The Institution of Structural Engineers
MARCH 1991
Guide to
Good management practice
for engineering design offices
The Institution of Structural Engineers
11 UPPER BELGRAVE STREET, LONDON, SW1X 8BH, 071-235 4535Membership of the Task Group
Professor W D Biggs, OBE CEng FIStructE (University of Reading), Chairman
G Brandon, CEng FICE (Taylor Woodrow Construction)
DK Doran, BSc(Eng) DIC FCGI CEng FiSwuctE FICE (Consultant)
4B Greer, CEng FiStruc (John Gumey & Partners)
S$ B Tietr, BSc(Eng) Fling FiStructE FICE (S B Tietz & Paniners)
AK A Lorans, BSc(Eng) ACGI, Secretary
which produced this report have endeavoured to ensure the accuracy of its contents.
However, the guidance and recommendations given in the report should always be
reviewed by those using the report with regard tothe full circumstances of their particular
application, Accordingly, no liability for negligence or otherwise can be accepted by the
Institution, the members ofits committee, its servants or agents.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted
in any form or by any means without prior permission of the Institution of Structural
Engineers who may be contacted at 11 Upper Belgrave Street, London SW1X 8BH.
SuruetE Good management practiceContents
Foreword «2.2.2.5 “5
introduction eter ee ee te eet
2Getting started 2... eee ee eee eee eB
2.1 Management policy - eee
2:2 Management representative
2.3 Organisation
2.4 Filing and sorting material
2.5 Reference library
‘3 Management systems per 0
3.1 Introduction 10
3.2 Office manual | 10
4 The review or audit 15
4.1 Value of an audit 215
42 Doing an audit. 15
5 Alternative roles of the engineer and further
management considerations. . . po aby
5.1 General oe 7
512 Traditional consulting siructural engineers ole | | | | 17
5°3 Consulting structural engineer, design only
commission... eee eevee eee 7
54 Consulting structural engineer, investigatory
‘commission oI
8.5 Contractors structural engineer 17
5.6 The structural engineer and the management
form of contract... 2... eee eevee IT
5.1 The structural engineer
‘design and build contract
5.8 The structural engineer acting for a contractor in a”
design and build contract... .
5.9 Structural engineers duty of care warranties
6 Implementation and certification . .
6.1 Meeting the standard
6.2 Levels of centfication
6.3 The certification bodies’ |
644 Assessment of quality management |
6.5Peerreview .. . :
6.6 Financial assistance available 1990/91" |
7 Suggested reading ......-...+55
Appendix A: Typical management policy and objectives
‘statement.
Appendix B: Sample proformas .
IStructE Good management practiceForeword
In 1987 the Institution of Structural Engineers established a Task Group to consider what
at first sight appeared to be two simple questions:
+ What was the Institution doing about quality assurance?
+ What should it be doing?
‘The first step was to seek information from members in firms and it soon became clear
that while the larger firms and the design offices of the larger contracting companies were
implementing quality assurance procedures there appeared to be some confusion and a
wide variation of understanding among smaller sized firms. The Task Group’ remit was,
accordingly, modified to pay particular attention to such firms,
Itbecame apparent that, fora small firm, neither the work load nor the expected return
‘would justify the time and expense involved in seeking third party validation. At the same
time, all of those firms who were contacted were keen to review and, where possible, to
improve their management practices. Firstly, this would provide a better service to the
client and secondly, it would put the firm in a position to move more painlessly towards
third party validation should this become necessary or desirable.
Accordingly the Task Group suggested that it should prepare a Guide to good
management practice for engineering design offices and that firms should be encouraged
to re
recommendations implicit in BS 5750. This suggestion was accepted by the Institution
and this Guide is the result,
It is necessary to stress that it is not intended as a guide to quality assurance and
certainly not to certification under the various schemes now available. It is no more, and
no less, than its title suggests - a guide to good management practice. Furthermore it gives
examples only of procedures which might be considered if appropriate and is not intended
to be exhaustive. Each firm must decide for itself what tasks should be covered within its
‘management procedures and how those procedures should be implemented on particular
projects. The procedures must be the means to the end not the end in themselves.
