Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Akhilesh Tiwari,
R/o House no. – 103,
Shiv mandir colony, vaishali nagar
Bhilai, Dist. Durg (C.G.)
SUBJECT –
CLAIM by Parents –
1. Accident caused due to mishandeling or negligence of school/school
authorities.
2. Claim that school authorities promised to pay for whole (Initial +
subsequent) treatment and any other costs for difficulties faced by the
family or parents.
3. That school promised to reimburse any cost that may arise in future in
relation to the injury after initial payment of Rs. 42,590/- for the
treatment and surgery.
4. Demanded around 2 to 3 lakhs rupees for plastic surgery (estimated cost)
5. Demanded Rs. 2,00,000 /- for the mental and physical trauma faced by
the patient(anshita) and her parents or family.
6. Claim that school promised to pay above mentioned costs and any other
subsequent cost in exchange for the parents silence or to not post any
complain against the school.
7. Claim for the financial difficulties caused to family due to unemployment
of mother (Rajni Tiwari)
REPLY –
1. As against the claim no. 1 mentioned above the injury caused was due to
an accident only which was not caused directly due to any negligence on
part of school or school authorities. It was a mere accident which was
unforceable and was not a result of mis-handeling or negligence of school
by school.
2. As against the claim 2 or 3 – No such promise was made by the school
authorities to the parents regarding future payments or reimbursement for
any other cost other than the treatment provided by the school.
3. As against claim 4 and 5 the estimates provided by the parent of the
student are of no use/value as no such promise was made to student or
parents for payment for plastic surgery and proper care and treatment was
provided/paid by school. The school also without any delay took
immediate action and did not fail in any sense to provide the care or
treatment it was bound to provide.
4. As against the claim no. 6 the school denies it as no such exchange took
place between the school and the parents and the claim is totally wrong
and it harms the reputation of school.
5. As against the claim no. 7, the school is not directly responsible for any
such event that arose in future as the without fail, the school provided
good treatment and care towards the student.
6. The parents also without any promise from the school/school authorities
Came and gave subsequent bills related to travelling charges, consultation
fees of other doctors, and estimated costs of other surgeries and plastic
surgery to mr. manjeet singh which the school/school authorities or Mr.
manjeet singh himself never promised to reimburse or pay any such
subsequent costs.