Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Filipinas Port V Go
Filipinas Port V Go
*
G.R. No. 161886. March 16, 2007.
_______________
* FIRST DIVISION.
454
455
456
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 3/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
GARCIA, J.:
_______________
457
_______________
458
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
_______________
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
459
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 7/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
_______________
460
_______________
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 8/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
461
_______________
6 Supra at note 1.
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 9/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
462
_______________
463
_______________
464
_______________
465
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 12/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
_______________
466
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 13/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
_______________
16 H. de Leon, The Corporation Code of the Phils., 2002 ed., pp. 310-311.
467
_______________
468
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 15/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
proof must20
establish his case by a preponderance of
evidence.
Besides, the determination of the necessity for
additional offices and/or positions in a corporation is a
management prerogative which courts are not wont to
review in the absence of any proof that such prerogative
was exercised in bad faith or with malice.
Indeed, it would be an improper judicial intrusion into
the internal affairs of Filport were the Court to determine
the propriety or impropriety of the creation of offices
therein and the grant of salary increases to officers thereof.
Such are corporate and/or business decisions which only
the corporation’s Board of Directors can determine. 21
So it is that in Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc. v. CA,
the Court unequivocally held:
_______________
19 Garcia v. De Vera, A.C. No. 6052, December 11, 2003, 418 SCRA 27.
20 Pastor v. Philippine National Bank, G.R. No. 141316, November 20,
2003, 416 SCRA 283.
21 Supra.
470
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 17/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 18/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
_______________
22 Chua v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 150793, November 19, 2004, 443
SCRA 259, 267.
23 Asset Privatization Trust v. Court of Appeals, 360 Phil. 768, 804-805;
300 SCRA 579, 614 (1998).
472
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 19/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
_______________
473
——o0o——
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 20/21
2/18/2021 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 518
central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000177b4a5fddf0bd59886003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 21/21