Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anth1020 Research Paper
Anth1020 Research Paper
ANTH1020
Dr. Potter
Most of us have heard about early humans, such as Neanderthals and famous
fossil findings like “Lucy,” but how much do we know about ourselves? Where did the
first modern humans come from? Modern humans like ourselves have been around for
thousands of years - but with so many years in between now and when we first
appeared, it is hard to say exactly how it happened. There are two current theories on
how modern humans came to be: the Regional Continuity Theory - also known as the
Multiregional Evolution Theory, and Replacement Theory - also known as the Out of
Africa Theory (Wong, 2001). Both of these have a great deal of evidence supporting
Let’s begin by looking at what each theory entails. First of all, what is the
Regional Continuity Theory? This theory was proposed by Milford Walpoff of The
University of Michigan, and it states that modern humans evolved from pre-modern
humans living in the same region. There are 3 major regions: Europe, Africa, and Asia;
so they believe that modern humans all evolved from pre-modern humans
independently of each other within these regions, then bred with each other to create
In order to have a solid theory, we need evidence to back it up. The Regional
Continuity Theory has just that. With current technology, scientists have been able to
sequence not only our DNA but the DNA of pre-modern human species in some cases
as well. This is not an easy feat - DNA disappears over time, but we have been lucky
enough to sequence the DNA of species such as Neanderthals and the Denisovans.
With the ability to see the genomes of these species came discoveries - we learned that
some populations of modern humans today contain 1-4% of Neanderthal DNA, and
there are even some who have Denisovan DNA. Because of this, we know for a fact
that modern humans and these various species of pre-modern humans bred with each
other and make up at least a small part of humans today, thus supporting the Regional
The other current popular theory of how modern humans came to be is called
Replacement Theory. This theory was proposed by Chris Stringer and Peter Andrews,
and it states that modern humans all originate from Africa and evolved from one species
of pre-modern human 200,000 years ago: Homo erectus. Modern humans then started
exterminating them.
This theory is the most widely accepted of the two in the scientific community,
and a key factor in this is the amount of genomic evidence to back it up (Modern
Humans, 2016). One example of this is an ancient woman scientists have dubbed
“Mitochondrial Eve.” They had discovered that mitochondrial DNA, or mtDNA, can be
recovered easily from fossil findings compared to regular DNA and is passed on through
matrilineal family lines only - making a daughter’s mtDNA the same as her mother’s,
grandmother’s, and so on. The mtDNA found in us today can be traced back to one
woman: Mitochondrial Eve, who lived between 50,000-500,000 years ago. But why only
one woman? Scientists believe that there was some event going on during that time that
made the human population scarce, and Eve was one of the only women to survive.
With that, she happened to become the source of all modern humans. This would also
explain why her mtDNA lives on within every woman (Modern Humans, 2016). Because
testing of skulls. When scientists mapped the skulls of ancient humans from around the
world, they were able to find that the most variability and diversity in skulls lied within
the population of Africa; whereas other ancient human skulls from around the world
didn’t vary much at all with others in their same region in comparison with Africa
(Modern Humans, 2016). This piece of evidence therefore supports the Replacement
Theory, because if small groups of humans branched out of their main population in
Africa there wouldn’t be as much variation because of a limited gene pool, and there
would be more variation in Africa because a larger population means a larger gene pool
While both of these theories have substantial evidence and are very convincing, I
think that the Replacement Theory holds up better than the Regional Continuity Theory.
I found through my research that there was more substantial evidence and resources
for the Replacement Theory in comparison to the Regional Continuity Theory, and
evidence is a key factor here. I also think the premise of the Regional Continuity Theory
is more far-fetched than that of the Replacement Theory - the chances of evolution from
different pre-modern humans in different areas to get the same species of modern
human, even with gene flow, seems like a slim chance because they all have very
different origins. Then there is also the chance of these things happening during the
same time period - which seems even slimmer. Even though these pre-modern humans
had thousands and thousands of years to travel to each other, I can’t imagine that
happening often enough to have the entire population of pre-moderns evolve into one
species that is 99% the same, and this isn’t normally how speciation works anyway. The
Replacement Theory seems more solid in the fact that a group of modern humans
evolved from only one species of pre-modern human in the same region during the
same time period, and that’s why I think it is the most correct of the two theories.
Works Cited
1. Wong, K. (2001, January 29). The Modern Human Origins Morass. Retrieved
April 26, 2021, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-modern-
human-origins/
2. Evolution of Modern Humans. (2016, June 13). Retrieved April 26, 2021, from
https://www.yourgenome.org/stories/evolution-of-modern-humans
3. Dorey, F. (2020, January 20). When and Where Did Our Species Originate?
Retrieved April 26, 2021, from https://australian.museum/learn/science/human-
evolution/when-and-where-did-our-species-originate/