You are on page 1of 10

Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266

Review

GB virus C: Insights into co-infection


Mark D. Berzsenyi a,∗ , D. Scott Bowden b , Stuart K. Roberts a
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Prahran 3181, Victoria, Australia
b Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, 10 Wreckyn St.,
North Melbourne 3051, Victoria, Australia

Received 23 February 2005; received in revised form 22 March 2005; accepted 1 April 2005

Abstract

GB virus C (GBV-C) is a single stranded positive sense RNA virus, which is a member of the Flaviviridae. It has a close sequence
homology and genomic organisation to hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, unlike HCV it is not hepatotrophic. GBV-C replicates within cells
of the haemopoietic lineage, in particular lymphocytes. No disease has been associated with GBV-C infection but co-infection with human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to improved morbidity and mortality for the HIV infected individual and slows progression to acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome. This potential benefit of GBV-C has been demonstrated in the pre and post highly active anti-retroviral treatment
(HAART) eras. GBV-C has been found to decrease HIV replication in in vitro models. The mechanism of the beneficial effect of GBV-C
appears to be mediated by alterations in the cellular immune response, the details of which remain unclear. Despite this, there continues to
be controversy regarding the influence of GBV-C on HIV as several reports have questioned the beneficial effect. GBV-C does not appear to
influence liver related disease in subjects co-infected with HCV or hepatitis B virus (HBV). Combination of HIV and HCV leads to accelerated
liver disease. The influence of GBV-C in this situation is yet to be determined. Elucidation of the putative protective effect of GBV-C in HIV
co-infection could potentially identify novel targets for anti-HIV therapeutics and lead to the development of disease modifying vaccines.
© 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: GB virus C; Human immunodeficiency virus; Hepatitis C virus; Co-infection

Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
2. Epidemiology and transmission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258
3. Molecular biology and phylogenetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258
4. Clinical significance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259
4.1. Human immunodeficiency virus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260
4.2. Hepatitis C virus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261
5. Interactions of GBV-C and HIV with the host’s cellular immune response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261
6. Future directions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
7. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263

1. Introduction a West African population when they were attempting to ret-


rospectively track down the causative agent of an incident of
GB virus C (GBV-C) was first identified by the Virus Dis- acute hepatitis in a Chicago surgeon (initials GB) (Simons
covery Group at Abbott Laboratories in serum samples from et al., 1995). The finding of GBV-C was fortuitous as it was
subsequently shown to be unrelated to the episode of hepatitis
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 92762223; fax: +61 3 92762194. experienced by the surgeon. Coincidentally, hepatitis G virus
E-mail address: M.Berzsenyi@alfred.org.au (M.D. Berzsenyi). (HGV) was independently cloned from the plasma of a patient

1386-6532/$ – see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2005.04.002
258 M.D. Berzsenyi et al. / Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266

who was subsequently found to be infected with hepatitis C (Tillmann et al., 1998; Thomas et al., 1998). Interestingly,
virus (HCV) (Linnen et al., 1996). Sequence comparison of studies have shown a low seroconversion rate of 5% in a
these two viruses has shown that they are different isolates of high-risk group of children all of whom were infected with
the same virus with nucleotide and amino acid homologies HCV. The authors suggested that there may be a greater risk of
of 86% and 95%, respectively (Alter, 1996; Polgreen et al., chronic carriage with early acquisition of GBV-C (Hardikar
2003). The virus is referred to as both GBV-C and HGV in et al., 1999).
the literature with the current taxonomic name being GBV- There is extensive evidence that GBV-C is transmitted by
C/HGV (Polgreen et al., 2003). However, the virus does not sexual and percutaneous routes in much the same way as
appear to be associated with hepatitis, so the virus will be HIV and is frequently found in populations at risk for blood-
referred to as GBV-C for this review. borne or sexually transmitted viruses (Alter et al., 1997;
Based on comparison of genome organization and se- Bjorkman et al., 2001; Lefrere et al., 1999a; Scallan et al.,
quence homologies, GBV-C is the most closely related human 1998; Sawayama et al., 1999). Male to male sex has been pro-
virus to HCV, another member of the Flaviviridae (Linnen et posed to be a more effective mode of transmission of GBV-C
al., 1996; Leary et al., 1996; Reed and Rice, 2000). In con- (Berzsenyi et al., 2005). Further to this, there is evidence that
trast to HCV, GBV-C does not appear to be hepatotrophic as GBV-C can be transmitted by either heterosexual or homo-
the virus neither replicates in hepatocytes nor causes acute or sexual means (Sawayama et al., 1999). Intrafamilial trans-
chronic hepatitis (Alter, 1997; Laskus et al., 1997). In fact, mission of GBV-C has also been reported and analysis of
GBV-C is a lymphotrophic virus that is believed to repli- gene sequences suggested that both vertical and horizontal
cate primarily in the spleen and bone marrow (Tucker et al., transmission occurs (Seifried et al., 2004).
2000). There is also some evidence that the virus replicates In a study of healthy individuals without risk factors for
in a number of different peripheral blood mononuclear cells, GBV-C and with normal alanine transaminase (ALT) levels,
including CD4 positive T cells (Xiang et al., 2000). GBV-C RNA was reported in 1.9% of individuals whereas
By itself, GBV-C infection has not been associated with GBV-C was seen in 6.8% of haemodialysis patients, 18.2%
any specific disease nor does it appear to represent a substan- of HIV infected individuals, 21.1% of multiple blood trans-
tial health risk. No association has been found between GBV- fusion recipients, 24.4% of HCV infected individuals, 28.8%
C and such conditions as hepatocellular carcinoma, lichen of intravenous drug users and 35.2% of haemophilia patients
planus, cryoglobulinaemia, Sjögren’s disease or various ma- (Feucht et al., 1997). Another study reported GBV-C RNA
lignant or non-malignant haematological disorders (Polgreen in 18% of haemophiliacs (Mauser-Bunschoten et al., 1998).
et al., 2003). However, in the setting of co-infection with hu- Further to these studies, GBV-C was seen in 11% of non-drug
man immunodeficiency virus (HIV), current evidence points injecting homosexual and bisexual men and 35% of intra-
to GBV-C offering a benefit in terms of slower progression venous drug users (Stark et al., 1996). Actual prevalence of
for HIV related diseases and acquired immunodeficiency syn- GBV-C will obviously vary according to the particular pop-
drome (AIDS). ulation studied but what is clear is that carriage of GBV-C is
This article will review the association of GBV-C with more common in groups with risk factors for percutaneous
HIV and the blood-borne hepatitis viruses as well as examine and sexual transmission.
the epidemiology, molecular biology, immunology of GBV-C GBV-C viraemia was seen in 25.3% of patients present-
and propose possible future directions of research. ing for liver transplantation with end stage liver disease due
to a viral cause. It was shown to have no influence on the
outcome of transplantation or recurrence of hepatitis in the
2. Epidemiology and transmission graft (Vargas et al., 1997). In addition, GBV-C acquired at
the time of transplantation was shown to have no impact on
GBV-C infection is relatively common and has a world the outcome of the graft including transplants performed for
wide distribution. Between 1% and 4% of healthy blood reasons other than viral hepatitis (Fried et al., 1997).
donors have GBV-C RNA detected in their sera (Moaven
et al., 1996; Alter, 1997; Stapleton, 2003). Of these, the ma-
jority of people clear the virus and develop antibodies to the 3. Molecular biology and phylogenetics
E2 envelope glycoprotein. The humoral immune response
to the E2 glycoprotein is associated with loss of GBV-C GBV-C and its close relative HCV are unusual among
RNA/viraemia. The prevalence of E2 antibodies (anti-E2) in RNA viruses of humans in that they cause persistent infection
sera is found to be two to six times higher than RNA/viraemia without a DNA intermediate or a known latent stage in their
suggesting that spontaneous clearance of GBV-C infection is replication cycle (Xiang et al., 2001). A diagram showing
common (Tacke et al., 1997b; Dille et al., 1997; Thomas et al., the comparative genomic organisation of GBV-C and HCV,
1998). Anti-E2 may serve as a useful marker for diagnosing potential differences as well as the various functions of HCV
clearance of GBV-C RNA/viraemia and as such is a marker genes is shown in Fig. 1.
of past infection (Tacke et al., 1997a). The development of The positive sense, single stranded RNA genome of GBV-
anti-E2 is also associated with protection from re-infection C is approximately 9400 nucleotides long. It contains a long
M.D. Berzsenyi et al. / Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266 259

