Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Registration no:
1. Ordinary Buildings
2. Special Building
3. Multi Storied Buildings.
Normally allowable FSI are 1.50 times for Ordinary and Special Building
and 2.0 to 2.50 times for Multi-Storied Buildings.
CMDA may allow premium FSI over and above the normally allowable FSI
subject to a maximum of 1 (one) relating the same to the road width
parameters as follows:-
h) What are the advantages of free hold over lease hold land tenure ?
What is freehold?
Freehold is the complete ownership of a piece of land and that which is built upon
it – the owner ‘holds’ it ‘freely’. When buying a freehold property you are
completely in charge of the building, what happens to it, how it’s used and it is
your responsibility for any repairs or upkeep. This is in comparison to leasehold,
where you own the property, but the land the property on is being ‘leased’ from the
leaseholder.
When buying a freehold property, you are buying the entirety of the land, and the
property on it. However, this doesn’t mean you will be exempt if you are working
on a project that requires planning permission.
Share of freehold/commonhold
In some cases with flats, you get a ‘share of freehold’ – this offers the advantage
of buying permanently – there is no lease that can end and revert back to the
freeholder. However, owning a portion of the freehold doesn’t mean the lease is
void. It really means you have two responsibilities. You will have more say in the
upkeep of the building and land, but if you have a share of freehold in a group of
flats, you may find yourself at odds with the neighbouring leaseholders when it
comes to arranging repairs work and paying for it.
Commonhold is a share of freehold, but usually means that the other leaseholders
in the building are also freeholders. Together, you hold the freehold for the building
and can decide together about maintenance costs or repairs.
What is feuhold?
Scotland has a different system to the rest of the UK. They abolished Feudal
Tenure in 2004, which meant that long term leases turned into freehold. There are
very few leasehold properties in Scotland.
he first question is what is meant by a ‘smart city’. The answer is, there is no
universally accepted definition of a smart city. It means different things to
different people. The conceptualisation of Smart City, therefore, varies from city
to city and country to country, depending on the level of development,
willingness to change and reform, resources and aspirations of the city residents.
A smart city would have a different connotation in India than, say, Europe. Even
in India, there is no one way of defining a smart city.
Some definitional boundaries are required to guide cities in the Mission. In the
imagination of any city dweller in India, the picture of a smart city contains a wish
list of infrastructure and services that describes his or her level of aspiration. To
provide for the aspirations and needs of the citizens, urban planners ideally aim
at developing the entire urban eco-system, which is represented by the four
pillars of comprehensive development-institutional, physical, social and
economic infrastructure. This can be a long term goal and cities can work
towards developing such comprehensive infrastructure incrementally, adding on
layers of ‘smartness’.
a) What is TDR ?
Q2
b) Briefly explain “Garden city movement”.
The garden city movement is a method of urban planning that was initiated in 1898 by Sir Ebenezer
Howard in the United Kingdom. Garden cities were intended to be planned, self-contained
communities surrounded by "greenbelts", containing proportionate areas of residences, industry and
agriculture.
Edward Bellamy's novel Looking Backward and Henry George's work Progress and
Poverty inspired Ebenezer Howard to publish his book To-morrow: a Peaceful Path to Real
Reform in 1898 (reissued in 1902 as Garden Cities of To-morrow).
Ideally his garden city would accommodate 32,000 people on a site of 6,000 acres (2,400 ha),
planned on a concentric pattern with open spaces, public parks and six radial boulevards, 120 ft (37
m) wide, extending from the centre. The garden city would be self-sufficient and when it reached full
population, another garden city would be developed nearby. Howard envisaged a cluster of several
garden cities as satellites of a central city of 50,000 people, linked by road and rail.
The second edition of his book, Garden Cities of To-morrow was successful and this provided
Howard with the support needed to realise his vision. The overcrowding and deterioration of cities
was one of the troubling issues of the time. Howard’s garden city concept combined the town and
country in order to provide the working class an alternative to working on farms or ‘crowded,
unhealthy cities’.
