See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/304782185

PSYCHOMOTOR TRAINING PROGRAM WITH ELEMENTS OF THEATRICAL

PLAY ON MOTOR PROFICIENCY AND COGNITIVE SKILLS OF PRESCHOOLERS

Article · July 2016

CITATION READS

1 1,067

3 authors, including:

Emmanouil Skordilis
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
76 PUBLICATIONS   613 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Master Thesis in my Department View project

Alive & Kicking View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Emmanouil Skordilis on 04 July 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Applied,
Natural and Social Sciences (IMPACT: IJRANSS)
ISSN(P): 2347-4580;ISSN(E): 2321-8851
Vol. 4, Issue 6, Jun 2016, 147-158
© Impact Journals

PSYCHOMOTOR TRAINING PROGRAM WITH ELEMENTS OF THEATRICAL PLAY ON

MOTOR PROFICIENCY AND COGNITIVE SKILLS OF PRESCHOOLERS

EIRINI E. SPANAKI1, ANDRIANA K. GREKIOTI2 & EMMANOUIL K. SKORDILIS3

1
Special Education, University of Patras, Greece
2
MA In Tesol: Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, University of Nicosia, Nicosia
3
Associate Professor, Adapted Physical Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a psychomotor training program with elements of theatrical
play, upon the cognitive skills and motor proficiency of 41 Greek preschoolers who attended in two separate regular
schools, in Heraklion, Crete. The two schools randomly served as the experimental - EG (N= 20 students) and control - CG
(N=21 students) groups. The Bruininks- Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency -Short Form (BOTMP – SF) (Bruininks,
1978) assessed the motor skills, while the ATHENA test (Paraskevopoulos & Paraskevopoulou, 2011) assessed the
cognitive skills. The EG followed a ten - week program, twice per week. The program was designed according to the
psychomotor development theory (Zimmer, 2007) enriched with theatrical play. 2 X 2 MANOVA, with t-parameter
estimates for post hoc comparisons were used for statistical analyses of motor proficiency. Significant interaction effects
with respect to ‘general motor proficiency’ was found. With respect to cognitive skills separate 2 X 2 ANOVAs were used
and the results were significant for ‘language proportions’, ‘vocabulary’, ‘picture memorization’, ‘distinction of graphs’,
‘complete proposals’ and ‘word completion’. The results provided implications for curriculum design, effective teaching
and preparing future teachers to work with alternative ways.

KEYWORDS: Psychomotor Training Program, Theatrical Play, Motor Proficiency, Cognitive Skills, Preschoolers

INTRODUCTION

Free game is not sufficient to motor development of children (Barbas, Venetsanou & Kambas, 2014; Manross,
2000; Fisher, et al., 2005). Children in preschool and primary school age need to participate in appropriate movement
programs, which should aim to prevent children’s future motor disorders. At the same time, these programs target at better
preparation for learning. Apart from these, the enhancement of the development of self-esteem and social and emotional
skills could be considered essential (Fisher, et al., 2005; Gallahue, 1996; Zimmer, 2007). Additionally, the researchers
agree that the organized movement programs are more useful for the cognitive skills of the children than the free motor
activities (Pascaul- Leone & Irvin, 1994) and they enhance the significant role of cultivation of language on cognitive
skills (Gioti, Derri & Koumourtzoglou, 2006). In that way, the curriculum of kindergarten includes the psychomotor
education as a training that supports the holistic development of children (APS, 2005). The effect of psychomotor training
programs upon motor proficiency has been examined in the past (Spanaki, Skordilis & Venetsanou, 2010; Trouli, 2008;
Zimmer, Christoforidis, Xanthi, Aggeloussis & Kambas, 2008) but the effect upon cognitive skills has not been reported in
depth yet. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is an attempt to examine the effect of an organized psychomotor

Impact Factor(JCC): 2.7341- This article can be downloaded from www.impactjournals.us

 148 Eirini E. Spanaki, Andriana K. Grekioti & Emmanouil K. Skordilis

training program, enriched with theatrical play, on the cognitive skills and motor proficiency of preschoolers. The existence
of programs that evolve the mobility of preschoolers and, simultaneously, have a positive impact on cognitive skills are of
particular importance in preschool age.

