PARTITION WALLS ON SLAB [Pn ae it 9 ee rub ms DSi 5 cd kav Jn | Amour rata Di 0.33 Wy minal Praal 2 fe ee ee ae be sd _ a bid am partilin Parallel aa Soi 5 jon 4, Se4 pate ea OMe WAY A Se Caden] Papslivn wall Parables o Lorg Shan i ay 4 L Wp Apa Hx Unit wenyhh Klin oe Cok parhihon wall Poulled Shab Bpom pewidth 4} distribu i) ad Gp Prnidy nbmreemed) : : on Ap toSda rk 1bed Crna = Ap todles Rinne alm hene Ay tthe portion Ue Yan Whats yy Postion i Kal Nee windy Aisin hula) Lind kn Vip i fer Nite, - 1 Prov Ride qn fordilinn =< Udhdm thal be > Ex wees h for metre Dan ch fiabtle S Prrtttn Subject A ral rin 4) Lele Prarie 9 thes wel af Parkehivon walls dm™ 1) wall aren 2 Lets tne amt tub weiiht Por rete Peet = byl)DESIGN OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED ONE-WAY SLAB WITH PARTITION WALL OVER THE SLAB Case |. Partition wall parallel to long span Slab thickness = 120m Slab load - 6.00KN/m2 Partition wall Load =Thickness x Height x Unit weight . 90.115 x 3.00 x 20 = 6.90 KN/m Bending moment M = 6.0 €3.0%/8 + 6.00 x 3.0/4 = 675 + 5.18 + = 11.93 KN/m Mu = 17.89Kn/m Main bars provide 10 # @ 13 cm c/o Distributors 6 @ 150m o/e Caseli. Partion wall parallel to short span Slab thickness = 12 cm Slab Loading = 6.00 KN/m? Bending moment = 60 x 3.0? / 8 = 6.75'KN/m Mu 10.13 KN/m. Main bars provi 8 #@ 16 cm o/c ‘Additional reinforcement required for partion wall Dispersion width (e) = Load due to partion (We) ‘Additional moment (Me) Mu = b, + 0.60 | : 0.115 + 060 x 30 = 1.92 200m 0.115 x 3.00 x 20 / 1.92 = 3.59 KN/m 8.59 x 3.0? / 8 = 4.04 KN/m 6.06 KN/m Provide additional reinforcement of 8 #@ 24 cm o/c for a width of 2.0 under partion wall, OTE Ff the total moment i.e, moment due to slab and partion wall, exceeds the limiting Moment carrying capacity of the slab, the depth of slab should be increased, femsonatt le500“Ayeanoadsas Aj 40 x] 03 jajjezed jem uoprased 205 (2/%)/q 40 (2/4)/ © Aq 40328} ayn Ajdnnus suopisod 19430 404 -ueds Jo azjuaa au te j[em uon sted 405 poof pj (@261-98b $1 40 Zz 21421 42y2y) Ueds Zuo) pue Ueds HoYs 404 UD!>YJ209 uoWOU BuIpuag Geis AEM OML = D um 919R BAoqe ay t 1 9H0N eo OL = M asym ueds uous we ITY OAY/M)] ® = ueds Buc wa = 2aI8s (XAI/M)] sob tet cL SEL TLR SHS ohkzeReL sth 06% 06k OSL OG 06 OS gk es Set sk see Cor = OE OE OHE GZ OLTSCCHSCiCOT:SCiCTTSC“iTL:CSCsCT Oc ok aL SEL Ok ON, eek ert sek sen eee oz 6L et on Oe ag eae ek stt. zL ue t % at ott peoy oust peor J209up s;pneoSid-w wo paseq qeje Aem-oms Jo axntios oup 3e siyem Uoppised 40} 0128} POT L CFG 25Design of Two Way Slab with Partition wall over it ; This article deals with the procedure to design a two way slab with partition wall (along short span o1 long span or along both the directions) for entire length placed at the centre of the span. ‘ In the case of two way slabs bending moments due to dead load and imposed load can be determined using bending moment co-efficients given in Table 22 of 1S.456-1978. The bending moments due to partition wall (along short span or long span or along both directions) can be calculated using the following formula based on M. Pigeaud’s theory. BM. along short span due to partition wall = af(W/bly)fall* Where a = B.M. Co-eff. of shorter span(from Table 22 of 1S.456-1978) W = Total load of partition wall y= Effective span in longer direction x = Effective span in shorter direction _fg = load factor for partition wall according to ly/Ix ratio B.M. along longer span: a [(W/Ixly) fi). Px a = BM. Co-eff. of longer span (from Table 22 of IS 456-1978) { = Load factor for partition wall according to ly/Ix ratio. The load factors fg and fy are given in Table 1 ‘After calculating the B.M. due to dead load + imposed load and partition wall, we have to check the sum’ of both bending moments (induced Mu) should not exceed the limiting moment of resistance of slab. Limiting moment of resistance = 2.07 bd? in the case of M15 grade of concrete and 2.76 bd* in the case + of M20 grade of concrete, Case | : Partition wall parallel to short