Fig. 1. Comparative genomic organization of the GBV-C and HCV genomes showing open reading frames (ORF) and 5 and 3 untranslated regions (UTR).
Both genomes are composed of single stranded positive sense RNA (ss+RNA). The ORF of GBV-C has 29% amino acid sequence homology with HCV with
significant areas of conserved homology implying similar functions for these genes. One area of significant difference is a core/capsid gene for GBV-C is yet
to be identified. The proposed functions of HCV genes are shown. Genes shown are not to scale.

Open Reading Frame (ORF) predicted to encode a polypro- isolates of GBV-C suggests that there are four major phy-
tein of approximately 3000 amino acids (Leary et al., 1996; logenetic groupings or genotypes that are equally divergent
Linnen et al., 1996; Polgreen et al., 2003). It contains an inter- from primate GBV-C as determined from analysis of the
nal ribosomal entry site (IRES) in the 5 untranslated region E2 gene. In addition, analysis of the E2 gene in certain
(UTR), two putative envelope proteins E1 and E2, NS3 with isolates from South Africa suggests there is a fifth genotype.
RNA helicase and trypsin-like serine protease domains and Thus, GBV-C is considered to have five genotypes based on
an RNA dependant RNA polymerase (NS5B). The ORF of these sequence relationships (Smith et al., 2000; Mison et
GBV-C has 29% amino acid sequence homology with HCV al., 2000; Sathar et al., 1999; Muerhoff et al., 1996; Mukaide
and significantly conserved areas of homology exist implying et al., 1997). The world wide geographical distribution of
similar function of gene products. The similarities with HCV GBV-C variants and the non-pathogenic nature of the virus
are generally limited to specific enzymatic motifs in the NS3 suggests a long evolutionary history which parallels pre-
and NS5B gene regions while there is little or no similarity in history human migration, implying the long term evolution
the genes encoding the envelope genes between GBV-C and of this RNA virus has been extremely slow (Smith et al.,
HCV. Amongst GBV-C isolates there is limited variation in 2000). Recently, studies have shown that the five genotypes
the genes encoding the putative envelope glycoproteins un- of GBV-C can be determined accurately and inexpensively
like HCV and HIV where variability has been linked to viral by restriction fragment length polymorphism (Schleicher
persistence (Simmonds, 2001). and Flehmig, 2003). A Japanese study has shown that within
Important features remain to be determined with respect to genotype 1 there are at least five subtypes. Interestingly
the genome of GBV-C. The coding region for the core protein a majority of Japanese patients with haemophilia were
of GBV-C remains undefined, in contrast to the core gene for infected with GBV-C of a unique and newly discovered
HCV, which has been identified (Polgreen et al., 2003). It has subtype within genotype 1 (Liu et al., 2003).
been suggested that the GBV-C core gene may utilize an alter-
native ORF or could be encoded by the negative sense RNA
(Xiang et al., 1999; Pavesi, 2000). However, this is somewhat 4. Clinical significance
unlikely considering the availability of computer programs to
analyze ORFs in all three reading frames in both positive and GBV-C has not been associated with any particular disease
negative directions. One possible explanation is the forma- entity despite numerous investigations. However, a number of
tion of secondary structures within the RNA genome that has reports have shown GBV-C to have a profound “protective”
made the detection of the core gene of GBV-C difficult. influence on HIV in the situation of co-infection. No role,
Different isolates or genotypes of GBV-C show limited protective or otherwise, has been found with GBV-C and co-
variability with nucleotide sequences differing by a max- infection with HCV or hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection to
imum of 13%. Comparison of epidemiologically distinct this point.
260 M.D. Berzsenyi et al. / Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266

