Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Social stratification is the division of large numbers of people into layers according to their
relative power, property, and prestige. It applies to both nations and to people within a nation,
society, or other group. Although they may differ as to which system of social stratification they
employ, all societies stratify their members. In addition, gender is a basis for stratifying people in
every society of the world. The four major systems of social stratification are slavery, caste, estate, and
class.
Slavery is defined as a form of social stratification in which some people own other people. It has
been common in world history with references to slavery being made in the Old Testament, and
Roman and Greek history. Slavery was usually based on debt, as a punishment for a crime, or a matter
of war. Racism was not associated with slavery until southern plantation owners developed a new
ideology to justify their enslavement of Africans in the seventeenth century.
Today, slavery is known to be practiced in the Sudan, Mauritania, Niger and the Ivory Coast.
The enslavement of children for work in sex is a problem in Africa, Asia, and South America. The
caste system is a form of social stratification based on ascribed status that follows an individual
throughout his or her life. India provides the best example of a caste system.
Based on religion, India’s caste system has existed for almost three thousand years. Although the
Indian government formally abolished the caste system in 1949, it still remains a respected aspect
of Indian tradition and is strictly followed by a significant portion of the population.
In the class system, social stratification is based on the possession of money or material
possessions. A major characteristic of the class system is that it allows social mobility, or
movement up and down the class ladder. Another method by which all societies stratify their
members is by gender. Cutting across all systems of stratification, these gender divisions universally
favor males over females.
Karl Marx and Max Weber disagreed on the meaning of social class in industrialized societies.
According to Marx, people’s relationship to the means of production is the sole factor in
determining their social class. They either belong to the bourgeoisie (those who owned the means of
production) or the proletariat (those who work for the owners).
According to Weber, Marx’s typology is too limiting because social class, as well as people’s
social class standing, consists of three interrelated components: property, prestige, and power.
Although all sociologists agree that social stratification is universal, they disagree as to why it is
universal.
The functionalist view of social stratification, developed by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore,
concludes that stratification is inevitable because society must make certain that its positions are
filled; ensure that the most qualified people fill the most important positions; and finally, to motivate
the most qualified individuals to fill the most important positions, society must offer them the greatest
reward to fill the most important positions.
Melvin Tumin identified three problems with the functionalist view:
First, how does one determine which positions are more important than others?
Second, to what degree are societies really meritocracies (promoting people on the basis of
their achievements)?
Third, if social stratification is so functional, why is it dysfunctional for so many?
Conflict theorists contend that conflict, not function, is the basis of social stratification. Italian
sociologist Gaetano Mosca argued that in every society groups compete for power. The groups
that gain power use that power to manipulate, control, and exploit the groups “beneath them.”
Members of the ruling elite in every society develop ideologies that justify their society’s social
stratification system. By dominating their society’s major social institutions and, thereby, controlling
information and ideas, members of the ruling elite are able to socialize other group members into
accepting their “proper places” in the social order.
Social stratification is one of the outcomes of the continuous occurring of social processes. Every
society is segmented in to different hierarchies. In virtually all societies, some people are regarded
as more important than others (more worthy of respect than others), either within the society as a
whole or in a certain situations.
Social stratification is the segmentation of society into different hierarchical arrangement or strata. It
refers tothe differences and inequalities in the socioeconomic life of people in a given society. It
represents the ranking of individuals or social positions and statuses in the social structure. The term
is borrowed from geology where it is used to explain the hierarchical arrangement of rocks and
mineral in the earth’s surface.
Sociologists use the term social stratification to describe the system of social standing. Social
stratification refers to a society’s categorization of its people into rankings of socioeconomic tiers
based on factors like wealth, income, race, education, and power.
However, sociologists recognize that social stratification is a society-wide system that makes
inequalities apparent. While there are always inequalities between individuals, sociologists are
interested in larger social patterns. Stratification is not about individual inequalities, but about
systematic inequalities based on group membership, classes, and the like. No individual, rich or poor,
can be blamed for social inequalities. The structure of society affects a person’s social standing.
Although individuals may support or fight inequalities, social stratification is created and supported by
society as a whole.