‘As Chairman of the Task Group I must pay a tribute to my colleagues - they have
worked hard to try to produce this document. At the same time the Task Group, as a whole,
would wish me to express my thanks and my appreciation to those firms and individuals
who have given freely of their time and expertise to supply information and to read and
comment upon various drafts. Collaboration such as this must be a good augury for the
future standing of our profession.
‘w and improve their management practices broadly in line with the
W DBiggs
Struct Good management practice1 Introduction
‘The aim to achieve quality in construction has always existed
‘The industry has however had a patchy reputation with a public
belle that many projects un late and over budget. High quality
construction demands good design and high levels of technical
competence. Unless these are accompanied by good
‘management, they will not be realised. There is now a greater
awareness of this need.
'BS5750: 1987 has attempted to address this problem but in
aiming to cover the whole range of work from start to finish
including production of components, it has failed to be wholly
convincing when dealing with the needs of design offices. This
document offers guidance on the management issues 10 be
addressed in design offices of all sizes but is perhaps of most
relevance in the cases of smaller practices. In many of these
communication between participants in the design is often
informal - word of mouth discussion overcoffce is enough when,
as is often the case, all staff are engaged upon one job. Small
practices do however grow and a management system which is
appropriate to, say, half a dozen qualified design staff may be
quite unsuitable for even thirty or so engineers,
‘There are special problems in the construction industry. It is
highly interactive and itis essential for all building professionals
engaged on a project 1 operate in a manner which results in a
successful completion of the project for both the client and the
individual professions involved. At present there is little
standardisation of management procedures between the
professions. The construction industry has the added problem of
advising clients, many of whom will have no experience of
construction, of their responsibilities to provide adequate
information, make necessary decisions in time and maintain good
communications. Some client decisions suchas requirements and
budgets cannot be delegated.
Management of design aiso inevitably demands flexibility
Professional judgement is essential, The size of projects can vary
dramatically; the members of a team can vary as can the role of
each individual within the team; different types of project demand
different management procedures and what may be appropriate
IStuctE Good management practice
for a briefing and a feasibility study may be wholly inadequate
fora large complex project requiring post construction services.
Managing the validation of another engineer's calculations is
different again. Itis therefore essential that those who determine
the management practice in a design office are sufficiently
experienced to recognise the needs of individual jobs.
(Over-management can become as counterproductive as lack of
management. Good management docs not require magic, but
application so that work is properly executed, maintenance of
Communication so that all are kept informed, and a clear
4efinition of understanding of responsibilities.
‘Some firms may wish to obtain third party certification. Such
step should not be lightly undertaken. It is likely to require &
‘reat deal of time, very careful thought, preparation and a heavy
investment in man-hours and cash. Its success also depends on
the ability of those auditing the procedures and their recognition
of the requirements related to that specific organisation ~ what
‘makes sense for a specialist firm may be inappropriate fora firm
of the same size executing more general tasks and both may not
readily apply to larger firms, perhaps in several offices. Good
‘management is always a means to an end and the end must not
become management itself. Good management atitsbestreduces
the tasks and the bureaucracy required to the minimum which will
achieve planned ends, It must be practical, controllable and
achievable at all times. A good audit must therefore reco;
that procedures require lexibility to be appropriate to every job
that a firm undertakes.
Lasily such procedures must be codified so that all, from the
‘most senior to the most junior, within an organisation can
understand their own role within the total framework. Each firm
will have a different view how this can be best achieved. Some
will be satisfied with check lists, others will want a full manual
and yet others may demand that each stage of a job follows
prescribed procedures and is signed on completion. This guide
nly sets out some signposts and firms should to devise their own
particular method for achieving the desired ends2 Getting started
Before making a review of the management and contro systems
in the design office five aspects should be considered.
2.1 Management policy
AA statement of te firm’s policy is always desirable - it should be
available to the enquirer and known to all staff. The statement
should be authorised and signed by a senior partner or director
and should refer tothe firm’s commitment, not only tothe client,
but to other professionals in the design team and to the public at
large. In formulating sucha statement, however, great care should
be taken that the firm is not inadvertently implying a level of
capability ,or commited to undertakings, beyond its intentions or
expertise.
