Professional Documents
Culture Documents
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 5
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Foundations of Modern Economics
Physics Approach In Economics Led To:
§ U"lity theory, revealed preference (Samuelson)
§ General equilibrium theory (Arrow, Debreu)
§ Game theory (Harsanyi, Nash, Selten, Shapley)
§ Macroeconometrics (Klein, Tinbergen)
§ PorGolio theory (Markowitz, Tobin)
§ Ra"onal expecta"ons (Lucas, Muth, Sargent)
§ Op"on-pricing theory (Black, Merton, Scholes)
§ Efficient markets (Fama, Samuelson)
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 6
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Foundations of Modern Economics
Physics Approach In Economics Led To:
Before the contemporary period of the past five
decades, theoretical physics had been an
inaccessible ideal toward which economic theory
sometimes strove. During that period, this striving
became a powerful stimulus in the mathematization
of economic theory.
– G. Debreu (1991, AEA Presidential Address)
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 7
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Foundations of Modern Economics
Theory
Economic
of Theory
Economic
of Behavior Homo Economicus
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 8
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Critique of Modern Economics
But Economics Was/Is Too
“The silliness of theories such asImportant and Successful
ra1onal addic1on theory raises
the ques1on of how they can§ be National
takenEconomic
seriously.Council
I suggest an
§ Council
explana1on based on the rela1ve of Economic Advisors
impenetrability of
§ Federal Reserve
mathema1cal arguments as compared to verbal
§ U.S. Treasury, OCC
arguments, the
psychological feeling of understanding
§ SEC, CFTC,triggered
FDIC by the stories
included in the ar1cles, along§ with the neglect
Wall Street, of some of the
corporations
underlying issues by the economics profession.”
§ Business schools
§ etc.
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 9
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Foundations of Modern Economics
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 10
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Foundations of Modern Economics
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 11
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
Survival Requires Consumption of Resources Over Time
§ Consumption, savings, and production are key decisions
§ They are constrained by technology and economic conditions
§ The challenge is to survive and reproduce!
§ Financial markets are critical in meeting this challenge
§ HOW?
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 12
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
Consider The “Calculus of ConsumpCon”
2. More is preferred to less (non-sababon, free disposal)
3. Transibvity:
4. Diminishing marginal returns
§ These axioms have surprisingly specific implicabons
B
(A3,B3) (A2,B2)
(A1,B1)
A
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 13
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
Consider The “Calculus of Consumption”
§ Consider the set of consumption bundles (A,B) that are as
equally satisfying as (A1,B1)
§ This is called an indifference curve
U3
U1 U2 Bliss
B B U1
(A1,B1)
A A
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 14
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
Consider The “Calculus of Consumption”
§ Can the following set of indifference curves be
possible?
U1U
B 2
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 15
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
Consider The “Calculus of Consumption”
§ Objective: Maximize utility subject to your available
resources
U1
B U0
(A1,B1)
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 16
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
Consider The “Calculus of Consumption”
§ What if markets for goods A and B exist, as well as money?
§ What does “markets exist” mean?
§ First determine your total wealth W = paA1 + pbB1 , then
choose the best (A,B) pair
B U1
Budget Constraint
(A1,B1)
A
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 17
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
Markets Unambiguously Makes Everyone Better Off!
U*
B
(A*,B*)
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 18
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
Now Suppose A Can Be Consumed or Used To Produce B
§ How much of Ao should we consume vs. use to produce B?
§ First, we must identify the production possibility frontier (PPF)
§ Depends on technology U*
B
(A*,B*)
A
I
Ao
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 19
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
Now Suppose We Have Markets and ProducCon CapabiliCes
§ How much of Ao should we invest and use to produce B?
§ How much of Ao should we consume?
U*
Effective Separation of Ownership and
B Control (Shareholder Values)
(A*,B*)
§ Shareholders want optimal investment and
production (A†,B†)
§ Then use markets to attain (A*,B*)
(A†,B†) § No need to specify shareholder preferences
§ “Maximize my opportunity set”
A
Ao
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 20
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Beauty of Microeconomics
What Is The Purpose of “Shareholder Values”?
§ Mechanism through which 3 C’s is possible:
– Communication, Coordination, Collaboration
§ Large-scale projects can be accomplished (Airbus A380)
§ Great challenges can be overcome (Manhattan Project)
§ Facilitates resource allocation through prices
§ Does not rely on centralized controls (but does require “leadership”)
§ This is a form of “collective intelligence”
§ Organizations are “smarter” than individuals
§ Do you believe that markets “work”? Marxism vs. Capitalism
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 21
All Rights Reserved
15.481
But Is It Correct?
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 22
All Rights Reserved
Rational Expectations
and Efficient Markets
15.481
Price Dynamics and the Hog Cycle
Price Supply
Demand
1. Start at Q0, Expected Price P0
2. Actual Price P1
P1 3. Yields Supply Q1
P*
P2 4. Actual Price P2
P0
5. Spirals Unbl…
6. Supply = Demand!
Quantity
Q0 Q2 Q* Q1
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 24
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Price Dynamics and the Hog Cycle
Price
Supply
Demand
In This Special Case:
§ Infinite cycles
P1
§ Price oscillates
P0 § Quantity oscillates
§ Demand ¹ Supply
Quantity
Q0 Q1
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 25
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Price Dynamics and the Hog Cycle
Price
Demand Supply
In This Special Case:
§ Market is unstable
§ Outward spiral
§ Market collapses
eventually
Quantity
Q0
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 26
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Price Dynamics and the Hog Cycle
John
Market Dynamics Involve Expectations: Muth
Price Supply
Demand
P*
Robert
Lucas
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 27
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Efficient Markets Hypothesis
Theory of Market Efficiency:
§ Samuelson (1965), Fama (1965, 1970)
§ No Free Lunch, No Arbitrage
§ Prices Fully Reflect All Available Information
§ Prices Follow Random Walks
§ Technical Analysis Is Futile
§ Trade-Off Between Risk and Expected Return
§ “Active” Management Does Not Add Value
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 29
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Efficient Markets Hypothesis
Reagan Establishes Presidential Commission To Investigate
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 30
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Efficient Markets Hypothesis
Rogers Commission Report Published June 9, 1986
§ Concluded that booster rocket O-ring was the problem
O-Ring
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 31
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Efficient Markets Hypothesis
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 32
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Efficient Markets Hypothesis
The Stock Market Reflected This Information Within Minutes
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 33
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Efficient Markets Hypothesis
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 34
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Wisdom of Crowds
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 35
All Rights Reserved
15.481
The Madness of Mobs
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 36
All Rights Reserved
15.481
Next Time
© 2020 by Andrew W. Lo
Lecture 1 Slide 37
All Rights Reserved