Professional Documents
Culture Documents
first stage (the economics of scale) the agglomeration costs are lower and support well to economy, but
later in the second stage (the dis-economies of scale) the agglomeration costs increase and impacts the
economy?
Agglomeration economy refers to the localized economy in which a large number of companies,
services, and industries exist near one another together to benefit from either a reduction of productive
and transaction costs or an increase in productivity. Agglomeration benefits regions and residents with
better job matching, higher wages and greater opportunities for social and civic engagement; meanwhile,
companies and factories are enabled to develop specific strategies supporting the flow in and out through
the economic activity.
At the first stage (the economies of scale), an agglomeration economy would support the economy as it
helps to increase returns to scale which contributes to the growth of the cities or areas. Besides, as being
located relatively close to each other, transportation costs from firm to firm or from factory to company
can be minimized. Due to the concentration of firms in a small area, that area may experience a
considerable growth; meanwhile, local people can create many great local markets. Besides, a cluster of
firms in the same or similar industries facilitates the movement of workers between firms, resulting in more
job opportunities and lower search and human resource costs for the firms. Lastly, as many companies
are majored in the same field, they are enabled to create and develop innovating ideas continuously and
exchange techniques and skills to expand and develop together.
However, in the second stage (the dis-economies of scale), the agglomeration economy no longer
supports the economy. In contrast, agglomeration costs increase significantly and impact both firms and
economy. In the long run, a large population of firms in a relatively small area would result in the
shortage of labour and competitive development among firms. Also, the significant growth to a specific
area may have negative impact on the surrounding environment and thus the economy faces strong
environmental pressures. Besides, an overwhelming growth and exploitation of specific fields in a long
run may lead to lack of reserve areas for other developing fields such as culture or accommodation.
Moreover, since many businesses join the same field, blockage or bottlenecks to many goods is more
likely to incur. Lastly, agglomeration in the second stage also creates economic inequality among areas,
cities or urban areas and rural areas.
In short, agglomeration may support the economy in the first stage of economies and help the area to
grow significantly, however, in the long term, when costs of agglomeration exceed the benefits, it can
impact the economy negatively.
Please explain why the economic organizations (foreign companies/global firms) invest their economic
activities in one country; they cause many changes of technology, politics, culture and society,
demography, and environment in different scales of global, regional, and local? Give examples.
Invest in one specific country -> Local scale
Invest in many countries (Vietnam, ThaiLand, Laos, Singapore) -> Regional scale
Invest worldwide (CocaCola) -> Global
Organizational change is not optional to keep pace with business. All organizations, at one time or
another, face substantive modifications to some aspect of their business.
Foreign investment in the sector has brought technology transfer and new production models that
have improved added value and competitiveness of Vietnamese products. It has also helped to create
more jobs and improve infrastructure in rural areas, and enabled the sector to directly connect
to global value chains.
But foreign investors have mainly invested in some localities and sub-sectors mostly because
of difficulties in accessing land to develop a stable source of materials and limited logistics services
and infrastructure
The Government has policies to attract foreign investors, including corporate tax and land rental
incentives, but the policies should clearly state the incentive rates
Demographic:
More people living in big cities, mostly young labor -> structure change (in labor age vs out labor
age)
Income is one demographic variable that can affect businesses. A company's products usually
appeal to certain income groups. For example, premium products such as high-end woman's
clothing usually appeal to women with higher incomes. Conversely, people with comparatively
lower incomes are more sensitive to price and, therefore, may prefer purchasing discount products.
People with lower incomes have less disposable income. Value is a major determinant in the
products they purchase. Hence, a company may best reach lower-income people through discount
retailers and wholesalers and attract higher-income buyers in specialty retail shops.
People's buying preferences also vary by geographic region, which is another type of
demographic. Those who meet buyers' needs and requirements in certain geographic regions can
earn higher sales and profits. For example, people often prefer certain food and drink flavors in
certain markets. Companies that sell the flavors consumers desire in various areas are more likely
to profit. Those who do not offer these flavors may risk losing customers to other competitors.
Buyers' education levels also impact the types of purchases they make. Higher levels of education
are correlated with higher household incomes, and this higher income drives many educated
buyers' purchasing choices. One example is higher earning households' greater likelihood to buy
more nutritionally dense groceries. Another is educated parents' greater likelihood to invest in
their children's educations through tutoring, standardized test prep and financial planning for
college.