Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Technology, Not Alarmism, Will Help Tackle Climate Change - HumanProgress
Technology, Not Alarmism, Will Help Tackle Climate Change - HumanProgress
A new policy report from the Breakthrough National Centre for Climate
Restoration warns that “planetary and human systems [are] reaching a ‘point
of no return’ by mid-century, in which the prospect of a largely uninhabitable
Earth leads to the breakdown of nations and the international order.” This
apocalyptic vision of the year 2050 follows a long tradition of
counterproductive doomsaying.
But instead of focusing on solutions, like nuclear power, which does not emit
CO2, and other technological breakthroughs that have the potential to reduce
carbon emissions, some well-meaning people resort to apocalyptic rhetoric.
Humanity has reached the “point of no return” many times already, according
to past doomsayers.
In 2006, Al Gore warned that unless drastic measures were taken “within the
next 10 years,” the world would “reach a point of no return.” That would place
“the point of no return” in 2016.
Also in 1970, North Texas State University philosopher Peter Gunter wrote,
“By the year 2000, 30 years from now, the entire world, with the exception of
Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”
In 1969, Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich said, “If I were a gambler,
I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.” It is a
good thing he did not put down money on that proposition, or he would have
had to pay out 31 years later. (In fact, it would have served his bank account
well to stay away from wagers entirely).
Many other such reasons for optimism exist. Yet the new report’s “2050
scenario finds a world in social breakdown and outright chaos,” David Spratt,
the research director at the Breakthrough National Centre for Climate
Restoration, told Vice.
In the year 353, a bishop called Hilary of Poitiers also predicted that the
world would end in just 12 years, in 365. It is a safe bet that Congresswoman
Ocasio-Cortez's forecast ends up as inaccurate as his was.