Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Region X
School ID
Name of School
Municipality
School Address
Name of the School Head
Position of the School Head
Contact No.
Teaching Staff Male Female Total
Number of Master Teacher III
Number of Master Teacher II
Number of Master Teacher I
Head Teacher III
Head Teacher II
Head Teacher I
Teacher III
Teacher II
Teacher I
Others, pls. specify below
Department of Education
Region X
School-Based Management (S B M) V a l I d a t I o n
School ID.:
School:
Municipality:
School Year
Validated:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement
(60%)
Efficiency (25%)
Dropout (Raw Data) No. of Drop-outs Enrolment
(Current Year) (Previous Year)
Quality (30%)
NAT MPS (%) No. of Promotees Enrolment
(Current Year) (Previous Year)
Maintenance Menu
SBM Validation Form and DOD Assessment
Blank SBM Valdation Form
click here to input your school
Enter the names of Validators profile
Chairman:
Member1:
Member2:
Member3:
Member4:
ID School Name Province Municipality
303944 Alae NHS BUKIDNON MANOLO FORTICH
303945 Bacusanon National High School BUKIDNON PANGANTUCAN
303947 Baungon National High School BUKIDNON BAUNGON
314925 Baungon NHS - Danatag Annex BUKIDNON BAUNGON
303948 Bocboc NHS BUKIDNON DON CARLOS
314927 Bocboc NHS (Kiara Annex) BUKIDNON DON CARLOS
303949 Bugcaon NHS BUKIDNON ANTAPAN
303951 Bukidnon NSHI BUKIDNON MARAMAG
314911 Bukidnon NSHI - San Miguel Annex BUKIDNON MARAMAG
303952 Cabulohan-Paradise NHS BUKIDNON CABANGLASAN
314908 Cabulohan-Paradise NHS - Townsite Annex BUKIDNON CABANGLASAN
600272 Central Mindanao University BUKIDNON MARAMAG
600152 Central Mindanao University Lab. HS BUKIDNON MARAMAG
500676 Dagumbaan Integrated School BUKIDNON TALAKAG
314901 Dalirig NHS BUKIDNON MANOLO FORTICH
304787 El Salvador City National High School MISAMIS ORIENTAL CITY OF EL SALVADOR
304131 Gingoog City CNHS - BACKKISMI NHS Annex MISAMIS ORIENTAL GINGOOG CITY
315503 Gingoog City CNHS - LURISA NHS Annex MISAMIS ORIENTAL GINGOOG CITY
315504 Gingoog City CNHS - PUNDASAN NHS Annex MISAMIS ORIENTAL GINGOOG CITY
304136 Jacinto D. Malimas Sr. National High School MISAMIS ORIENTAL GINGOOG CITY
315502 Odiongan NHS - Talisay NHS Annex MISAMIS ORIENTAL GINGOOG CITY
500811 Pedro Maligmat Integrated School - Sec MISAMIS ORIENTAL GINGOOG CITY
304137 San Luis National High School MISAMIS ORIENTAL GINGOOG CITY
304139 Acelo C. Badelles, Sr. MNHS - Abuno HS Annex LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304140 Bunawan Agri. HS LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304143 Dalipuga National High School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304144 Dalipuga NHS - Hindang NHS Annex LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
500698 Del Carmen Integrated School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304153 Ditucalan National High School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304141 Don Jose F. Yanez MHS (Bunawan NHS) LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304154 Esperidion F. Encabo I MHS (Pugaan NHS) LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
500696 Francisco Laya Memorial Integrated School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304149 Iligan City East High School - Hinaplanon Annex LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304148 Iligan City East HS - Santiago HS Annex LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304146 Iligan City East National HS (Sta. Filomena) LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304145 Iligan City NHS LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
315604 Iligan City NHS - Pala-o HS Annex LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
315603 Iligan City NHS - Tambacan HS Annex LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304150 Iligan City NSOF LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304142 KABACSANAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
315609 Kalubihon High School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304147 KIWALAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304151 Mainit High School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304152 Maria Cristina National High School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
600151 MSU-IIT Integrated Developmental School (IDS) LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
403671 MSU-IIT Integrated Developmental School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304155 Rogongon Agricultural High School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304156 Suarez National High School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
500697 Sultan Mamarinta Panandigan Integrated School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304157 Tomas Cabili National High School LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304158 Tomas Cabili NHS - Annex LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304159 Tubaran NHS LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
315606 Tubaran NHS (Lanipao Annex) LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
304160 Tubaran NHS - Digkilaan HS Annex LANAO DEL NORTE ILIGAN CITY
