low-income students instead? That way, we are not subsidizing college costs for
students from high-income families that might not have a problem paying off tuition fees. After
all, the actual cost of college is more than just tuition and fees. We have got rent, food and
transportation.
Conclusion
Upon this argument that the government must pay for the tuition cost while students pay
for the other expenses such as room and board. It is proved that tuition-free college is not a free
college, and the student will stay have a large debt. For some people, college is an exciting
but tuition is not the only one expense college. Students have to pay and accounts for about 40%
of the total average college cost. Lastly, even if taxpayers covered college tuition, college costs
Gritz, J. R. (2010, July 29). What's Wrong With the American University System. The Atlantic.
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2010/07/whats-wrong-with-the-
american-university-system/60458/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickhess/2018/06/06/the-college-dropout-problem/
Kamenetz, A. (2016, September 17). How College Aid Is Like A Bad Coupon. Npr.
https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/09/17/492973995/how-college-aid-is-like-a-bad-
coupon.?t=1615192132817
Samuels, R. (2013). Why Public Higher Education Should Be Free: How to Decrease Cost and