In order to build a garden city Howard needed to find finance to buy land. To do this he founded the
Garden Cities Association (later known as the Town and Country Planning Association or TCPA),
which created First Garden City, Ltd. in 1899 to create the garden city of Letchworth.
The donors would collect interest on their investment if the garden city generated profits through
rents. Howard tried to include working class cooperative organisations but could not win their
financial support. Because he had to rely only on the wealthy investors he had to make concessions
to his plan, including eliminating the cooperative ownership scheme with no landlords, short-term rent
increases, and hiring architects who did not agree with his rigid design plans.
In 1904, Raymond Unwin, architect and town planner, along with his partner Barry Parker, won the
competition run to plan Letchworth, an area 34 miles outside London. Unwin and Parker planned the
town in the centre of the Letchworth estate with Howard’s large agricultural greenbelt surrounding the
town. They shared Howard’s notion that the working class deserved better and more affordable
housing. However, the architects ignored Howard’s symmetric design, instead replacing it with a
more ‘organic’ design.
Letchworth slowly attracted more residents because it was able to attract manufacturers through low
taxes, low rents and more space. Despite Howard’s efforts, the home prices in this garden city could
not remain affordable for blue-collar workers to live in. The population was made up mostly skilled
middle class workers. Ten years later the First Garden City became profitable and started paying
dividends to its investors. Although many viewed Letchworth as a success, it did not immediately
inspire government investment into the next line of garden cities.
A very good book with a great deal of detail of all aspects of the development of Letchworth and a
comprehensive bibliography of other books on the subject is "Letchworth The First Garden City by
Mervyn Miller".
In 1919 Howard bought land at Welwyn to house the second garden city. The purchase was at
auction, with money Howard borrowed from friends. The Welwyn Garden City Corporation was
formed to oversee the construction.
Even until the end of the 1930s, Letchworth Garden City and Welwyn Garden City, both in the
County of Hertfordshire, England. remained as the only existing garden cities. The movement
succeeded in emphasising the need for urban planning policies that eventually led to the New Town
movement.
Frederic James Osborn, a colleague of Howard, was successor at the Garden City Association.
After WWII the concept was again implemented when the New Towns Act initiated the development
of many new communities based on Howard's egalitarian ideas.
Land-use planning is the process of regulating the use of land in an effort to promote
more desirable social and environmental outcomes as well as a more efficient use of
resources. Goals of land use planning may include environmental conservation,
restraint of urban sprawl, minimization of transport costs, prevention of land use
conflicts, and a reduction in exposure to pollutants. By and large, the uses of land
determine the diverse socioeconomic activities that occur in a specific area, the
patterns of human behavior they produce, and their impact on the environment.
In urban planning, land use planning seeks to order and regulate land use in an
efficient and ethical way, thus preventing land use conflicts. Governments use land
use planning to manage the development of land within their jurisdictions. In doing so,
the governmental unit can plan for the needs of the community while safeguarding
natural resources. To this end, it is the systematic assessment of land and water
potential, alternatives for land use, and economic and social conditions in order to
select and adopt the best land use options.[1] Often one element of a comprehensive
plan, a land use plan provides a vision for the future possibilities of development in
neighborhoods, districts, cities, or any defined planning area.
In the United States, the terms land use planning, regional planning, urban planning,
and urban design are often used interchangeably, and will depend on the state,
county, and/or project in question. Despite confusing nomenclature, the essential
function of land use planning remains the same whatever term is applied.