500453 Kawit Oriental Integrated School of Fisheries LANAO DEL NORTE KAUSWAGAN
304004 Lala NHS LANAO DEL NORTE LALA
500689 Lala Proper IS LANAO DEL NORTE LALA
304005 Lanao del Norte NCHS LANAO DEL NORTE BAROY
Lanao del Norte Provincial Science and
Technology HS (former Malingao NHS (Annex
315102 New Pualas NHS) LANAO DEL NORTE TUBOD (Capital)
304007 Liangan NHS LANAO DEL NORTE BACOLOD
304008 Linamon NHS LANAO DEL NORTE LINAMON
304009 Magsaysay NHS LANAO DEL NORTE MAGSAYSAY
304010 Maigo NHS LANAO DEL NORTE MAIGO
304011 Marcela T. Mabanta NHS LANAO DEL NORTE KAUSWAGAN
304012 MATUNGAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL LANAO DEL NORTE MATUNGAO
Mindanao State University - Maigo School of Arts
600093 and Trades LANAO DEL NORTE MAIGO
600310 MSU-Baloi Community High School LANAO DEL NORTE BALOI
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Bukidnon
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Cagayan de Oro
City
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
Division of Camiguin
SBM ValIdatIon
Municipality:
School:
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Baseline Data
Access (45%) Community
Enrolment Increase Enrolment (Raw Data) Mapping
Quality (30%)
NAT MPS/Promotion Rate NAT MPS (%) Promotion Rate
Secondary Options:
P.I. 60% Legend:
Option1: ER, DR, RR, NAT1 ### #VALUE! ER- Enrolment Rate
CM-Community Mapping
Option2: ER, DR, RR, NAT2 ### #VALUE! RR- Repetition Rate
PrR-Promotion Rate
Option3: ER, DR, RR, PrR ### #VALUE! NAT- National Achievement Rate
DR- Dropout Rate
Option4: CM, DR, RR, NAT1 ### #VALUE!
Option5: CM, DR, RR, NAT2 ### #VALUE!
Option6: CM, DR, RR, PrR ### #VALUE!
2. Comments/ Suggestions/
Recommendations/ Technical
Assistance:
Step 5: Go back to step 1, click the best option, then generate SBM Validation Form, Save and Close.
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 Division: 0
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Enrolment
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Performance Improvement SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 Division: 0
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computati
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points on Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of Participatio 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase n
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Performance Improvement SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School:
0 Division: 0
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of Participatio 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase n
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Performance Improvement SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Department of Education
Region X
Division of ___________________
District:
School Year:
School: School I.D.
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%) Level:
Computati
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points Score on Results
Access (45%)
Enrolment / % of A. Enrolment Increase
0- No evidence
Participation Rate Increase Enrolment
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
2-Average: At least 7% Inc.
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Results:
Remarks:
Validators:
Member Member
Member Member
Chairman
Department of Education
Region X
Municipality:
School Year:
School:
School I.D. 0
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%) Level: 0
Computati
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points Score on Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Enrolment
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
Performance SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Improvement
Results:
#VALUE!
Remarks:
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Option1: ER, DR, RR, NAT1
Department of Education
Region X
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total #VALUE!
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
1 2 3
Results:
#VALUE!
Remarks:
0.00
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Option2: ER, DR, RR, NAT2
Department of Education
Region X
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total #VALUE!
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
1 2 3
Results:
#VALUE!
Remarks:
0.00
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Option3: ER, DR, RR, PrR
Department of Education
Region X
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
Performance Improvement SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Results:
#VALUE!
Remarks: 0.00
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Municipality:
School Year:
School:
School I.D. 0
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%) Level: 0
Computati
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points Score on Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of Community 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Mapping
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Efficiency % of
(25%) Dropout Rate (DR): decrease Dropout 1. Marginal: At least
5% dec.
2. Average: At least 2% #VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! dec.
3. High: Has 0 Dropout rate
#VALUE! or less than 2%
Ave. % of Decrease #VALUE!