To conclude Social differentiation is a universal characteristic because the division of some
functions is necessary in a society. Some of these are biological but most of these are socially
fixed. in every society, individuals are different in terms of profession, material possession,
honor, prestige, authority, beliefs and other characteristics. This difference of individuals provides
a mechanism of dividing into different classes which is called stratification. According to sociologists,
this study is very important because it seriously affects the institutional relations and social interaction.
Stratification is the product of social inequality and is a relatively permanent position of the society, is
transmitted from one race to another, limits the chances of progress. Its ways are different in different
societies and are changeable with social changes and sometimes this stratification becomes a cause of
revolution.
The study of social stratification is particularly important for sociologists. Some of the reasons
for this may include (Giddens, 1995):
To explore the bases for the assignment of individuals into various hierarchies of the social
structure. What are the bases for stratifying individuals into a specific stratum?
Ogburn and Nimkoff: ‘The process by which individuals and groups are ranked in more or
less enduring hierarchy of status is known as stratification”
Lundberg: “A stratified society is one marked by inequality, by differences among people that
are evaluated by them as being “lower” and “higher”.
CH. Persell :“Social stratification is the fairly permanent making of position in a society in
terms of unequal power, prestige or privileges. “He further says that "The unequal
opportunities or rewards are for people in different social positions."
RT. Schaefer :Stratification, a structure ranking of entire groups of people that perpetuate
unequal economic rewards and powers in a society.
Ian Robertson: Social stratification is the structured inequality of entire categories of people,
who have different access to social rewards as a result of their status in social hierarchy."
Raymond W. Murray: Social stratification is horizontal division of society into “higher” and
“lower” social units.”
Melvin M Tumin: “Social stratification refers to “arrangement of any social group or society
into hierarchy of positions that are unequal with regard to power, property, social evaluation
and psychic gratification”.
According to Davis, social stratification has come into being due to the functional necessity of
the social system.
According to Karl Mrax, social factors are responsible for the emergence of different social
strata, i.e. social stratification.
Gumplowioz and other contended that the origin of social stratification is to be found in the
conquest of one group by another.
3) Origin of Stratification
The people in different societies have different ranks and high and low. The distribution of people of a
society in groups on the basis of their status is called social stratification. This distribution may be on
the basis of occupation, caste, education, source of income, prestige and political power. Social
stratification differs from society to society. It is classification of people within a society.
3. Prestige: Respect of an individual in society is related to the level of prestige that s/he enjoys.
Prestige includes nobility, harmlessness, participating in social welfare projects, helping the
needy etc.
4. Power: Power gains one respect. In Pakistan, following characteristics could be important:
Outspoken in public, educated, well off in financial resources, interest in solving people’s
problems, active, religious oriented etc.
5. Cast: Caste system in Pakistan is an important element in social stratification. Some castes are
considered high, some are low.
6. Education: Education like all other societies in the world, defines social status in Pakistan
too. Educated people are better rated and respected socially owing to their occupations,
professions and status while illiterate people always belong to lower class.
On the basis of the analysis of the different definitions given by eminent scholars, social stratification
may have the following characteristics.
Social stratification is universal: There is no society on this world which is free from
stratification. Modern stratification differs from stratification of primitive societies. It is a
worldwide phenomenon. According to Sorokin “all permanently organized groups are
stratified.”
Stratification is social: It is true that biological qualities do not determine one’s superiority
and inferiority. Factors like age, sex, intelligence as well as strength often contribute as the
basis on which statues are distinguished. But one’s education, property, power, experience,
character, personality etc. are found to be more important than biological qualities. Hence,
stratification is social by nature.
It is ancient: Stratification system is very old. It was present even in the small wondering
bonds. In almost all the ancient civilizations, the differences between the rich and poor, humble
and powerful existed.
It is in diverse forms: The forms of stratification are not uniform in all the societies. In the
modern world class, caste and estate are the general forms of stratification.
