Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/233988919
CITATIONS READS
5 10,265
1 author:
Puchong Praekhaow
King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi
6 PUBLICATIONS 5 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Puchong Praekhaow on 20 May 2014.
Puchong Praekhaow1,*
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut’s University of
Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
*
Corresponding author: puchong.pra@kmutt.ac.th
Abstract
This paper is focused on the net profit of trading points using three moving average techniques based on pattern determinations.
Stocks’ samples were selected by simple random sampling method from the stocks in the set 50 stocks indexes of the Thailand Stock
Market. The net profits of the investment in each trading methods on the experiments were compared. The results indicated that all of
the moving average technique can make profit for trading. Moreover, the simple moving average technique can give profit-making up
to 9% ,which is better than other methods.
1. INTRODUCTION trading rules and the crucial rules to the investment strategy
for investors. In this research the main purpose is on the
Nowadays, the investments in stock markets around the development of trading rule with the model that is invented by
world have become more complicated. This is because of the the three methods of the moving average as follows, simple
dynamic fast pace nature of the business world. Hence, the moving average (SMA), weighted moving average (WMA),
simple system to provide current information and predict and exponential moving average (EMA). Besides, this
future stock prices is desirable to inventors. Moreover, these research provides comparative regard to the profit for trading
systems need to be back-ended with suitable mathematical and in the stock market of all three moving average methods.
statistical tools. .
with n time length is calculated at time ( t + 1) , The net profits of selling in this research were calculated
with the formulas as follows,
( Pi , i = t , t − 1,"t − n + 1) is observed value of the stock prices
at time (t). and α is a constant smoothing factor calculated Net Profit = Sale Price - Cost Price
from the Pearson correlation coefficient of closing stock prices
today and yesterday. Cost Price = Market Price + Commission + Taxes
The signals of trading rule model were determined as Sale Price = Market Price - Commission – Taxes
follows (see in Fig. 1).
Net Profit
Percentage of the net profit = × 100
1. The buying signals are generated at the crossover which Cost Price
the daily closing stock price is moving up higher than the
moving average method of the daily closing stock price. The net profits of the investment in each trading methods
Therefore, the investor will buy the stock on the opening price on the experiments were compared by the analysis of variance
in the next day. test (ANOVA). (R.A. Fisher , Referred by Montgomery, D. C.,
1991) If the statistics test was conducted at 0.05 significant
2. The selling signals are generated at the crossover which level, the net profits of three moving average methods will be
the daily closing stock price is moving down lower than the multiple compared with Duncan Multiple Rang test. (Duncan,
moving average method of the daily closing stock price. The Referred by Montgomery, D. C., 1991)
investor will sell the stock on the opening price in the next
day ,which there is the profit. If the stock was not the profit,
the investor will sell the stock in the next cycle of trading.
3. RESULTS
Price
Between January 1st, 2009 and July 15th, 2009, the price of
Selling Point the sample stocks (BEC, ITD, PTT, and SCB) had the closing
price average, maximum price and minimum price value as
Daily closing shown in Table. 1.
Stock Price
Moving Average Method Table 1 Price of the sample stocks
2
GMSTEC 2010: International Conference for a Sustainable Greater Mekong Subregion,
26-27 August 2010, Bangkok, Thailand
3
GMSTEC 2010: International Conference for a Sustainable Greater Mekong Subregion,
26-27 August 2010, Bangkok, Thailand
The signals of buying and selling determined by trading rule 3.3 Comparing the Analysis
model of the SMA at interval 10 days, 20 days , the WMA at
interval 5 days, 10 days, 20 days , and the EMA at interval 5 Using the one – way ANOVA method to analyze the relation
days,10 days, 20 days, they were calculated in the same of the net profit depended on the all three moving average
methods. methods. The statistics test was conducted at 0.05 significant
levels (p-value < 0.05) as shown in Table 5.
3.2 Returns of Trading
The net profits were trading with the MA types of the Table 5 Result of ANOVA
experiment as shown in Table 2.