Especially, from the perspective of motor development, Zimmer, Christoforidis, Xanthi, Aggeloussis and Kambas
(2008) studied the effect of a psychomotor intervention program on motor performance of 233 Greek preschoolers. The
results of the research showed a significant effect of the intervention program to experimental group (EG) and the
researchers argued that the particular features of the psychomotor training made the program attractive to children.
Additionally, Spanaki, Skordilis & Venetsanou (2010) examined the effect of a psychomotor training program on motor
development of 148 primary school students. After the assessment by Bruininks- Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-
BOTMP (Bruininks, 1978), the students divided in three groups: a) high, b) average and c) low motor proficiency; also, in
experimental (EG) and control group (CG). There was a significant improvement for three groups on gross, fine, fine-
gross motor skills and graphomotor skills of EG, in contrast to the lower improvement of the CG, which was participated in
the curriculum program.

From another perspective, there are researchers who studied intervention programs as music and motor ones
which demonstrated improvement in balance, speed of walking, dynamic balance, rhythm, time and expression of
movements. Hamburg and Clair (2002) supported that music is useful for motor development. Gruhn et al. (2003)
maintained that a person’s musical abilities can interact considerably to the speed of thought. Researchers support that
preschool children who participated in a music and motor education program had improvement in the training of motor
concepts of spatial orientation, rhythm and reaction time, whereas the same time, seemed to develop creativity and
imagination (Derri, Tsapakidou, Zachopoulou & Kioumourtzoglou, 2001; Tsapakidou, Zachopoulou & Zografou, 2001).
Additionally, Pavlidou (2001) studied the preschoolers’ participation in a program which included a combination of
different activities of psychomotor education, such as music-motor, dance and theatrical play. The preschoolers presented
significant improvement in their mobility, perception of space and rhythm, but also in understanding instructions, the
reproduction of movement, especially in creative movement and, also, in communicative relationships between them. From
another perspective, Kouretzis (2008) supported that the theatrical play constitutes a combination of motor activities, using
music and expression vectors through imitation, drama or improvisation. The researchers, also, suggest the teaching of
psychomotor education and musical reactivity in relation to exercise, in a similar way that the children acquired the motor
development, holistically (Trouli, 2008).

Tracing the relationship of motor and cognitive skills of children, Getchell, McMenamin and Whitall (2005)
studied the gross motor development of children with learning disabilities and they concluded that the gross motor
coordination skills provide important information for early detection of learning disabilities. Subsequently, studies with
children with 'non-verbal' learning disabilities (eg. mathematics or writing) showed consequent difficulties of coordination,
balance and graphomotor skills (Molenaar - Klumpe, 2002; Rourke, 1995). Getchell et al. (2005) supported that the motor
coordination is a reliable criterion for understanding the mechanisms for learning disabilities. Goswami (1996) studied the
effect of a variety of cognitive activities designed for 200 children, 8- 15 years old. The results of this research showed that
the children who were physically active had better performance in cognitive tests. In addition, Haines (2003) processed
data from the catalogs of the National Health Service of G. Britain, where there were files of the results of tests carried out

Index Copernicus Value: 3.0 - Articles can be sent to editor@impactjournals.us

 Psychomotor Training Program with Elements of Theatrical Play on Motor Proficiency and Cognitive Skills of Preschoolers 149

at children from 4 to 8 years, which aimed at the diagnosis of motor development or learning disabilities. Research results
confirmed the existence of a relationship rhythmic ability and motor performance, the performance of language and
reading.

Specifically, Gioti, Derri & Kioumourtzoglou (2006) studied the effect of both physical education and language
program on 67 preschoolers’ knowledge on oral and written speech. The EG participated in a five week- integrated
teaching program, while the CG followed the typical preschool program and the EG improved the language elements more
than CG. In Greece, Kambas, Amoutzas, Makri, Gourgoulis and Antoniou (2002) studied the effect of a program of
psychomotor therapy (PPSA), emphasizing awareness of space and time, and graphomotor development of 35
preschoolers. According to the researchers the EG improved significantly the scores in the tests 'cycle' and 'triangle', during
the first analysis unlike the children of CG. Simultaneously, theatrical play has a significant role inside the kindergarten.
Furthermore, Tsimpidaki et al. (2014) studied the effect of a theatrical play program on development skills of 8 children
with mental retardation (Μ.Ο.= 13.7 years old), who participated in theatrical play for 15 times. The program focused on
role play in basic life activities (occupations, household activities, sports activities and hospital care) and showed
significant offer on basic knowledge for social inclusion, recognition, understanding and expression of emotions and
basically, in self- esteem development.