It persists across generations, although it often allows for some degree of social mobility;
Division of work
Sense of cooperation and competition
Diversity and Modernization
Socio cultural changes
Encourages hard work
Ensures circulations of elites / wealth or resources
Serves as an economic function (ensure rational use of available talent
Prevents waste of resources
Stabilizes and reinforces the attitude and skills
Helps to pursue different professions and jobs
Social control
Up gradation
Social mobility
promote efficiency
to play a bridge role
7) Global stratification: compares the wealth, economic stability, status, and power of countries
across the world, and also highlights worldwide patterns of social inequality within nations.
In the early years of civilization, hunter-gatherer and agrarian societies lived off the earth and rarely
interacted with other societies (except during times of war).
As civilizations began to grow and emerging cities developed political and economic systems, trade
increased, as did military conquest.
Explorers went out in search of new land and resources as well as to trade goods, ideas, and
customs. They eventually took land, people, and resources from all over the world, building empires
and establishing networks of colonies with imperialist policies, foundational religious ideologies, and
incredible economic and military power.
global inequality is concentrating resources in certain nations and is significantly affecting the
opportunities of individuals in poorer and less powerful countries.
In fact, a recent Oxfam report that suggested the richest eighty-five people in the world are worth
more than the poorest 3.5 billion combined.
The functionalist perspective is a macroanalytical view that focuses on the way that all aspects of
society are integral to the continued health and viability of the whole. A functionalist might focus
on why we have global inequality and what social purposes it serves. This view might assert, for
example, that we have global inequality because some nations are better than others at adapting to
new technologies and profiting from a globalized economy, and that when core nation companies
locate in peripheral nations, they expand the local economy and benefit the workers.
Conflict theory focuses on the creation and reproduction of inequality. A conflict theorist would
likely address the systematic inequality created when core nations exploit the resources of
peripheral nations. For example, how many U.S. companies take advantage of overseas workers
who lack the constitutional protection and guaranteed minimum wages that exist in the United
States? Doing so allows them to maximize profits, but at what cost?
The symbolic interaction perspective studies the day-to-day impact of global inequality, the
meanings individuals attach to global stratification, and the subjective nature of poverty. Someone
applying this view to global inequality would probably focus on understanding the difference
between what someone living in a core nation defines as poverty (relative poverty, defined as
being unable to live the lifestyle of the average person in your country) and what someone living
in a peripheral nation defines as poverty (absolute poverty, defined as being barely able, or unable,
to afford basic necessities, such as food).
Life
Country Infant Mortality Rate
Expectancy
The United
6.17 deaths per 1000 live births 79 years
States
50 years
Afghanistan 117.3 deaths per 1000 live births
Dependency According to dependency theory, poor nations have remained poor because they
theory have been exploited by rich nations and by multinational corporations.
In the global hierarchy, industrializing countries are at the middle of the global economic
order as measured by indicators such as income per capita, basic infrastructure, literacy
rates, or HDI.
HDI is the measure of development that is used by the United Nations. HDI considers a
country’s per capita gross domestic product (GDP), per capita income, rate of literacy, life
expectancy, basic infrastructure, and other factors to determine how developed a country is.
Because so-called “industrializing countries” do not always have economic growth, some
scholars prefer the descriptive term “less- developed country ” to describe nations with
smaller economies than developed countries.
Social Class
1) Introduction
Ogburn and Nimkof: A social class is the aggregate of persons having essentially the same
social status in a given society.
A social class large numbers of people who have similar amounts of income and education and who
work at jobs that are roughly comparable in prestige.
A social class is a large group of people who occupy a similar position in an economic system. There
are several different dimensions of social class, including income, wealth, power, occupation,
education, race, and ethnicity. While defining social classes in the U.S. is difficult, most sociologists
recognize four main categories: upper class, middle class, working class, and the lower class.
A social class is a group of people of similar status, commonly sharing comparable levels of power
and wealth. In sociology, social classes describe one form of social stratification. When a society is
organized by social classes, as opposed to by castes, it is theoretically possible for people to attain a
higher status than the status with which they started. This movement is possible because social classes
are not based on birth but on factors such as education and professional success. For example,
someone born into a low-income family can achieve a higher status through education, talent, and
work, or perhaps through social connections. A society organized according to social classes, then,
allows for some social mobility.
