Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s00226-010-0315-9
ORIGINAL
L. Awoyemi • I. P. Jones
L. Awoyemi (&)
Department of Forestry, University of Ado Ekiti, P. M. B 5363 Ado Ekiti, Nigeria
e-mail: lawrenceawoyemi05@yahoo.com
I. P. Jones
Centre for Electron Microscopy and School of Metallurgy and Materials,
University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
123
262 Wood Sci Technol (2011) 45:261–267
Introduction
Experimental
Wood materials
Heat treatment
An airtight sealed cylindrical vessel made of steel was placed inside a laboratory
oven where preheating at 220°C was carried out for 1 h. The samples were then
placed inside the vessel and heat-treated for 1 h (group B) and 2 h (group C). The
samples in group A were used as control.
Wood anatomy
123
Wood Sci Technol (2011) 45:261–267 263
The weight and dimension of the samples were obtained before and after the heat
treatment. The data obtained was used to calculate density reduction and mass loss
by the formulae:
M
D¼
V
D1 D2
DD ¼ 100
D1
where D = density (kg/m3), M = mass before or after heat treatment (kg),
V = volume before or after heat treatment (m3), DD = change in density (%),
D1 = density before heat treatment (kg/m3), D2 = density after heat treatment
(kg/m3).
The measurements of water uptake and thickness swelling were carried out by
soaking the wood samples in water (pH * 7.0) in a laboratory at room temperature
(23°C) for 24 h. The moisture content of each sample was recorded at five different
points in time up to 24 h. The amount of water absorbed at each point in time was
obtained. At the end of the 24-h soaking period, the swollen weights and dimensions
of each sample were recorded. The volumetric swelling coefficient was derived
from the data obtained using the formula:
100ðV2 V1 Þ
VSwC ¼
V1
where VSwC = volumetric swelling coefficient (%), V2 = swollen volume and
V1 = initial volume.
Wood strength
The 3-point bending test was carried out with the samples placed on a support with a
span of 50 mm and a machine speed of 1 mm/m. The modulus of rupture was
obtained directly from the computer programme supplied with the machine.
Results
Physical properties
The changes in properties of red cedar wood due to heat treatment are shown in
Table 1. During the first hour of treatment, there was a reduction of 7.91, 30.8, 16.5
and 2.3% in density, water uptake, thickness and modulus of rupture, respectively.
Increasing the treatment time to 2 h resulted in higher reductions for all the
properties.
123
264 Wood Sci Technol (2011) 45:261–267
Table 1 Properties of red cedar wood before and after heat treatment
Treatment Density Water Thickness Modulus of
reduction (%) uptake swelling (%) rupture (MPa)
Wood anatomy
The effects of heat treatment on the anatomical properties of red cedar wood are
summarized by the differences in features between treated and untreated wood in
the figures below (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4).
Heat treatment of red cedar wood resulted in the destruction of tracheid walls, ray
tissues (Figs. 3 and 4) and pit deaspiration (Fig. 4). The destroyed tracheid walls
and ray tissues appeared blown up, thus increasing the size of the specimen. The
process of pit deaspiration resulted in an increase in the size of the pits, thus creating
more openings in the wood.
Discussion
Fig. 1 SEM of red cedar wood (longitudinal cut) before heat treatment showing normal tracheids and
aspirated pits
123
Wood Sci Technol (2011) 45:261–267 265
Fig. 2 SEM of red cedar wood before heat treatment showing normal cell walls in the tracheids
Fig. 3 SEM image of red cedar wood (longitudinal cut) after 1 h of heat treatment showing partial
destruction of the tracheids and pit deaspiration
and phenolic acids. The presence of these degradation products was associated with
the various changes in wood properties. However, the damage done to the wood
anatomical structure in this species indicates that chemical degradation is not the
only reason for changes in wood properties during heat treatment. In addition, the
degradation of the tracheid walls during heat treatment agrees with the degradation
of the hemicelluloses which is one of the major components of the cellulose cell
wall (Fig. 4). They are responsible for the reductions in density, thickness swelling
and modulus of rupture.
The lower water uptake in heat-treated wood compared to untreated wood,
despite the opening of the aspirated pits, shows that the wood–water relationship of
123
266 Wood Sci Technol (2011) 45:261–267
Fig. 4 SEM image of red cedar wood (longitudinal cut) after 2 h of heat treatment showing higher
degree of destruction of the tracheids and pit deaspiration
Conclusion
Heat treatment of red cedar wood resulted in the destruction of tracheid walls, ray
tissues and pit deaspiration. These changes in wood anatomy indicate that the
widely established chemical degradation is not the only reason for changes in wood
properties during heat treatment. However, it is believed that the effects of the
chemical changes still outweigh those of the anatomical changes on the modification
observed during the process of heat treatment.
Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Royal Society (UK
Academy of Sciences) through the grant awarded to Dr Awoyemi under the Incoming International Visit
Scheme.
References
Ayadi N, Lejeune F, Charrier F, Charrier B, Merlin A (2003) Colour stability of heat-treated wood during
artificial weathering. Holz Roh Werkst 61:221–226
Boonstra MJ, Tjeerdsma B (2006) Chemical analysis of heat treated softwoods. Holz Roh Werkst
64:204–211
Boonstra MJ, van Acker J, Kegel E, Stevens M (2006) Optimisation of a two stage heat treatment process:
durability aspects. Wood Sci Technol 40:31–57
123
Wood Sci Technol (2011) 45:261–267 267
123