Abraham Maslow’s 5-tier Theory of Motivation, posits the view that a
worker has a hierarchy of needs that a public administrator must carefully
study, assess and fulfill, with the end-in-view of creating and maintaining an efficient and therefore productive worker.
Such theory, coming as it did from an experimental behaviorist who started
his experiments on monkeys, and as published critiques have shown, posed serious apprehensions on the quality of his studies. Some observers have even suggested that Maslow is better understood in an inferential- analytical method rather than qualitative.
Thus, an inference-analysis of Maslow’s theory suggests that public
organizations exist to serve co-existent human needs, and that this inter- dependence in turn, if it is a good fit, produces mutual benefits between the worker and the organization, or otherwise, mutual detriment.
Maslow’s theory is distinguished from the classical view from the
perspectives of emphasis, nature and focus. Maslow’s was the fulfillment of basic needs, belongingness and human emotions, while the latter’s was rigid, mechanistic and highly impersonal.
The interplay of human behavior in complex settings in the workplace
produce both pros and cons to the Maslowian theory. More recent studies have shown that the primary motivational aspect for employees is not financial, but the pride in his work and his output. Such studies may not be viable today however, due to dire bread-and-butter issues, which necessitate the inverse proportions or a re-structuring of Maslow’s 5 tiers. But the larger picture gives us the backbone learning from Maslow that a public administrator must carefully tread on human behavior in order to keep the worker motivated and engaged.