‘The statement may be written formally, or informally, - a
sample statement, covering the items to be included is given in
‘Appendix A. The statement should be circulated to, and retained
by, all staff who should, in addition, be fully appraised of the
reasons why such a statement is considered necessary.
2,2 Management representative
Having declared a policy it is next necessary to ensure that itis
implemented. The firm should appoint a senior member to be
responsible for ensuring that all members of staff understand and
implement the declared company policy. Such a member should
also take responsibility for:
+ preparation of the firm’s operational procedures issuing,
updating and withdrawing these as necessary
‘+ ensuring that these procedures are understood, and followed by
allemployees
‘+ carrying out a periodic audit of any job to confirm that the
necessary procedures are being followed
+ authorising departures from the standard procedures where the
simplicity (or the complexity) of the job demands it
‘+ making due provision for information, training etc as the firms
policy requires
Jt must be obvious that this task is of crucial importance and one
should only be undertaken by a qualified and experienced
cengincer with authority and respect within the firm soas to ensure
commitment particularly from senior staff.
2.3 Organisation
‘The firm should produce and maintain an up-to-date chartor other
description of its organisational structure. This should describe
duties, responsibilities and the routes to be followed by key
Personnel for management reporting. Where staff have
permanent responsibilities, the chart shouid identify these with
an indication oftheir level of authority relating to their specified
tasks and lines of communication, This is especially important
where several offices are involved.
‘All personnel should be able to identify how they interact.
Engineers should also be able to identify what the standard
procedures are and who has authority to:
+ initiate action to prevent the occurrence of design non-
conformity
idemtify and record any problems
+ initiate, recommend or provide solutions
* verify the implementation of solutions.
‘Where all above a certain level of seniority have such aright, this
level must be clearly defined e.g. by skills, qualifications,
experience or as otherwise relevant. Establishment of such levels
is not intended to preclude promotion but, in fact, rather to
encourage it and to act as a review for implementation of any
training programme which the firm may wish to
Additionally, specific organisational charis relevant to
individual projects are advisable, particularly on larger projects.
Onprojecs likely to contin overlong peiod it maybe beter
to describe this by tasks rather than individuals as these may
change in the course ofthe project.
2.4 Filing and sorting material
Inwhat follows it will be seen that one crucial task for senior staf
ill be to ensure that there is an organised system for filing,
storing and, perhaps most impoctanly, retrieving written mater.
al. Each firm will develop its own system but the three most
{important elements are:
+ cleardesignations and classifications - preferably ona standard
proforma
‘+ an unequivocal indexing system for identification and location
of material
+ offsite storage - employing specialists may at times be an
‘economical answer
Large projects may require a separate file for each item -
calculations specifications, schedules etc - for smaller projects a
single file may be sufficient.
in completion of the project all files should be reviewed by
whe egies 1 dard dapat ond nad material The
ngth of the retention period will vary for different projects an
das for removal and disposal shouldbe clearly marked. The
overall aim must be that of easy retrieval, both of material
currently in hand and that which has been archived. The storage
Of bulk material soon becomes a problem, At first sight two
‘methods appear attractive:
+ microform - before electing to use this the firm should study
BS 6498:1984 - Guide 10 the preparation of microfilms and
‘other microforms that may be required as evidence. This gives
advice about planning and running a microfilm programme so
that firms will be able to establish that a microfilm is, in fact,
a true copy of an original document.
+ computer storage - all data generated by computer should be
stored at the completion of a project but careful handling is
necessary to prevent loss of information by ageing or
contamination,
‘The data should be stored in such a way as to allow for retrieval
byalater generation of computcrsand it may be desirable, oreven,
[StructE Good management practicenecessary to retain outdated hardware and software to retrieve
data from the archives.
2.5 Reference library
A library with eadily available current reference material should
jnclude_as a minimum, all relevant Standards, Codes of Practice
IStruetE Good management practice
and regulations. A system for cataloguing and updating should
bbe established.
‘Before starting any job, engineers and technicians who keep
their own selection of standard literature should be able to
‘demonstrate that these are up to date. In any event, they should
bbe required to update such collections periodically and itis the