Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name
Instructor
Course
Date
A Compare and Contrast Essay on the Nude Woman Venus of Willendorf and Praxiteles,
Aphrodite of Knidos
Introduction
Many pieces of literature were created during the Palaeolithic period. A vast majority of
prehistoric sculptures represented either animals or humans. Generally, the art of the time mostly
represented women as opposed to men. More often than not, the painters and sculptors presented
women as nude. The representation is opposed to scholars' general assumption that men and
women of the time had garments covering their body parts, especially the private ones. The
Venus of Willendorf and Aphrodite of Knidos are some of the most popular figurines of the Old
Stone Age. A close analysis of the two sculptures depicts both similarities and differences.
Both sculptures were presented as nude. The painters and sculptors of time portrayed
women without clothes. The representation made both statutes gather considerable fame. The
woman's sculptures clear show a natural depiction of the breast. However, there is a notable
difference in the physical appearance of the two sculptures. While the nudity of the Venus of
Willendorf is fully exposed, the Aphrodite of Knidos portrayed with her right hand covering her
Limestone was the material used to make the two sculptures. Studies of Greek history
during the Old Stone Age period show that limestone and in abundance; thus, the makes of the
sculptors of the time had fewer difficulties making their sculptures and paints (Havelock n.p.).
However, there is a noticeable difference between the techniques used in making the Venus of
Willendorf and Aphrodite of Knidos. While the Venus of Willendorf was made using oolitic
limestone held together by lime mud, Praxiteles used fine marble to make the Aphrodite of
Knidos.
The two sculptures had various common uses and purposes. Generally, they were used to
represent a goddess that had not been seen. Moreover, the sculptures of both sculptures were
aimed at providing the views with the insight of respective societies of great aspiration. They
were also representations of the people's thoughts about femineity, sensuality, and ultimately
their view on beauty. Arguably, to a greater extent, the two sculptures have a high likelihood of
being made to represent fertility in women during the time (Kohen 50). However, while
Aphrodite of Knidos may have been intended to be used to portray a woman's beauty, there is a
high likelihood that the Venus of Willendorf was purposed to portray a woman as just fertility
objects that needed no beauty in them. The harsh portrayal of the Venus of Willendorf has been
interpreted by many artists of this decade as a sign that a woman of the old stone was more of a
sexual object.
To the viewers, with cultural and historical contexts, the Venus of Willendorf and
Aphrodite of Knidos had variation similarities while at the same time depicting diverse
differences. Both sculptures passed that women were important people in the societies of the
time. It is the reason few male sculptures and paintings were made compared to those of men
during the time. Meaning is also created that during the time, what was more important was
Surname 3
reproduction (Havelock n.p.). The breasts and the pelvic parts seem to be cherished in both
paintings. However, the beautiful face in Aphrodite of Knidos shows that the facial look of a
woman was cherished while the Venus of Willendorf's ugly face reverses the meaning.
In conclusion, the Palaeolithic period was dominated by major works of sculptors and
painters. Most of the painters were more focused on portraying women, who they mostly showed
as naked. A closer assessment of the Venus of Willendorf and Aphrodite of Knidos show both
similarities and differences. The differences can be noticed in their physical appearance, uses,
intended meaning to the viewers, and the materials and techniques used to make the sculptures.
Surname 4
Works Cited
Havelock, Christine Mitchell. The Aphrodite of Knidos and her successors: a historical review of
Kohen, Max. "The Venus of Willendorf." American Imago 3.4 (1946): 49-60.