4.1. Human immunodeficiency virus creased in all patients who started HAART (Tillmann et al.,
2001).
Infection with HIV is associated with a wide range of More recently, samples collected in the pre-HAART era
clinical scenarios ranging from preservation of the immune from the Multicenter Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
system, particularly in the presence of highly active anti- Cohort Study, an ongoing study in various centres in the
retroviral treatment (HAART), to asymptomatic and oppor- United States, have been analysed (Williams et al., 2004).
tunistic infections leading all the way to established AIDS Individuals who had provided samples were then prospec-
(Pantaleo and Fauci, 1996). HIV infection has a particularly tively followed up. The study showed that GBV-C viremia
high rate of co-infection with GBV-C. Studies have suggested was significantly associated with prolonged survival among
the rate of co-infection varies between 14% and 45% with HIV positive men 5 to 6 years after HIV seroconversion, but
higher rates occurring in homosexual men and intravenous not at 12 to 18 months, and the loss of GBV-C RNA by 5 to
drug users (Lau et al., 1999; Rey et al., 1999; Puig-Basagoiti 6 years after HIV seroconversion was associated with the
et al., 2000; Tillmann and Manns, 2001). However, the rate of poorest prognosis. The authors of the study concluded that
spontaneous clearance of GBV-C RNA and the development there was a significant survival advantage associated with per-
of E2 antibodies in HIV/GBV-C co-infected patients occurs sistence of GBV-C in the HIV co-infected patient (Williams
at a slower rate than in the immunocomponent host. In some et al., 2004). Whether this data can be applied to the post-
instances GBV-C viraemia can be lost without the develop- HAART era remains to be determined. Further to this, a ret-
ment of E2 antibodies in the co-infected host (Alter, 1997; rospective study was performed on a cohort of HIV positive
Stapleton, 2003). patients with known GBV-C status who had answered ques-
Reports initially started to appear in the late 1990s suggest- tionnaires assessing quality of life. Patients with GBV-C vi-
ing that co-infection with HIV and GBV-C gave a more favor- raemia showed superior quality of life. This further supports
able outcome for patients with delayed development of AIDS the favourable course of HIV disease in GBV-C viraemic
compared to those with HIV infection alone (Heringlake et patients (Tillmann et al., 2004).
al., 1998; Lefrere et al., 1999b; Yeo et al., 2000; Tillmann Not all studies of co-infection with HIV and GBV-C have
et al., 2001; Xiang et al., 2001; Williams et al., 2004). Sev- found a beneficial effect on HIV disease progression (Birk
eral key findings have been reported. Firstly, there is a higher et al., 2002; Brumme et al., 2002; Bjorkman et al., 2004;
rate of GBV-C viraemia amongst those patients co-infected Van der Bij et al., 2005). In a Swedish study of 157 HIV-1
with HIV. In HIV infected patients the mortality rate was infected individuals, no influence of GBV-C co-infection
significantly lower among those with GBV-C viraemia, inde- could be seen on immunological or clinical outcomes of
pendent of previous anti-retroviral treatment or prophylaxis HIV infection (Birk et al., 2002). However, patients in this
against pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, base-line CD4 posi- study had high CD4 positive T cell counts, which would
tive T cell count, age, race, sex, or mode of HIV transmission. be expected early in the course of HIV infection. Many
In sub-group analysis, defined by CD4 positive cell counts, of the studies describing a beneficial effect as previously
all patients with GBV-C had a lower mortality rate than HIV discussed, examined patients with a broader range of CD4
infected patients without GBV-C viraemia. Also shown was positive T cells counts (Heringlake et al., 1998; Lefrere et
that HIV replication was diminished in vitro by co-infection al., 1999b; Yeo et al., 2000; Tillmann et al., 2001; Xiang et
with GBV-C (Xiang et al., 2001). This last fact is important al., 2001). Furthermore, it has been suggested that GBV-C
as it suggests that GBV-C directly affects HIV replication viraemia in HIV-1 infection may represent a phenomenon
rather than act via some other mechanism. secondary to HIV progression, rather than an independent
In another study, which may have relevance to the cur- prognostic factor. However, an interaction between the two
rent management of HIV patients in the post-HAART era, viruses still appeared to exist, since loss of GBV-C viraemia
197 HIV infected patients were screened for GBV-C and was associated with increased HIV progression. The study
their clinical status was then followed prospectively. Of the found that GBV-C status at diagnosis did not predict disease
patients who tested positive for GBV-C RNA, survival was outcomes in their HIV cohort (Bjorkman et al., 2004). As
significantly longer and there was a slower progression to already discussed, long term persistence of GBV-C viraemia
AIDS than those patients who were GBV-C negative. Sur- is probably a key component of the beneficial outcome of
vival after the development of AIDS was also better in the GBV-C/HIV co-infection. This may help explain discrepan-
GBV-C positive patients. When the analysis was stratified cies in studies in which the follow-up has been shorter and
for age and CD4 positive cell count, GBV-C viraemia was no apparent benefit has been shown (Williams et al., 2004).
significantly associated with reduced mortality. Importantly, A cohort of 326 homosexual males in the pre-HAART
in an analysis restricted to the post-HAART era, the pres- era had GBV-C status determined shortly after HIV-1 sero-
ence of GBV-C RNA remained predictive of longer sur- conversion and again prior to widespread use of HAART in
vival. HIV viral load was also lower in the GBV-C posi- 1996. Median follow-up period was 8 years. Those who lost
tive patients than in the GBV-C negative patients. An in- GBV-C RNA between the two sample collections had nearly
verse correlation between the GBV-C viral load and the HIV a threefold increased risk of HIV disease progression com-
viral load was also shown. Of note, GBV-C viral load in- pared to those who never had GBV-C. This effect became
M.D. Berzsenyi et al. / Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266 261

