Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Elastisitas 1
Elastisitas 1
YVES NIEVERGELT"
Abstract. The following pages introduce the notion of elasticity and present its main mathematical and
graphical properties, illustrating them on real economic cases, such as the consumption of marijuana and the
demand for hospital beds.
*Received by the editors March 26, 1982, and in revised form June 17, 1982. The work of this author was
partially supported by a grant from the Swiss National Research Fund.
’Department of Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.
261
262 CLASSROOM NOTES
Pb I Price
Downloaded 03/26/14 to 140.120.135.222. Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see http://www.siam.org/journals/ojsa.php
nD(p) -1
rD(p) >-1
Quantity
0 qo q
MR(q) 0 MR(q) 0
FIG. 1. The domain of D lies or, the vertical axis, whereas TR and MR have theirs on the horizontal
axis.
TR’-P+q.P’=P.
+.. =P. + op =P. +
r P
Consequently, the marginal revenue MR(q) TR’(q) is positive where ro(p) < and
negative where nv(P) > (with p P(q)). For instance, if D is an affine function as in
Example 1.2, then total revenues reach their maximum at the midpoint (qo, P0), where
ro(po) by (4a), and therefore TR’(q0) 0 (see Fig. 1). Students will enjoy working
out the following two real cases:
Example 2.1. Belinfante and Davis found that the demand for record albums was
q D(p) -88.3 p + 1821, so that p -0.01133 q + 20.62. Hence, total reve-
q0 1821 / 2
-
nues will be largest with a price tag Po--20.62/2, i.e. $10.31 per album, and then
910 records will be sold.
Example 2.2. Hogarty and Elzinga [3] estimated the price elasticity of demand for
beer to be a constant r/o 1, with q D(p) 123/p (where p is in cents per can and q
in cans per adult per day). In this case, total revenues do not depend on price:
TR(q) TR oD(p)= p. D(p)= 123 (per adult per day) regardless of price and
quantity.
3. Visualizing r. Plotting a function F against logarithmic scales produces a curve
whose .slope equals the elasticity/’r of F: performing the changes of coordinates
(5) 4:u--e and ff:z-*ln(v)
and forming the composite (which amounts to changing scales)
(6) f:= p o Fo q,
CLASSROOM NOTES 263
e
(7) f’(u)- F’(e") e
F’(eu) rlr(eU),
F(e u) F(eu)
so that the slope off at u is indeed the elasticity of F at x e u. An alternative argument
runs as follows"
x dF
(1/F(x)) dF d[Log(F(x))]
n (x)
F(x) (1/x) dx
dx d [Log (x)]
(8)
lim Log [F(x + Ax)] Log IF(x)]
ax-.O Log (x + Ax) Log (x)
which equals the slope offat u In (x). Observe that both arguments hold with any base
for the logarithm, e.g. l0 or e. Of course, the slope off must be measured against linear
scales to yield r/F. This gives an easy way to locate the values of x where F(X) 1" find
wherefhas slope 1.
The next example will catch students’ attention.
Example 3.1. Nisbet and Vakil [6] proposed two demand curves for marijuana
among UCLA students (quantities in "lids" per month, prices in dollars per "lid"; one
"lid" equals one dried ounce)"
(A) q D1 (p) 15.4 p-l.O3, i.e. p 14.8 q-0.987,
(B) q D:(p):= -0.225 .p + 3.74, i.e.p -4.44 q + 16.6.
S/ounce
20
15 tangent line
D
i0
(q*,p*) ’\, (qo,Po)
ounces/month
1
0.i 0.2 0.3 .4 .5 .6 .8 1.0 2.0 3.0 4. 5. 6. 8. i0
FIG. 2. Dz(p) -0.225 p + 3.74, on logarithmic scales. (q*,p*) (1.49, 10) shows the prevailing
market situation, while (qo, Po) (1.87, 8.30) indicates the optimal point, where the tangent line to D2 (drawn
in) has slope 1.
264 CLASSROOM NOTES
D has constant elasticity -1.013 and therefore would simply appear as a straight line
with slope -1.013 on logarithmic scales. At the going price of $10 per ounce, D has
Downloaded 03/26/14 to 140.120.135.222. Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see http://www.siam.org/journals/ojsa.php
elasticity 1.51, the slope of the tangent to p o D_ o 4 at (q*, p*) (1.49, 10). Sliding a
straight edge with slope until it is tangent to the curve shows that D has elasticity
at (qo, P0) (1.87, 8.30), where revenues would be maximal (see Fig. 2).
4. Calculus with elasticities. The elasticities rir and rig of tWO given positive functions
F, G" *+ *+ follow rules similar to those of elementary calculus:
(a) riFG OF + riG,
(b) F/G riF riG,
(d) ri a- riF,
(e) riFoG (riF G) (chain rule),
rig
where a and X are constants. Let us prove (a) and (e) as examples:
X X
(a) riFG (F. G)’- (F’G + F. G’)= riF + riG,
F.G F.G
X X
(e) riFoG (F o G )’ (F’ o G) G’
FoG FoG
G
.(F, oG).X .G’ (riF o G) riG.
Fo G
The proof of (b) is similar to that of (a), while (c) and (d) constitute particular cases of
(e).
A function F can also be recovered from its elasticity as follows: since riF
(x/F) dF/dx then dF/F (riF/X) dx, and an integration yields
In IF(x) f,x), dx + In
J X
(9)
F(x) K. exp .frir(X)x dx]
for some constant K. Here is an application of this formula.
Example 4.1. Cullis, Forster and Frost [2] studied the demand for inpatient
treatment, whose elasticity can be written rio(S)=-2.19. S, where S denotes the
number of available hospital beds, and D that of deaths and discharges per year. Equation
(9) then yields
S
(10) D(S) K.exp [f-2.19. S
dS K e -2"’9"s
where Z represents the partition function and q -kT. Log (Z) the Helmholtz free
energy. (See [5, p. 62] and [7, p. 64].) Of course, the present paper does not tell how to
Downloaded 03/26/14 to 140.120.135.222. Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see http://www.siam.org/journals/ojsa.php
REFERENCES
[1] A. BELINFANTE AND R. R. DAVIS, JR., Estimating the demand for record albums, Rev. Business and
Economic Research, XIV/2 (winter 1978-1979), pp. 47-53.
[2] J. G. CULLIS, D. P. FORSTER AND C. E. B. FROST, The demand for inpatient treatment: some recent
evidence. Appl. Economics, 12 (1980), pp. 43-60.
[3] T. F. HOGARTV AND K. G. ELZ|NGA, The demand for beer, Rev. Economics and Statistics, LIV/2 (1972),
pp. 195-198.
[4] E. MANSFIELD, Microeconomics, Theory and Applications, 3rd. ed., W. W. Norton, New York, 1979.
[5] F.D. MURNAGHAr,Finite Deformation of an Elastic Solid, John Wiley, New York, 1951.
[6] C.T. NISBET AND F. VAKIL, Some estimates ofprice and expenditure elasticities of demandfor marijuana
among U.C.L.A. students, Rev. Economics and Statistics, LIV/4 (1972), pp. 473-475.
[7] C.J. THOMPSON, Mathematical Statistical Mechanics, Macmillan, New York, 1972.