Overall, there is no extensive research on psycho- pedagogical programs with combination of psychomotor
training and theatrical play in Greece. Additionally, it seems that there is limited research regarding the effect that
psychomotor programs and theatrical play on cognitive skills of children of preschool and primary school age.

METHODS
The Sample

The study was conducted on a sample of 41 Greek preschoolers 19 boys and 21 girls, with an average age of
64.09 months (SD 6.81). Children who participated in this study attended a regular kindergarten program and were not
involved in any further sports activities. None of them had any previous experience with the set cognitive tasks and motor
tests. All the parents signed a written consent for each child to participate in the study.

The participants attended in two different kindergartens which were randomly selected from the relevant list from
the Prefecture of Heraklion. By random selection too, the one constituted the experimental group (EG = 20) and the other
constituted the control group (CG = 21) (Thomas & Nelson, 2003) (Table 1).

MEASUREMENTS
Bruininks- Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency

Bruininks- Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency -Short Form (BOTMP - SF) (Bruininks, 1978) assessed
participants’ motor proficiency. It is a popular motor assessment battery for children aging 4½ - 14½ years (Kambas,
Aggeloussis, Proviadaki, Mavromatis & Taxildaris, 2004; Wilson, Kaplan, Crawford & Dewey, 2000). The BOTMP- SF
incorporates 14 items classified under 8 motor areas: 1) running speed and agility, 2) balance, 3) bilateral coordination, 4)
strength, 5) upper- limb coordination, 6) response speed, 7) visual- motor control, 8) upper- limb speed and dexterity.
According to several research findings, the SF is valid enough to provide satisfactory information about the motor
proficiency of children (Broadhead & Bruininks, 1982; Hassan, 2001). Additionally, the above test seems to be a valid test

Impact Factor(JCC): 2.7341- This article can be downloaded from www.impactjournals.us

 150 Eirini E. Spanaki, Andriana K. Grekioti & Emmanouil K. Skordilis

of motor proficiency in normal Greek preschool and primary school children (Kambas & Aggeloussis, 2006; Kambas et al.,
2010; Spanaki, Skordilis & Venetsanou, 2010; Venetsanou, Kambas, Aggelousis & Fatouros, 2006). Venetsanou et al.,
(2006) assessed the detection of children with motor problems through: a) the BOTMP-SF and b) BOTMP-LF. The
researchers found that 72.2% of students with motor problems were identified with both measuring instruments and
concluded that these instruments could be used for clinical and research purposes in Greece, provided that the scoring
system would undergo certain modifications. Finally, Proviadaki (2004) confirmed the precision and reliability of BOTMP
and provided the translated data sheets and the users' guidelines in Greek. The evaluation lasted about 20 minutes for each
participant and their performance on the BOTMP –SF can be scored in several ways. Raw scores (like the number of dots
made, etc.) are noted, and they are then converted into a numerical point score that compile the total battery composite
(Kouli, Avloniti, Venetsanou, Giannakidou, Gazi, & Kambas, 2010).

ATHENA Test

The ATHENA test assessed the cognitive skills of the participants (Paraskevopoulos & Paraskevopoulou, 2011).
The test incorporates fourteen individualized diagnostic items evaluating the perceptual, cognitive, and psychomotor
processes. It is considered a diagnostic tool of learning difficulties and evaluates necessary development elements for
school learning and adaptation (Paraskevopoulos, Kalantzi-Azizi & Giannitsas, 1999). The tool offers a typical diagnostic
diagram, which gives important information on the profile of each child tested. It supports the development and
implementation of instructive and remedial programs for children, interventions such as supplementary teaching programs
etc (Paraskevopoulos & Paraskevopoulou, 2011). The evaluation lasted about 30 minutes for each participant.