much smaller following adjustment for time-updated CD4 Does GBV-C infection in the setting of HCV and HIV
positive T cell counts. The authors concluded that persis- co-infection lead to any changes in outcome? This is an
tence of GBV-C RNA depends on the presence of sufficient important question as in urban intravenous drug using popu-
numbers of CD4 positive cells and that a drop in CD4 cells lations within the United States, HIV and HCV co-infection
associated with HIV disease progression is a cause, not a has been reported in 60% to 80% of individuals, although
consequence, of GBV-C RNA loss (Van der Bij et al., 2005). the prevalence of co-infection is highly variable and depen-
However, since the introduction of HAART, CD4 cell counts dent on the population’s risk factors for acquiring infection
have increased and HIV viral loads have decreased causing (Sherman, 2004). Liver disease associated with HCV appears
a reduction in patient mortality from AIDS related illness to be accelerated in patients with HIV. There appears to be a
(Mocroft et al., 1998; Palella et al., 1998) and as already dis- significant increase in fibrotic progression among those with
cussed GBV-C RNA remains predictive of longer survival in HCV and HIV co-infection (Benhamou et al., 1999). Anti-
the post-HAART era (Tillmann et al., 2001). Another study retroviral therapy has been shown to have a positive impact
found that GBV-C RNA was relatively common (20.4%) in on progression of liver fibrosis in HCV and HIV co-infection
HIV infected individuals seeking treatment but the presence (Qurishi et al., 2003) although, drug-related hepatoxicity
of the virus had no effect on initial response to anti-retroviral makes use of these agents in the setting of chronic viral
therapy (Brumme et al., 2002). In comparison, a further re- hepatitis or cirrhosis a possible concern. Whether HCV
port has shown that patients with concurrent GBV-C and HIV effects HIV disease progression seems less clear with some
infection exhibit a better response to HAART as indicated by reports suggesting more rapid progression to AIDS (Greub et
higher complete virological response rates (Rodriguez et al., al., 2000) while others have shown no effect on CD4 counts,
2003). recovery (Sherman et al., 2002) or survival (Macias et al.,
2002). Currently, little is known about the effect GBV-C has
4.2. Hepatitis C virus in the setting of HCV and HIV co-infection. Interestingly,
patients infected with GBV-C, HCV, and HIV has been
Among newly diagnosed cases of blood-borne viral hep- shown to have an improved response to HAART (Voirin et
atitis in the United States, 18% were positive for GBV-C, al., 2002). A recent abstract has reported GBV-C viraemia in
and 80% of these patients were also infected with HCV. 30% of patients co-infected with HCV and HIV, with GBV-C
Other studies have reported the incidence of GBV-C amongst viraemia being cleared in 45% of these patients following 24
patients with HCV infection varies from 11% to 24% (Di weeks of combination therapy with interferon and ribivirin.
Bisceglie, 1996; Tanaka et al., 1996; Feucht et al., 1997). Sustained clearance of GBV-C RNA was seen in 18% of
Does GBV-C have a role to play in HCV co-infection? patients while clearance of GBV-C RNA was not associated
Histological evaluation of GBV-C infection in chronic HCV with HIV-1 RNA levels becoming elevated (Zander et al.,
has shown that GBV-C has no effect on severity of HCV re- 2003). The effect over time of GBV-C RNA clearance in this
lated liver disease (Bralet et al., 1997). Hepatic inflammation situation is unknown including the possibility that the ben-
is thought to be predominantly as a result of HCV in the set- eficial effect of GBV-C maybe lost. To the present time, no
ting of co-infection with GBV-C (Pereira et al., 2002) with no studies have addressed the long term effect GBV-C viraemia
statistical difference in the degree of inflammation between has on chronic HCV related liver disease in the setting of HIV
liver biopsies from HCV mono-infected patients and GBV- co-infection.
C/HCV co-infected patients. Of note, there was a trend to Little work has been done in relation to HBV and GBV-
a lesser degree of hepatic inflammation in the GBV-C co- C co-infection. What has been shown is that there was no
infected group (Strauss et al., 2002). GBV-C has been shown significant effect of GBV-C on HBV DNA levels (Kao et al.,
to have no effect on the course of co-existent HCV infec- 1998).
tion or the clinical effectiveness of interferon-based treatment
regimens. Interferon-alfa has been shown to be effective in
the clearance of GBV-C viraemia in 20.7% of patients and 5. Interactions of GBV-C and HIV with the host’s
may potentate anti-E2 seroconversion in these individuals. cellular immune response
GBV-C viraemia has been shown to recur in 53% following
cessation of treatment (Oshita et al., 1998; Yu et al., 2001). The identification of the mechanism by which GBV-C
In a meta-analysis examining over 5300 patients, no role of inhibits the replication of HIV might lead to the development
GBV-C in HCV infection was shown and no correlation was of new treatments for HIV. The exact mechanism of the
observed between the response of HCV and GBV-C to inter- beneficial effect of GBV-C on the course of HIV infection
feron. Overall, GBV-C is thought to have no adverse effect remains obscure, although recent research has identified
on the course of HCV related chronic liver disease or the de- a number of putative pathways. Fig. 2 summarises the
velopment of chronicity from acute HCV infection. It does current postulated mechanisms by which GBV-C may exert
not appear to have any influence on histology, transaminase- a protective effect against HIV.
levels or response of HCV to antiviral therapy (Rambusch Infection with both GBV-C and HIV has been shown to
et al., 1998). lead to stable serum levels of T-helper 1 (Th1) cytokine pro-
262 M.D. Berzsenyi et al. / Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266

Fig. 2. Multiple mechanisms have been postulated for the action GBV-C infection exerts on co-infected patients with HIV. Up regulation of Th1 cytokines
and down regulation of Th2 cytokines leads to a profile, which is associated with improved outcomes for HIV/AIDS. Another mechanism is via increased
chemokine production, which leads to inhibition of CCR5 and CXCR4 co-receptors for HIV entry. Central to this cascade is increased production of Regulated
on Activation, Normal T cell-Expressed and Secreted (RANTES) chemokine whose expression is also increased by the GBV-C E2 envelope protein interacting
with CD81 cell surface receptor. Other mechanisms that have been suggested include different strains of GBV-C having varying degrees of “protective effect”,
GBV-C augmenting innate immunity and GBV-C decreasing the efficiency of transcription from the integrated HIV pro-virus in the host genome. Whether
HCV and HBV have a clear role is in this scenario is yet to be determined.