Sour of Sum of df Mean F
Table 2 Average of the net profit with three MA. Variance Square Square
Between 410.467 2 205.233 0.034*
MA Types Mean N Std. Deviation Groups 1810.73 33 54.871
SMA Within 5 35
11.8025 12 9.31474
Groups 2221.20
WMA 10.3608 12 8.57753 Total 2
EMA 4.0283 12 2.06732 * Significant at 0.05
Total 8.7306 36 7.96636 From Table 5, there was playing significant of the F statistics
test show that the net profit depends on the type of the moving
From Table 2, it was found that the average rates of return average methods. Then, the net profits of all three moving ave
were 8.7306% and the net profit of SMA was better than other rage methods were multiple compared by using Duncan Multi
methods. ple Rang test. (Refer to Montgomery, D. C., 1991) The results
are presented in the Table 6.
The net profits were trading with the interval 5 days, 10 days,
and 20 days MA of the experiment as shown in Table 3. Table 6 Multiple Comparison of the returns
Table 3 Average of the net profit with the interval-days MA Type of MA SMA WMA EMA
(11.08) (10.36) (4.03)
Interval
SMA(11.08) - -0.72 -7.05∗
Mean N Std. Deviation
5-day WMA(10.36) - -6.33∗
7.8092 12 6.23628
EMA(4.03) -
10-day 7.5058 12 6.37809
* Significant at 0.05,
20-day 10.8767 12 10.71304 (Number) is a percentage of the net profit
Total 8.7306 36 7.96636
Table 6 shows that the percentage’ net profit in the EMA is
Table 3 shows that the average rates of return were 8.7306% different from the SMA and WMA at 0.05 significant levels.
and the net profit of 20 days SMA was better than other
methods.
4. DISCUSSION
Table 4 The percentage of the net profit of all the methods.
The results of the net profits were trading by the three
moving average rules in Thailand stock markets; the causes of
Stock Type of MA the percentage of the net profit the net profits might be from the increasing of stocks prices in
5 days 10 days 20 days the interval of the experiment. The SMA can give to produce
SMV 1.72 2.05 2.12 the highest returns among the various rules during the period
BEC of the experiment in the time test and there is the ability to
WMV 2.00 1.91 1.77 generate above average returns of the net profit. This is
EMV 0.99 1.28 1.62 because the SMA is not sensitive to vary the stocks prices
SMV 12.98 10.54 23.26 while to other is better. The interval length of about 20 days in
ITD WMV 12.31 12.17 26.07 the moving average methods of the investment was emerged
EMV 7.61 4.61 5.17 as the most profitable. It might cause the market condition at
SMV 18.55 21.45 29.32 that time belong to the investment on long time.
PTT WMV 18.15 16.55 21.31
EMV 3.18 3.34 3.53
SMV 6.65 5.66 7.34 5. Conclusion
SCB WMV 4.44 4.52 3.14
This study presents development of the moving average
EMV 5.14 6.00 5.87
trading rules in Thailand Stock Exchange. The experiment of
the research using a sample was chosen by simple random
Table 4 shows that the PTT stock that determined 20 days sampling method from the stocks in the set 50 stocks indexes
SMA give to a higher net profit better than other methods, on the Thailand Stock Market. The results found that the time
while the 5 days EMS of BEC stock give to a lowest net profit length of 20 days emerged as the most profitable for SMA and
EMA. Also, it indicated that profits generated from SMA were
4
GMSTEC 2010: International Conference for a Sustainable Greater Mekong Subregion,
26-27 August 2010, Bangkok, Thailand
higher than WMA and EMA. The stocks in set 50 stocks pp.519-544.
indexes of Thailand Stock Exchange showed the most
promising net profits from the applying of both the three
moving averages and the trading points of the time length 20
days. There are the consistence with market efficiency, and the
moving average trading rules make a better opportunity for
buying and selling of the stocks profitable at any time. Future
researches should be on other popular technical indicators
such as the variables that relative strength indicator on the
individual stock in these markets would be of interest as well
as to measure additional insights. Also, the study should
include the process monitoring the basic factor of the stock. It
could make determination of trading points to be used much
more widely.
5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
6. REFERENCES