For the purposes of the present study, the participants were assessed in nine items: a)‘language proportions ', b)
‘copy shapes’, c) ' vocabulary ', d)' images memorization ', e)' number memorization ', f) ‘complete proposals’, g) ‘ word
competition’, h)' distinction of graphs’ and i) 'visual -motor control’. Papanis et al. (2009) stated that the ATHENA is a
multidisciplinary test of intra-individual assessment and offers a comprehensive view for critical developmental areas. It
identifies areas where the students are lacking, areas that inhibit their ability to respond to the learning requirements, and
supports the teaching - therapeutic intervention for students with and without disabilities. Citing the most important factors
that influence the choice of this instrument is its adaptation on particularities of the Greek population and the provision of a
short form with cognitive items evaluating cognitive skills of children with or without special needs. Also, the creators
suggest the Athena test for evaluating cognitive development of children over five years old (Paraskevopoulos &
Paraskevopoulou, 2011).

ATHENA Test was constructed and was weighed in the psychometric laboratory of the Faculty of Philosophy,
Pedagogy and Psychology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, in a process that lasted seven years. Initially it
was administered to 500 preschoolers and 660 children aged 5 to 9 years. Triga (2010) examined the validity and reliability
of the tool and it was at a satisfactory level.

Statistical Analysis

Separate 2 X 2 factorial ANOVAs evaluated the interaction effect between experimental condition (EG vs CG)
and time (pre and post testing), with respect to the cognitive skills of kindergarten students and 2 X 2 MANOVA evaluated
the same interaction with respect to the motor proficiency. If the level of F-values was significant in repeated

Index Copernicus Value: 3.0 - Articles can be sent to editor@impactjournals.us

 Psychomotor Training Program with Elements of Theatrical Play on Motor Proficiency and Cognitive Skills of Preschoolers 151

measurements, the differences of arithmetic means were analyzed with the Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. The t-
test was used to determine the statistical significance of differences in coefficients of reliability and homogeneity of motor
tests between the initial and final measurements. Post hoc comparisons were made using p values set at.001. In addition,
Eta Squared (η2) values were also used for data interpretation (Table 2).

Finally, the reliability of the measurement was performed by the method Intraclass Correlation Coefficient - ICC
for the BOTMP was very high (ICC =.925) for the motor proficiency. The reliability was, also, performed by the method
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient - ICC for the Athena Test and it was very high (ICC = <. 803 and >.921) for the cognitive
skills of preschoolers too.

The Procedure – The Program

Initially, two assessment tools were selected to assess preschoolers’ motor proficiency and cognitive skills,
respectively. Measurements were taken before the beginning of the intervention program and at the end. The children were
individually assessed in the school yard, about their motor performance, according to the BOTMP guidelines (Bruininks,
1978). The examiner was experienced with administration and motor assessment in general. The Athena test was used
evaluating the cognitive performance in the classroom. The examiner was educated and experienced with administration.

The EG participated for ten weeks in an intervention psychomotor program with elements of theatrical play, while
the CG followed the typical program of the kindergarten. The intervention program was carried out two times per week for
45 minutes each time. Based on the results of the initial evaluation, the design of the intervention program was made. It
was instructed by an expert on Zimmer’s pedagogical approach of the Psychomotor Training philosophy (2007) and
included elements of theatrical play (Kouretzis, 1991). The scheduling of the present intervention program incorporated
teamwork activities with playful elements. Significant characteristics of the above program were the contact and the
communication between the children who participated as well as the encouragement and the animation of participants.
Simultaneously, the participants had chances to be self activated through tasks which generated concerns.

Indicatively, in the courtyard there was a scene with bricks and boxes or objectives for darts, chairs (material of
psychomotor training) etc. According to a myth that the kids animated, they shared "roles" and were required to make
motor choices. They walked or rolled, ran around or jumped through hoops, made balance in bricks etc. Participants were
encouraged to act according to their imagination, initiative and their inspirations. They had the choice to decide on the way
they would participate. The myth intended to encourage all children to participate in activities (for example: Treasure Hunt:
"All the pirates found a way to move along the paths in order to find their treasure ") (Intervention Program is represented
in Table 3).