A statushierarchy in which individuals and groups are classified on the basis of esteem and
prestige acquired mainly through economic success and accumulation of wealth. Social class
may also refer to any particular level in such a hierarchy.
Four common social classes informally recognized in many societies are: Upper class, (2)
Middle class, (3) Working class, and the (4) Lower class.
Sociologists have given three-fold classification of classes which consists of - upper class, middle
class and lower class.
Sorokin has spoken of three major types of class stratification -they are economic, political
and occupational classes.
Lloyd Warner shows how class distinctions contribute to social stability.
Veblen analyzed the consumption pattern of the rich class by the concept of conspicuous
consumption.
Warner has classified classes into six types- upper-upper class, upper-middle class, upper-
lower class, lower-upper class, the lower middle class and lower class.
Social class is conceptualized in various ways as a function of the theoretical or political orientation of
the writer; much like “personality” is defined differently by psychologists who hold different
theoretical perspectives. How many social classes are there in our society? Disagreement within the
field on both the number and the composition are of these classes.
a) Upper Class – Elite
Represent scientific and technical knowledge – engineers, accountants, lawyers, architects, university
faculty, managers and directors of public and private organizations. Have both high incomes and high
social prestige, Well-educated. Difficult to define a “middle class” (i.e. upper middle, middle middle
and lower middle) probably the largest class group in the United States – because being middle class is
more than just income, about lifestyles and resources, etc.
D. Caste
Cast is a complex phenomenon which is difficult to define writers and thinkers are not unanimous in
their opinion regarding caste. However, caste has been defined as under:
Sir Herbert Risely: Caste is a “collection of families, bearing a common name, claiming a
common descent, from a mythical ancestor, human and divine, professing to follow the same
hereditary calling and regarded by those who are competent to give an opinion as forming a
single homogeneous community.”
MacIver and Page: “When status is wholly predetermined so that men are born to their lot
without any hope of changing it, then the class takes the extreme form of caste.”
C.H. Cooley: “When a class is somewhat strictly hereditary, we may call it a caste.”
A. W. Green: “Caste is a system of stratification in which mobility up and down the status
ladder, at least ideally may not occur”.
Ketkar: “A caste is a group having two characteristics; (i) membership is confined to those
who are born of members and includes all persons so born, (ii) the members are forbidden by
an inexorable social law to marry outside the group.”
• Main differences between class and caste systems
Cast Class
Particular Universal
Ascribed status (by birth) Achieved status
Closed system Open system
Divine origin (religious oriented or Secular (nothing to do with tradition or
traditional) religion)
Purity and impurity (untouchable in Feeling of disparity
Hindus)
Regulation of relations Limits relations
Greater social distance Less social distance
Conservative Progressive
Endogamy group Exogamy
Complexity (a number of castes are in Simplicity
Pakistan)
Caste consciousness (more dangerous) Class consciousness (less dangerous)
Every society has social mobility, but the rate of social mobility is different in all the societies
depending upon their cultural conditions. Social mobility refers to the movement within the social
structure, from one social position to another. It means a change in social status. All societies provide
some opportunity for social mobility. But the societies differ from each other to extent in which
individuals can move from one class or status level to another.
It is said that the greater the amount of social mobility, the more open the class structure. The concept
of social mobility has fundamental importance in ascertaining the relative “openness” of a social
structure. The nature, forms, direction and magnitude of social mobility depends on the nature and
types of social stratification. Sociologists study social mobility in order to find out the relative
‘openness’ of a social structure.
Any group that improves its standard will also improve its social status. But the rate of social mobility
is not uniform in all the countries. It differs from society to society from time to time. In India the rate
of mobility is naturally low because of agriculture being the predominant occupation and the
continuity of caste system as compared to the other countries of the world.
1) Definition
According to Fairchild " social mobility is a movement from one condition to another"
Stephensen says that "social mobility is moving of an individual or group of people from one
status to another"
Horton and Hunt " social mobility may be defined as the act of moving from one social class to
another"
From the above definitions, social mobility can be defined:
is a movement of an individual or group of people from one condition to another
is adoption of change which may be social progress or
is rejection of previous social conditions and adjusting into the new changes of life
Downward Mobility: Some people in the society move at the bottom of social class ladder.