#VALUE!
% of
Repetition Rate decrease Repetition % 1. Marginal: At least
5% dec.
2. Average: At least 2% #VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! dec.
#VALUE! 3. High: Has 0 Repetition rate
or less than 2%
Ave. % of decrease #VALUE!
Quality (30%) Option 1
Elementary-Baseline 67%
% of 1-Marginal: At least 2% Inc.
NAT MPS Increase NAT MPS 2-Average- At least 5% Inc.
3- High- With 7% Inc. or 75%
Secondary- Baseline 48%
1-Marginal: At least 7% Inc.
2-Average: At least 8% Inc.
3-High: With 10% Inc. or 75% 3.00 0.9 0.9
Option 2
1-Marginal: 26-50%
2-Average: 51-75%
3-High: 76-100%
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total #VALUE!
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
Performance Improvement SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Results:
#VALUE!
Remarks:
0.00
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Option5: CM, DR, RR, NAT2
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 School Year:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Enrolment
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total #VALUE!
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
Performance SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Improvement
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Err:509
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 School Year:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Enrolment
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
Performance Improvement SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Err:509
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 School Year:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Enrolment
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total #VALUE!
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
Performance SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Improvement
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Err:509
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 School Year:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Enrolment
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
Performance SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Improvement
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Err:509
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 School Year:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Enrolment
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total #VALUE!
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
Performance SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Improvement
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Err:509
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 School Year:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computati
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points on Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of Participatio 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase n Rate
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Efficiency % of
(25%) Dropout Rate (DR): decrease Dropout 1. Marginal: At least
5% dec.
2. Average: At least 2% #VALUE!
#VALUE! dec.
3. High: Has 0 Dropout rate
#VALUE! or less than 2%
Ave. % of Decrease #VALUE!
Completion Rate % of 0 - No evidence
(CR): Increase Completion
1-Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
2. #VALUE!
Average: At least 7% Inc. #VALUE!
#VALUE!
3. High:
#VALUE! At least 10% Inc.
or CR 95%
Ave. % of Increase #VALUE!
Cohort Survival Rate % of Cohort 0 - No evidence
(CSR): Increase Survival
1-Marginal: At least 5% Inc
95.00 2.
Average: At least 7% Inc 2
96.00 3. High: At
83.72 least 10% Inc
or 95% CSR
Ave. % of Increase
Quality (30%) Option 1
Elementary-Baseline 67%
% of 1-Marginal: At least 2% Inc.
NAT MPS Increase NAT MPS 2-Average- At least 5% Inc.
3- High- With 7% Inc. or 75% Inc.
Secondary- Baseline 48%
1-Marginal: At least 7% Inc.
2-Average: At least 8% Inc.
3-High: With 10% Inc. or 75% Inc #VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! Option 2
1-Marginal: 26-50% Inc.
2-Average: 51-75% Inc.
3-High: 76-100% Inc.
#VALUE!
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
Performance SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Improvement
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Err:509
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 School Year:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%)
% of Participation A. Enrolment Increase
0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Rate
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
2-Average: At least 7% Inc.
3 1.35
3-High: At least 10% Inc.
B. Justification: Enrolment Rate
based on Community Mapping
0 1. Marginal: At least 85% Inc.
2. Average: At least 90% Inc.
3. High: At least 95% Inc.
Efficiency % of
(25%) Dropout Rate (DR): decrease Dropout 1. Marginal: At least
5% dec.
2. Average: At least 2% #VALUE!
#VALUE! dec.
3. High: Has 0 Dropout rate
#VALUE! or less than 2%
Ave. % of Decrease #VALUE!
Completion Rate % of 0 - No evidence
(CR): Increase Completion
1-Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
2. #VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! Average: At least 7% Inc.
3. High:
#VALUE! At least 10% Inc.
Ave. % of Increase #VALUE! or 95% CR
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total #VALUE!
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
Performance Improvement SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Err:509
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School: 0 School Year:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%)
% of Participation A. Enrolment Increase
0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Rate
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
Performance SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Improvement
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Err:509
Department of Education
Region X
Efficiency % of
(25%) Dropout Rate (DR): decrease Dropout % 1. Marginal: At least
5% dec.
2. Average: At least 2%
dec.
#VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE!
3. High: Has 0 Dropout rate
#VALUE! or less than 2%
Ave. % of Decrease #VALUE!