The Canadian Institute of Planners offers a definition that land use planning means the
scientific, aesthetic, and orderly disposition of land, resources, facilities and services
with a view to securing the physical, economic and social efficiency, health and well-
being of urban and rural communities.[2] The American Planning Association states that
the goal of land use planning is to further the welfare of people and their communities
by creating convenient, equitable, healthful, efficient, and attractive environments for
present and future generations.[3]
er common in places between the urban and rural areas and may cause the premature
removal of land from agricultural use.[3] Urban owners often complain that the odour or
noise were not apparent at the time when the house was purchased. Producers argue
that these differences occurred because of the weather conditions, and do not mean
that they had changed what they were doing. Most farms have, in fact, in some ways
reduced their odour. Moreover, spraying may cause a lot of noise, disturbing the
nearby residents. As farmers often work at night-time or early in the morning, residents
complain that the noise is disturbing their sleep.[4]
Another major concern in such areas is the traffic. Heavy farming materials as well as
materials for home construction are heavy and bulky, and therefore move somewhat
slowly and cause traffic congestions. Crime in such fringes,
particularly trespassing and vandalism, are also common, and affect both landowners
and the producers.[4]
Rural[edit]
Such conflicts are, however, not restricted to urban areas. For example, car repairing
workshops and cargo container storages located near the residential suburbs can
trigger land-use conflicts by raising the risk of fire and polluting the nearby
environment. For example, oil from the car repairing workshops can cause water
pollution.[1]
Solutions[edit]
There are a number of possible methods to ease, avoid or eradicate land-use conflicts.
The most common ones are listed below:[5]
d) Urban planning
Urban planning is the planning of land uses. This helps to separate lands uses
that do not complement each other. For example, a green belt may be used to
separate residential areas from factories.
e) Redevelopment
Redeveloping old urban areas by planning the land uses carefully so that land
is used in a better way than before. This will improve the quality of the
environment of that area.
h) Reclamation
Reclamation helps solve land-use conflicts indirectly by easing the demand for
land and lowering the land price.
i) Tort law
Q3
j) Land Pooling Technique as a tool for master plan implementation.
Discuss.
1. Protection of agricultural lands from land use conversions so as to ensure food security and to
meet consumption needs of a growing population and to meet livelihood needs of the dependent
population.
2. To identify and protect lands that are required to promote and support social development,
particularly of tribal communities and poor section of society for their livelihood.
3. To preserve historic and cultural heritage by protecting, places/sites of religious, archaeological,
scenic and tourist importance. Objectives related to environmental concerns
4. To preserve and conserve lands under important environmental functions such as those declared
as National Parks, Wild Life Sanctuaries, Reserved Forests, Eco Sensitive Zones, etc. and guide
land uses around such preserved and conserved areas so as not to have land use conflicts or
negative environmental impacts.
5. To preserve the areas of natural environment and its resources that provide ecosystem services.
Objectives related to developmental/ economic concerns
6. To promote properly guided and coordinated development in a sustainable manner of all
developmental sectors including agriculture, urban, industrial, infrastructure and mining so as to
minimise land use conflicts or negative environmental impacts. Objectives related to enforcement
and implementation of the policy 7. To suggest a general implementation framework for
implementing land utilisation policy by all concerned at different levels, viz. national, state, regional
and local, and undertaking capacity building
b) What is land tenure? What are different types of tenure policy available
in India.
Land tenure refers to the way in which land is held by an individual from the Government. It shows
the relationships between the land holder and the State. The absolute ownership of land rests with
the Government. Government gives proprietary rights to individuals or communities.
There were three main types of land tenures in India on the eve of Indian independence ―
landlord tenure or Zamindari System, independent single tenure or Ryotwari System and the joint
village or village community or Mahalwari community.
i. Zamindari: This system was introduced by Lord Cornwallis in Bengal in 1973. Under this
system, the lands of a village or few villages was held by one person or few joint owners
who were responsible for payment of land revenue to the Government. There used to be
number of intermediaries between the Zamindars and the actual tillers of the soil. The
system took were various forms such as Zamindari, Jagirdari, Inamdari, etc. In many cases
revenue collectors were raised to the status of land owners. This system was introduced in
many parts of the country. In this system, tillers of the soil were exploited by way of
exhorbitant rents. There were no incentives for them to improve the land or to use better
cultivation practices. There were many other social evils of the system. It is said that the
British introduced Zamindari system to achieve two objectives. First, it helped in regular
collection of land revenue from a few persons i.e. Zamindars. Secondly, it created a class
of people who would remain loyal to the British ruler in the country.
