Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Approach needed that enables statements about the system as a whole without
knowing the every single details.
Statistical mechanics is the formalism that tries to explain physical properties of
matter in bulk on the basis of the dynamical behavior of its microscopic constituents.
How do we proceed ?
We consider our system at hand having N(≈ 1023 ) number of particles confined
in a volume V . We carry out the analysis in the thermodynamic limit, i.e N →
∞, V → ∞ while the density n = N/V remains fixed and finite.
Next we consider the total energy E of the system. If the particles comprising the
system could be regarded as noninteracting, the total energy E can be written as
X
E= ǫi ni (1)
i
and X
N= ni (2)
i
There are three different kind of distribution corresponding to three different kind
of particles
1 Identical but distinguishable particles, the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.
Basically the classical statistics.
2Identical indistinguishable particles with integral spin, the Bose-Einstein
statistics.
3 Identical indistinguishable particles with half-integral spin, the Fermi-Dirac
statistics.
2 and 3 together constitute the quantum statistics.
Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution gives the average number of particles in the
energy ǫ at the absolute temperature T . It is given by
A is like a normalization constant. We integrate n(ǫ) over all energies to get N, the
total number of particles. k is Boltzmann’s constant (1.38 × 10−23 J/K), and T is
the temperature in Kelvins.
Find relative number of atoms/molecules at various energy levels of a system at
equillibrium temperature T.
2πN √ −ǫ/kT
n(ǫ)dǫ = ǫe dǫ
(πkT )3/2
ǫ = 12 mv 2 → dǫ = mvdv
Now n(ǫ)dǫ = n(v )dv
we get the molecular speed distribution
m 3/2 2 −mv 2 /2kT
n(v )dv = 4πN[ ] v e dv (13)
2πkT
1. Root Mean square speed (RMS Speed, v¯2 ) The proper way is to
average the squares of the velocities, and then take the square root of this value.
The resulting quantity is known as the root mean square (RMS) velocity
1 ∞ 2
Z Z ∞
m 3/2 4 −mv 2 /2kT
v¯2 = v n(v )dv = 4π[ ] v e dv (14)
N 0 0 2πkT
Using Gamma function √
for the integration, we get
v¯2 = 4π( 2πkT
m
)3/2 3 4 π ( 2kT
m )
5/2
= 3kT
m
r
3kT
vRMS =
m
1 ∞
Z Z ∞
m 3/2 3 −mv 2 /2kT
v̄ = vn(v )dv = 4π( ) v e dv (16)
N 0 0 2πkT
Using Gamma function for the q integration, we get
m 3/2 1 2kT 2
v̄ = [4π( 2πkT ) ][ 2 ( m ) ] = 8kT
πm
q
v̄ = 8kTπm
dn(v ) m 3/2 2 2
= 4πN( ) [(2v )e −mv /2kT − v 2 e −mv /2kT (2v )] = 0 (18)
dv 2πkT
Solving this, we get
r
2kT
vp =
m
Dr. Ananta Charan Pradhan (Department of Physics & AstronomyNIT,PH1002
Rourkela)
(II Semester) March 15, 2021 15 / 54
Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
Distribution of Molecular Speeds
MB statistics (Classical systems): consists of identical and distinguishable particles. They are treated
like billiard balls.
FD and BE statistics (Quantum systems): containing large numbers of identical indistinguishable
particles.
If the de Broglie wavelength λ is much smaller than the average separation hdi of the particles, then we
can neglect the overlap of the de Broglie waves, in which case the particles can be treated as if they
were distinguishable: λ ≪ hdi where
h h h
λ= = √ = √ (19)
p 2mEk 3mkT
The average separation of the particles is hdi = (V /N)1/3 , where (N/V ) is the number of particles per
unit volume in the system.
Thus, √ h = (V /N)1/3 which when cubed and rearranged becomes
3mkT
N h3
( )( )≪1 (20)
V (3mkT )3/2
The condition under which the Boltzmann distribution can be used. Low particle densities and high
temperatures for particles of a given mass.