#VALUE!
% of
Repetition Rate decrease Repetition % 1. Marginal: At least
5% dec.
2. Average: At least 2% #VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE! dec.
3. High: Has 0 Repetition rate
#VALUE! or less than 2%
Ave. % of decrease #VALUE!
Quality (30%) Option 1
% of Elementary-Baseline 67%
1-Marginal: At least 2% Inc.
Promotion Rate Increase Promotion % 2-Average- At least 5% Inc.
3- High- With 7% Inc. or 75%
Secondary- Baseline 48%
1-Marginal: At least 7% Inc.
2-Average: At least 8% Inc.
3-High: With 10% Inc. or 75% 3.00 0.9 0.9
Option 2
1-Marginal: 26-50%
2-Average: 51-75%
3-High: 76-100%
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total #VALUE!
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
Performance SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Improvement
Results:
#VALUE!
Remarks:
0.00
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
SBM Validation
Name of
School:
0 School Year:
Efficiency % of
(25%) Dropout Rate (DR): decrease Dropout 1. Marginal: At least
5% dec.
2. Average: At least 2% #VALUE!
#VALUE! dec.
3. High: Has 0 Dropout rate
#VALUE! or less than 2%
Ave. % of Decrease #VALUE!
Completion Rate % of 0 - No evidence
(CR): Increase Completion
1-Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
2. 3
Average: At least 7% Inc. #VALUE!
3. High:
At least 10% Inc.
or 95% CR
Ave. % of Increase
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Performance Improvement SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
Err:509
Department of Education
Region X
SBM Validation
Name of
School:
0 School Year:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Computatio
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points n Results
Access (45%) A. Enrolment Increase
% of Participation 0- No evidence
Enrolment Increase Increase Rate
1- Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
Efficiency % of
(25%) Dropout Rate (DR): decrease Dropout 1. Marginal: At least
5% dec.
2. Average: At least 2% #VALUE!
#VALUE! dec.
3. High: Has 0 Dropout rate
#VALUE! or less than 2%
Ave. % of Decrease #VALUE!
Completion Rate % of 0 - No evidence
(CR): Increase Completion
1-Marginal: At least 5% Inc.
2. 3
Average: At least 7% Inc. #VALUE!
3. High:
At least 10% Inc.
or 95% CR
Ave. % of Increase
Ave. % of Increase
Sub-Total #VALUE!
Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Interpretation:
Developing ( Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)
Results:
#VALUE!
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20 0.00
0.10
0.00
Performance SBM Assessment Score SBM Final Rating
Improvement
Validators:
0 0
Member Member
0 0
Member Member
0
Chairman
0
Department of Education
Region X
School:
A network of leadership and governance guides the education system to achieve its shared vision, mission and goals making them responsive and relevant to the context of diverse environments.
✘ Note:
Things to
2. The development plan (e.g. SIP) is The school leads the regular review and The school and community stakeholders working as The community stakeholders lead the regular 1. Point t
regularly reviewed by the school improvement of the development plan. full partners lead the continual review and review and improvement process; the school possible
community to keep it responsive and improvement of the development plan. stakeholders facilitate the process. 2. Click t
relevant to emerging needs, challenges (NO Evidence) based fro
and opportunities. 3. After
click the
upper po
previous
3. The school is organized by a clear The school defines the organizational structure, and The school and community collaboratively define the Guided by an agreed organizational structure, the
structure and work arrangements that the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. structure and the roles and responsibilities of community stakeholders lead in defining the
promote shared leadership and stakeholders organizational structure and the roles and
governance and define the roles and responsibilities; school provides technical and
responsibilities of the stakeholders. (NO Evidence) administrative support.
previous
5. A long program is in operation that Developing structures are in place and analysis of Leaders undertake training modes that are Leaders assume responsibility for their own training
addresses the training and development the competency and development needs of leaders convenient to them (on-line, off-line, modular, and development. School community leaders
needs of school and community leaders. is conducted; result is used to develop a long term group, or home-based) and which do not disrupt working individually or in groups, coach and mentor
training and Development program. their regular functions. Leaders monitor and one another to achieve their VMG.
(NO Evidence) evaluate their own learning progress.