At the end of the experimental procedure the re-evaluation on motor proficiency and cognitive skills of all
participants (EG and CG) followed, by the same research tools which was used for the initial assessment.

RESULTS

A significant interaction effect was found with respect to the 'general motor proficiency’ of the preschoolers (Λ
=.462, F = 45.397, p =.000, η2 =.538) (Figure.1). With respect to children’s cognitive skills, the univariate analyzes yielded
significant interaction regarding ‘language proportions’ (Λ =.668, F = 6.119, p =.002, η2 =.332) (figure. 2), ‘vocabulary’ (Λ
=.547, F =.10,229, p =.000, η2 =.453) (figure. 3), ‘picture memorization’(Λ =.776, F = 3.555, p =.023, η2 =.224) (figure.4),

Impact Factor(JCC): 2.7341- This article can be downloaded from www.impactjournals.us

 152 Eirini E. Spanaki, Andriana K. Grekioti & Emmanouil K. Skordilis

‘distinction of graphs’ (Λ =.807, F = 2.945, p =.045, η2 =.193) (figure. 5), ‘complete proposals’(Λ =.633, F = 7.151, p
=.001, η2 =.367) (figure.6) and ‘word completion’ (Λ =.649, F = 6.659, p =.001, η2 =.351) (figure. 7). For post hoc
comparisons, t- tests were significant for the ‘vocabulary’ (1η measurement: t= -1.945, p=.059, η2=.088, 2η mes.: t= 1.986,
p=.054, η2=.092), and the ‘word completion’ (1η mes.: t= -2.060, p=.046, η2=.098, 2η mes.: t= 1.910, p=.063, η2=.086).

DISCUSSIONS

The current research studied the effect of a psychomotor intervention program with elements of theatrical play
upon preschoolers’ motor proficiency and cognitive skills. The results obtained in this study showed a statistically
significant improvement for both motor proficiency and cognitive skills of the experimental group. A significant interaction
effect was found with respect to the 'general motor proficiency’ of the participants. Additionally, the children of the
experimental group showed significant improved performance in six out of the nine cognitive items that were studied. On
the contrary, the children who participated in the control group did not perform significantly better in the post-
measurement than in the pre-measurement, in any test.

That finding is consistent with previous studies that examined the effects of motor/ psychomotor intervention
programs upon motor proficiency (Spanaki, 2008; Spanaki, Skordilis & Venetsanou, 2010; Zimmer et al., 2008 etc).
Spanaki et al. (2010) supported that there was a significant interaction between the intervention program of psychomotor
training and the motor proficiency of the EG. Additionally, the results of the present study are in accordance to Pavlidou
(2001) who studied preschoolers’ participation in a program which included a combination of different activities of
psychomotor education, such as music-motor, dance and theatrical play.

Regarding cognitive development, the results of the present study shed light on the views of researchers who had
pointed the relation between motor and cognitive skills (Gioti et al., 2006; Gethell et al., 2005; Haines, 2003; Kambas et
al., 2002; Pascual – Leone & Irwin, 1994; Tsimpidaki et al., 2014). Pascual – Leone and Irwin (1994) highlighted the
importance of the organized motor program and supported that a structured program increases the children's activation
level on cognitive skills. In addition, Haines (2003), also, found a relationship between gross motor skills performance in
auditory verbal comprehension and language tests, from the catalogs of the National Health Service of G. Britain.

Furthermore, Gioti et al. (2006) found that children who participated in physical education and language program
improved the language elements after the application of the program. Kambas et al. (2002) supported the effectiveness of
psychomotor training on graphomotor development of preschoolers.

The present study supports the significant role of the intimacy between psychomotor education and theatrical play.
Researchers insist on the close relation between the above psycho pedagogical approaches and they think about them like
specific ways to attach holistically preschoolers and primary students, with or without special needs (Kouretzis, 1987;
2008). Tsimpidaki et al. (2014) highlighted the effect of the theatrical play on general development of children with special
needs, emphasizing on knowledge for social inclusion. Simultaneously, it should not be forgotten the psychomotor training
and the theatrical play have a significant role inside the kindergarten. The theatrical play can support the communication
between the preschoolers, the smooth integration of the child in the group nursery and the development of child’s skills
(Bourneli, 2002).