ψ(1), ψ(2), ψ(3),..... represents the wave function of the individual particles.
ψ(1, 2) represents the wave function of the two particles and can also be
written as ψ(1, 2) = ψ(1)ψ(2).
ψ(1, 2) = ψ(2, 1) −→ Symmetric wave function
ψ(1, 2) = −ψ(2, 1) −→ Antisymmetric wave function
Consider two identical particles (1 and 2) which may exist in two different
states (a and b). The wave function of the system is either
ψI = ψa (1)ψb (2) or ψII = ψa (2)ψb (1)
The particles are indistinguishable, so, we cannot tell whether ψI or ψII
describes the system. Both the states are equally likely or equivalently we can
say the system spends half the time in ψI state and half the time in ψII state.
Therefore a linear combination of ψI and ψII is proper description of the
system.
ǫF = −αkT (33)
1
fFD (ǫ) = (34)
e (ǫ−ǫF )/kT + 1
1 1 1
For T=0, ǫ < ǫF , fFD (ǫ) = = = 0+1 =1
e (ǫ−ǫF )/kT +1 e −∞ +1
1 1
For T=0, ǫ > ǫF , fFD (ǫ) = = e ∞ +1 =0
e (ǫ−ǫF )/kT +1
1 1
At T > 0, when E=EF we have fFD (ǫ) = =
e 0 +1 2
If the cavity is a cube L long on each edge, then the standing waves in the x, y, z
direction will be formed for the condition such that
2L
jx = λ =1,2,3,....=number of half wavelengths in x-direction.
2L
jy = λ =1,2,3,....=number of half wavelengths in y-direction.
2L
jz = λ =1,2,3,....=number of half wavelengths in z-direction.
2Lν 2 2L 8πL3
g (ν)dν = π( ) dν = 3 ν 2 dν (37)
c c c
Density of standing waves in a cavity
1 8πν 2
G (ν)dν = g (ν)dν = dν (38)
L3 c3
The higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength and the greater the number
of waves.
Dr. Ananta Charan Pradhan (Department of Physics & AstronomyNIT,PH1002
Rourkela)
(II Semester) March 15, 2021 32 / 54
Rayleigh-Jeans Formula
We assume the waves originate in oscillators in the cavity walls and each oscillator
has two degrees of freedom. kT/2 is energy per degree of freedom. The energy
density in the frequency interval from ν to ν + dν is thus
8πν 2 kT
u(ν)dν = ǭG (ν)dν = kTG (ν)dν = dν (39)
c3
This is called the Rayleigh-Jeans formula which leads to the ”ultraviolet
catastrophe”. It predicts increasing energy density with increasing . It doesn’t
match experiment at all. It doesn’t even come close. Something is seriously
wrong.
We found that the Rayleigh-Jeans formula could not explain the spectral
energy density for blackbody radiation.
What’s wrong with the Rayleigh-Jeans formula ?
Rayleigh divided up the energy into kT/2 for each degree of freedom. This is
fine for a continuous energy distribution (classical).
We now know that it doesn’t work for harmonic oscillators, where energy is
quantized in units of hν.
However, our density of standing wave modes is fine but our energy density
was wrong.
Planck assumed that the oscillations in the cavity walls are limited to
ǫn = nhν.
Then he used Maxwell Boltzmann distribution to find that the number of
oscillation with energy ǫn is proportional to e −ǫn /kT at temperature T.
In such cases average energy per oscillator is
hν
ǭ = (40)
e hν/kT − 1
8πh ν 3 dν
u(ν)dν = hν G (ν)dν f (ν) = (41)
c 3 e hν/kT − 1
This formula works very well and it tells us that every body of condensed
matter radiates, regardless of its temperature. An object need not be so hot
that it glows conspicuously in the visible region in order to radiate.
The radiation from an object at room temperature is mainly in the far
infrared part of the spectrum to which eye is not sensitive.