2. The implemented curriculum is Local beliefs, norms, values, traditions, folklores, The localized curriculum is implemented and Best practices in localizing the curriculum are
localized to make it more meaningful to current events, and existing technologist are monitored closely to ensure that it makes learning mainstreamed and benchmarked by other schools.
the learners and applicable to life in the documented are used to developed lasting more meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired There is marked increase in number of projects that
community. curriculum. Localization guidelines are agreed to by learning outcomes, and directly improves uses the community as learning laboratory, and the
school community and teachers are properly community life. Ineffective approaches are replaced school as an agent of change for improvement of
(NO Evidence) oriented. and innovative ones are developed. the community.
Level II of Practice (Evidence indicate Level III of Practice (Evidence indicate
Level O (NO Level I of Practice (Evidence indicate early or planned practices and procedures are fully practices and procedures satisfy quality
A. Indicators Evidence) preliminary stage) implemented) standards)
3. A representative group of school and A representative team of school and community Learning materials and approaches to reinforce Materials and approaches are being used in
community stakeholders develop the stakeholders assess content and methods used in strengths and address deficiencies are developed school, in the family and in community to develop
methods and materials for developing teaching creative, critical thinking and problem and tested for applicability on schools, family and critical, creative thinking and problem solving
creative thinking and problem solving. solving. Assessment results are used as guide to community. community of learners and are producing desired
(NO Evidence) develop materials. results.
A school-based monitoring and learning The school-based monitoring and The monitoring system is accepted and
system is conducted regularly and cooperatively; learning systems generate. Feedback that is used for regularly used for collective decision making.
And feedback is shared with stakeholders. making decisions that enhance the total
4. The learning systems are regularly and development of learners.
collaboratively monitored by the
community using appropriate tools to
ensure the holistic growth and
development of the learners and the The system uses a tool that monitors the holistic A committee takes care of the continuous The monitoring tool has been improved to provide
community. development of learners. improvement of tool. both quantitative and qualitative data.
(NO Evidence)
5. Appropriate assessment tools for The assessment tools are reviewed by the The assessment tools are reviewed by the school School assessment results are used to develop
teaching and learning are continuously school and assessment results are shared with community and results are shared community learning programs that are suited to community,
reviewed and improved, and assessment school’s stakeholders. stakeholders. and customized to each learners’ context, result of
results are contextualized to the learner which are used for collaborative decision-making.
and local situation and the attainment of (NO Evidence)
relevant life skills.
Stakeholders are aware of child/learner- Stakeholders begin to practice child/ learner- Learning environments, methods and resources are
centered, rights-based, and inclusive principles of centered principles of education in the design of community driven, inclusive and adherent to child’s
education. support to education. right and protection requirements.
(NO Evidence)
6. Learning mangers and facilitators
(teacher, administrator and community
members) nature values and
environment that are protective of all
children and demonstrate behaviors
consistent to the organization’s vision,
mission and goals.
6. Learning mangers and facilitators Level II of Practice (Evidence indicate Level III of Practice (Evidence indicate
(teacher, administrator and community Level O (NO Level I of Practice (Evidence indicate early or planned practices and procedures are fully practices and procedures satisfy quality
members) nature values and
A. Indicators
environment that are protective of all Evidence) preliminary stage) implemented) standards)
children and demonstrate behaviors Learning managers and facilitators’ conduct Learning managers and facilitators’ apply the Learning mangers and facilitators observe
consistent to the organization’s vision, activities aimed to increase stakeholder’s awareness principles in designing learning materials. learner’s rights from designing the curriculum to
mission and goals. and commitment to fundamental rights of children structuring the whole learning environment.
(NO Evidence) and the basic principle of educating them.
Practices, tools and materials for developing self- Practices, tools and materials for developing There is continuous exchange of information sharing
directed learners are highly observable in school, but self-directed learners are beginning to emerge in the of expertise and materials among the schools, home
not only in the home or in the community. homes and in the community. and community for the development of self-
7. Methods and resources are learner directed learners.
and community-friendly, enjoyable, safe,
inclusive, and accessible and aimed at
developing self directed learners.
