Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9 DQ Design Qualification
18 IQ Installation Qualification
20 OQ Operation Qualification
21 PQ Performance Qualification
PWM
Purified Water DOCUMENTATION
Definition
To tell the supplier what the customer requires, what specification that needs to be adhered to, how
much water is needed, what the water system is to do etc.
To describe the components of the equipment, how it will be connected together and how the system
functions. This is the supplier’s response to the clients URS.
Drawing of the system, that shows all valves, instruments, and equipment. This is the principal design
document created by the supplier.
Lists all the valves and the valve specification.
Lists all the instruments and the instrument specification.
Lists all the equipment and the equipment specification.
Lists all the utilities and the utility specification, such as water, drains, electricity, steam, air, chemicals
etc. Created by the supplier.
Equipment layout drawing, showing information as to the connections to the equipment and their
locations
The design qualification or enhanced design review is carried out to ensure that the designed
equipment, using the design documents, meets the user requirements.
To describe the control panel software function and design
To test the functions described in the SDS
To describe the control panel hardware function and design
To test the functions described in the HDS
To categorise configurable instruments. This gives information on how to record configuration
and validation process that should be used
To test the equipment at the supplier’s factory without running water through the system. The
system does not have to be fully assembled for this. Checks include ensuring the correct
equipment is available
To test the equipment operationally in the factory with water. This tests all the equipment
functionality.
This document tests the equipment on site. The SAT can be a combination of the IQ,
Commissioning and OQ documents, depending on each client’s understanding.
To document that the equipment is correctly installed on site as intended. The supplier
normally creates this document.
To document that the system is correctly set up and that the system is made ready for full
functional operation. This document records all the start up data. The supplier creates this
document.
To document that the system functions and operates as described in the FDS. The supplier
normally creates this document.
To record that the system produces good quality water and that the quality is consistent when
the system is on line.
This documents the client’s approach to validation on site and in particular to the current site project.
It identifies the scope of the validation exercise allowing the validation on site to be suitably managed.
This document defines how the supplier will fulfil the user and supplier’s quality requirements on the
project. It also provides details of the project management on the contract. This may include a Gantt
chart for the project management of the contract. This is the supplier’s response to the VMP.
This document gives details of how and when the equipment that is to be supplied is inspected at the
supplier’s works. This details the type of inspection and who will inspect, also giving options as to
when it is suggested that the client inspects.
It is First most important document which describes overall quality of Purified water for
Pharmaceutical purpose as per production need. It comprises of complete data set of raw water
quality, PW quality, Complete GAD, Instrument list, Calibration record, Sampling plan & points with
Analytical Parameter, ALL SOPs List, Alert & Action Limit, critical point, FMEA, Equipment & Instrument
Detail, Documentation Control, and Validation Data along with Prototype of all Formats/Forms, special
emphasis of cleaning & sanitisation, personal training etc.
Responsibility
Document created by the client or his
engineer.
Document created by the SUPPLIER
PID
GAD
O&M
DQ
SDS
STS
HDS
HTS
GAMP Categorisation
MFAT
FAT
SAT
IQ
OQ
PQ
VMP
QPP
QIP
Audit Checklist for Purified Wa
Sr. No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
3
4
8
9
10
11
12
Audit Checklist for Purified Water Sys
Compliance to be checked
Is there a validated system for water treatment drawn from own or other sources?
Are the sources of raw water, treatment processes, sampling plans specified?
Are the distribution points and storage for raw and purified water system specified?
Does the IQ protocol include the review of facility and specifications of equipment like its
design, welding roughness on pipelines, dead points or sections in the pipelines?
Does the protocol include SOP for operations, maintaining, cleaning and calibration of
gadgets?
Does the report for IQ protocol include Summary and description of the assay performed with
data tables, results conclusions, reference of the protocol and revision and approval signatures?
Does the OQ protocol include system production capacity (L/min), water rate, flow type, valve
operation with alarm and control operations?
Are the SOPs prepared and maintained for phase 1 with sampling records for 2-4 weeks?
Are the sampling records maintained for pre-treatment point in phase 2 after phase 1?
Is the holding tank for PW system fitted with sterilizing grade vent filter which is integrity
tested?
Is the PW held at more than or equal to 80oc when stored on continuous circulation?
