Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Description
Global Business Strategy looks at the opportunities and risks associated
with staking out a global competitive presence and introduces the
fundamentals of global strategic thinking. The authors demonstrate how
a company should change and adapt its domestic business model to
achieve a competitive advantage as it expands globally.
Our framework includes a company’s business model, the strategic
decisions a company needs to make as it globalizes its operations, and
globalization strategies for creating a competitive advantage. A business
model has four principal dimensions: market participation, the value
proposition, the supply chain infrastructure, and its management model.
Keywords
global strategy; global competitive advantage; business model; value
creation; value proposition; market participation; supply chain infra-
structure; global management model; global industry; global branding;
innovation; outsourcing; offshoring; global management
Contents
Preface��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ix
Acknowledgments���������������������������������������������������������������������������������xiii
Notes�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������235
References�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������243
About the Authors�������������������������������������������������������������������������������257
Index�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������259
Preface
This book introduces the fundamentals of global strategic thinking.
We begin by analyzing the growing number of global business changes
and the increased uncertainty they have brought with them. With nation-
alism on the rise in the Western world, the tariff wars between the United
States and China, the shift of the commercial center of gravity to Asia,
the worldwide COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, and the opportunities
and risks associated with staking out a global competitive presence have
increased substantially.
Underestimating risk can lead to strategies that neither defend against
the threats nor take advantage of the opportunities that higher uncer-
tainty levels may provide. At the other extreme, assuming that the world
is entirely unpredictable can lead managers to abandon the analytical rigor
of their traditional planning processes altogether and base their s trategic
decisions primarily on instinct.
We define crafting a global strategy in terms of change; how and when
a company should change or adapt its core (domestic) business model to
achieve a competitive advantage as it expands globally. This definition’s
conceptual framework has three fundamental building blocks: a compa-
ny’s core business model, the various strategic decisions a company faces as it
globalizes, and a range of globalization strategy options for creating a global
competitive advantage.
Writing this book was inspired by recent events. As a retired Dean and
Distinguished Professor Emeritus of the Lundquist College of Business at
the University of Oregon, I have the good fortune of being invited peri-
odically to teach in graduate and executive programs around the world
and was scheduled to teach in Europe in April of this year. Accordingly,
I had prepared—in the form of lecture notes and slide material—a com-
plete, new course on global strategy. When the COVID-19 coronavirus
pandemic hit and the course was canceled, I decided to spend my time in
self-isolation refining this material and writing this book.
I have a lot of people to thank. My coauthor, Jack Pearce, helped
develop the perspective of the book; provided many additions and
examples; and was the best critic, supporter, and friend an author could
wish for. My dear friends Alan Eliason and Doug Bales encouraged me
all the way and were always ready to discuss specific issues of interest.
Vijay Sathe, my former colleague at the Peter F. Drucker and Masatoshi
Ito Graduate School of Management, and I collaborated in a number
of executive programs over the years. These experiences provided me
with new perspectives on strategy development. Rob Zwettler, former
Executive Director at Business Expert Press, and Scott Isenberg, current
Executive Director, have been extremely supportive of this effort. And,
of course, I am indebted to the late Peter F. Drucker. His guidance and
friendship meant a lot to me. Considered by many the father of modern
management, Peter’s unique perspectives on modern capitalism, on the
role of the private sector, nonprofits, and the government have helped
shape the thinking of CEOs, academics, analysts, and commentators
alike. I hope this book contributes to this process.
Finally, as aspiring authors quickly learn and seasoned writers already
know, writing a book is a mammoth undertaking. Fortunately, I had a lot
of encouragement along the way from my family and friends and take this
xiv Acknowledgments
opportunity to thank them all for letting me spend the time and for their
words of encouragement. I am grateful to all of them and hope the result
meets their high expectations.
Cornelis A. de Kluyver (Kees)
Retired Dean and Distinguished Professor Emeritus
Lundquist College of Business
University of Oregon,
Eugene, OR, 97403
The Globalization of
Markets and Competition
Introduction
This first chapter considers the economic, political, technological, and
cultural dimensions that have propelled globalization, as well as factors
that are checking its progress. Second, we discuss the shift of the c enter
of gravity of global competition from the West to Asia and consider
how global competition is evolving. Third, we deal with industry
globalization and assess the growing complexity of the global competitive
environment. We conclude the chapter by looking at the benefits and
costs of globalization.
Defining Globalization
The integration of national economies into a global economic system has
been one of the most important developments of the last century. This
integration process, called globalization, has resulted in remarkable growth
in trade between countries. Globalization is manifested as a growing
economic interdependence among countries at a macro level, reflected in
the increasing cross-border flow of goods, services, capital, and technical
knowledge. At the company level, globalization refers to the increasing
percentage of revenues and profits derived from foreign markets.