When the financial condition, health or business of individual deteriorates they may move from
top to bottom on social class ladder. There can be a lot more reasons for moving downward
from top on social hierarchy. One may experience downward mobility because of loss in
business, or quitting education or job, or may be because of breakup or divorce.
e) Intergenerational Mobility
An individual who belong to upper class his parents may be middle class and his grandparents may be
lower-class. The difference between the social classes of generation and generational change in social
status and class is known as intergeneration mobility.
f) Intra generational Mobility
The difference between the social classes of same generation members is known as intra generational
mobility. An individual belonging to upper class does not mean that, his siblings belong to same class
or possess same social status.
g) Horizontal Mobility
When there is a change in the status of residence of a person but without any significant change is
called horizontal Mobility
1) Understanding Socialization
Culture and Socialization; formal and non-formal socialization, transmission of culture, cultural
relativism. Sub-cultures.
Young and Mack: the process of introducing the individual into social word is called
socialization. In common sense, socialization is a lifelong training for the adjustment of one’s
life in society. The process of socialization is process of learning norms, roles, techniques and
other social patterns.
Peter says that socialization is process of transmission of culture, the process whereby man
learns the rules and practices of social groups
Horton and Hunt said that socialization is the process whereby one internalizes the norms of
groups among whom one lives so that a unique “self” emerges.
h) Types of Socialization
Primary socialization
Anticipatory socialization
Developmental socialization
Re-socialization
The family,
Neighbors,
Religion,
Economics,
Politics,
Education,
Peers or age mates,
Social institutions,
Literature and mass media of communication,
The community,
Folkways,
Mores,
Customs,
Clubs,
Associations,
Networks,
Job environment,
Reconciliation and rehabilitation centers
j) Function of Socialization
Non-formal learning – Organized (even if it is only loosely organized), may or may not be
guided by a formal curriculum. This type of education may be led by a qualified teacher or by a
leader with more experience. Though it doesn’t result in a formal degree or diploma, non-
formal education is highly enriching and builds an individual’s skills and capacities.
Continuing education courses are an example for adults. Girl guides and boy scouts are an
example for children. It is often considered more engaging, as the learner’s interest is a driving
force behind their participation.
Informal learning – No formal curriculum and no credits earned. The teacher is simply
someone with more experience such as a parent, grandparent or a friend. A father teaching his
child to play catch or a babysitter teaching a child their ABC’s is an example of informal
education.
These may be overly simplified explanations. There are times when the lines between each type of
learning get blurred, as well. It isn’t always as cut and dries as it seems, but these definitions give you
a general idea of each type of learning.
k) Anal Stage
Towards the end of biting period of oral stage, the child is able to walk, talk, and eat on his
own.
He can retain or release something that he has.
This is true of bowel and bladder function also.
He can either retain or release his bowel and bladder contents. Now, the child no more depends
upon the mouth zone for pleasure.
He now derives pleasure from bowel and bladder (anal zone) functioning, which entails
anxiety because of toilet training by parents.
Child is taught where to pass urine and where to go for defecation etc. In this training of
bladder and bowel control, child may develop autonomy, or shame and doubt.
The task of anal is to develop autonomy. If the parents are supportive without being
overprotective and if the child is allowed to function with some independence, he gains some
confidence in his autonomy probably by the age of three and prefers love over hate,
cooperation over willfulness, and self-expression over suppression.
Autonomy, thus, overbalances shame and doubt and leads to development of confidence that
he can control his functions, and also, to some extent, the people around him.
Contrary to this, the child may feel angry, foolish and ashamed if parents criticize his faces and
over-control his bowel and bladder functioning during the training for toilet.
By accepting the client as he is, the caseworker can reduce his feeling of self-hatred and
perfectionism.
Over-demanding adults or those who express temper tantrums when asked to assume
responsibility may need to be helped to control their impulsive acts.
They should be rewarded when they exhibit controls, and one should reinforce their autonomy
and independence when exercised.