Feed Water
❏ What is the source for the plant water (city or private supply – well ground water, or surface
water)?
❏ Is source water entering the facility, whether from a municipal supply or a private well, tested for
microbiological contamination, and what are the specifications?
❏ Is coliform bacteria testing performed according to 40 CFR 141.14; 141.21?
❏ Is source water entering the facility tested for chemical contamination, or are municipality reports
provided?
❏ Does the water meet the EPA specifications for potable water?
❏ What is the frequency of testing?
❏ If the results are provided by the water supplier, are they reviewed and approved by a suitably
qualified user?
❏ What actions are taken if specifications are not met?
❏ If the water is being tested by the user, is a written SOP describing sampling and testing available?
❏ Is there a continuous temperature recorder and controller for each storage tank?
❏ How often is the tank vent filter integrity tested and checked for condensate blockage?
❏ Is the vent filter a hydrophobic 0.2 um?
❏ What type of tubing is used? (316L Stainless Steel piping is common in WFI and purified water.
Some plastics (e.g., PVDF can also be used but must be checked for compatibility.)
❏ Is there acceptable documentation/video of the stainless steel welding and unique identification of
each welded joint?
❏ Is there a copy of the welder’s certification and the welding procedure on file?
❏ Are there any dead legs or potential areas where air can become trapped orwhere water can
stagnate?
❏ Does the system contain screw-threaded fittings instead of the required sanitary fittings?
❏ Does the system contain ball valves or other fittings that can possibly retain water from the main
system and cause potential microbial problems?
❏ Does the heat exchanger, with the exception of a double concentric tube or double sheet tube,
have a greater pressure on the water system side than the coolant?
❏ Do any of the use points in the system have 0.2 um filters (FDA prefers no in-line filters)? Actual
water microbial counts may be “masked” by filters.
❏ Review water sampling results for at least six months preceding and two months following the
manufacture of lots selected during the audit. If specifications were not met, review investigation and
corrective actions. Are the results, investigations, and corrective actions acceptable?
❏ Are the sampling locations and frequency of testing suitable for the system?
❏ Who performs sampling for the chemical and microbial samples?
❏ Check that the sampling personnel are adequately trained and the training is appropriately
documented.
❏ Are chemical and microbial results being trended? Are the results acceptable?
❏ Have changes been made to the water system since the last audit? Since the system was initially
qualified? If major system changes have occurred, have the changes been evaluated for the need for
re-qualification?
❏ Are any pumps only used periodically? These can be a source of bacterial contamination from
stagnant water.
❏ Are thorough and complete records of the system cleaning, passivation, and maintenance
maintained? The records should include who performed and supervised the cleaning, date, cleaning
agents used, pH, conductivity, and microbial results.
Installation Qualification
• Approved protocol?
• Meet acceptance criteria?
Operational Qualification
• Approved protocol?
• Meet acceptance criteria including daily sampling after each step of the purification process at each
point of use for two to four weeks?
• Are the operational SOPs approved?
• Repeat testing as above.
Performance Qualification
• Approved protocol?
• Meet acceptance criteria including: WFI sampling one point of use each day with all points tested
weekly. Complete a year of testing and meet specifications?
SOPs:
Operation and maintenance of the system
Sampling and handling
Change control
• Review content and completeness
• Do the SOPs reflect actual procedures observed or being documented?
Batch release SOP (if applicable)
• What documentation is required to release the batch?
• Who physically releases the batch and how?
• Are batches ever used before receiving the quality release documentation?
Shut Down and power failure
Calibration records
• Select equipment and examine the records. Are outside vendor records reviewed and approved by
suitably qualified personnel of the company owning the equipment?
• What actions are taken when a result is out of calibration?
Water For Injection (WFI)
❏ Is the water prepared by distillation or reverse osmosis?
❏ Is clean steam (free of additives) used to generate the WFI?
❏ How is the feed water treated prior to the distillation? Is the source water chlorinated, carbon
treated, deionized?
❏ Is endotoxin testing performed on the tank, pre/post-final treatment step and points of use?
❏ What is the level of endotoxins from the feed water, and is it appropriate to feed the still or
reverse osmosis? (Stills normally only affect a 2.5 to 3 log reduction in endotoxin content.)
