Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fakulti Pengurusan
dan Pembangunan Sumber Manusia
2. Taufik is a shareholder of Titan Park Sdn. Bhd. holding 10% of its issued shares.
Following frequent quarrels with the majority shareholder in the company whom
he believes are acting more for their personal interests rather than in the interests
of the company, Taufik is contemplating to seek a remedy for oppression under
Section 181 of the Companies Act 1965.
You are required to advise Taufik on the followings:
b) What are the orders that the court may make as a remedy for the
petitioning shareholders and explain the order in relation to the case of
Tuan Haji Ishak v. Leong Hup Holdings Bhd. [1996] 1 MLJ 661?
(15 marks)
2. Compulsory winding up may be initiated by person listed under Section 217 (1) of
the Companies Act 1965. One ofthe most popular grounds used to seek an order
for compulsory winding up is stated under Section 218 of the Companies Act
1965 i.e. inability of the company to pay its debt to its creditors. In light of this,
discuss the court's consideration in determining a winding up petition based on
this ground. Illustrate your answer with decided cases.
(25 marks)
2
3. (a) One of the advantages of forming a limited company is that the company
becomes a legal entity, separate and distinct form the members. However
the veil of incorporation may sometimes be lifted. Analyse this statement
with reference to relevant sections and the decided cases.
(17 marks)
(b) Ali and Abu are the only two members and directors of a company called
Pintar Sdn. Bhd. They wish to effect a change of name of the company.
As a company secretary, advise them whether there are any restrictions on
the choice of company name and the legal requirements for effecting a
change of name of company.
(8 marks)
4. Sinaria Bhd. was incorporated in 1969. Its object clause provides that the
company will run a restaurant and catering business and any other business
incidental or consequential to it. Alex, Brian and Adam are the directors. During
the course of business the directors decided to venture into sheep rearing without
amending the object clause. They made the following contracts:
ii) The directors bought 1,000 heads of sheep from Drake Sheep Ltd. from
Australia for $100,000 Australian dollar. Drake Sheep Ltd. did not know
of the provisions of the object clause of Sinaria Bhd. They have not been
paid for the sheep and have started an action against Sinaria Bhd.
3
iii) The directors contracted to buy animal food from Pets Sdn. Bhd. for
RM50, 000 and this contract has not yet been performed.