Autonomy and independence are totally different from impulsive acts as these involve
rationality and not emotionality.
m) Latency Stage
This stage covers the period from 6 to 11 years, i.e., school age.
The child can reason out rationally and can use the tools that adults use.
The sexual interests and curiosity (common in genital period) get suppressed till puberty.
If encouraged and given opportunity, he gains confidence in his ability to perform and use
adult materials.
This leads to feeling of industry in him.
When unable to use adult materials, he develops inferiority feelings. Such children may
develop problems with peers.
They need to be encouraged to interact with classmates and be less dependent upon others. If
the child has mastered the task of genital period (initiative in place of guilt) he will be able to
master the tasks of latency (industry in place of inferiority) also provided he is encouraged to
undertake and helped to execute the responsibilities entrusted to him.
n) Adolescence Stage
This period, regarded as a period of turmoil, usually starts at 12-13 years and can extend up to
18-19 years.
The adolescents, during this transitional process from childhood to maturity, behave something
like an adult and sometimes like a child.
Parents too show their ambivalence to accept them in their new role of an adult in-the-making.
This stage exhibits all the psycho-social characteristics of earlier period and only towards the
end, all these get resolved into a new set of role (identity) for the adolescent.
In order to develop a personal identity, he becomes fan of some hero, starts following certain
ideologies, and tries his luck with opposite sex.
In decision and confusion are not uncommon in this stage.
Identification with a wrong person shall create problems for him.
The task of this age is to develop identity, i.e., values, strengths, skills, various roles,
limitations, etc., failing which his identity gets diffused and he fails to know how to behave in
different situations.
He needs to be helped to deal with the physiological, emotional pressures along-with pressures
from parents, peers, etc. Group work is more helpful with problem-adolescents.
When showing confusion about their role, they can be helped to emulate the group leader or
identify with group worker.
Parents can handle adolescents properly if educated adequately about the needs and problems
of this age.
Similarly, tasks for young adulthood, adulthood and old age are intimacy vs. isolation,
generatively vs. stagnation, and ego-integrity vs. despair.
These psycho-analytical concepts are helpful in understanding behavior of the individuals.
Apart from these, there are some other tasks described by some other scholars for each stage
which according to them are to be achieved for a normal human development.
To conclude:
Socialization is an interactive communication process that involves both individual development and
personal influences, namely the personal reception and interpretation of all social messages, but also
the dynamics and content of social influences.
Thus, socialization is a complex process that is based on the theory of social learning, learning which
is a fundamental mechanism of assimilation of social experience.
Although retaining a certain autonomy, man and society form an indissoluble unity, and society is
generated by the relationship between its members.
The socialization term is expressed in the literature by social learning, culture, etc.
All these terms have the meaning of a process through which the little child is humanized by acquiring
human behaviors.
In order for the socialization process to prove its efficiency, it must develop the individual's ability to
self-educate, to manage himself to discern between good and evil, to know how to choose between the
moral attitudes that are assessed by society negatively and those which allow for adequate social
cohabitation.
Id Superego
the instinctive and (the Police Force)
unsocialized desires. the operation of
It’s selfish & culture & society
antisocial within the individual
Freud believed that the id, ego, and superego are in constant conflict and that adult personality and
behavior are rooted in the results of these internal struggles throughout childhood. He believed that a
person who has a strong ego has a healthy personality and that imbalances in this system can lead to
neurosis (what we now think of as anxiety and depression) and unhealthy behaviors.
• Critical Analysis
We appreciate Freud’s idea that early childhood experiences have lasting impact on our personalities,
and that we internalize social norms, but Most of the critics of Freud’s era refused to accept sex as
basic human need.
Recently, Freud’s theory is criticized as male centered thereby devaluing women.
Also Freud made biology a center point of his theory ignoring social, cultural and other individual
aspects.
Example: A man intends to drive a car at 400 speeds (Id), suddenly he believes that driving car at 400 speeds may kill him
or others (super ego) and decides to run the car at 120 speeds (ego)
Example 2: MCQs in Sociology (Fill all the questions without thinking, why to fill all because few of them may be wrong
therefore, it is necessary to fill only those which are correct and well known to me.
F. Personality Development