Index Copernicus Value: 3.0 - Articles can be sent to editor@impactjournals.us

 Psychomotor Training Program with Elements of Theatrical Play on Motor Proficiency and Cognitive Skills of Preschoolers 153

However, several limiting factors do not allow generalization of the present findings without caution. There was
no possibility to make two groups (EG and CG) that would include preschoolers mixed from two different classes
(randomly), but on the contrary, the groups were unchanged parts of the classes, because the program took place within
school hours. But the demographic characteristics of participants in the two groups was attempted to be roughly similar.
Additionally, the participants were from two kindergartens only and there is need to repeat this intervention program in
larger sample population in order to generalize. Additionally, the improved performance upon cognitive skills of the
children of EG, in the post-measurements might be due to the instructions that were given to them during the program. For
that reason, it is possible that the children had more improvement on cognitive skills in the second measurements. Overall,
this aspect is supported by other researchers who emphasize the importance of cognitive information in the performance of
motor skills (Barnhardt et al. 2005; Case-Smith, 2002; Jongmans et al. 2003). However, it became an attempt to delimitate
some environmental factors. The parents and the teachers had been advised that participants in the program couldn’t
participate in such extracurricular activities (sports, art, theater etc.) during the ten weeks.

In future, it would be useful to study the effect of psychomotor program with elements of theatrical play,
implementing it with preschoolers/ students with special educational needs, such as children with Learning Disabilities,
chronic diseases, mental retardation, even emotional problems or even in groups with movement/ developmental
difficulties (DCD, ADHD). Indeed, an intertemporal study which would be based on the scale of difficulty in motor
proficiency and cognitive skills and which would have repeated measurements of the participants’ abilities would be
interesting. Remarkable would be a comparative study of different intervention programs, for example, psychomotor, or
motor- music, motor- drama etc. and their effect on all-round development of children. Also, a research design could be
established that includes follow up measurements, after a certain period of time from the program, to determine whether
students’ improvement was maintained or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the aforementioned findings, it is important for preschool teachers and physical educators to know that
the implementation of psychomotor training, enriched with theatrical play, in preschool age contributes not only to the
improvement of children’s motor proficiency but also supports cognitive skills. Also, the teachers ought to have in mind
alternative ways to support students' learning through interventions in their skills development from an early age. Particular
attention should be given in the way that the teachers, physical educators and preschool teachers would provide an
alternative program within the framework of early intervention on the students’ motor proficiency and cognitive skills.
Overall, taking into consideration the effectiveness of the present program both on motor proficiency and cognitive skills,
there is importance to compare it with other methodological approaches.

Table 1: Students’ Demographics

Μeans (Months) SD Ν
General Schools 64.09 6.81 41
EG 61.63 7.08 19
CG 66.22 5.92 22
Boys 19
Girls 22

Impact Factor(JCC): 2.7341- This article can be downloaded from www.impactjournals.us

154 Eirini E. Spanaki, Andriana K. Grekioti & Emmanouil K. Skordilis

Table 2: 2 Χ 2 ANOVA Interaction between the Intervention Program and the Time
Subtests Λ F p η2
Total score of BOTMP- SF .462 45.397 .000 .538
Language proportions .668 6.119 .002 .332
Vocabulary .547 10.229 .000 .453
Picture memorization .776 3.555 .023 .224
Distinction of graphs .807 2.945 .045 .193
Complete proposals .633 7.151 .001 .367
Word completion .649 6.659 .001 .351

Table 3: Example of Program

Role- myth Development - Motor activities Materials
Gross motor development-
‘Pirates and the Chairs, boxes, mattress,
movements in different ways
treasure’ tables, gymnastic hoops etc.
(balance, walking on tiptoe etc)
‘Athletes in Gross motor development – Cords, automobile tires,
races with jumps, running, crawling on the exercise mat, bowling fitness
obstacles’ ground, turning etc. etc
Flagpoles fitness, cylindrical
Perception of space and body-
‘River races’ soil pipe, automobile tires,
activities of bilateral coordination
paddle boat etc.
‘The planets into Perception of space- Shapes with
Balls, gymnastic hoops,
the square of the the body- balls, spinning tops,
bares, big boxes etc.
universe’ triangles, squares and diamonds

