Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vidal vs. Judge Dojillo
Vidal vs. Judge Dojillo
*
A.M. No. MTJ-05-1591. July 14, 2005.
(Formerly A.M. OCA I.P.I. No. 02-1318-MTJ)
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000178c3edb4edeba11808003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/6
4/12/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 463
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
265
RESOLUTION
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.:
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000178c3edb4edeba11808003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/6
4/12/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 463
brother’s lawyer but in the area reserved for the public; and that
the main reason why he was there was to observe how election
protests are conducted as he has never conducted one. His other
reason was to give moral support to his brother.
“This matter was referred for investigation and, in her report,
the Hon. Tita Rodriguez-Villarin, Presiding Judge, RTC, Branch
46, Urdaneta City observed that:
266
267
_______________
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000178c3edb4edeba11808003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/6
4/12/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 463
1 A.M. No. MTJ-01-1376, January 23, 2002, 374 SCRA 225, 230-231.
268
——o0o——
269
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000178c3edb4edeba11808003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/6
4/12/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 463
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000178c3edb4edeba11808003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/6