Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Md. Mizanur Rahman (2015) Modern Islamist Movements: History,
Religion, and Politics, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 42:4, 680-682, DOI:
10.1080/13530194.2014.905291
680
BOOK REVIEWS
(Chapter 2). They believed that Muslim scholars must come out of their existing
pedagogy to embrace the blessings of western modernity. In fact, they argued for
the synthesis and mutual tolerance between western and Islamic ideas.
The second group comprises Muhammad ibd Abd al-Wahab, Hasan al-Banna,
Syed Qutub and Sayyed Abu ala Mawdudi. The most influential is Mohammad
Wahab, who conceived the ‘oneness of God’ and emphasised going back to the
fundamentals of Islam. He opposed idolatry and believed that people could
express their concerns directly to God without intercession of any kind. Likewise,
Banna urged people to follow ‘the true faith and teaching of Islam’ (p. 49) and
encouraged the ‘Islamic state’.
Syed Qutub embraced Islam as the ultimate solution to the tremendous
challenges faced by the individuals, societies and political structures of the
Muslim world (pp. 54 –60). He applied the notion jahiliyya (ignorant) to people
who believed in secularism. Qutub’s interpretation of Islamic history, Islam’s
sacred texts and his conception of Islam’s role in the twentieth century would have
British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 2015.42:680-682.
681
BOOK REVIEWS
mizdipi88@gmail.com
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2014.905291
Ernst outlines his reasons for writing the book, as well as the aims and ideas that
will be discussed, in his introduction entitled ‘The Problem of Reading the Qur’an’
(pp. 1 – 19). The book is aimed at university students, particularly those working in
Islamic Studies and Comparative Religion, digesting the main current scholarship
on the Qur’an, as well as a wider (non-Muslim) audience. Ernst’s approach is what
makes this book so different to other introductions to the Qur’an since he takes a
literary approach, which means that it does not include any discussion of topics or
subject areas such as ‘theology’, ‘women’ and so on.
Chapter 1 (‘The History and Form of the Qur’an and Practices of Reading’,
pp. 20 – 75) is a long chapter covering various aspects of the Qur’anic text at great
speed, including: the history, codification and collection of the Qur’an, revisionist
theories, the Qur’an’s relation to the Bible, asbab al-nuzul, sira, the suras and
ayas, the bismillah, rhyming prose, the Qur’an and poetry, chronology, the
interpretation of whole suras, chiastic structures, and rhetorical devices, including
iltifāt, interpretation, ‘scientific exegeses’, abrogation, translations, inimitability,
and the internet.
Chapter 2 (‘Early Meccan Suras’, pp. 76– 104) examines the styles, themes and
contents of the early Meccan suras. After a brief sketch of the stylistic features of
the early Meccan period (pp. 76– 78), Ernst presents an analysis of the structures
of Q. 51 (al-Dhāriyyāt), Q. 80 (‘Abasa) and Q. 68 (al-Qalam), focusing on the
symmetry of the suras (pp. 78 – 83). Ernst’s arguments for symmetry are
interesting, but such analyses can be subjective, and there is the possibility of
reading symmetry into the Qur’an, but Ernst provides a suitable overview of the
method. The rest of the chapter provides a helpful reflection on the apocalyptic
682