FIGURES

Index Copernicus Value: 3.0 - Articles can be sent to editor@impactjournals.us

Psychomotor Training Program with Elements of Theatrical Play on Motor Proficiency and Cognitive Skills of Preschoolers 155

REFERENCES

1. Barbas, Ι., Venetsanou, F. & Kambas, A. (2014). Games with physical contact. Playful activities for all contact
sports for children from 6-12 years. Kavala: Ed. Shuttle.

2. Barnhardt, C., Borsting, E., Deland, P., Pham, N. & Vu, T. (2005). Relationship between visual-motor integration
and spatial organization of written language and math. Optometry and Vision Science, 82(2), 138-143.

3. Bruininks, R. H. (1978). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Minnesota: American Guidance Service.

4. Bourneli, N. (2002). Motor Creativity. Special Program for the Development of Motor Creativity for Kids.
Athens: Alfa Status.

5. Case-Smith, J. (2002). Effectiveness of school based occupational therapy intervention on handwriting. American
Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 17-25.

6. Derri, V., Tsapakidou, A., Zachopoulou, E., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2001). Effect of a music and movement
programme on development of locomotor skills by children 4 to 6 years of age. European Journal of Physical
Education, 6, 16- 25.

7. Fisher, et al., 2005 Fisher, A., Reilly, J., Kelly, L., Montgomery, C., Williamson, A., & Paton, J. (2005).
Fundamental movement skills and habitual physical activity in young children. Medicine & Science in Sports &
Exercise, 37, 684–688.

8. Gallahue, D. L. (1996). Developmental physical education for today’s students. Dubuque, IA: Brown &
Lunchmark.

9. Getchell, N., McMenamin, S., & Whitall, J. ( 2005). Dual motor task coordination in children with and without
learning disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 22, 21- 38.

10. Gioti, E., Derri, V. & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2006). Preschoolers' Linguistic Development through Physical
education. Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education, 4 (3), 371 – 378.

11. Goswami, U. (1996). Analogical Reasoning and Cognitive Development. Advances in Child Development and
Behavior (pp. 92-135). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Goswami, U. & B.

12. Gruhn, W., Galley, N., Kluth, C. (2003). Do Mental Speed and Musical Abilities Interact? N.Y. Academy Music
Education Department & University of Music: Freiburg.

13. Hamburg, J., & Clair, A. A. (2003). The effects of a laban- based movement program with music on measures of
balance and gait in oldel adults. Activity Adaption Aging, 28, 17- 33.

14. Haines, C. (2003). Sequencing, co- ordination and rhythm ability in young children. Child: Care, Health and
Development, 29 (5), 395- 409.

15. Jongmans, M.J., Linthorst-Bakker, E., Westenberg, Y. & Smits-Engelsman, B.C.M. (2003). Use of a task-oriented
self-instruction method to support children in primary school with poor handwriting quality and speed. Human

Impact Factor(JCC): 2.7341- This article can be downloaded from www.impactjournals.us

156 Eirini E. Spanaki, Andriana K. Grekioti & Emmanouil K. Skordilis

Movement Science, 22, 549-566.

16. Kambas, Aggeloussis, Proviadaki, Mavromatis & Taxildaris, (2004). Control of the internal structure and
consistency of the bundle (integrated form) in preschoolers and elementary first age in Greece. Inquiries in
Physical Education and Sport, 2(2), 163-172

17. Kambas, A., Amoutzas, K., Makri, H., Gourgoulis, V., & Antoniou, P. (2002). The effect of psychomotor
education emphasizing in time and space, on the development of graphomotor skills in preschoolers. Exercise and
Society, 32, 49-57.

18. Kambas, A., Fatouros, Y., Christoforidis, C., Venetsanou, F., Papageorgiou, P., Giannakidou, D., & Aggeloussis,
N. (2010) The effects of Psychomotor Intervention, on Visual-Motor Control as a Graphomotor aspect in
preschool age. European Psychomotricity Journal, 3(1), 54-61.