Learners are equipped with essential Learning programs are designed and developed The program is collaboratively implemented and The program is mainstreamed continuously
knowledge, skills, and values to assume to produce learners who are responsible and monitored by teachers and parents to ensure that it improve to make relevant to emergent demands.
responsibility and accountability for their accountable for their learning. produces desired learners.
own learning. (NO Evidence)
1. Roles and responsibility of accountable There is an active party that initiates classification of The stakeholders are engaged in clarifying and Shared and participatory processes are used in
person/s and collective body/ies are the roles and responsibilities in education delivery. defining their specific roles and responsibilities. determining roles, responsibilities, and
clearly defined and agreed upon by accountabilities of stakeholders in managing and
community stakeholders. (NO Evidence) supporting education.
2. Achievement of goals is recognized Performance accountability is practiced at the A community-level accountability system is evolving A community-accepted performance
based on a collaboratively develop school level. from school-led initiatives. accountability, recognition and incentive system is
performance accountability system; gaps being practiced.
are addressed through appropriate (NO Evidence)
action.
Level II of Practice (Evidence indicate Level III of Practice (Evidence indicate
Level O (NO Level I of Practice (Evidence indicate early or planned practices and procedures are fully practices and procedures satisfy quality
A. Indicators Evidence) preliminary stage) implemented) standards)
3. The accountability system is owned by The school articulates the accountabity Stakeholders are engaged in the development and School community stakeholders continuously
the community and is continuously assessment framework with basic components, operation of an appropriate accountability and collaboratively review and enhance
enhanced to ensure that management including implementation guidelines to the assessment system. accountability systems’ processes, mechanisms and
structures and mechanism are responsive stakeholders. tools.
to the emerging learning needs of the (NO Evidence)
community.
4. Accountability assessment criteria and The school, with the participation of stakeholders, Stakeholders are engaged in the development Schools community stakeholders continuously
tools, feedback mechanism, and articulates an accountability assessment framework and operation of an appropriate accountability and collaboratively review and enhance
information collection and validation with basic components, including implementation assessment system. accountability system’ processes, mechanisms and
techniques and processes are inclusive guidelines tools.
and collaboratively develop and agreed (NO Evidence)
upon.
5. Participatory assessment of School initiates periodic performance Collaborative conduct of performance School-community- developed performance
performance is done regularly with the assessment with the participation of stakeholders. assessment informs planning, plan adjustments and assessment is practiced and is the basis for
community. Assessment results and requirements for technical assistance. improving monitoring and evaluation systems,
lessons learned serve as basis for providing technical assistance, and recognizing and
feedback, technical assistance, and (NO Evidence) refining plans.
recognition and plan adjustments.
3. In place is a community-developed Stakeholders support judicious, appropriate, and Stakeholders are engaged and share expertise in the Stakeholders sustain the implementation and
resource management system that drives effective use of resources. collaborative development of resource management improvement of a collaboratively developed,
appropriate behaviors of the system. periodically adjusted, and constituent-focused
stakeholders to ensure judicious, resource management system.
appropriate and effective use of (NO Evidence)
resources.
4. Regular monitoring, evaluation, and Stakeholders are invited to participate in the Stakeholder engaged and share expertise in the Stakeholders sustain the implementation and
reporting processes of resource development and implementation of monitoring, collaborative development of resource management improvement of a collaboratively developed,
management are collaboratively evaluation, and reporting processes on resource system. periodically adjusted, and constituent-focused
developed and implemented by the management. resource management system.
learning managers, facilitators, and (NO Evidence)
community stakeholders.
5. There is a system that manages the An engagement procedure to identify and utilize Stakeholders support a system of partnership for An established system of partnership is managed
network and linkages which strengthen partnerships with stakeholders for improving improving resource management. and sustained by the stakeholders for continuous
and sustain partnership for improving resource management is evident. improvement of resource management.
resource management. (NO Evidence)
Summary :
Cummulative Scores
SBM Principles Weight of Validators per Results
Principles Chairman: 0
Leadership and 0.00
Governance
30% 0 Member1: 0
Curriculum &
Learning 30% 0.00 0 Member2: 0
Level II of Practice (Evidence indicate Level III of Practice (Evidence indicate
Level O (NO Level I of Practice (Evidence indicate early or planned practices and procedures are fully practices and procedures satisfy quality
A. Indicators Evidence) preliminary stage) implemented) standards)
Accountability and
Continuous
Improvement 25% 0.00 0 Member3: 0
Resource
Management 15% 0.00 0 Member4: 0
Sub-total
0.00