files during follow-up compared to patients who are GBV-C for CCR5 and stromal-derived factor (SDF-1) which is the
RNA negative in which Th1 cytokine profiles fall. In ad- only known ligand for CXCR4. Most importantly, the in-
dition, T-helper 2 (Th2) cytokine profiles progressively in- hibitory effect of GBV-C on HIV was neutralized by an-
crease in the absence of GBV-C infection (Nunnari et al., tibodies directed against these chemokines (Xiang et al.,
2003). The importance of T-helper cell response against HIV 2004). In addition, GBV-C was not shown to cause cytotoxic
is supported by studies showing that progression of AIDS is effects on lymphocytes in this study. Polymorphisms of these
correlated with the inability of mononuclear cells to produce chemokine receptors or SDF-1 do not appear to contribute to
Interleukin 2 (IL-2), Interleukin 12 (IL-12) and Interferon-␥ the beneficial effect of GBV-C on HIV/AIDS (Tillmann et
(INF-␥) cytokines (Th1 response) with increased production al., 2002). Further to this, it has also been shown that GBV-C
of Interleukin 4 (IL-4) and Interleukin 10 (IL10) (Th2 re- E2 protein binds to CD81, a member of the tetraspanin fam-
sponse) (Spellberg and Edwards, 2001). In an in vitro study, ily, which is expressed on the cell surface of most nucleated
GBV-C infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells led to cells. GBV-C E2 envelope protein has been found to interact
lower replication of laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV with CD81 to increase RANTES and decrease CCR5 sur-
that use CCR5 or CXCR4 as co-receptors for T cell entry. face expression thus also affecting entry of HIV to the cell
Certain strains of HIV (R5) use CCR5 while other strains of (Nattermann et al., 2003). Previously, ligation of CD81 with
HIV (X4) use CXCR4 to gain entry into cells. GBV-C induces HCV E2 has been shown to alter cellular functions of T cells
chemokines leading to decreased expression of these HIV and natural killer cells (Tseng and Klimpel, 2002).
co-receptors. The chemokines implicated, as shown by their Studies have indicated that there is an innate immune
higher levels of mRNA, include Regulated on Activation Nor- mechanism that inhibits HIV both early and late in the retro-
mal T cell-Expressed and Secreted (RANTES), macrophage viral life cycle in various cells in humans and primates. It
inflammatory protein 1␣ (MIP-1␣), and macrophage inflam- has been suggested that GBV-C may augment this process
matory protein 1␤ (MIP-1␤) which are the natural ligands of intracellular inhibition of HIV internalization. GBV-C is
M.D. Berzsenyi et al. / Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266 263

also thought to decrease the efficiency of transcription of in HIV, hepatitis viruses, influenza virus as well as malignant
HIV from the integrated provirus (Pomerantz and Nunnari, diseases, such as chronic myeloid leukaemia and its associ-
2004). There is some limited evidence to suggest that differ- ated BCR-ABL transcript (Stevenson, 2004). In one possible
ent genotypes of GBV-C offer different degrees of “protec- approach specific cellular RNA molecules, such as genes in-
tion” against HIV in the co-infected host. CD4 positive cell volved in the Th2 response could be targeted to achieve the
counts tended to be lower in patients infected with GBV-C effect GBV-C has on the HIV infected T cells without in-
genotype 2a. However, as the authors of the article stated, fecting the individual with GBV-C. The silencing effect of
further studies are required with larger cohorts from sep- RNA interference is highly specific and potent and requires
arate geographical areas to determine if a particular geno- only that the sequence of the target RNA be known. How-
type is associated with reduced morbidity or mortality from ever, obstacles must be overcome before RNA interference
HIV (Muerhoff et al., 2003). Furthermore, clinical isolates of can live up to its potential as a therapeutic method (Stevenson,
GBV-C have been found to differ in their ability to replicate 2004).
and RNA sequence variability in key regulatory regions may
be the cause, at least in the in vitro model used in this study
(George et al., 2003). 7. Summary

GBV-C is a novel virus having a unique interaction with


6. Future directions HIV in the co-infected host. It is related to HCV, another
member of the Flaviviridae, but unlike HCV has no appar-
There remain many questions that need to be answered ent pathogenic role in liver disease. It has tropism for pe-
before a full understanding of the impact of GBV-C co- ripheral blood mononuclear cells including CD4 positive T
infection with HIV and other viruses can be determined. cells. Mysteries still remain about the genome of GBV-C
One area, which requires further study is what happens to with the core gene still not identified. There is compelling
GBV-C during the course of infection in terms of changes evidence to suggest that as long as GBV-C continues to repli-
in viral sequence and the effect these alterations may cate in the HIV co-infected host it leads to an improvement
have on the immune response to HIV. In addition, a better in HIV/AIDS related morbidity and mortality. This effect is
understanding of any role different subtypes of GBV-C may still seen following the introduction of HAART. Alteration
play in HIV/AIDS progression is required. Although GBV-C in the host’s cellular immune response to HIV seems to be
has been shown to replicate within cells of the haemopoietic responsible for the “protective” effect of GBV-C. However,
lineage, clear evidence for replication within hepatocytes the exact mechanism is still to be defined. In contrast, GBV-C
has not yet been shown (Copra, 2004). Further, little work infection appears to have no affect on chronic liver disease
has been done on co-infection of GBV-C with HBV. due to HCV or HBV. The influence of GBV-C on liver disease
Moreover, limited work has been performed in the rel- in the situation of co-infection with HCV and HIV is yet to be
atively common situation of GBV-C, HCV and HIV co- determined. The interaction between GBV-C and HIV may
infection. Specifically what effect does GBV-C have on the lead to new therapeutic approaches that halt or slow the pro-
natural history of chronic HCV infection in the HIV and HCV gression of HIV/AIDS without some of the current treatment
co-infected host? Does GBV-C affect the severity of liver dis- issues of drug resistance and toxicity.
ease in HCV and HIV co-infection and are there any specific
alterations in pro-inflammatory, pro-fibrotic or pro-apoptotic
gene expression in this scenario? References
Of significance in the GBV-C story is determination of
which molecular or cellular events are involved in its “protec- Alter H. The cloning and clinical implications of HGV and GBV-C. N
tive” effect in the HIV infected person. Studies have already Engl J Med 1996;334:1536.
Alter HJ. G-pers creepers, where did you get those papers? A re-
started to delineate the mechanism of this beneficial effect, as assessment of the literature on the hepatitis G virus. Transfusion
outlined in this review. This could lead to the development of 1997;37:569.
novel targets for anti-HIV drugs and vaccines. As these events Alter H, Nakatsuji Y, Melpolder J, Wages J, Wesley R, Shih W-K, et
are occurring at the cellular level, it may be more difficult for al. The incidence of transfusion-associated hepatitis G virus infection
HIV to develop resistance to these effects (Xiang et al., 2004). and its relation to liver disease. N Engl J Med 1997;336:747–54.
Benhamou Y, Bochet M, Di Martino V, Charlotte F, Azria F, Coutel-
One way in which a better understanding of mechanism of the lier A, et al. Liver fibrosis progression in human immunodeficiency
GBV-C’s “protective” effect could be translated into a therapy virus and hepatitis C virus co-infected patients. The Multivirc Group.
is by RNA interference. Using this approach the expression Hepatology 1999;30:1054–8.
of genes can be silenced by pathways that promote the degra- Berzsenyi MD, Bowden DS, Bailey MJ, White C, Coghlan P, Dudley FJ,
dation of specific RNA molecules (Stevenson, 2004). These et al. Male to male sex is associated with a high prevalence of expo-
sure to GB virus C. J Clin Virol 2005, doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2005.01.002.
pathways can be used in order to regulate gene expression in Birk M, Lindback S, Lidman C. No influence of GB virus C replica-
a variety of biological systems. Currently work is under way tion on the prognosis in a cohort of HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS
to harness RNA interference to interrupt the disease process 2002;16:2482–5.
264 M.D. Berzsenyi et al. / Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266