Economic globalization started as countries lowered tariffs and
nontariff barriers, and international trade and foreign direct investment
(FDI) grew. As more and more countries embraced free-market and anti-
protectionist policies, the globalization of production and markets ensued.
The globalization of production allowed companies to spread parts of their
manufacturing operations worldwide to reduce costs. The g lobalization
of markets has led to an increased focus on the world as a huge global
4 Global Business Strategy
Globalization or Regionalization?
While the term globalization is widely used, from an economic p erspective,
it is more accurate to speak of semiglobalization or regionalization because
global trade and investment is largely concentrated in three sets of
relationships—between the United States and the European Union (EU),
The Globalization of Markets and Competition 5
the EU and Asia, and Asia and the United States, frequently referred to
as the Triad. The EU and the United States have the largest bilateral trade
and investment relationship in the world. EU and U.S. investments are
the principal drivers of the transatlantic relationship, contributing to
growth and jobs in both the E.U. and the United States.1
Asia and Europe are leading trade partners, with 1.5 trillion U.S.
dollars of annual trade in goods. The two continents are moving quickly to
build and strengthen ties, with a firm commitment to agree to S ustainable
Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable connectivity has become a
focal point of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), an intergovernmental
cooperation forum between 30 European and 21 Asian countries. Trade
within Europe and Asia is four times higher than the trade between the
two regions. However, the trade between the Asian and European regions
is still higher than that between any other world region. Russia is the
third-largest trader in the ASEM group of countries; it exports twice as
much to Europe as Asia.2
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in 2015 to 2017 (the latest years for
which accurate statistics are available) between Asia and Europe reached
close to 90 billion U.S. dollars annually—nearly the same level as FDI
flows within Europe. Over half of European investments in Asia come
from the United Kingdom and Germany. Similarly, China and Japan
are the principal investors from Asia in Europe, while India and China
account for around half the total European foreign investment.
U.S. trade with Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was
272.0 billion U.S. dollars in total (two way) goods trade during 2018. Goods
exports totaled 86.2 billion U.S. dollars; goods imports totaled 185.8 billion
U.S. dollars. The U.S. goods trade deficit with ASEAN was 99.6 b illion
U.S. dollars in 2018. Trade in services with ASEAN countries (exports
and imports) totaled 55 billion U.S. dollars in 2017 (latest data available).
Exports were 33 billion U.S. dollars; services imports were 22 billion U.S.
dollars. The U.S. services trade surplus with ASEAN countries was 10 billion
U.S. dollars in 2017 (latest data available). U.S. FDI in ASEAN countries
(stock) was 328.8 billion U.S. d ollars in 2017 (latest data available), up
5.6 percent from 2016. U.S. direct investment in ASEAN countries is led
by the nonbank holding companies, manufacturing, and wholesale trade
sectors.3 This evidence supports the notion that global trade is still largely
semiglobal or regional is likely to remain that way for some time.
6 Global Business Strategy
Economic
The merging of
distinctly separate
national markets
into a global
marketplace
Political Technology
The Spread of Dimensions Communication
Democracy and of and Information
Market-based Globalization Technology,
systems Transportation
Cultural
The Globalization
of Values and
Cultures
large with strong existing ties to customers. S pecialized markets usually have
greater space for new companies and can compete based on new technologies
and ideas. For example, a high-quality producer of a utomobile engine com-
ponents does not need to compete with larger firms such as Ford and Toyota
in the end customer market. Rather, it can allocate all of its resources to
become even more competitive in d esigning engine components. That means,
among other things, that resources (e.g., staff and technology investments)
can become more specialized.
Companies that can leverage the benefits from trade, such as scaling
up and specializing production, also create better-paying jobs that
demand greater skills. These benefits tend to be strongest in economies
that are open to trade and investment. While outsourcing and off-shoring
sometimes lead to unemployment, wages and employment levels tend
to be higher because trade enhances human resources efficiency. When
some parts of the production are off-shored, companies can specialize and
invest more in human capital.
Globalization has resulted in lower consumer prices and increased
living standards. While this benefit has primarily accrued to Western
economies, developing countries are catching up due to freer and higher
levels of trade in the world.
Consumer choice and product variation have increased. Between
1972 and 2001, the number of goods in the U.S. economy doubled to
16,000, while the median number of countries from which a good was
imported rose to 12.4
Globalization has also promoted economic efficiency in the world
economy.5 Economies of scale and specialization have improved resource
use in the economy. As a consequence, labor productivity has increased.6
Moreover, the fragmentation of value chains has boosted productivity
through lower-cost imports of inputs.7 Trade and investment improve the
technology of sectors and economies by forcing greater competition upon
incumbent firms. The top 10 percent of U.S. firms in productivity is twice
as productive as the bottom 10 percent.8 In Europe, the top 10 percent of
firms are three times as productive as the bottom 10 percent.9
Globalization has reduced inflation in Western economies and
increased real wages by lowering the cost of consumption. Many goods
that previously were affordable by only a few—for example, a mobile
8 Global Business Strategy
the efforts underway to control its effects have brought economic growth
to a temporary standstill in many parts of the world. However, there is
no evidence that a sustained process of deglobalization has begun, as
some suggest.17 World trade has steadily increased in recent years despite
variations in the growth rate.
