‘ges Frequency Relative Frequency 5 008 0 aur Fa 025 5 025 0 aur 5 08 coupes ‘Amount(s) Frequency Relative Frequency 100-150 5 007 anes0 5 aor 2sr300 5 ao? aonas0 5 oor asei00 0 aus sono Pt as 42500 w ons sons 0 aus ssi-600 5 aor ones 5 ao?1 nthe folonngnstgram data values that al on the ah boundary ar coun nthe lass neva, We Ylue tha al onthe et boundary aren counted (oth te exception ofthe fet meena whee both Boundary ales ae nes) ‘Onboard charges fr singles bey use Sanng tome trian era rm UA pou B sor Fawe 2321. inthe following nstogram, the dea values ra fllon the Nght boundary ae counted nthe as terval whe lus that fal nthe et boundary are nat ured ant the exception the terval where vas on bth burden ae tuted). yen Se PETE te Fawe 2322 6. Compare the two graphs i. Arawers may vary, Possible answers inclu: = oth graphs have a single peak = Both oreohs use class intervals with with egal to $50, 1. Arowars may vary. Possible answers incude: = The coulesaraph has a lass interval wth no vale. stakes aimost tice as many cass naval o spay the data for couples. Ii, Aroners may vary Posse ansversinchde: The graphs are moe snr than efferent because the overall patterns forthe araphs are the same, 8. Check student's soliton. f. Compare the raph forthe Singles with the new graph forthe Coupes: = Beth eraphs have a single peak Bt oreo display 6 ess intenvas. + wot arene show the sare gener! paren. 1 Answers may vary. Posse ansnersinchde: although the with of the class neva for couples sdcuble that ofthe lass rterals for singles, the ora ‘are more similar thn they ae flere « Anowers may vary. Possbe answers clude: You are able to compare te graphs eval by Inter ts easer to compare the overall patems with the new Scale on the Couples graph. Because a coupe represents two Incidal, the new scale leads to a more accurate comparison. hy Answers may vary. Possible ansners clude: Based on the histograms, seems that spending does nt vary much from singles to indus who ae part oF a (cpl. The overall patterns are the same. The renge oF spending for couples approximately double the range fr did