Bjorkman P, Naucler A, Winqvist N, Mushahwar I, Widell A. A case- Linnen J, Wages J, Zhang-Keck Z, Fry KE, Krawczynski KZ, Alter H,
control study of the transmission routes for GB virus C/hepatitis G et al. Molecular cloning and disease association of Hepatitis G virus:
virus in Swedish blood donors lacking markers for hepatitis C virus a transfusion-transmissible agent. Science 1996;271:505–8.
infection. Vox Sang 2001;81:148–53. Liu H-F, Teng C-W, Fukuda Y, Nakano I, Hayashi K, Takamatsu J, et
Bjorkman P, Flamholc L, Naucler A, Molnegren V, Wallmark E, Widell al. A novel subtype of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus genotype 1 de-
A. GB virus C during the natural course of HIV-1 infection: viremia tected uniquely in patients with hemophilia in Japan. J Med Virol
at diagnosis does not predict mortality. AIDS 2004;18:877–86. 2003;71:385–90.
Bralet M-P, Roudot-Thoraval F, Pawlotsky J-M, Bastie A, Tran Van Macias J, Melguizo I, Fernandez-Rivera FJ, Garcia-Garcia A, Mira
Nhieu, Duval J, et al. Histopathologic impact of GB virus C infection JA, Ramos AJ. Mortality due to liver failure and impact on sur-
on chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 1997;112:188–92. vival of hepatitis virus infections in HIV-infected patients receiv-
Brumme ZL, Chan KJ, Dong WWY, Mo T, Wynhoven B, Hogg RS, ing potent anti-retroviral therapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
et al. No association between GB virus-C viremia and virological 2002;21(11):775–81.
or immunological failure after starting initial anti-retroviral therapy. Mauser-Bunschoten EP, Damen M, Zaaijer HL, Sjerps M, Roosendaal
AIDS 2002;16:1929–33. G, Lelie PN, et al. Hepatitis G virus RNA and Hepatitis G virus-
Copra S. Current status of hepatitis G virus infection. In: Rose BD, editor. E2 antibodies in Dutch hemophilia patients in relation to transfusion
UpToDate, Wellesley, MA, 2004. history. Blood 1998;92:2164–8.
Di Bisceglie AM. Hepatitis G virus infection: a work in progress. Ann Mison L, Hyland C, Poidinger M, Borthwick I, Faoagali J, Aeno U,
Intern Med 1996;125:772. et al. Hepatitis G virus genotypes in Australia, Papua New Guinea
Dille BJ, Surowy TK, Gutierrez RA, Coleman PF, Knigge MF, Carrick and the Solomon Islands: a possible New Pacifc type identified. J
RJ, et al. An ELISA for detection of antibodies to the E2 protein of Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;15:952–6.
GB virus C. J Infect Dis 1997;175:458–61. Moaven LD, Hyland CA, Young IF, Bowden DS, McCaw R, Mison L, et
Feucht H-H, Zollner B, Polywka S, Knodler B, Scrother M, Nolte H, et al. al. Prevalence of hepatitis G virus in Queensland blood donors. Med
Prevalence of hepatitis G viraemia among healthy subjects, individuals J Aust 1996;165:369–71.
with liver disease, and persons at risk for parenteral transmission. J Mocroft A, Vella S, Benfield TL, Chiesi A, Miller V, Gargalianos P,
Clin Microbiol 1997;35:767–8. et al. Changing patterns of mortality across Europe in patients in-
Fried MW, Khudyakov YE, Smallwood GA, Cong M, Nichols B, Diaz E, fected with HIV-1. EuroSIDA Study Group. Lancet 1998;352:1725–
et al. Hepatitis G virus co-infection in liver transplantation recipients 30.
with chronic hepatitis C and nonviral chronic liver disease. Hepatology Muerhoff AS, Simons JN, Leary TP, Erker JC, Chalmers ML, Pilot-Matias
1997;25:1271–5. TJ, et al. Sequence heterogeneity within the 5 -terminal region of the
George SL, Xiang J, Stapleton JT. Clinical isolates of GB virus type hepatitis GB virus C genome and evidence for genotypes. J Hepatol
C vary in their ability to persist and replicate in peripheral blood 1996;25:379–84.
mononuclear cell cultures. Virology 2003;316:191–201. Muerhoff AS, Tillmann HL, Manns MP, Dawson GJ, Desai SM. GB virus
Greub G, Ledergerber B, Battegay M, Grob P, Perrin L, Furrer H, et C genotype determination in GB virus-C/HIV co-infected individuals.
al. Clinical progression, survival, and immune recovery during anti- J Med Virol 2003;70:141–9.
retroviral therapy in patients with HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus co- Mukaide M, Mizokami M, Orito E, Ohba K, Nakano T, Ueda R, et al.
infection: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Lancet 2000;356:1800–5. Three different GB virus C/hepatitis G virus genotypes: phylogenetic
Hardikar W, Moaven LD, Bowden DS, Locarnini SA, Smith AL. Hepatitis analysis and a genotyping assay based on restriction fragment length
G: viroprevalence and seroconversion in a high-risk group of children. polymorphism. FEBS Lett 1997;407:51–8.
J Viral Hepat 1999;6:337–41. Nattermann J, Nischalke HD, Kupfer B, Rockstroh J, Hess L, Sauerbruch
Heringlake S, Ockenga J, Tillmann HL, Trautwein C, Meissner D, Stoll T, et al. Regulation of CC chemokine receptor 5 in hepatitis G virus
M, et al. GB virus C/hepatitis G virus infection: a favorable prognostic infection. AIDS 2003;17:1457–62.
factor in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients? J Infect Dis Nunnari G, Nigro L, Palermo F, Attanasio M, Berger A, Doerr HW, et
1998;177:1723–6. al. Slower progression of HIV-1 infection in persons with GB virus
Kao J-H, Chen P-J, Lai M-Y, Chen W, Chen D-S. Effect of GB virus- C Co-infection correlates with an intact T-Helper 1 cytokine profile.
C/hepatitis G virus on hepatitis B and C viremia in multiple hepatitis Ann Intern Med 2003;139:26–30.
virus infections. Arch Virol 1998;143:787–802. Oshita M, Hayashi N, Mita E, Iio S, Hiramatsu N, Hijioka T, et al. GBV-
Laskus T, Radkowski M, Wang L-F, Vargas H, Rakela J. Lack of evidence C/HGV infection in chronic hepatitis C patients: its effect on clinical
for hepatitis G virus in the livers of patients co-infected with hepatitis features and interferon therapy. J Med Virol 1998;55:98–102.
C and G viruses. J Virol 1997;71:7804–6. Palella Jr FJ, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, Loveless MO, Fuhrer J, Satten
Lau DT, Miller KD, Detmer J, Kolberg J, Herpin B, Metcalf JA, et al. GA, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with
Hepatitis G virus and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection: advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient
response to interferon-alpha therapy. J Infect Dis 1999;180:1334–7. Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998;338:853–60.
Leary TP, Muerhoff AS, Simons JN, Pilot-Matias TJ, Erker JC, Chalmers Pantaleo G, Fauci AS. Immunopathogenesis of HIV infection. Annu Rev
ML, et al. Sequence and genomic organization of GBV-C: a novel Microbiol 1996;50:825–54.
member of the Flaviviridae associated with human non-A–E hepatitis. Pavesi A. Detection of signature sequences in overlapping genes and
J Med Virol 1996;48:60–7. prediction of a novel overlapping gene in hepatitis G virus. J Mol
Lefrere J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Morand-Joubert L, Brossard Y, Parnet- Evol 2000;50:284–95.
Mathieu F, Mariotti M, et al. Prevalence of GB virus C/hepatitis Pereira LMMB, Spinelli V, Ximenes RA, Cavalcanti MS, Melo R, Juca N,
G virus RNA and of anti-E2 in individuals at high or low risk for et al. Chronic hepatitis C infection: influence of the viral load, geno-
blood-borne or sexually transmitted viruses: evidence of sexual and types, and GBV-C/HGV co-infection on the severity of the disease in
parenteral transmission. Transfusion 1999a;39:83–94. a Brazilian population. J Med Virol 2002;67:27–32.
Lefrere JJ, Roudot-Thoraval F, Morand-Joubert L, Petit JC, Lerable J, Polgreen PM, Xiang J, Chang Q, Stapleton JT. GB virus type C/hepatitis
Thauvin M, et al. Carriage of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus RNA is G virus: a non-pathogenic flavivirus associated with prolonged sur-
associated with a slower immunologic, virologic, and clinical progres- vival in HIV-infected individuals. Microbes Infect 2003;5:1255–61.
sion of human immunodeficiency virus disease in co-infected persons. Pomerantz RJ, Nunnari G. HIV and GB virus C : can two viruses be
J Infect Dis 1999b;179:783–9. better than one? N Engl J Med 2004;350:963–5.
M.D. Berzsenyi et al. / Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266 265