ii. Mahalwari: Under this system, the village lands were held jointly by the village communities,
the members of which were jointly and severally responsible for the payment of land
revenue. Land revenue was fixed for the whole village and the village headman (Lumberdar)
collected it for which he received ‘Panchatra’ i.e. 5 per cent as commission.
iii. Rayatwari: It was introduced by Sir Thomas Munro first in Madras state and then in Bombay
State. In this system, there was a direct relationship between Government and the tenant
or Rayat i.e. individual land holder. Every registered holder was recognised as its proprietor
and he could sell or transfer the land. He was assured of permanent tenure as long as he
paid the land revenue. The land holder was also allowed to sublet his land. It was a better
system as compared to Zamindari or Mahalwari and similar other forms of tenure.
a) What are impact of unclear property rights on the socio-economic status of Indian
families.
“The assumption that land without clear ownership is uninhabited is a colonial
legacy,” said Arvind Khare, Executive Director of RRI. “There are communities
Q5 living almost everywhere, and in many cases, they have been living there long
before governments came in the picture. It is illogical to not consult these
communities on investments involving their traditional lands. It is even more
illogical to believe that these communities are against development – in fact, they
want development and can indeed be the drive behind development.”
The TMP Systems report also established broad patterns of conflict. One pattern
showed that more than three quarters of all conflicts examined occur at the start of
a project or when the project expands. Instead of involving local communities at
the inception of a project that involves their land, governments and corporations
often reach out to them after the plans have been drawn up, begetting conflict that
could have been averted.
“Property rights and records in many emerging markets are unclear to the point
that ownership of land can be granted by governments and accepted by investors
without the knowledge or consent of the people who live or depend on that land,”
said Dr. Chris Anderson, principal of Yirri Global LLC and a board Member of the
Open Contracting Partnership. He warned companies against exacerbating the
risks on such projects. “Far from being an ‘externality,’ land conflicts with local
communities can be a real threat to stable returns, in fact, to the whole enterprise
and investment, and warrant early proactive attention rather than passively hoping
that these issues will ‘get cleared up’ over time,” he said.
Dr. Anderson, who was formerly with the global mining corporation Rio Tinto, is a
part of the Interlaken Group, a cross-sector collaboration including international
companies such as Unilever, Nestle, Coca-Cola, and Olam. The Group was
formed to help companies implement advice from the UN’s Food and Agriculture
Organization on respecting land and forest rights. It has just released a new set of
practical guidelines for companies and their investors to integrate this advice in
their projects.
Recognition of community rights on such lands through laws like India’s landmark
Forest Rights Act would transform rural livelihoods as well as advance long-term
development. The Central Government has recently directed Bihar, West Bengal,
Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Uttarakhand, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh
and Jharkhand to implement the Act. This move came in the wake of Prime
Minister Narendra Modi’s directions to the Ministry of Tribal Affairs earlier this year
to implement the Act in a “campaign mode” and rapidly give land rights to tribals.
An earlier RRI analysis noted that the Act’s implementation was vital for the
survival and livelihoods of around 150 million of the country’s poorest and most
marginalised citizens. Major examples of conflict arising from lack of formal
community rights on customarily used rural and forest lands include Vedanta
Aluminum Ltd., which was unable to develop an open cast bauxite mine in
Niyamgiri due to fierce opposition by the local Dongria Kondh tribe, and POSCO’s
ill-fated steel plant in Jagatsinghtpur.
condominium is one of a group of housing units where the homeowners own their
individual unit space, and all the dwellings share ownership of common use areas.
The individual units normally share walls, but that isn't a requirement. The main
difference between condos and regular single homes is that there is no individual
ownership of a plot of land. All the land in the condominium project is owned in
common by all the homeowners.
The Benefits
There are many good reasons for owning a condominium. One of the most common
is their continued popularity over time, which means that when you're ready
to retire or move, selling your condo will perhaps be easier than selling a single home.
Another benefit is the exterior and structural maintenance aspect of condo ownership.
As the owner, you need not deal with landscaping, mowing grass, exterior
maintenance, or other repair issues related to the exterior of the units and the
common areas. Retirees like this and vacation owners love it. Investors like this
aspect as well, as they aren't relying on tenants for exterior maintenance.
