SMP Co., Ltd.

Title: Raw Food Defense(Mandalay)

Table A.1 – Threat information

No Threats to company and info-systems from: Possible method of operation Comments

1 Competitors Deliberate Contamination, Vandalism, Sabotage Developing company profile may provoke
attack
2 Unhappy Staff/ Contractors Deliberate Contamination, Vandalism Set Clear JD and KPIs, rewards based on KPIs
achievements
Clear contractor selection guide line.
3 Neighbors Deliberate Contamination, Vandalism Developing company profile may provoke
attack
4 Ideologically motivated groups Deliberate Contamination, Vandalism, Sabotage Employee back ground check, set employee
hiring procedure
No Threats to locations from: Possible method of operation Comments
5 Ideologically motivated groups Vandalism, Sabotage Systematic audit in place, personal security
check
6 Neighbors Vandalism, Sabotage Access to people on business only, vehicle
parking outside premises, visible and
comprehensive perimeter fencing, CCTV
monitoring/recording
7 Competitors Vandalism, Sabotage Access to people on business only, vehicle
parking outside premises, visible and
comprehensive perimeter fencing, CCTV
monitoring/recording
8 Contractors Vandalism, Sabotage Verifications of contractors
No Threats to product from: Possible method of operation Comments
9 Unhappy Staff/ Contractors Deliberately Contamination staff in critical roles motivated and monitored,
whistleblowing arrangements, temporary staff
supervised, set clear roles and KPI and KPI
bases reward system.
Verifications of contractors
10 Ideologically motivated groups Deliberately Contamination Official threat level unchanged
11 Competitors Deliberately Contamination Access to people on business only, vehicle
parking outside premises, visible and
comprehensive perimeter fencing, CCTV
monitoring/recording
12 Suppliers Deliberately Contamination Specified and approved, Conduct vendor
performance evaluations.

Table A.2 Threat identification

Step Process Threat Vulnerabilit Access Mitigation Adulterant; Impact of QA/QC Likelihood Impact
No step y Contamination process
1.1 Raw Gas Vandalism Raw CO2 SMP staff Fresh supply Open Valve Impure Raw Raw COA 2 3
YD staff more then set CO2 Purity
positions inspections
1.2 Activated Deliberately Raw Supplier  Incoming  Add  Impure COA 2 3
Carbon contaminati Activated SMP staff inspection others chemicals Received from
ons Carbon Store staff  Original chemicals  Not food approved
packaging  Not food grade supplier
grade
1.3 Molecular Deliberately Raw Supplier  Incoming  Add  Impure COA 2 3
Sieve contaminati Molecular SMP staff inspection others chemicals Received from
ons sieve Store staff  Original chemicals  Not food approved
packaging  Not food grade supplier
grade
1.4 Lubricant - - - - - - - - -
1.5 Water Vandalism or Raw Water YD staff  Daily  Add  Impure  Daily 2 3
Sabotage SMP staff inspection others raw water analysis
chemicals  Monthly
 Not micro

Document No: IMS-FR-FS-30 Revision No: 001 Effective Date: 2.11.18 Page 1 of 3
 SMP Co., Ltd.

Title: Raw Food Defense(Mandalay)

supply analysis
right  Yearly
quality third
party
analysis
1.6 Customer Vandalism Empty Customer  Inspect Unclean / Not clean / safe - 2 3
Cylinder cylinder SMP staff before unsafe cylinder cylinder
filling
1.7 Trailer Vandalism Empty SMP staff  Inspect Unclean / Not clean / safe - 2 3
trailer before unsafe trailer trailer
filling
Storage
2.1 Raw Gas - - - - - - - - -
2.2 Activated - - - - - - - - -
Carbon
2.3 Molecular - - - - - - - - -
Sieve
2.4 Lubricant - - - - - - - - -
2.5 Water
2.6 Customer - - - - - - - - -
Cylinder
2.7 Trailer Vandalism Empty SMP staff  Inspect Unclean / Not clean / safe - 2 3
trailer before unsafe trailer trailer
filling

Figure A.2 – Threat prioritization

Impact 5 Threat A
4
3 Threat C Threat B
2 Threat E
1 Threat D
1 2 3 4 5
Exclude (1,1) threats Likelihood

 Have to prepare preventive action for very high risk (threat A), high risk (threat B) and moderate risk (threat C).
 Low risk (threat D); up to the food defense team have to decide whether it makes sense to have the preventive
action.
 Threat E, negligible

Prepared By Approved By
Kay Zin Win Kalyar Moe Moe

Document No: IMS-FR-FS-30 Revision No: 001 Effective Date: 2.11.18 Page 1 of 3