Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The New Modern Slavery (B)
The New Modern Slavery (B)
Amarins
Natália Amarins
ESOL 0310
17 May 2020
received and reported to the government more than 3,500 incidents in 2015. Au pair is a cultural
exchange for those looking to acquire fluency in a foreign language and experience a different
culture working 45 hours a week taking care of children of a family (known as host Family) in
exchange for a $500 scholarship, a private room, food and a weekly payment of $195.75.
Although the term Au pair comes from French and means "at par" or "equal". According to Zack
Kopplin in an article published on Politico Magazine o ne in five au pairs has already gone
through a difficult situation during the exchange. They report horror stories of “overworked,
humiliated, refused meals, threatened with arrest and deportation — even victims of theft” (Zack
Kopplin). This official figure is based on the incidents that have been reported to the au pair
agencies, but the other various problems that the program can bring to these young people who
decide to board to the United States are not accounted for. Currently, there is a great debate
between the government and the agencies whether the Au Pair program should be terminated or
not. However, analyzing the numbers and cases, the Au Pair program should be extinguished
because it does not have a stricter control over the participants (host family and au pair), for
being a job that refers to modern slavery and for the countless emotional problems that the au
First of all, the program is sold in different ways. On the registration site, the agencies
advertise the program as a cheaper and easier exchange for improving English, getting to know
North American culture and being part of a family, like a sister or older brother. However, in the
registration session for families, the program is sold as a cheap and comfortable childcare option
for having a person living in your home available to take care of your children at any time of the
day. Many au pairs come to the United States with an expectation and when they arrive here,
they realize that the cultural Exchange is really just an exchange of work. Julia Beebe, lead
organizer at Boston-based Matahari Women Workers’ Center, affirms to CS Monitor that “The
program has taken the form of a work program and been advertised by the au pair agencies as
cheap childcare”. Most of them end up working more than 45 hours a week for the same amount
of $195.75. They end up spending more time with the children than the parents themselves. It is
a very big responsibility to only receive $4.35 an hour. According to Zack Kopplin, many
families require the au pair to do more than what is in the contract, such as housework and seven
deny them food. Among in the au pair cluster, it is not difficult to find stories of girls who were
It is inevitable to say that having an au pair brings benefits to a host family, you have a
trusted person spending more time with your child than you do, you have the security of having a
person trained to handle all phases of your child, you have the option to change that person as
many times as you want, in case she or he does not suit your requirements. And all this, for a
minimum amount. Actually, well below the minimum. However, the other side of the story is
quite complicated. Often for au pairs it ends up being a nightmare. The responsibility of taking
care of children who are not yours for nine hours a day (or more), children who do not speak
3
Amarins
your native language and who often despise you for performing the function you are in is at the
very least complex. The program causes emotional problems for those who have a bad
experience because going through these risk situations in a country that is not their own without
a support, brings a feeling of inferiority and vulnerability. The problem is so great that there are
psychological clinics that offer specialized therapy services for those who have been or are still
an au pair.
One solution for the program to work is the inspection. People who apply to be an au pair
are evaluated and trained by the agencies before arriving at the host Family home. They have a
background checked thoroughly. However, families do not go through the background check
process. Families only need to pay a fee and prove that they can offer a private room for the au
pair. This is one of the major shortcomings of the program. Another point is the willingness of
the agencies to favor host families in the event of a rematch or in cases where the program rules
are not respected by them. When a rule is broken by the host Family, agencies suggest that au
pairs are flexible, but if a rule is broken by an au pair it is automatically out of the program. In
2019 a class action was triggered by au pairs against the agencies stating that the au pair program
is a domestic job, so the hourly rate should be in line with the state minimum wage. The case
was won and is already in effect in Massachusetts. According to Olleen Slevin in an article
published in AP News, the agreement says that agencies should encourage families and au pairs
to reach an agreement on increasing the stipulated amount - “The minimum pay is based on the
federal minimum wage of $7.25 for 45 hours of work minus a 40 percent deduction for room and
board” (Slevin). However, after this decision many families left the program because it is not
4
Amarins
feasible to pay a minimum wage plus board and food, a nanny is cheaper. And other families
who decided to stay on the program reduced the hours worked by the au pair.
In conclusion, currently in most states the program is not fair for au pairs, but it is fair for
host families, but if actions like class action are taken, it is fair for the au pair and not viable for
families. In fact, the program has no middle ground. One side is always vulnerable. According to
Janie Chuang, a law professor at American University in Washington in an interview given to AP
News “There are a lot of people who have wonderful experiences...but then there are au pairs
with horrible experiences”. However, it should be consciously analyzed, keep the program
because few au pairs get along? Or extinguish the program because most of the experiences fail?
Is this the price that the au pair must pay to learn a new language? It seems fairer for immigrants
to find other types of exchange to experience the cultural experience in the US and families to
hire Americans citizens for this position and thus help people who are unemployed and in need
of a job.
5
Amarins
Works Cited
“Au Pair Rights: More Protections, but at What Cost to Cultural Exchange?” The Christian
www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2020/0124/Au-pair-rights-More-protections-but-at-wha
t-cost-to-cultural-exchange.
Kopplin, Zack. “'They Think We Are Slaves'.” POLITICO Magazine, 27 Mar. 2017,
www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/au-pair-program-abuse-state-department-2149
56.
Slevin, Colleen. “About 10,000 Au Pairs to Get Paid in Class-Action Settlement.” AP NEWS,
A good, well thought out essay. Some of your vocabulary choices are not right, but I have
pointed most out to you! There are some minor grammar errors and sentence structure
I was myself an au pair in both France and Germany many years ago! The concept must have
changed (or maybe the people who abuse the system) because I had very good experiences
in both countries!