8πh ν 3 dν
u(ν)dν = hνG (ν)f (ν)dν = (43)
c 3 e hν/kT − 1
Dr. Ananta Charan Pradhan (Department of Physics & AstronomyNIT,PH1002
Rourkela)
(II Semester) March 15, 2021 37 / 54
Wien’s Displacement Law
The wavelength (λmax ) at the peak of energy density of black body spectrum
at a given ‘T’ can be calculated by expressing ‘u’ as a function of ‘λ’ and
du
equating dλ to zero.
The energy distribution of photons in the cavity as a function of λ is
8πch 1
u(λ) = (44)
λ5 e hc/λkT − 1
Now the derivative,
!
1 −e a/λT ( Ta )( −1
λ2 )
d 1 1 −5 1
5
= 6
+ 5
= 0 (45)
dλ λ e a/λT −1 λ e a/λT −1 λ [e a/λT − 1]2
The total energy density inside the cavity is found by integrating the energy
R∞ 3 4
density over all frequencies (standard integration used: 0 e xx−1 = π15 )
∞ ∞
8πh ν3 8π 5 k 4 4
Z Z
u= u(ν)dν = dν = T = aT 4 (47)
0 0 c 3 e hν/kT − 1 15c 3 h3
R = eσT 4 (48)
Where σ = ac −8 2 4
4 = 5.67 × 10 W /m .K . The emissivity e(0-1) depends on
the nature of radiation surface.
unity of radiation, R in the above equation is erg/cm2 /sec or joule/m2 /sec.
The specific heat of a solid is the amount of energy required to raise its
temperature by 1 K.
We find specific heats by calculating the internal energy of solid as a function
∂E
of temperature. The specific heat = ( ∂T )V or P .
If we think atoms of a solid as 3-dimensional harmonic oscillators, each with
2 degrees of freedom, then the energy of a solid should be equal to
E = N × 3 × 2 × kT /2 = 3NkT = 3RT , where N = Avogadro’s number for 1
mole of solid and R is the gas constant = 8.31 J/mole.K =1.99 cal/mole.K.
The specific heat at constant volume is given by
∂E
CV = ( ∂T )V = 3R = 5.97 cal/mole.K
This is called Dulong-Petit’s law which states that the CV ∼ 3R for most of
the solids at room temperature.
The specific heat at constant pressure CP is 3 to 5 percent higher than CV in
solids because it includes the work associated with a volume change as well as the
change in internal energy.
Dr. Ananta Charan Pradhan (Department of Physics & AstronomyNIT,PH1002
Rourkela)
(II Semester) March 15, 2021 41 / 54
Specific Heat of Solids
Limitations of Dulong-Petit Law
At high temperatures, all crystalline solids have a specific heat of 6 cal/(mole.K)
i.e., they require 6 calories per mole to raise their temperature 1 K which is
consistent with Dulong-Petit Law. However, Dulong-Petit Law completely failed
to explain two observations.
1 The CV of light elements such as boron, beryllium, and diamond (3.34, 3.85,
and 1.46 cal/(mole.K), respectively at 20 ◦ C).
2 Specific heat of solids drops sharply at low temperatures and approaches 0 as
T → 0 K.
Einstein’s formula
Case I: At high temperature, hν << kT →
hν hν 1 hν 2 hν 2
(e kT − 1)2 = [1 + ( )+ ( ) + .... − 1]2 = ( ) (52)
kT 2 kT kT
Specific heat becomes,
hν
3R[1 + kT + ....] hν 2 hν
CV = hν 2
( ) = 3R[1 + + ...] = 3R (53)
( kT ) kT kT
Einstein’s formula
( hν )2
Case III: At low temperature (but T > 0): 3R e hν/kT
kT
= 3R(θE /T )2 e −θE /T i.e,
as T << θE , CV is proportional to e −θE /T (where θE = hν k ). Thus specific
heat decreases as the temperature decreases. Good agreement with
experiment.
Conclusions: Specific heat decrease exponentially at low T’s, approaches to
classical value at high T and tends to zero at T=0.
