Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Natrr - Appendices
Natrr - Appendices
Do you have any idea to improve this instructional material, please write your idea or comment
below:
Appendix 5. Blueprint of Interview Guide for English Reading Teacher
Direction: Please tick (v) and rate yourself honestly based on what you actually see to given
statement using the following scales: 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Agree, 4: Strongly
Agree
Rating Comment
No. Evaluation Criteria
1 2 3 4
1 The developed instructional
material conforms the
authentic strategy i.e. timed
repeated reading
2 The developed instructional
material is appropriately
shaped on the basis of
automaticity theory i.e. break
down according to the word
count and complexity of
headword
3 The developed instructional
material meets the fluency
strategy needed by the
students
4 The developed instructional
material covers relevant
objectives related to national
exam
5 The developed instructional
material articulates the
developed instruction clearly
and understandably
6 The vocab hint in the
developed instructional
material meets the objectives
of developing reading fluency
7 The approach and strategy in
the use of vocab hint meet
the objective of avoiding
student’s discouragement
when encounter unfamiliar
vocabularies
8 The developed instructional
material promotes the learner
to be more autonomous in
reading
9 The developed instructional
material enables the learner
to train their reading skill
independently
10 The language used in the
developed instructional
material is simple and
relevant to the level of
student’s proficiency
11 The layout and icons or
pictures used help the
learners to be more aware of
the instruction and the
workspace they are within
12 The tutorial page for the main
instruction in reading teaches
the learners clearly and
sufficiently
13 The “My Reading Progress”
has actual effect to the
learners’ encouragement and
motivation growth
14 The design is appropriate
and not exceeding
unnecessary feature or page
15 The material leads the
learners to understand the
benefit of the strategy in
understandable approach
16 The design of the font for the
text is appropriate and
sufficiently convenient to
relevant learner’s reading
17 The self-assessment in the
developed instructional
material helps maintain
student’s learning motivation
Comment
(Validator’s Name)
Appendix 8. Heuristic Evaluation Sheet on the Teacher’s Developmental Testing
Direction: Please tick (v) and rate yourself honestly based on what you actually see to given
statement using the following scales: 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Agree, 4: Strongly
Agree
Rating Comment
No. Evaluation Criteria
1 2 3 4
1 The developed instructional
material meets the fluency
strategy needed by the
students
2 The developed instructional
material covers relevant
objectives related to national
exam
3 The developed instructional
material articulates the
developed instruction clearly
and understandably
4 The vocab hint in the
developed instructional
material meets the objectives
of developing reading fluency
5 The approach and strategy in
the use of vocab hint meet
the objective of avoiding
student’s discouragement
when encounter unfamiliar
vocabularies
6 The developed instructional
material promotes the learner
to be more autonomous in
reading
7 The developed instructional
material enables the learner
to train their reading skill
independently
8 The language used in the
developed instructional
material is simple and
relevant to the level of
student’s proficiency
9 The layout and icons or
pictures used help the
learners to be more aware of
the instruction and the
workspace they are within
10 The tutorial page for the main
instruction in reading teaches
the learners clearly and
sufficiently
11 The “My Reading Progress”
has actual effect to the
learners’ encouragement and
motivation growth
*) This heuristic evaluation is designed mainly to intuitively inspect the developed instructional
material -Non-Assisted Timed Repeated Reading- whether major likelihood of problem would
occur to the learners when they use it1.
Comment
(Validator’s Name)
1
Novick, David G. and Hollingsed, Tasha, "Usability inspection methods after 15 years of research and
practice" (2007). Departmental Papers (CS). Paper 16.
Appendix 9. Flowchart of Content for Non-Assisted Timed Repeated Reading Material
Appendix 10. Prototype of Non-Assisted Timed Repeated Reading Instructional Material