Moreover, most globalization and trade measures focus primarily on
manufactured goods, even though services comprise the fastest-growing
and dynamic sector of the global economy. The deglobalization argument
also does not account for the rapid growth in the number of middle- and
lower-class consumers—especially in emerging markets. This has allowed
local firms that focused largely on export markets to turn inward because
of a growing domestic market. Nevertheless, the current increase in global
uncertainty has threatened jobs and dissuaded many companies from
expanding and innovating.
social norms, and language quickly can become barriers, that is, create
distance. A common language, for example, makes trade much easier
and, therefore, more likely. Social norms, the set of unspoken principles
that strongly guides everyday behavior, are mostly invisible. For example,
Japanese and European consumers prefer smaller automobiles and
household appliances, reflecting a social norm that highly values space.
The food industry must concern itself with religious attributes; Hindus
do not eat beef because their religion forbids it. Thus, cultural distance
shapes preference and, ultimately, choice.
Administrative or political distance. Administrative or political distance
is created by differences in governmental laws, policies, and institutions,
including international relationships between countries, treaties, and
membership in international organizations. The greater the distance, the
less likely it is that extensive trade relations develop. Over the last half
century, the EU’s integration is probably the best example of deliberate
efforts to reduce administrative distance among trading partners. Addi-
tionally, bad relationships can increase administrative distance. Although
India and Pakistan share a colonial past, land borders, and linguistic ties,
their long-standing mutual hostility has reduced official trade to almost
nothing.
Countries can also create administrative and political distance
through unilateral measures. Indeed, policies of individual governments
pose the most common barriers to cross-border competition. In some
cases, difficulties arise in a company’s home country. For companies from
the United States, domestic prohibitions on bribery and the p rescription
of health, safety, and environmental policies have a dampening effect
on their international businesses. More commonly, though, it is the
target country’s government that raises barriers to foreign competition:
tariffs, trade quotas, restrictions on FDI, and preferences for domestic
competitors in the form of subsidies and favoritism in regulation and
procurement.
Geographic distance. Geographic distance is about more than how
far away a country is in miles. Other geographic attributes include
the country’s physical size, average within-country distances to bor-
ders, access to waterways and the ocean, and topography. They also
include h uman-made elements such as a country’s transportation and
14 Global Business Strategy
This shift in the global competitive landscape will have a great impact
in the years to come. Consider, for example, the growing number of
companies from emerging markets that appear in the Fortune 500.
It is expected that half will come from emerging markets in the
not-too-distant future.
Consider also the significant increase in the number of emerging
market companies acquiring established Western businesses and brands,
proof that globalization is no longer just another word for A
mericanization.
For example, Budweiser, the maker of America’s favorite beer, is currently
part of the MNC Anheuser-Busch InBev and is produced in various
breweries worldwide.
Lenovo, the Chinese computer-maker, became a global brand in 2005
when it paid around 1.75 billion U.S. dollars for IBM’s PC business—
including the ThinkPad laptop range. Lenovo had the right to use the
IBM brand for five years, but dropped it two years ahead of schedule; such
was its confidence in its brand.20 This new phase of globalization creates
huge opportunities and threats—for developed-world m ultinationals and
new competitors from developing countries.
Industry Globalization
An important consideration in formulating a global strategy is how global
an industry is or is likely to become. Virtually, all industries are global in
some respects. However, only a handful of industries can be considered
truly global today or are likely to become so in the future. Many more will
remain hybrids, that is, global in some respects, local in others. Industry
globalization, therefore, is a matter of degree. What counts is which indus-
try segments are becoming global and how they affect strategic choice.
The Globalization of Markets and Competition 17
1. Increased trade has delivered a greater choice of goods. Free trade has
allowed countries to specialize in producing goods wherever they
have a comparative advantage. When countries specialize, benefits
include lower prices for consumers, increased choice of products,
bigger export markets for domestic manufacturers, economies of
scale, and increased competition.
2. Free movement of labor. Increased labor migration benefits both
workers and recipient countries. If a country experiences high
unemployment, there are increased opportunities to look for work
elsewhere.
3. Increased economies of scale. Globalization enables goods to be
produced in different parts of the world, thereby lowering average
costs and prices for consumers.
22 Global Business Strategy
Greater
choice of
Goods
More Free
investment movement
of Labor
Benefits
Harm to
developing
economies
Increased Economies
competition of Scale Tax Environmental
avoidance costs
Costs
Less
cultural Labor
diversity issues