❏ Is the system in a state of control and producing water of a quality suitable for its intended use?
fied Water System
Complies as per established Reference Document
Systems? Yes/No
SOPs of Purified Water System
Name of SOP
PERIODIC SANITISATION OF PURIFIED WATER SYSTEM
SOPIWTD/01
SOPIWTD/02
SOPIWTD/03
SOPIWTD/04
SOPIWTD/OS
SOPIWTD/06
SOPIWTD/07
SOPIWTD/08
SOPIWTD/09
SOPIWTD/10
SOPIWTD/11
SOPIWTD/12
SOPIWTD/13
SOPIWTD/14
SOPIWTD/15
SOPIWTD/16
SOPIWTD/17
SOPIWTD/18
SOPIWTD/20
SOPIWTD/19
SOPIWTD121
SOPIWTDI22
SOPIWTD124
SOPIWTD/23
SOPIWTD/25
SOPIWTD126
SOPIWTD127
SOPIWTD128
SOPIWTD/29
SOPIWTD/30
SOP/BTD/01
SOP/BTD/02
SOP/BTD/03
SOP/BTD/04
SOP/ATDI01 Ambient Air
SOP/ATD/02 Ambient Air
SOP/ATD/03 Ambient Air
SO PlAT D/04 Ambient Air
SOP/ATD/05 Ambient Air ETP sludge
SOP/ATD/06 Ambient Air ETP sludge
SOP/HWTD/01 ETP sludge
SOP/HWTD/02 ETP sludge
SOP/HWTD/03 ETP sludge
SOP/HWTD/04 ETP sludge
SOP/HWTD/05 ETP sludge
SOP/HWTD/06 ETP sludge
SOP/HWTD/07
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
IS-3025 PART 31 (1988)
IS-3025 PART 24 (1986)
Name of SOP
PERIODIC SANITISATION OF PURIFIED WATER SYSTEM
Dept. Form/Format
ENG/ Maintenance Record of Sanitization
RO Plant Chemical Injection
Source Well
Flow Rate from Raw water tank to Filtered W
Hypochlorite:
1.Hypochlorite is powerful oxidising agent (Na
2. It helps to kill organism present in water
Micron Media 3. It helps to kill bacteria, This is nothing but pr
Filter Note: Not injected due to water quality is goo
Raw Water
Tank
Coagulant:
1.It combines all small particles together to form
Agglomeration ( Here not injected because Turb
Hypo Chlorite MB-549 2.Our Raw water quality is good, so we are not
Coagulant WT-14 3. The Turbidity is 3NTU. Upto 15 NTU turbid
Note: Not injected due to water quality is goo
MMF
RO Inlet
Antiscalant:
1. Antiscalant chemical name is Phosphonate or
RO Tank Outlet 2. Ca2++ Mg2+, Ba2++ Sr2+ this all are scaling (Ag
Antiscalant phosphonate reacts with Ca2++ Mg2
Magnesium Phosphonate which is soluble in wa
4. So the water will flow from RO Filter freely
not blocked).
RO Tank Permeate 5. SMBS (Sodium Meta Bisulphite).
Water
Softener Inlet
Flow Rate from Softener to Boiler Feed Wat
1. Softener is removing hardness from the wate
2. Whatever Ca 2+ & Mg 2+ salts are there it w
3. Caustic is to raise the pH of the Water to 10.4
Softener Outlet 4. The pH should not increase above 10.4, to av
Sodium Hydroxide
(caustic)
OSTG Outlet
Injection
Meta Bisulphite).
oftener to Boiler Feed Water Tank is 200GPM
ving hardness from the water
& Mg 2+ salts are there it will be removed
e the pH of the Water to 10.4 in BFW Tank.
ot increase above 10.4, to avoid any scaling issue.
is greater than 7.
Inspection of water system
The following list identifies items and a logical sequence for a WPU system inspection or audit:
— The setting of monitoring alert and action levels;
— monitoring results and evaluation of trends;
— Inspection of the last annual system review;
— Review of any changes made to the system since the last audit and check that the change control
has been implemented;
— Review of deviations recorded and their investigation;
— General inspection of system for status and condition;
— Review of maintenance, failure and repair logs; and
— Checking calibration and standardization of critical instruments.
System reviews
WPU (PW, HPW and WFI) systems should be reviewed at appropriate regular intervals. The review
team should comprise representatives from engineering, QA, operations and maintenance. The review
should consider matters such as: