1.

Definitely during the Primary Research Section portion of your feedback, cause there was a
portion of it I had completely skipped over.
2. I changed a few things for small grammatical, spelling, and flow changes, but most notably, I
changed the “Situatedness of Genre” section, in which I added more detail about the modality
and the subject of coding, I put more proof in the “Access” section, and I also added the
required portions to the “Primary Research” section to give more of a look at what exactly I’m
trying to look at.
3. I had to add an explanation for an example assignment in “Situatedness of Genre” to give
people a better understanding of how Computer Science and coding assignments are handled.
In “Primary Research”, I added the different modes I wanted to look at, and the reason why I’m
focusing on those, rather than others.
4. There weren’t any revisions I can’t think of that I chose not to make.
5. Definitely, I’ve added more and it’s gained more depth, especially in the “Situatedness of Genre”
section, which is important since I need the reader to understand what I’m working with.
6. I’ve learned that I have to pay more attention to talking to a reader in the light that they are
unaware of the subject that I’m going to explore.