Flaws of Einstein’s formula: The fall in specific heat with decrease in
temperature is more rapid than observed in experiment in case of some
elements (Cu, Al, etc.)
Why zero point energy of HO does not enter into the analysis ?
Ground state enrgy ( 12 hν) of HO is merely a constant and it is independent of
temperature. Added term to total energy will be ǫ0 = 3N( 12 hν) = a constant
∂E
and will vanish when the partial derivative ( ∂T )V is taken to find CV .
Question : Find the specific heat at constant volume of 1.00 cm3 of radiation in
thermal equilibrium at 1000 K.
Answer : Energy density u = aT 4
Stefan-Boltzmann law R = eσT 4
Stefan’s constant σ = ac −8
4 = 5.67 × 10 W /m .K
2
The total energy (U) is related to the energy density u by U=Vu, where V is the
volume. In terms of temperature, U = Vu = VaT4 = V 4σ c T
4
∂E
The specific heat at constant volume is then CV = ( ∂T )V = V 16σ
c T
3
16(5.67×10−8 )
3×108 (1000)3 (1.0 × 10−6 ) = 3.03 × 10−12 J/K
From this density of states, we can calculate the Fermi energy (ǫF ). In
metals, electrons fill energy levels beginning with the lowest empty level and
proceeding to the highest.
In the ground state, there are no empty levels which have filled levels above
them. Electrons stop filling energy levels when we run out of electrons.
ǫF doesn’t depend on temperature, and only depends on how many electrons
are present in the given volume of metal. The total number of electrons in
the volume V is equall to the number of states since each state is limited to
one electron. So,
Z ǫF Z ǫF √ √
8 2πVm3/2 √ 16 2πVm3/2 3/2
N= g (ǫ)dǫ = ǫdǫ = ǫF (56)
0 0 h3 3h3
So, the Fermi energy
h2 3N 2/3
( ) ǫF = (57)
2m 8πV
where the quantity N/V is the density of electrons.
Dr. Ananta Charan Pradhan (Department of Physics & AstronomyNIT,PH1002
Rourkela)
(II Semester) March 15, 2021 50 / 54
Electron Energy Distribution in metal
Now we know the density of states, g(ǫ), we can calculate the distribution of
electron energies in a metal.
√ √ −3/2 √
(8 2πVm3/2 /h3 ) ǫdǫ (3N/2)ǫF ǫdǫ
n(ǫ)dǫ = g (ǫ)f (ǫ)dǫ = = (58)
e (ǫ−ǫF )/kT + 1 e (ǫ−ǫF )/kT + 1
3N −3/2 ǫF 3/2 3
Z
E0 = ǫ ǫ dǫ = NǫF (59)
2 F 0 5
3
Average electron energy at T = 0 is ǫ¯0 = ǫF
5
This average electron energy is on the order of a few eV. An effective temperature
calculated from ǫ = kT is on the order of many thousands of degrees for typical
metals.
The electronic heat capacity is proportional to kT/ǫF . This, plus the plot shows
why the electronic heat capacity is so low at ordinary temperatures.
1 Find the Fermi energy in copper on the assumption that each copper atom
contributes one free electron to the electron gas. The density of copper is
8.94x103 kg/m3 and its atomic mass is 63.5 u.
Answer:
The electron density N/V in copper is equal to the number of copper atoms
per unit volume.
N atoms mass/m3 8.94×103 28
V = m3 = mass/atom = 63.5×1.66×10−27 = 8.48x10 atoms/m3 =
28
8.48x10 electrons/m3
h2 3N 2/3
The Fermi energy, ǫF = 2m ( 8πV ) ,
where the quantity N/V is the density of electrons.
(6.62×10−34 )2 3×8.48x1028 2/3
ǫF = 2×9.11×10 −31 ( 8π ) = 1.13 × 10−18 J = 7.04eV
2 The Fermi energy in silver is 5.51 eV. (a) What is the average energy of the
free electrons in silver at O K ? (b) What temperature is necessary for the
average molecular energy in an ideal gas to have this value? (c) What is the
speed of an electron with this energy?