You are on page 1of 1

JON

DOC
1. No article of incorporation or certificate of
registration attached in the complaint = no capacity 1.No article of incorporation or certificate of
to sue? Not sure lol - di rin ako sure dito kung registration attached in the complaint = no
kelangan ba talaga o hindi.. capacity to sue? Not sure lol

2. Oral agreement and/or kasunduan ng 2.Oral agreement and/or kasunduan ng


pagpapatira was executed on nov 11, 2017 (see pagpapatira was executed on nov 11, 2017
par 7 of complaint & annex E) but TCT 12345 was (see par 7 of complaint & annex E) but TCT
entered on feb 22, 2018 (see annex B). So illegal 12345 was entered on feb 22, 2018 (see
possession yung families from the start kasi wala annex B). So illegal possession yung
pa possession si DEF nung nag kasunduan sila, so families from the start kasi wala pa
accion publiciana na dapat? - valid pa din naman possession si DEF nung nag kasunduan
ata unlawful detainer kasi nung time entered yung sila, so accion publiciana na dapat?
contract sila naman talaga owner. Yung registration
lang naman binds third parties. Kaso kung sila
mismo nag enter sa kasunduan, parang 3.Par 8 of complaint, 2 years later... informed
inacknowledge na din nila yung ownership nung def defendants pero yung first demand jan 10,
2020 on par 9?
5. Par 15 cf 16, walang witness na mag iidentify ng
ibang documents except sa demand letter? Rule 7 4.Par 14 of complaint cf relief b cf annex H;
sec 6b litigation expenses is not the same as atty
fees? Docket fees so di siya puwede
7. Annex I & J doesn’t follow JA rule Sec 3. So di singilin? Like cost of suit dapat? Not sure lol
siya magagamit as evid as per sec 10c? (AM 12-8-
8-SC) - ito ata hindi sa pleading inaaassail. Sa offer
and objection na ata to ng evidence during trial 5.Par 15 cf 16, walang witness na mag iidentify
nagiging issue ng ibang documents except sa demand
letter? Rule 7 sec 6b
8. Demand letters (Annex E, F, G) walang
signature ni Catriona Viceral (president of DEF); 6.Par 16, walang picture nung notice in par 15
Wala naman authority yung lawyers to demand to d. Di puwede yung notice as demand to
vacate, wala attached sec cert so invalid demand? vacate kasi di naman sila lessor/lessee?
- ito din feel ko pinaka may bearing. Na no valid Rule 70 sec 2
demand was made kasi wala naman authority yung
firm gumawa ng demand letter on behalf of their 7.Annex I & J doesn’t follow JA rule Sec 3. So
client. Ang nakasulat lang naman sa demand letter di siya magagamit as evid as per sec 10c?
yung def lumapit sa kanila pero as per board (AM 12-8-8-SC)
resolution yung president yung may authority to act
on behalf of the corp pag dating sa legal issues. So 8. Demand letters (Annex E, F, G) walang
agree ako dito na walang valid demand hehe signature ni Catriona Viceral (president of DEF);
Wala naman authority yung lawyers to demand to
vacate, wala attached sec cert so invalid demand?

Answer
Admissions
Denial
Affirmative Defenses

SPA

You might also like