span: Clear panel size : 3.3 mx 4.95 m Effective depth= 80 mm, Use M15 grade concrete fex =:15N/mm? Effective span lx = 3.3 m, Tor 40 steel fy = 415 N/mm? Effective span ly = 4.95 m ly/ix = 1.50 < 2.0. Hence it is a two way slab. Thickness = 100 mm, 3300 mm: Loadings : ese ee ene, Self weight 0.10x25 2.5kN/m? + Imposed load = 4,0kN/m? & Floor finish = 1.0kN/m? 5 2 Total load o 4950-mm,Edge condition : Two adjacent edges discontinuous. : Design + Total load of partition wall = 0.115 x 3.20 x 20x 3.3 = 24.3 KN a Shorter Span Longer Span Details er Support Midspan Support Midspan B.M. Co-efficient (a) 0.075 0.056 0.047 0.035 (From Table 22 of IS 456-1978) BLM, due to D.L. + LL 6.130 4570 3.840 2.860 awh? (M1) kNm BM. due to partition wall(M2) kNm al(W/liy) al Wty) al(W/yb) aC W/ly «faye? «he? «fhe fill? Load factor from Table 1 based ‘on M Pigeaud’s theory fp = 1.65, fo = 1.65 f=28 f= 2.80 (M2) kNm 2.0 1.50 243 1.59 Total B.M. 8.13 6.07 5.97 445 M = (M1+M2) kNm Factored BM. Mu = 1.5xMKN.m. 12.19 911 8.96 6.68 K = Mu/bd? (N/mm?) 1.90 1.42, 1.40 1.04 pt (from Table 1 of Design Aids 0.641 0.450 0.442 0.316 to IS 456-1978) Ast cm? (pt/100)bd 518 3.60 3.54 158 Reinforcement details 10#@ 10#@ 8#@ a) 400mmC/C — 220mm/CC 400 mmC/C 200 mmC/C (Cr) (Cr) + + 10# @ ar@ 220 mm C/C (Extra) 200 mm C/C (Extra)ie, 4950 mm. ——+ . 1650 mm 3300 mm. Case Il: Partition wall parallel to long span Shorter Span Longer Span Details a Support Midspan Support B.M. co-efficient (a) 0.075 0.056 0.047 0.035 B.M. due to (D.L+1-L) 6.13 457 3.84 2.86 Ma = @ Wh? B.M. due to partition wall (M2) al(W/bly) ally) el (Wty) eal W/Iyb) « fa)]b? « felix? = fb a figh? Load factor from Table 1 1.90 1.90 1.28 1.28 aced on Pigeatid’s theory M2 2.31 172 0.97 0.73 Total BM. M = (M1+M2) KN.m 844 6.29 4.81 3.59 Mu=1.5xM_ Nam 12.66 9.44 7.22 "3.39 K = Mu/bd? N/mm? 1.98 1 1.13 0.84 pt (from Table 1 of Design Aids 0.676 0.472 0.347 0.250 to IS 456-1978) Ast. cm? [(pt/100)xbd] 5.41 3.78 2.78 2.0 Reinforcement details 10#@ 10#@ 8#@ 8#@ 400mmC/C — 200mm/CC 440 mmC/C 220 mmC/C (cr) (cr) + + 10# @ 8#@ 200 mm C/C (Extra) 320 mm C/C (Extra)case It: Partition wal parallel to both shorter span and longer SPs Thickness = 100 mm, Effective depth = 60 mm, Efective span Is = 3.31m_4950 m , Effective span ly = 4.95 m baa p ‘ Loadings : s Al Self wt. 0.11x25 = 2.75 kN /m? o €| Imposed load = 4.00 N/m? 3| Floor finish = 1,00 KN/m? +s 8 7.75 kN/m A Wh? = 7.75 x 3.32 = 84.40 KN. 275m Shorter Span Longer Span Details : Support Midspan ‘Support Midspan BM. co-efficient (a) 0.075 0.056 0.047 0.035 ‘BM. due to (D.L.+1-L) 6.63 473 3.97 2.97 M1 = a Whe kN.n BLM. due to partition wall (M2) axtcw/bdyy——_eetW/lyb) al(w/lyb) afew /lybo) parallel to shorter span (M2) KN.m fg)]b? feb fyb? ht Load factor from Table 1 fp = 1.65 fp = 1.65 fi = 2.80 fi = 2.80 based on M. Pigeaud’s theory M2 kN.m. 2.0 1.50 2.13 59 BM. due to partition wall parallel ai(W/Ixly) exf(W/Iyb) cxf /lybe) al(W/lyix) to longer span (M3) kN.m « fy)}b «fell? fy? fyb Load factor from Table 1 1.90 1.90 1.28 1.28 based on Pigeaud’s theory BM. due to partition wall 2.31 1 0.97 0.73 parallel to longer span (M3) kN.mm. Total 8.M. 10.64 7.95 7.07 5.29 M = (M1+M2+M3) KN.m. factored BM. Mu = 1.5xM KN.m. 15.96 11.93 10.61 7.94 1.31 0.98 Mu/bd? N/mm? 1.97 1.47Shorter Span Longer Span : Details Support Midspan Support Midspan Pt. (Table 1 of Design Aids to 0.672 0.469 0.41 0.296 15 456-1978) Ast. cm? 6.05 4.22 37 2.66 [(Pt/100)bd) forcement details 10#@ 10#@ a#@ 8#@ 360mm C/C 180mm/CC 360mmC/C 180 mmC/C (cr) (Cr) + + 10#@ a#@ 180 mm C/C (Extra) 180 mm C/C (Extra) Note: 1. Suppose if the partition wall does not run for entire span, the B.M. can be arrived out as given below. If the length of the partition wall is 2.0 m instead of 3.3 m, then BM due to partition wall = M2 x (2.0/3.30) If the partition wall does not lie exactly at the centre of the span BM. due to partition wall parallel to shorter span = M2 x [a/(ty/2)] B.M. due to partition wall parallel to longer span = M2 x [b/(Ix/2)]