You may choose to buy a condo in a vacation area that you often visit. You could then
take advantage of certain tax breaks for property ownership and you wouldn't have to
rent hotel rooms during your frequent visits.
Insurance and some utilities can be less expensive as well. The condo owner
needs only ensure the interior of their unit, not the exterior and structure overall.
The Drawbacks
All of these benefits come at a cost, and that's the condominium association fee
component. There will be a monthly or quarterly fee paid into the condo association to
take care of all common costs, insurance, taxes, maintenance, repairs, some utilities,
and so on.
The expenses and the dues that fund them can change and almost always increase
over time with inflation. You as an owner get a vote at association meetings, but it is
just one vote. If the rules say a majority vote can raise monthly owner dues, then
you'll have to pay them or you'll find a lien on your unit.
Periodically, you'll also find rules that allow assessments for major repairs, such as a
new roof or parking and sidewalk work in the project. There can also be assessments
divided among owners to redo the pool or renovate the clubhouse. In buying a unit
you will have agreed to abide by the rules and pay your share of valid assessments.
There can be very strict condo association rules and restrictions. Drive into any
condominium project and pay attention to the exterior of the units. They all look the
same with respect to paint colors and exterior construction and design materials, and
they always will.
You will find strict rules in the association covenants and restrictions that mandate no
changing and little individuality when it comes to the exterior look of the units. You
may discover that you can't even hang a holiday wreath on your door, and you'll likely
turn up a rule about no wind chimes. It's all about maintaining a consistent look for the
entire project. You may also find limitations on what type of furniture or other items
you can have on an outdoor patio.
There can even be rules about how much you can individualize the interior of your
unit. These are justified by statements that the units must be in a condition to be
easily sold in the marketplace.
If you paint your interior bright orange and your cabinets bright green, this could lead
to problems. If you're a hermit, they may not know until you leave, but just be aware
that the restrictions apply to both exteriors and interiors in many condominium
projects.
1. NETWORK CONNECTIVITY
Connectivity is a fundamental element for smart cities. With a robust network of
connected applications and devices through an IoT-enabled infrastructure, local
authorities are turning concrete cities into AI and sensors, converging physical and
virtual worlds. Governments can now tap into real-time city functions, from traffic
control, public transport, surveillance cameras, sensor systems to air quality
monitor and so on, to solve urban problems.
For instance, the Cities of Tomorrow project in Singapore tackles the key areas
such as urban ecosystems, energy and resource efficiency with intelligent systems
powered by data analytics and predictive diagnosis. As part of its Smart Nation
initiatives, the country’s city planners have been introducing various sustainability
solutions to transform non-greenfield neighbourhoods.
Here’s an example of Yuhua Estate in Singapore:
Q6
For connected cities to become a reality, governments must build an ecosystem of
innovators to foster collaboration amongst multiple stakeholders, including network
operators – to enable wider broadband coverage, increase the speed of data
transmissions, and businesses as well as individuals – to improve city planning
based on its own characteristics.
2. EFFECTIVE MOBILITY
The blueprint of smart cities project aims to build a connected infrastructure with
sensor-enabled physical assets that can generate data for traffic flows
optimization. Then came the arrival of NFC-enabled universal travel accounts, e-
hailing services, computer-aided transportation, and smart parking.
Recent trends in smart mobility revolution also reveal a steadily increased interest
in autonomous technology, with the biggest investment opportunities in the
following areas:
Driverless cars
Electric mobility – Renewable energy storage
Cloud, AI and Big data
Drones
Shared mobility
Mobility as a service
Intelligent transport systems
The outlook of smart mobility is indeed a bold vision, which requires strategic
partnerships between government and business, both in terms of regulatory and
technological frameworks. The future is exciting as more and more governments
are embracing cooperation, connectivity, and data-sharing as the building blocks
for more efficient city traffic, with a leading example from the Netherlands (source).