Puig-Basagoiti F, Cabana M, Guilera M, Gimenez-Barcons M, Sirera Strauss E, da Costa Gayotto LC, Fay F, Fay O, Fernandes HS, Fischer
G, Tural C, et al. Prevalence and route of transmission of infection Chamone Dde. Liver histology in co-infection of hepatitis C virus
with a novel DNA virus (TTV), hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis G (HCV) and hepatitis G virus (HGV). Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo
virus in patients infected with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2002;44:67–70.
2000;23:89–94. Tacke M, Kiyosawa K, Stark K, Schlueter V, Ofenloch-Haehnle B, Hess
Qurishi N, Kreuzberg C, Luchters G, Effenberger W, Kupfer B, Sauer- G, et al. Detection of antibodies to a putative hepatitis G virus enve-
bruch T, et al. Effect of anti-retroviral therapy on liver-related mor- lope protein. Lancet 1997a;349:318–20.
tality in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infection. Lancet Tacke M, Schmolke S, Schlueter V, Sauleda S, Esteban JI, Tanaka E, et
2003;362:1708–13. al. Humoral immune response to the E2 protein of hepatitis G virus is
Rambusch EG, Wedemeyer H, Tillmann HL, Heringlake S, Manns MP. associated with long-term recovery from infection and reveals a high
Significance of co-infection with hepatitis G virus for chronic hepatitis frequency of hepatitis G virus exposure among healthy blood donors.
C-a review of the literature. Z Gastroenterol 1998;36:41–53. Hepatology 1997b;26:1626–33.
Reed KD, Rice CM. Overview of hepatitis C virus genome structure, Tanaka E, Alter HJ, Nakatsuji Y, Shih JW, Kim JP, Mastsumoto A, et
polyprotein processing, and protein properties. Curr Top Microbiol al. Effect of hepatitis G virus infection on chronic hepatitis C. Ann
Immunol 2000;242:55–84. Intern Med 1996;125:740–3.
Rey D, Fraize S, Vidinic J, Meyer P, Fritsch S, Labouret, et al. High Thomas DL, Vlahov D, Alter HJ, Hunt JC, Marshall R, Astemborski
prevalence of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus RNA in patients in- J, et al. Association of antibody to GB virus C (hepatitis G virus)
fected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Med Virol 1999;57: with viral clearance and protection from reinfection. J Infect Dis
75–9. 1998;177:539–42.
Rodriguez B, Woolley I, Lederman MM, Zdunek D, Hess G, Valdez Tillmann HL, Heringlake S, Trautwein C, Meissner D, Nashan B, Schlitt
H. Effect of GB virus C co-infection on response to anti-retroviral HJ, et al. Antibodies against the GB virus C envelope 2 protein before
treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J Infect liver transplantation protect against GB virus C de novo infection.
Dis 2003;187:504–7. Hepatology 1998;28:379–84.
Sathar MA, Soni PN, Pegoraro R, Simmonds P, Smith DB, Dhillon AP, Tillmann HL, Heiken H, Knapik-Botor A, Heringlake S, Ockenga J,
et al. A new variant of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus (GBV-C/HGV) Wilber JC, et al. Infection with GB virus C and reduced mortality
from South Africa. virus Res 1999;64:151–60. among HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:715–24.
Sawayama Y, Hayashi J, Etoh Y, Urabe H, Minami K, Kashiwagi S. Het- Tillmann HL, Manns MP. GB virus-C infection in patients infected with
erosexual transmission of the GB virus C/Hepatitis G virus infection the human immunodeficiency virus. Antiviral Res 2001;52:83–90.
to non-intravenous drug-using female prostitutes in Fukuoka, Japan. Tillmann HL, Stoll M, Manns MP, Schmidt RE, Heiken H. Chemokine
Dig Dis Sci 1999;44:1937–43. receptor polymorphisms and GB virus C status in HIV-positive pa-
Scallan MF, Clutterbuck D, Jarvis LM, Scott G, Simmonds P. Sex- tients. AIDS 2002;16:808–9.
ual transmission of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus. J Med Virol Tillmann HL, Manns MP, Claes C, Heiken H, Schmidt RE, Stoll M. GB
1998;55:203–8. virus C infection and quality of life in HIV-positive patients. AIDS
Schleicher SB, Flehmig BF. Genotyping of GB virus C by restric- Care 2004;16:736–43.
tion pattern analysis of the 5 untranslated region. J Med Virol Tseng CT, Klimpel GR. Binding of hepatitis C virus envelope pro-
2003;71:226–32. tein E2 to CD81 inhibits natural killer cell functions. J Exp Med
Seifried C, Weber M, Bialleck H, Seifried E, Schrezenmeier H, Roth WK. 2002;195:43–9.