19. Kouli, O., Avloniti, A., Venetsanou, F., Giannakidou, D., Gazi, S., & Kambas, A. (2010). The effect of a
psychomotor training program on the motor proficiency of preschool children in

20. a multicultural environment. European Psychomotricity Journal, 3(1), 31-36.

21. Kouretzis, L. (1987). The game as a tool of education, learning and creative expression of preschool children and
first grade of elementary school. Suggestion: Congress SELDE Athens.

22. Kouretzis, L. (2008). The Theatrical Play and dimensions. The Theatrical Play the MELINA program. Action
Plans (project). Athens: Ed. Traveler.

23. Manross, M. (2000). Learning to throw in physical education class: Part 3. Teaching Elementary Physical
Education, 11(3), 26-29.

24. Molenaar – Klumpe, M. (2002). Non- verbal learning disabilities: Characteristics, diagnosis and treatment within
an educational setting. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

25. Norusis, M. J. (1993). SPSS for Windows. Base system user’s guide. Release 6.0. Chicago: Marketing Department,
SPSS Inc.

26. Paraskevopoulos, I. & Paraskevopoulou, P. (2011). Athena test. Diagnosis of Learning Disabilities. Examiner
Guide: General Manual. Athens: Ed. Athena test.

27. Pascual- Leone, J. & Irwin, R. (1994). Noncognitive factors in high- road/ Low- road learning: I. Models of
abstraction in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 1, 73- 89.

28. Pavlidou, Ε. (2001). Rhythmic as an Educational Tool in Early Childhood: A Combined Program of Kinetic and
Rhythmic Education. Proceedings of the 3rd Panhellenic Conference of OMEP. Athens: Greek Letters.

29. Spanaki, E. (2008). Effect of an intervention psychomotor program on motor performance of primary school age
children. Unpublished thesis. University, Athens.

30. Spanaki I, Skordilis E, Venetsanou F. (2010). The Effect of a Psychomotor Program on the Motor Proficiency of
Early Elementary School Children. Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education, 8(2):132-141.

Index Copernicus Value: 3.0 - Articles can be sent to editor@impactjournals.us

Psychomotor Training Program with Elements of Theatrical Play on Motor Proficiency and Cognitive Skills of Preschoolers 157

31. Τsimpidaki et al. (2013). Theatrical play for children with special educational needs. Recording a program at
daycare center. Retrieved on 17 December 2013 from
http://www.specialeducation.gr/files/8eatriko%20paixnidi_amea.doc.

32. Triga, E. D. (2005). Speech-language problems. Case study. Program Manager: C. Drakos. University of Athens.

33. Triga, E.D. (2010). The diagnosis of learning difficulties in blind children. Customizing ATHENS Test to Braille.
Proceedings of the Second Panhellenic Special Education Conference, 15- 18 April, Athens.

34. Trouli, K. (2008). The psychomotor education in early childhood: an experimental study. 1st Symposium Greek
Scientific Society Psychomotor. Retrieved in 25 March 2015 from
www.phyed.duth.gr/files/congress/2008/Spa_abstracts.pdf

35. Tsapakidou, A, Zachopoulou, E., & Zografou, M. (2001). Early young children’s behavior during music and
movement program. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 41, 333- 345.

36. Zimmer, R. (2007). Motor education Manual. From theory to practice. Athens: Athlotypo.

37. Zimmer, R., Christoforidis, C., Xanthi, P., Aggeloussis, N., & Kambas, A. (2008). The effects of a psychomotor
training program on motor proficiency of Greek preschoolers. European Psychomotricity Journal, 1(2), 3-9.

38. Venetsanou, F., Kambas, A., Sagioti, E., & Giannakidou, D. (2009). Effect of an exercise program focusing
coordination on preschooler’s motor proficiency. European Journal of Psychomotricity, 2(1), 46 -55.

39. Wilson, B. N., Kaplan, B. J., Crawford, S. G., & Dewey, D. (2000). Interrater reliability of the Bruininks-
Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency – Long Form. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 95-110.

Impact Factor(JCC): 2.7341- This article can be downloaded from www.impactjournals.us

View publication stats