At the same time, citizens and visitors must be encouraged and educated to adapt
to the concept of efficient mobility. For example, to adjust their own commuting
behaviour based on real-time traffic reports.
More efforts in reducing privately-owned vehicles could potentially solve urban
problems as well, such as car-free zones restriction, pedestrian and bicycle lanes
installation.
3. CYBER RESILIENCE
Connected cities are a trade-off between efficiency and data privacy. To support
the transmission, analysis and storage of big data – the veins of the city, a
sophisticated cyber resilience strategy must be inextricably tied to all technological
developments.
“IoT will force us to reinvent how we do cyber security.” – Menny Barzilay, Cyber
Security Strategist, former CISO, Israeli Defense Force
Hackers are broadening smart cities attacks, as evident in Atlanta’s cyberattack
case – whereas major government network was brought down for days and
somewhat 8000 people had been affected. Such incidents pose tremendous
threats to the future deployment of billions of connected devices that underpin
smart city infrastructure. This is where advanced technologies such as artificial
intelligence and blockchain can make a difference.
4. CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT
A social fabric remains the core of smart cities. The way forward for smart cities
development is to be community-driven, rather than mere focus on technology
investment.
Urban planning must focus on the root cause of problems to design better services
that yield tangible results. Which means technology alone is not the change agent.
Citizens are the main catalyst that accelerates smart city initiatives. Citizen-
government dialogues are fundamental to the execution strategies, especially to
elevate real-time feedback to map intelligent technologies with human behaviour.
Understand that social change is intertwined with educational and cultural aspects,
the best approach is to ensure digital mindsets and literacy amongst citizens as
well as visitors. Local leaders can introduce the smart city concept with an open
portal for individual contribution. After all, the success of a smart city can only be
determined by the degree of citizen involvement in creating a livable city.
With various projects booming across the planet, the future of smart cities is
happening right now. From IoT advancement, 5G revolution, autonomous mobility,
renewable energy installation to AI-powered healthcare, public services and
advanced data analytics, cities are changing, and people are changing with them.
Q7
Discuss in detail about the legislative and fiscal tools implemented by government to
combat land speculation.
http://www.bputonline.com
Q Write short answer on any TWO:
8
a) Briefly discuss the interrelated plans used for the implementation of the urban development
planning system.
he basis for integrating energy aspects in planning processes is a thorough understanding of the existing
urban planning process in a given city. Such a process should include all phases (see graphic below),
steps, stakeholders and their related activities/responsibilities as well as instruments and tools used in
planning urban development projects.
In most cases the main planning instrument of a city such as the zoning plan or land use plan needs to be
adapted when new projects are being developed. However, it is important to not only show the final,
official steps when adapting the zoning plan. The process map should depict all phases including the early
planning steps, feasibility and master plans, the permitting process and final implementation. It should also
show some decision points or paths during this process for instance criteria for special procedural steps or
competitions. It might also be helpful to develop two process maps: one for the procedure of new
development areas and one for transformation areas.
The principal phases of an urban planning process are:
1. Preparatory / exploration phase
2. Feasibility / planning phase
3. Formal planning / zoning phase
4. Design and implementation phase
5. Operational phase
The following figure shows an example of a “typical” simplified urban planning process for a new
development area.
b) How building regulation is used as a tool to regulate land use in urban area ?
Zoning is a planning control tool for regulating the built environment and creating functional real estate markets.
It does so by dividing land that comprises the statutory area of a local authority into sections, permitting
particular land uses on specific sites to shape the layout of towns and cities and enable various types of
development. Zoning has a relatively short history as a tool for land-use planning. It determines the location,
size, and use of buildings and decides the density of city blocks (City of New York 2015a).
The planning and zoning process functions differently around the world and is controlled by different levels of
authority. Most commonly, a local authority such as a municipality or a county controls zoning (as in Australia or
the United States) whereas in other cases zoning is implemented at the state or national level (as in France or
Germany). Sometimes zoning is governed by a combination of the two approaches. Beyond these immediate
controls, additional regulations that affect zoning are often used, such as planning scheme overlays in Australia
or impact assessments in Germany.