High prevalence of GBV-C/HGV among relatives of GBV-C/HGV Tucker TJ, Smuts HE, Eedes C, Knobel GD, Eickhaus P, Robson SC,
positive blood donors in blood recipients and in patients with aplastic et al. Evidence that the GBV-C/Hepatitis G virus is primarily a lym-
anemia. Transfusion 2004;44:268–74. photropic virus. J Med Virol 2000;61:52–8.
Sherman KE, Rouster SD, Chung RT, Rajicic N. Hepatitis C virus preva- Van der Bij AK, Kloosterboer N, Prins M, Boeser-Nunnink B, Geskus RB,
lence among patients infected with Human Immunodeficiency virus: a Lange JM, et al. GB virus C co-infection and HIV-1 disease progres-
cross-sectional analysis of the US adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group. sion: The Amsterdam Cohort Study. J Infect Dis 2005;191:678–85.
Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:831–7. Vargas HE, Laskus T, Radkowski M, Poutous A, Wang LF, Lee R, et
Sherman KE. HCV and HIV: A bad combination. in: Wang T, Dienstag al. Hepatitis G virus co-infection in hepatitis C virus-infected liver
T, Camilleri M, Course Directors. A new era in gastroenterology and transplant recipients. Transplantation 1997;64:786–8.
hepatology. American Gastroenterological Association Spring Post- Voirin N, Trepo C, Esteve J, Chevallier P, Ritter J, Fabry J, et al. Effects
graduate Course, New Orleans, May 15–16 2004; p. 151–4. of co-infection with hepatitis C virus and GB virus C on CD4 cell
Simmonds P. The origin and evolution of hepatitis viruses in humans. J count and HIV-RNA level among HIV-infected patients treated with
Gen Virol 2001;82:693–712. highly active anti-retroviral therapy. AIDS 2002;16:1556–9.
Simons JN, Leary TP, Dawson GJ, Pilot-Matias TJ, Muerhoff AS, Williams CF, Klinzman D, Yamashita TE, Xiang J, Polgreen PM, Rinaldo
Schlauder GC, et al. Isolation of a novel virus-like sequence asso- C, et al. Persistent GB virus C infection and survival in HIV-infected
ciated with human hepatitis. Nat Med 1995;1:564–9. men. N Engl J Med 2004;350:981–90.
Smith DB, Basaras M, Frost S, Haydon D, Cuceanu N, Prescott L, et Xiang J, Daniels KJ, Soll DR, Schmidt WN, LaBrecque DR, Stapleton JT.
al. Phylogenetic analysis of GBV-C/hepatitis G virus. J Gen Virol Visualization and characterization of GB virus C (hepatitis G virus)
2000;81:769–80. particles: evidence for a nucleocapsid. J Viral Hepat 1999;6:S16–22.
Spellberg B, Edwards JE. Type 1/Type 2 immunity in infectious diseases. Xiang J, Wunschmann S, Schmidt W, Shao J, Stapleton JT. Full-length
Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:76–102. GB virus C (Hepatitis G virus) RNA transcripts are infectious in
Stapleton JT. GB virus type C/hepatitis G virus. Semin Liver Dis primary CD4-positive T cells. J Virol 2000;74:9125–33.
2003;23:137–48. Xiang J, Wunschmann S, Diekema DJ, Klinzman D, Patrick KD, George
Stark K, Bienzle U, Hess G, Engel AM, Hegenscheid B, Schluter. SL, et al. Effect of co-infection with GB virus C on survival among
Detection of the hepatitis G virus genome among injecting drug patients with HIV infection. N Engl J Med 2001;345:707–14.
users, homosexual and bisexual men, and blood donors. J Infect Dis Xiang J, George SL, Wünschmann S, Chang Q, Klinzman D, Staple-
1996;174:1320–3. ton JT. Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by GB virus C infection
Stevenson M. Therapeutic potential of RNA interference. N Engl J Med through increases in RANTES, MIP-1␣, MIP-1␤, and SDF-1. Lancet
2004;351:1772–7. 2004;363:2040–6.
266 M.D. Berzsenyi et al. / Journal of Clinical Virology 33 (2005) 257–266

Yeo AET, Matsumoto A, Hisada M, Shih JW, Alter HJ, Goedert JJ. Zander C, Andersen J, Blackard J, Lin W, Zdunek D, Peters
Effect of hepatitis G virus infection on progression of HIV infection M, et al. GB virus C clearance is frequent in HIV/HCV
in patients with hemophilia. Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study. co-infected patients receiving interferon and Ribavirin treatment
Ann Intern Med 2000;132:959–63. but does not adversely affect HIV-1 viremia: The adult ACTG
Yu M-L, Chuang W-L, Dai C-Y, Chen S-C, Lin Z-Y, Hsieh M-Y, et al. A5071 study roup. In: Abstracts of the 54th annual meeting
GB virus C/hepatitis G virus infection in chronic hepatitis C patients of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases;
with and without interferon-␣ therapy. Antiviral Res 2001;52:241–9. 2003.

You might also like